In your article, Germans were mentioned in regards to the templars (something like that). The Rothschilds used to be “Bauers” and changed their name (Rothschilds = Red Shield). So I’m wondering where the fake Jews (Synagogue of Satan) fits into all of this?
What a fascinating article. Thanks for sharing this well written article.
Finally had a chance to sit down and read this essay. Not super strong. When coming to broad explanatory theories of our past, present and future our minds have to do two actions: 1) use specific examples of empiricle data and 2) draw general conclusions (ie posit universals). Those universals that we posit may either be shaped by a noun-based mode of thinking which involves taking patterns and plugging them into a program that then drives at conclusions which is something computers are designed to do. The other type of action is 2) verb-based thinking which involves tuning the mind to processes of change that are themselves shaped by dynamics, intentions, goals, designs etc which is where causal motive principles are located.
The above essay is a typical (albeit hypertrophied) example of a noun-based pattern formation thought process that ignores massive swaths of reality to justify a conclusion which the author wished very much to force the selected facts to support.
I'm not against this sort of thing if it accomodates as much of discoverable reality as possible, but when lazy thinking is at the drivers' seat and massive facts of reality are ignored, I get annoyed.
In this case, the author wishes his readers to believe that the US constitution AND declaration of independence were both frauds cooked up to dupe its victims into creating a crown controlled nation under the pope's control. If the papacy is actually the core essence of all evil, then why have so many Popes been assassinated over the years? Why have so many popes worked to destroy the Jesuits (big example of 1773) and Freemasons and not only popes but also cardinals and bishops who were like minded and worked to support them? Obviously there are evil Roman empire corruptions in the catholic church, but why ignore the good as well? Similarly why did the British Empire fight for 6 grueling years 1776-1783 against the rebels when they could have just done it in a few months and given them their false fake nation in a few weeks if it was always the intention? The losses and expenses were incredible and the obsession to break the american revolutionaries was very real. Also why does the author paint the false image that the rebellious americans under evil Ben Franklin's persuasion paid 18 million livres back the crown they were fighting in 1782? The majesty being referred to here is clearly the French king who later had his head chopped off and not the British king whom the author insinuates. The french were organized over decades by Franklin and co to support the revolution and the best of those french collaborators (again many of whom were decapitated in the French color revolution) truly understood the Augustinian challenge for mankind to finally break free of animalistic imperial inbreeding and achieve a city of god on earth. Also if esquire meant a tool of the crown and lawyer who went to one of the Crown Inns as its sole definition, then why did Ben Franklin sign his name esquire when he was never a lawyer and never had more than a grade 4 level official education? Why ignore all of the fights that Franklin, Hamilton, John Jay etc fought risking their lives and so much more for the sake of their ideas and consciences? Why ignore all the action and drama of history which are right there for any non-lazy minded researcher to explore? Why would Ben Franklin and especially Hamilton and Washington have risked their lives on so many occasions which they verifiably did if they were just agents of evil? Why would so many presidents have died fighting against the oligarchy and in defense of humanity using the constitutional powers of the nation in battle against this evil parasite (which they did)? There are so many other points of lazy minded pattern-formation connectoid lobotomized computer thinking deployed by the author that it is dizzying. My paradoxes stand and again I would advise people who want to figure things out to dig into some more rigorous research using a study of the writings of Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton and other figures who risked so much to fight evil in order to give us the priviledge of living in a world where we have literacy, have access to forms of sanitation, food etc that allows us to live beyond a 40 avg year life expenctancy under a feudal garch's estate. Anyone who reads stuff like what this author just published, would have to conclude that there is nothing to do but not fight for anything which would make those oligarchs which the good author appears to detest extremely happy.
I believe in reincarnation so even killing those who uphold these laws would not be enough. They would come back raging in their next life.... The answer lies in teaching them some respect. Teaching them that dominion over others is not remotely holy, acceptable or necessary.
These laws were made to direct people into Catholic control. To make all humans the chattels of God's supposed representatives on Earth. Since the Papal Bull of 1302, Unam Sanctum, there has been evil in the heart of the 'Holy Roman Empire' and it needs exposing.
I challenge their claim to represent God. In fact, I challenge them to prove to me that God supports their system! The entire religion of Christianity belies the words and actions of Jesus, misrepresenting him entirely. There has been 2,000 years of evil conducted in the name of God!
Put together, all the claims that a small group of people, each one claiming a different group of people, is in control of the world suggest to me that no one is in control of the world. I find this reassuring.
Rule of law means:
- The laws are created by people elected by the citizens.
- The people who create the laws are themselves subject to the laws they create.
"But where says some is the King of America? ...the world may know, that so far as we approve of monarchy, that in America the law is king."
Stunning info, Frances. And yes I vaguely remember your posting a link to this in one of your stack articles but guess I didn't look at it carefully then or maybe just didn't read all the way through it.
Unbelievable & shocking overview. >
"By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the “United States.”
"By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope."
"The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders."
"He who controls the gold controls the world."
He who controls the money (banks) legal system (Crown lawyers) & real estate (the Crown Estates) is truly King of the Castle for sure. Rigging the system has taken on a whole new meaning w/this article.
(p.s. Frances - I've copied our chat that disappeared from your chat so I can send it in email to you if you want it for the record. I evidently can't respond to you in the chat there as it keeps being deleted as you've pointed out to me this evening. Maybe it will self-correct in the days ahead... who knows?)
"In other words," The whole pile of legalese is nothing but CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD because if we are not told this, if we are not taught this, if we are not privy to this, if we have not signed a contract to this KNOWINGLY, if we are kept in the dark about it, then for all intents and purposes it is VOID for FRAUD and is CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on it's face. I say, trade in those federal reserve "notes" (Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) almost 60 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT..) for silver coins, gold coins and do so QUICKLY so the THEIVES don't use their WORTHLESS ("All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy." ~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4 Faith is what backs our monetary system. YOUR faith. Do you still have faith?) FAKE ASS monopoly money to take more gold and silver out of circulation. OTHERWISE plan on arming up, finding out where they keep it and TAKE IT BACK from these bastards. As for "rule of law"? This is so far away from what our creator could consider a rule of law as to be laughable. HIS RULE OF LAW is DO NO HARM. Don't STEAL. These piece of human excrement's "rule of law" revolves around FRAUD, DECIPT, THEFT, ROBBERY, EXTORTION, MURDER, MAYHEM, DESTRUCTION...the list goes on! Nice to know about this but really? They can SHOVE that so called rule of law where the sun doesn't shine!
I don't rid my house of rats because I hate rats. I rid my house of rats because I love my family and I don't want one of them bit by a rat. So out of LOVE I will help rid the world of these parasites when the day comes that we sharpen our shooting skills, and AIM SMALL MISS SMALL. It's the lot of man. It's a cycle. Freedom reigns...control freak parasites start to take over, freedom wains, people get tyrannized by the control freaks and their enforcers...finally they realize that the cute little puppy they brought home has turned into a tyrant. The people rise up again, throw off the chains, and freedom reigns. Rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat...on it goes. I can't love the one who is torturing me or my family. I can only kill them. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis
Well, fuckin A. I might have guessed this... but I'm still astounded.
So, looks like we are now living in the actual END TIMES... for the "Crown." By all that is Holy, I will work to help bring about a NEW WORLD, that is unknown so far, that is of the PEOPLE, and not of any prancing "knights" or tyrant wannabes. Let 'em all sink into Hell where they belong.
Independence makes more sens this way now: in dependence 🫅🏻 they good with the spell ing in this occult world. Always hiddencin plain sight for those having the eyes wide shut 😉 ty! You know i’m new here but its only been 3 days and i am already amazed about some facts found here and nowhere else.
Dec 24, 2023·edited Dec 24, 2023Liked by Frances Leader
Why all the talk about "law" regarding Royalty, Emperors, ruling dynasties, powers that be, etc.? Political reality is based on organized violence, power and intimidation. Yeah, something like "common law" should exist and is allowed to function at times by the powers that be when it suits their purposes, when they are promoting the idea they are the protectors of the "rights and prosperity" of the people. . .clearly NOT THE CASE just now. Even when in a "rule of law mode", they are assiduously promoting their covert control of at least the "commanding heights" of the economy and political system.
I'd like to think that King Charles, right now, is "jumping the shark" by going for all out tyranny in the name of "Saving the Planet". Ruling classes do eventually fall. Prince Phillip, perhaps the major influence on Charles, was clearly a Malthusian wanting to be reincarnated as a depopulation virus, but Queen Elizabeth seemed more temperate. Charles may be still trying to prove himself to his father.
Dec 14, 2023·edited Dec 14, 2023Liked by Frances Leader
Adding "Esq." after a man's name when addressing an envelope used to be quite normal. My father received a lot of mail in this format.
So this self titling in itself is not signifying being the Crown's man.
Here in NZ a lot of public land (leased to farmers etc) is called "Crown Land", so that's a worry if that's owned by the Templars.
Officially it's owned by "Her Majesty" - so that's a worry too.
The point about countries' governments using the entire country as collateral was seen to play out again with Pfizer clotshots contracts - where if the country couldn't cough up enough then the country became Pfizer's.
(I can't quote such a contract, sorry, but maybe another reader can confirm. I might be exaggerating. lol.)
In your article, Germans were mentioned in regards to the templars (something like that). The Rothschilds used to be “Bauers” and changed their name (Rothschilds = Red Shield). So I’m wondering where the fake Jews (Synagogue of Satan) fits into all of this?
What a fascinating article. Thanks for sharing this well written article.
Occult Art of Law (A lecture explaining the terminology which traps us into slavery)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s2rmdBNbN1Qq/
You will see that I did not write this document. I merely mirrored it from an article I found online which was quoting from this short book: https://www.scribd.com/document/167584305/16808761-The-Crown-Temple-ECC-pdf
Interesting but very long video - Secrets in Plain Sight:
https://youtu.be/DHhgLnIvuAs
Finally had a chance to sit down and read this essay. Not super strong. When coming to broad explanatory theories of our past, present and future our minds have to do two actions: 1) use specific examples of empiricle data and 2) draw general conclusions (ie posit universals). Those universals that we posit may either be shaped by a noun-based mode of thinking which involves taking patterns and plugging them into a program that then drives at conclusions which is something computers are designed to do. The other type of action is 2) verb-based thinking which involves tuning the mind to processes of change that are themselves shaped by dynamics, intentions, goals, designs etc which is where causal motive principles are located.
The above essay is a typical (albeit hypertrophied) example of a noun-based pattern formation thought process that ignores massive swaths of reality to justify a conclusion which the author wished very much to force the selected facts to support.
I'm not against this sort of thing if it accomodates as much of discoverable reality as possible, but when lazy thinking is at the drivers' seat and massive facts of reality are ignored, I get annoyed.
In this case, the author wishes his readers to believe that the US constitution AND declaration of independence were both frauds cooked up to dupe its victims into creating a crown controlled nation under the pope's control. If the papacy is actually the core essence of all evil, then why have so many Popes been assassinated over the years? Why have so many popes worked to destroy the Jesuits (big example of 1773) and Freemasons and not only popes but also cardinals and bishops who were like minded and worked to support them? Obviously there are evil Roman empire corruptions in the catholic church, but why ignore the good as well? Similarly why did the British Empire fight for 6 grueling years 1776-1783 against the rebels when they could have just done it in a few months and given them their false fake nation in a few weeks if it was always the intention? The losses and expenses were incredible and the obsession to break the american revolutionaries was very real. Also why does the author paint the false image that the rebellious americans under evil Ben Franklin's persuasion paid 18 million livres back the crown they were fighting in 1782? The majesty being referred to here is clearly the French king who later had his head chopped off and not the British king whom the author insinuates. The french were organized over decades by Franklin and co to support the revolution and the best of those french collaborators (again many of whom were decapitated in the French color revolution) truly understood the Augustinian challenge for mankind to finally break free of animalistic imperial inbreeding and achieve a city of god on earth. Also if esquire meant a tool of the crown and lawyer who went to one of the Crown Inns as its sole definition, then why did Ben Franklin sign his name esquire when he was never a lawyer and never had more than a grade 4 level official education? Why ignore all of the fights that Franklin, Hamilton, John Jay etc fought risking their lives and so much more for the sake of their ideas and consciences? Why ignore all the action and drama of history which are right there for any non-lazy minded researcher to explore? Why would Ben Franklin and especially Hamilton and Washington have risked their lives on so many occasions which they verifiably did if they were just agents of evil? Why would so many presidents have died fighting against the oligarchy and in defense of humanity using the constitutional powers of the nation in battle against this evil parasite (which they did)? There are so many other points of lazy minded pattern-formation connectoid lobotomized computer thinking deployed by the author that it is dizzying. My paradoxes stand and again I would advise people who want to figure things out to dig into some more rigorous research using a study of the writings of Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton and other figures who risked so much to fight evil in order to give us the priviledge of living in a world where we have literacy, have access to forms of sanitation, food etc that allows us to live beyond a 40 avg year life expenctancy under a feudal garch's estate. Anyone who reads stuff like what this author just published, would have to conclude that there is nothing to do but not fight for anything which would make those oligarchs which the good author appears to detest extremely happy.
Revolutions, Tyrants & Wars - Total Onslaught - Walter Veith
https://youtu.be/dAxabNMNt60
I believe in reincarnation so even killing those who uphold these laws would not be enough. They would come back raging in their next life.... The answer lies in teaching them some respect. Teaching them that dominion over others is not remotely holy, acceptable or necessary.
These laws were made to direct people into Catholic control. To make all humans the chattels of God's supposed representatives on Earth. Since the Papal Bull of 1302, Unam Sanctum, there has been evil in the heart of the 'Holy Roman Empire' and it needs exposing.
I challenge their claim to represent God. In fact, I challenge them to prove to me that God supports their system! The entire religion of Christianity belies the words and actions of Jesus, misrepresenting him entirely. There has been 2,000 years of evil conducted in the name of God!
By their fruits we know them.
Magna Carta was signed at Runnymede.
Put together, all the claims that a small group of people, each one claiming a different group of people, is in control of the world suggest to me that no one is in control of the world. I find this reassuring.
Rule of law means:
- The laws are created by people elected by the citizens.
- The people who create the laws are themselves subject to the laws they create.
"But where says some is the King of America? ...the world may know, that so far as we approve of monarchy, that in America the law is king."
Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)
Stunning info, Frances. And yes I vaguely remember your posting a link to this in one of your stack articles but guess I didn't look at it carefully then or maybe just didn't read all the way through it.
Unbelievable & shocking overview. >
"By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the “United States.”
"By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope."
"The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders."
"He who controls the gold controls the world."
He who controls the money (banks) legal system (Crown lawyers) & real estate (the Crown Estates) is truly King of the Castle for sure. Rigging the system has taken on a whole new meaning w/this article.
(p.s. Frances - I've copied our chat that disappeared from your chat so I can send it in email to you if you want it for the record. I evidently can't respond to you in the chat there as it keeps being deleted as you've pointed out to me this evening. Maybe it will self-correct in the days ahead... who knows?)
"In other words," The whole pile of legalese is nothing but CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD because if we are not told this, if we are not taught this, if we are not privy to this, if we have not signed a contract to this KNOWINGLY, if we are kept in the dark about it, then for all intents and purposes it is VOID for FRAUD and is CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on it's face. I say, trade in those federal reserve "notes" (Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) almost 60 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT..) for silver coins, gold coins and do so QUICKLY so the THEIVES don't use their WORTHLESS ("All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy." ~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4 Faith is what backs our monetary system. YOUR faith. Do you still have faith?) FAKE ASS monopoly money to take more gold and silver out of circulation. OTHERWISE plan on arming up, finding out where they keep it and TAKE IT BACK from these bastards. As for "rule of law"? This is so far away from what our creator could consider a rule of law as to be laughable. HIS RULE OF LAW is DO NO HARM. Don't STEAL. These piece of human excrement's "rule of law" revolves around FRAUD, DECIPT, THEFT, ROBBERY, EXTORTION, MURDER, MAYHEM, DESTRUCTION...the list goes on! Nice to know about this but really? They can SHOVE that so called rule of law where the sun doesn't shine!
I don't rid my house of rats because I hate rats. I rid my house of rats because I love my family and I don't want one of them bit by a rat. So out of LOVE I will help rid the world of these parasites when the day comes that we sharpen our shooting skills, and AIM SMALL MISS SMALL. It's the lot of man. It's a cycle. Freedom reigns...control freak parasites start to take over, freedom wains, people get tyrannized by the control freaks and their enforcers...finally they realize that the cute little puppy they brought home has turned into a tyrant. The people rise up again, throw off the chains, and freedom reigns. Rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat...on it goes. I can't love the one who is torturing me or my family. I can only kill them. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis
Well, fuckin A. I might have guessed this... but I'm still astounded.
So, looks like we are now living in the actual END TIMES... for the "Crown." By all that is Holy, I will work to help bring about a NEW WORLD, that is unknown so far, that is of the PEOPLE, and not of any prancing "knights" or tyrant wannabes. Let 'em all sink into Hell where they belong.
Independence makes more sens this way now: in dependence 🫅🏻 they good with the spell ing in this occult world. Always hiddencin plain sight for those having the eyes wide shut 😉 ty! You know i’m new here but its only been 3 days and i am already amazed about some facts found here and nowhere else.
Different people mean different things by "rule of law." I could care less what the predator ruling class thinks is the rule of law.
Oh my God
Why all the talk about "law" regarding Royalty, Emperors, ruling dynasties, powers that be, etc.? Political reality is based on organized violence, power and intimidation. Yeah, something like "common law" should exist and is allowed to function at times by the powers that be when it suits their purposes, when they are promoting the idea they are the protectors of the "rights and prosperity" of the people. . .clearly NOT THE CASE just now. Even when in a "rule of law mode", they are assiduously promoting their covert control of at least the "commanding heights" of the economy and political system.
I'd like to think that King Charles, right now, is "jumping the shark" by going for all out tyranny in the name of "Saving the Planet". Ruling classes do eventually fall. Prince Phillip, perhaps the major influence on Charles, was clearly a Malthusian wanting to be reincarnated as a depopulation virus, but Queen Elizabeth seemed more temperate. Charles may be still trying to prove himself to his father.
Adding "Esq." after a man's name when addressing an envelope used to be quite normal. My father received a lot of mail in this format.
So this self titling in itself is not signifying being the Crown's man.
Here in NZ a lot of public land (leased to farmers etc) is called "Crown Land", so that's a worry if that's owned by the Templars.
Officially it's owned by "Her Majesty" - so that's a worry too.
The point about countries' governments using the entire country as collateral was seen to play out again with Pfizer clotshots contracts - where if the country couldn't cough up enough then the country became Pfizer's.
(I can't quote such a contract, sorry, but maybe another reader can confirm. I might be exaggerating. lol.)