I linked this post to Claire Criag, pathologist. Hopefully, word will get out and those, first do no harm docs, and those no balls docs, will speak out now, to patients first!
One of my family members told me today that she is suffering from "eye floaters". I immediately thought of TalkNet's comments here and so I went back to his recent article on the subject (which he has since updated - see https://talknet.substack.com/p/dissolving-vaxx-clots-and-eye-floaters ) I asked him a question and he took the time to provide a very useful and insightful response, which ended like this:
"The awakening I went through proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that reality reflects what we focus upon, so ruminating on fearful potentials only serves to solidify them as an experience. It's hard not to worry, and I still do when it's me facing uncertainly, but knowing what I know keeps me in check...."
TN's updated article is also worth reading. I have encountered some amazing people on this channel and learnt so much in the process. Thanks Frances! I think I owe you a coffee or two!
I get cloudy patches in my vision, which dry on my eyelashes to scratchy crystals if I use my laptop too much. I invested in a pair of blue light blocking glasses and the problem went away. They have other useful features such as confusing facial recognition (apparently!).
Interesting. I have recently started getting unusually sharp crystals right in the inner corners of my eyes which need quite deep digging out. They probably started about a year ago though it could be as little as 6 months. Whatever the case, it seems to now be the normal state of things and isn't much like normal "sleepy dust". In fact it's worse than when I wore contacts. Then, a bit of over-use could result in a ton of sleepy dust, but none of it sharp like this.
Depends on how much they get paid? The price for ignoring 200 years of agreed-upon ethics is still less than most individuals have in their wallets at any one time. The ethics were only there for show, not for adherence. All the governing Trust will have to do to persuade them is wave a new Mercedes catalogue under their noses.
We need a permanent installation of gallows in Harley Street as badly as we need one in Whitehall.
Frances I ran across that video on rumble last Monday and was horrified and shut it off because I didn't want my vaxxed sister to hear it....and when I went back to finish it had been privatized. I finally found another same video after searching through bitchute rumble and banned video. Please tell me you have a copy. I do not know what to say..or do...and when I consider they are gonna ignore this and they are already making more mnra jabs for everything from bird flu to rsv....
It really knocked the stuffing out of me....dear God help us all.
Just make sure that no one forgets the original white clots (WEF, UN, WHO (ok black clot there), world governments, big pharma & its minions etc) who brought & sold the fibrous white clots to the world.
Sorry to point out that the numbers in the Table at the top of your article are chemically and physically impossible. It looks like someone put parts per Million by mistake. If they were parts per Billion it would make more sense.
See how we know the White Fibrin Clots are Amyloid from proper protein analysis published by Richard Hirschman.
If you check against the presentation made by Greg Harrison - https://rumble.com/v577oot-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html - beginning around 44min40, it is correct: P = 1,130 ppm in unvaccinated blood; 4,900ppm in vaccinated clot. (tin, on the other hand, is measured in ppb). If I understood correctly, the table GH presents in the video is the one published in Epoch Times which was based on Mike Adam's work, but it's not the same table (not all the same elements). Also, the MA table that appears first in present article doesn't make clear that the second column is referring to phosphorous found in unvaccinated blood. Sorry if I've confused you more!
Thanks very much. The more detailed scrutiny the better. As a former analytical chemist of biological tissues, the first question to ask is how were the samples dried to eliminate free water? "Phosphate is an essential electrolyte in the human body as it constitutes about 1% of the total body weight. In an adult, the normal serum phosphate level ranges between 2.5 to 4.5 mg/d L." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560925/
Then you have to ask if Phosphorus concentration was reported as the element P or as normally done as Phosphate PO4 which weighs 3 times as much. Trace element analysis is usually done by "ashing" the biological sample in a "bomb" in the presence of an oxidant.
I can't answer that but there were 2 laboratories involved - 1 in N-Z, 1 in Hungary. and both ran ICP analyses. Greg Harrison begins presentation around 20 mins in. He's an Australian polymer chemist. I think he said he was from ACT. You should be able to contact him directly.
The table at the top of my article is a screenshot from 2022 by Mike Adams. I added it to my post for reference to show how out of proportion phosphorus was to the other elements found during his analysis. Thanks for noting that the correct figures may have been expressed wrongly.
However, the rest of your comment confuses me somewhat. I find this particularly strange given that Richard Hirschman was one of the forum members who were discussing the findings from Greg Harrison and he did not express any disagreement.
Perhaps you did not notice that he was involved with the presentation?
Richard Hirschman knows absolutely the protein analysis because he published it on X. On 12 June 2024 he told me that the scientists who did that analysis will probably publish in the refereed literature. I know the identity of one, but Richard asked me not to mention any names. I will add the analysis he published to my article.
Hirschman introduced GH and said he's been working with him since May 2023. GH confirmed MA's 2022 findings re. phosphorus levels etc. as per first table in present article plus table published by Epoch Times and displayed in GH presentation at min. ~44.40 of interview. ICP method was used (same as MA). Then he used HPLC method to analyse the protein components, the most prominent one he found to be fibrinogen. What struck GH was the preponderance of the beta fibrinogen, which far exceeded alpha & gamma (as can be seen on Hirschman's X report that you added to your Feb article). Normal blood clots apparently have 1:1:1 ratio in alpha-beta-gamma chain. The analysis was carried out by two N-Z university labs which GH did not wish to name (as yet). I believe they're in process of publishing a paper on subject and would prefer not to get knocked off beforehand. That's also probably why the original interview was taken down and imo it was a stupid idea to put it up in the first place. Anyway, it appears to me that nobody's working at cross-purposes here, you included, and that all more or less basically on the different variations of the same same wave. There are many pathways to the clot after all. I will add to this comment tomorrow to explain how your conclusions on white clot formation in all jabs, viral vector and mRNA alike, and that of MA, GH & colleagues re. mRNA, are not necessarily mutually exclusive and may even be mutually enriching. I've also read quite a few of your posts today and often read your comments on others' substacks. Your info on EDTA in AstraZeneca jabs shocked me. I was not aware of that. Anyone proposing EDTA treatments (like Mihalcea), oral and especially IV, had better know what they're doing. That said, those who claim the jabs contain GO are not all pushing EDTA therapies. I haven't heard John O'Looney pushing any therapies, let alone how to remove GO from the body. He has simply done some serious research and concluded GO or some chemical variation of same (cf. "Andreas Noak & The Razor Blades") is in ALL the jabs. I don't believe it's there to kill us, just to work out how much we need to control us (without actually killing us, at least not straight away) and if it kills a few, even many of us in the process, who cares? So we have high-dose mRNA/GO in Moderna, lower in Pfizer.
Kerrylyn, Geoff's problem is that he assumed he knew the content of the presentation. He spouted off without being fully informed. Now he looks a total plonker and is unlikely to admit it.
You still have not replaced your Fantasy analysis Table at top of your article dsiplaying numbers that are chemically and physically impossible. You are tellinng people your are happy to claim 93% Chlorine. Try finding any organic compound with that much Chlorine.
That's possible but he may have tried to access the video after it was taken down, although I doubt it because he would've said so I suppose. Imo, he was triggered by mention of O'Looney who believes there's GO in the jabs and says so openly, even in interview intro. Geoff on the other hand is an "anti-graphene-oxide pusher" who has taken it upon himself to discredit anyone who claims any chemical form of G is in the jabs, whether GO, rGO, or graphene hydroxide aka the razor blades that killed Noak. He also claims people like Looney are by association responsible for others pushing dangerous GO remedies like EDTA, whereas O'Looney has never pushed any treatments whatsoever. I put Geoff in the Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernan, Latypova, Jacy Lindsay ... category... all pro-vaxxers, at least in the past, but keep their distance from anyone who dares even touch on the GO issue. because that would necessarily lead us on to the control agenda which is what this is all about. He's more worried about sullying his reputation than anything else by associating with those engaging in unaccepted & unacceptable narrative - aka GO in the jabs. Sure, it probably also leads to clots, but it's not main purpose. That's why mention of O'Looney made him go off half-cock. JO + GO too much
Phosphorus is not part of the protein analysis. We will have to wait for Richard's scientist friends to tell us what other tests they applied. They clearly know their stuff.
Even shittier is that some of us knew about this before the roll out yet nobody would listen to us. This was the test of faith for us all. People who were taking the shots were sold on it. So many people chose the bs science. It was clear to most of us yet somehow so many people were spellbound by the bs. Life is precious. Dont trust anyone who wants to “help” you for profit.
SIL has a blood clot in her arm after her pacemaker was put in and the doctor says it’s because you always get blood clots after receiving one…even though she’s had 5 shots🤷♂️
They set it to private the day after they posted the video so you can’t watch it, but by searching the title you can find two other people had posted it also..
It always helps to keep the title to search it later or download videos straight away and store them.. Always assume that they won’t be there next time you look..
⬇️
🟪
FUNERAL EMBALMERS/ DIRECTORS AND NEW EVIDENCE ON WHITE CLOTS PRESENTED IN PRESENTATION...
Honestly, most things on this topic *don't* get pulled from Rumble so it either pissed someone off or someone is worried about getting too much notoriety.
Sorry to ask this question here: would it be safe to store Celtic salt crystal in a pure silver pill box (I want to carry the salt in my pocket while I'm working)?
I wonder what happened. Is it something he's aware of or done himself (I doubt)? I posted a comment about it's viewing status on another recent video he posted.
My like not working. I am using Amazon Firestick on my TV, also on laptop but my recliner chair is more comfortable, although now have developed painful callouses on both thumbs due to the text entry! I do hope medics take note. I have a friend to receive hip replacement ssurgery in 2 weeks time. She and terminal lung illness partner both had 5 min doses. In addition, she suffers with Transverse Myelitis which she had prior to plandemic and her "treatment" for this is regular blood plasma infusions, which we know do not get screened. Her arthritis progression may be due to jabs, and studies show this. She's at #10 scale for pain right now so surgery only option, however, surgeon she chose, via private GP refferal to "surgeon who takes on high risk patients, yet he said after her private, paid consultation, that his reputation was more paramount- surgeon with reputation of taking on "high risk" patients. He clarified by saying he hated the NHS system.
I have read a large number of opinions about that but am not convinced that what is being seen is 'tech'. It may be metal or crystal at the nano level.
The question is whether the nanotech works to achieve all the goals of the transhumanist agenda, which include linking us up to the cloud via IoBNT to enable mass surveillance and ultimately complete control of planet & its inhabitants. The technology exists and has been deployed for decades according to Clifford Carnicom, and many others. Whether you call it self-replicating CDBs or self-assembling nanomachines, it leads to same result: the formation of rubbery clots being just one of them. The metamaterials, heavy metals, crystaline structures have been contaminating our blood through chemical spraying, chemicals in jet fuel/chemtrails, many other things (in food supply, pharmaceutical drugs, amalgam fillings, metal prostheses, some anaesthetics, other vaccines, esp. flu shots). Part of the agenda is to mitigate damage said to be due global warming (cf Dane Wigington "The Dimming" 2021). 5G roll-out, increased emfs did further damage. Covid shot was the icing on the cake so to speak, or "final layer of complexity" as Clifford Carnicom explains which has sped up damage and according to some, is now being spread to unvaxxed via shedding, which is why we're seeing increase in the clots especially over last year. The only people I hear denying the nanotech exists in cv vax are pro-virus group (MCulloch, Cole, Malone...) or some in no-virus group: Scoglio, Lanka, Coppolino. The others avoid discussing the subject (Cowan, Kaufman, Sam Bailey) or go after those who discuss it and try to close discussions down: Coppolino, Massey. They do the same over graphene oxide.
I am not convinced that shedding is a thing. I am even less convinced that the predator class would go to the expense of producing trillions of nanotech devices and distribute them randomly into the environment in the hope that they would create the Internet of Things. There is little return on those bucks.
I'm not talking about my views on shedding. I don't know. That's view of Mihalcea to explain how vaxxed/unvaxxed blood is now looking pretty much the same. Ditto for Dr Nixon but he doesn't necessarily link it to shedding. Same for Carnicom. As I mentioned somewhere else, he considers the cv jabs to be "an extra layer of complexity" on top of damage already done by the crap we've been inhaling, ingesting. etc. for decades... He doesn't go into nanotech. On chemtrails, as I understand, they encompass basically 2 distinct projects involving to 1. 3D radar techniques facilitated by high saline levels across oceans which was later taken up and adapted by army for use overland. As I recall, the piezzo crystaIs containing barium, strontium ... which are sensitive to MW radiation, come into play here. They also contain mercury, organo-phosphates (which chelate copper from nerves and cause morgellons) and embedded in ferritin to seal them off from outside. They are claimed to be capable of sending out text and pulling in an artificial signals to form a "read-write" system -- that can both send & receive. Apparently by around 2017, close to 100% of US citizens were "readable", ~70% "writable", and then came the covid shots to fix up the "writable" side of things. Second, the spraying designed to dim the sun, as explained by Wigington, to reduce global warming (which Wigington claims to believe in - and which is probably why he hasn't been banned from YT). So already, well before cv vaccines, the technology was v. sophisticated, but vaccines were needed to improve how it functioned and involved addition of GO, rGO or graphene hydroxide (cf. chemist Andreas Noak). Sorry about poor expression. I may also have got some details wrong. Anyone reading this should feel free to correct me. I threw my response together based on work of above-mentioned individuals plus Harald Kautz-Vella (navy/army tech, piezzocrystals/morgellons...), John Lukach (IoB/BNT tech...)T, Prof. Ian F. Akyildiz, Dr. Josep Jornet (nanotech in vax, GO). There's nothing random about it. It all works in sync and was planned that way. I don't claim to be an expert in any of these subjects but I understand the big picture - or sort of.
You can't "see" Bluetooth LE signals, you need technology that can pick up the wireless protocols and decode them. Only wireless gear, packet sniffers and BLE capable technology is able to "see" these signals. I have and can confirm there is something strange coming from the surrounding people. But it appears to be more of a psuedo-random number generation pattern that is being broadcast, much more likely what the crypto-currency patents would need for proof of work, than any IOB technology.
The expert on synthetic clots is Clifford Carnicom, as I'm sure everyone here knows. There's synthetic crap floating around in our blood, whether we've been injected or not. The cv shots simply added a layer of complexity that sped up the clot formation process. I agree there may be no way to dissolve them entirely but I'm glad Clifford is still trying, together with all the microscopy guys, sometimes at risk to their own heath. Anyway, the focus also needs to be on how to prevent them from forming in the first place. A. Mihalcea often refers to Clifford's work but I see her more as a fear monger now, like you're all gonna die with a big smile on her face, very creepy, as well as the droning voice, trying to scare us into doing chelation therapies that have not been proven to work and are probably dangerous if you do them regularly. Most people can't afford chelation therapy anyway. So I steer clear of her.
The other factor that's speeding up the clotting process and the increasing health problems we've been experiencing over last few years is of course EMFs/5G and that's only going to get worse as 5G expands, given the cv shot ingredients are designed to work in tandem. I'm surprised that some in the no-virus group seem to be down-playing the importance of this subject or avoiding it as far as possible. Thev've done amazing work on no-virus issue and Tom Cowan also did a great job waking people up back in 2019-2020 on emfs/5g, as Frances pointed out in recent article, but nothing substantial since then, as much as Christine Massey claims to the contrary. So above all, don't get bogged down debating her. She's not up to speed on emfs/5g, nanotech... Her expertise lies in no-virus issues where she's one of best researchers in the world and one of the least acknowledged unfortunately. (Frances: if you're reading this, she asked me to forward the last message she sent to me on to you, but you've already told me you're not interested. I have a big file on our exchange, the docs she sent me, all of which I have read carefully and annotated with my own observations in case you decide to do a follow-up article on Tom Cowan or something more general about who's avoiding which subjects and why.) The "White Fibrous Clots" is probably the most avoided issue of all. Re. Tom Cowan, I should add he has a great store with lots of products intended to mitigate effects of EMFs and other detoxifying products, some of them quite affordable, so well worth a visit to the store which is listed on his website.
Finally, if you're a smoker, I suggest it's not the time to quit, or if you have stopped, maybe keep wearing the nicotine patches. Nicotine has protective qualities. If you smoke moderately and only organic tobacco you'll be fine. I'm not suggesting people take up smoking but it's the pesticides they spray on tobacco and all the other nasty chemicals they contain that harm you and cause addiction, not the nicotine. Avoid vaping too, bad news. probably far more harmful than tobacco. French scientist Jean-Pierre Changeux is the expert in this field, not Brian Ardis. Frances has talked about this somewhere recently too.
I've been a subscriber, at one stage or another, to all the individuals I've criticised in this comment, incl. a paid subscriber to three of them. I doubt any of them are subscribers here but just in case, any criticism was meant to be constructive and no offense was intended. Oh Lord please don't let me be misunderstood! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2sz_YwwwQ4
PS: I hope this message is not too far off-topic Frances. I'm having vision problems so I only skimmed through your article. I don't need to see keyboard to type but reading is more difficult esp. fine print.
Thanks for your comprehensive response. I agree with everything you say but I won’t give Christine Massey the benefit of my attention since she made it clear to me that she does not pay a jot of attention to my work on EMFs. She states that 5G is ‘unrelated’ and ‘another issue’. I will not waste my time on gatekeepers.
You are welcome to write your own post, including all the research and references you mention and I will be very happy to read that.
You're right. Much more important things to focus on. This is getting terrifying. I sense Clifford is past hope but still hoping. At least he's not fearmongering. And all these people making money out of avoiding the essential question. Massey's probably an exception actually. More the fool her. I just cling to the hope of finding an antidote. Would they be so stupid as to not have thought about that? Any thoughts?
The only antidote I can imagine which might solve all the issues is a coronal mass ejection from the sun, a pole reversal and a global tsunami to wash it all clean! But that is me being super-dark, pitch back and fatalistic!
Until then I am trying to enjoy this rather typical British summer and ignore the soap opera we call geo-politics!
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THE VIDEO FORUM HAS BEEN SET TO PRIVATE BUT TWO OTHER COPIES ARE AVAILABLE ON RUMBLE HERE:
https://rumble.com/v577oot-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html
https://rumble.com/v578101-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html
Fyi the first one is better. Volume in 2nd was too low for me (I'm just listening to it now.)
I linked this post to Claire Criag, pathologist. Hopefully, word will get out and those, first do no harm docs, and those no balls docs, will speak out now, to patients first!
Recent related post: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/deadly-quiet
Also, see this video: https://rumble.com/v51ak5r-john-olooney-vaccine-deaths.html
and here is John's opinion on the recent assassination attempt on Trump:
https://rumble.com/v56znlh-john-olooney-trumps-assassination-attempt-14th-july-2024.html
One of my family members told me today that she is suffering from "eye floaters". I immediately thought of TalkNet's comments here and so I went back to his recent article on the subject (which he has since updated - see https://talknet.substack.com/p/dissolving-vaxx-clots-and-eye-floaters ) I asked him a question and he took the time to provide a very useful and insightful response, which ended like this:
"The awakening I went through proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that reality reflects what we focus upon, so ruminating on fearful potentials only serves to solidify them as an experience. It's hard not to worry, and I still do when it's me facing uncertainly, but knowing what I know keeps me in check...."
TN's updated article is also worth reading. I have encountered some amazing people on this channel and learnt so much in the process. Thanks Frances! I think I owe you a coffee or two!
I get cloudy patches in my vision, which dry on my eyelashes to scratchy crystals if I use my laptop too much. I invested in a pair of blue light blocking glasses and the problem went away. They have other useful features such as confusing facial recognition (apparently!).
Reflectacles - https://www.reflectacles.com/order/ircloak
Interesting. I have recently started getting unusually sharp crystals right in the inner corners of my eyes which need quite deep digging out. They probably started about a year ago though it could be as little as 6 months. Whatever the case, it seems to now be the normal state of things and isn't much like normal "sleepy dust". In fact it's worse than when I wore contacts. Then, a bit of over-use could result in a ton of sleepy dust, but none of it sharp like this.
I'll check that out. Thanks!
Update from John O'Looney, directed at doctors: ARE YOU GOING TO DO IT AGAIN?
https://odysee.com/@WelcomeToTheDelusion:d/JohnOLooneyJuly2024:c?r=AUf2oqXgwV26Y4vkfnw1h38ihRkFDVao
Depends on how much they get paid? The price for ignoring 200 years of agreed-upon ethics is still less than most individuals have in their wallets at any one time. The ethics were only there for show, not for adherence. All the governing Trust will have to do to persuade them is wave a new Mercedes catalogue under their noses.
We need a permanent installation of gallows in Harley Street as badly as we need one in Whitehall.
Frances I ran across that video on rumble last Monday and was horrified and shut it off because I didn't want my vaxxed sister to hear it....and when I went back to finish it had been privatized. I finally found another same video after searching through bitchute rumble and banned video. Please tell me you have a copy. I do not know what to say..or do...and when I consider they are gonna ignore this and they are already making more mnra jabs for everything from bird flu to rsv....
It really knocked the stuffing out of me....dear God help us all.
Just make sure that no one forgets the original white clots (WEF, UN, WHO (ok black clot there), world governments, big pharma & its minions etc) who brought & sold the fibrous white clots to the world.
Sorry to point out that the numbers in the Table at the top of your article are chemically and physically impossible. It looks like someone put parts per Million by mistake. If they were parts per Billion it would make more sense.
See how we know the White Fibrin Clots are Amyloid from proper protein analysis published by Richard Hirschman.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/conformal-white-fibrin-clots-are
If you check against the presentation made by Greg Harrison - https://rumble.com/v577oot-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html - beginning around 44min40, it is correct: P = 1,130 ppm in unvaccinated blood; 4,900ppm in vaccinated clot. (tin, on the other hand, is measured in ppb). If I understood correctly, the table GH presents in the video is the one published in Epoch Times which was based on Mike Adam's work, but it's not the same table (not all the same elements). Also, the MA table that appears first in present article doesn't make clear that the second column is referring to phosphorous found in unvaccinated blood. Sorry if I've confused you more!
Thanks very much. The more detailed scrutiny the better. As a former analytical chemist of biological tissues, the first question to ask is how were the samples dried to eliminate free water? "Phosphate is an essential electrolyte in the human body as it constitutes about 1% of the total body weight. In an adult, the normal serum phosphate level ranges between 2.5 to 4.5 mg/d L." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560925/
Then you have to ask if Phosphorus concentration was reported as the element P or as normally done as Phosphate PO4 which weighs 3 times as much. Trace element analysis is usually done by "ashing" the biological sample in a "bomb" in the presence of an oxidant.
I can't answer that but there were 2 laboratories involved - 1 in N-Z, 1 in Hungary. and both ran ICP analyses. Greg Harrison begins presentation around 20 mins in. He's an Australian polymer chemist. I think he said he was from ACT. You should be able to contact him directly.
He can confirm that no polymer exists with 93% Chlorine
I'll take his/your word for it but we were talking about Phosphorus. Tell him to consult with Clifford Carnicom.
You can convert the normal Phosphate measured in milligram per decilitre to parts per million to compare in the meantime.
The table at the top of my article is a screenshot from 2022 by Mike Adams. I added it to my post for reference to show how out of proportion phosphorus was to the other elements found during his analysis. Thanks for noting that the correct figures may have been expressed wrongly.
However, the rest of your comment confuses me somewhat. I find this particularly strange given that Richard Hirschman was one of the forum members who were discussing the findings from Greg Harrison and he did not express any disagreement.
Perhaps you did not notice that he was involved with the presentation?
Richard Hirschman knows absolutely the protein analysis because he published it on X. On 12 June 2024 he told me that the scientists who did that analysis will probably publish in the refereed literature. I know the identity of one, but Richard asked me not to mention any names. I will add the analysis he published to my article.
Hirschman introduced GH and said he's been working with him since May 2023. GH confirmed MA's 2022 findings re. phosphorus levels etc. as per first table in present article plus table published by Epoch Times and displayed in GH presentation at min. ~44.40 of interview. ICP method was used (same as MA). Then he used HPLC method to analyse the protein components, the most prominent one he found to be fibrinogen. What struck GH was the preponderance of the beta fibrinogen, which far exceeded alpha & gamma (as can be seen on Hirschman's X report that you added to your Feb article). Normal blood clots apparently have 1:1:1 ratio in alpha-beta-gamma chain. The analysis was carried out by two N-Z university labs which GH did not wish to name (as yet). I believe they're in process of publishing a paper on subject and would prefer not to get knocked off beforehand. That's also probably why the original interview was taken down and imo it was a stupid idea to put it up in the first place. Anyway, it appears to me that nobody's working at cross-purposes here, you included, and that all more or less basically on the different variations of the same same wave. There are many pathways to the clot after all. I will add to this comment tomorrow to explain how your conclusions on white clot formation in all jabs, viral vector and mRNA alike, and that of MA, GH & colleagues re. mRNA, are not necessarily mutually exclusive and may even be mutually enriching. I've also read quite a few of your posts today and often read your comments on others' substacks. Your info on EDTA in AstraZeneca jabs shocked me. I was not aware of that. Anyone proposing EDTA treatments (like Mihalcea), oral and especially IV, had better know what they're doing. That said, those who claim the jabs contain GO are not all pushing EDTA therapies. I haven't heard John O'Looney pushing any therapies, let alone how to remove GO from the body. He has simply done some serious research and concluded GO or some chemical variation of same (cf. "Andreas Noak & The Razor Blades") is in ALL the jabs. I don't believe it's there to kill us, just to work out how much we need to control us (without actually killing us, at least not straight away) and if it kills a few, even many of us in the process, who cares? So we have high-dose mRNA/GO in Moderna, lower in Pfizer.
Kerrylyn, Geoff's problem is that he assumed he knew the content of the presentation. He spouted off without being fully informed. Now he looks a total plonker and is unlikely to admit it.
You still have not replaced your Fantasy analysis Table at top of your article dsiplaying numbers that are chemically and physically impossible. You are tellinng people your are happy to claim 93% Chlorine. Try finding any organic compound with that much Chlorine.
That's possible but he may have tried to access the video after it was taken down, although I doubt it because he would've said so I suppose. Imo, he was triggered by mention of O'Looney who believes there's GO in the jabs and says so openly, even in interview intro. Geoff on the other hand is an "anti-graphene-oxide pusher" who has taken it upon himself to discredit anyone who claims any chemical form of G is in the jabs, whether GO, rGO, or graphene hydroxide aka the razor blades that killed Noak. He also claims people like Looney are by association responsible for others pushing dangerous GO remedies like EDTA, whereas O'Looney has never pushed any treatments whatsoever. I put Geoff in the Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernan, Latypova, Jacy Lindsay ... category... all pro-vaxxers, at least in the past, but keep their distance from anyone who dares even touch on the GO issue. because that would necessarily lead us on to the control agenda which is what this is all about. He's more worried about sullying his reputation than anything else by associating with those engaging in unaccepted & unacceptable narrative - aka GO in the jabs. Sure, it probably also leads to clots, but it's not main purpose. That's why mention of O'Looney made him go off half-cock. JO + GO too much
There is absolutely no evidence of Graphene Oxide used in any of the Covid19 jabs. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Done
I see no analysis mentioning phosphorus.
Phosphorus is not part of the protein analysis. We will have to wait for Richard's scientist friends to tell us what other tests they applied. They clearly know their stuff.
Did you see the video presentation or not?
So - you are telling me that they did not test for the same things? I am sorry but doesn't that mean that your comment is irrelevant here?
Even shittier is that some of us knew about this before the roll out yet nobody would listen to us. This was the test of faith for us all. People who were taking the shots were sold on it. So many people chose the bs science. It was clear to most of us yet somehow so many people were spellbound by the bs. Life is precious. Dont trust anyone who wants to “help” you for profit.
SIL has a blood clot in her arm after her pacemaker was put in and the doctor says it’s because you always get blood clots after receiving one…even though she’s had 5 shots🤷♂️
It looks like that video has been made private :(
Yes... now why would that have happened? There must have been too much truth in it!
They set it to private the day after they posted the video so you can’t watch it, but by searching the title you can find two other people had posted it also..
It always helps to keep the title to search it later or download videos straight away and store them.. Always assume that they won’t be there next time you look..
⬇️
🟪
FUNERAL EMBALMERS/ DIRECTORS AND NEW EVIDENCE ON WHITE CLOTS PRESENTED IN PRESENTATION...
https://rumble.com/v577oot-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html
🟪🟪
https://rumble.com/v578101-funeral-embalmers-directors-and-new-evidence-on-white-clots-presented-in-pr.html
I guess we get the gist of the panel.
Honestly, most things on this topic *don't* get pulled from Rumble so it either pissed someone off or someone is worried about getting too much notoriety.
Sorry to ask this question here: would it be safe to store Celtic salt crystal in a pure silver pill box (I want to carry the salt in my pocket while I'm working)?
I have a tiny silver spoon in my salt. It has not affected the salt in any way.
That's music to my ears , thank you Francis 🙏
The rumble link re chemist analysis of clots is now private / restricted for whatever reason - John O'looney one you linked.
Wow! I am so glad I took some screenshots!
I wonder what happened. Is it something he's aware of or done himself (I doubt)? I posted a comment about it's viewing status on another recent video he posted.
Two fresh copies have been uploaded to Rumble and you can find the links in my pinned comment above.
My like not working. I am using Amazon Firestick on my TV, also on laptop but my recliner chair is more comfortable, although now have developed painful callouses on both thumbs due to the text entry! I do hope medics take note. I have a friend to receive hip replacement ssurgery in 2 weeks time. She and terminal lung illness partner both had 5 min doses. In addition, she suffers with Transverse Myelitis which she had prior to plandemic and her "treatment" for this is regular blood plasma infusions, which we know do not get screened. Her arthritis progression may be due to jabs, and studies show this. She's at #10 scale for pain right now so surgery only option, however, surgeon she chose, via private GP refferal to "surgeon who takes on high risk patients, yet he said after her private, paid consultation, that his reputation was more paramount- surgeon with reputation of taking on "high risk" patients. He clarified by saying he hated the NHS system.
There is tech in them too. Have you looked into that?
I have read a large number of opinions about that but am not convinced that what is being seen is 'tech'. It may be metal or crystal at the nano level.
check out this book --> https://gofile.io/d/uHsP0J
The question is whether the nanotech works to achieve all the goals of the transhumanist agenda, which include linking us up to the cloud via IoBNT to enable mass surveillance and ultimately complete control of planet & its inhabitants. The technology exists and has been deployed for decades according to Clifford Carnicom, and many others. Whether you call it self-replicating CDBs or self-assembling nanomachines, it leads to same result: the formation of rubbery clots being just one of them. The metamaterials, heavy metals, crystaline structures have been contaminating our blood through chemical spraying, chemicals in jet fuel/chemtrails, many other things (in food supply, pharmaceutical drugs, amalgam fillings, metal prostheses, some anaesthetics, other vaccines, esp. flu shots). Part of the agenda is to mitigate damage said to be due global warming (cf Dane Wigington "The Dimming" 2021). 5G roll-out, increased emfs did further damage. Covid shot was the icing on the cake so to speak, or "final layer of complexity" as Clifford Carnicom explains which has sped up damage and according to some, is now being spread to unvaxxed via shedding, which is why we're seeing increase in the clots especially over last year. The only people I hear denying the nanotech exists in cv vax are pro-virus group (MCulloch, Cole, Malone...) or some in no-virus group: Scoglio, Lanka, Coppolino. The others avoid discussing the subject (Cowan, Kaufman, Sam Bailey) or go after those who discuss it and try to close discussions down: Coppolino, Massey. They do the same over graphene oxide.
I am not convinced that shedding is a thing. I am even less convinced that the predator class would go to the expense of producing trillions of nanotech devices and distribute them randomly into the environment in the hope that they would create the Internet of Things. There is little return on those bucks.
Nano metals in chemtrails and vaccines has been a thing for many years, so I do believe that happens. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/in-2018-italian-scientists-were-silenced
I'm not talking about my views on shedding. I don't know. That's view of Mihalcea to explain how vaxxed/unvaxxed blood is now looking pretty much the same. Ditto for Dr Nixon but he doesn't necessarily link it to shedding. Same for Carnicom. As I mentioned somewhere else, he considers the cv jabs to be "an extra layer of complexity" on top of damage already done by the crap we've been inhaling, ingesting. etc. for decades... He doesn't go into nanotech. On chemtrails, as I understand, they encompass basically 2 distinct projects involving to 1. 3D radar techniques facilitated by high saline levels across oceans which was later taken up and adapted by army for use overland. As I recall, the piezzo crystaIs containing barium, strontium ... which are sensitive to MW radiation, come into play here. They also contain mercury, organo-phosphates (which chelate copper from nerves and cause morgellons) and embedded in ferritin to seal them off from outside. They are claimed to be capable of sending out text and pulling in an artificial signals to form a "read-write" system -- that can both send & receive. Apparently by around 2017, close to 100% of US citizens were "readable", ~70% "writable", and then came the covid shots to fix up the "writable" side of things. Second, the spraying designed to dim the sun, as explained by Wigington, to reduce global warming (which Wigington claims to believe in - and which is probably why he hasn't been banned from YT). So already, well before cv vaccines, the technology was v. sophisticated, but vaccines were needed to improve how it functioned and involved addition of GO, rGO or graphene hydroxide (cf. chemist Andreas Noak). Sorry about poor expression. I may also have got some details wrong. Anyone reading this should feel free to correct me. I threw my response together based on work of above-mentioned individuals plus Harald Kautz-Vella (navy/army tech, piezzocrystals/morgellons...), John Lukach (IoB/BNT tech...)T, Prof. Ian F. Akyildiz, Dr. Josep Jornet (nanotech in vax, GO). There's nothing random about it. It all works in sync and was planned that way. I don't claim to be an expert in any of these subjects but I understand the big picture - or sort of.
You can't "see" Bluetooth LE signals, you need technology that can pick up the wireless protocols and decode them. Only wireless gear, packet sniffers and BLE capable technology is able to "see" these signals. I have and can confirm there is something strange coming from the surrounding people. But it appears to be more of a psuedo-random number generation pattern that is being broadcast, much more likely what the crypto-currency patents would need for proof of work, than any IOB technology.
Grown from blood in a petri dish just ICYMI
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/rubbery-clot-grown-in-a-petri-dish
This post from Dr Ana is behind a paywall.
My apols - the Carnicom Institute direct: https://carnicominstitute.substack.com/p/the-maturation-of-a-bio-polymer
It just goes to show how a small bunch of people (including an Analytic Chemist), with implacable integrity, can root out truth/dispel lies.
The expert on synthetic clots is Clifford Carnicom, as I'm sure everyone here knows. There's synthetic crap floating around in our blood, whether we've been injected or not. The cv shots simply added a layer of complexity that sped up the clot formation process. I agree there may be no way to dissolve them entirely but I'm glad Clifford is still trying, together with all the microscopy guys, sometimes at risk to their own heath. Anyway, the focus also needs to be on how to prevent them from forming in the first place. A. Mihalcea often refers to Clifford's work but I see her more as a fear monger now, like you're all gonna die with a big smile on her face, very creepy, as well as the droning voice, trying to scare us into doing chelation therapies that have not been proven to work and are probably dangerous if you do them regularly. Most people can't afford chelation therapy anyway. So I steer clear of her.
The other factor that's speeding up the clotting process and the increasing health problems we've been experiencing over last few years is of course EMFs/5G and that's only going to get worse as 5G expands, given the cv shot ingredients are designed to work in tandem. I'm surprised that some in the no-virus group seem to be down-playing the importance of this subject or avoiding it as far as possible. Thev've done amazing work on no-virus issue and Tom Cowan also did a great job waking people up back in 2019-2020 on emfs/5g, as Frances pointed out in recent article, but nothing substantial since then, as much as Christine Massey claims to the contrary. So above all, don't get bogged down debating her. She's not up to speed on emfs/5g, nanotech... Her expertise lies in no-virus issues where she's one of best researchers in the world and one of the least acknowledged unfortunately. (Frances: if you're reading this, she asked me to forward the last message she sent to me on to you, but you've already told me you're not interested. I have a big file on our exchange, the docs she sent me, all of which I have read carefully and annotated with my own observations in case you decide to do a follow-up article on Tom Cowan or something more general about who's avoiding which subjects and why.) The "White Fibrous Clots" is probably the most avoided issue of all. Re. Tom Cowan, I should add he has a great store with lots of products intended to mitigate effects of EMFs and other detoxifying products, some of them quite affordable, so well worth a visit to the store which is listed on his website.
Finally, if you're a smoker, I suggest it's not the time to quit, or if you have stopped, maybe keep wearing the nicotine patches. Nicotine has protective qualities. If you smoke moderately and only organic tobacco you'll be fine. I'm not suggesting people take up smoking but it's the pesticides they spray on tobacco and all the other nasty chemicals they contain that harm you and cause addiction, not the nicotine. Avoid vaping too, bad news. probably far more harmful than tobacco. French scientist Jean-Pierre Changeux is the expert in this field, not Brian Ardis. Frances has talked about this somewhere recently too.
I've been a subscriber, at one stage or another, to all the individuals I've criticised in this comment, incl. a paid subscriber to three of them. I doubt any of them are subscribers here but just in case, any criticism was meant to be constructive and no offense was intended. Oh Lord please don't let me be misunderstood! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2sz_YwwwQ4
PS: I hope this message is not too far off-topic Frances. I'm having vision problems so I only skimmed through your article. I don't need to see keyboard to type but reading is more difficult esp. fine print.
Thanks for your comprehensive response. I agree with everything you say but I won’t give Christine Massey the benefit of my attention since she made it clear to me that she does not pay a jot of attention to my work on EMFs. She states that 5G is ‘unrelated’ and ‘another issue’. I will not waste my time on gatekeepers.
You are welcome to write your own post, including all the research and references you mention and I will be very happy to read that.
You're right. Much more important things to focus on. This is getting terrifying. I sense Clifford is past hope but still hoping. At least he's not fearmongering. And all these people making money out of avoiding the essential question. Massey's probably an exception actually. More the fool her. I just cling to the hope of finding an antidote. Would they be so stupid as to not have thought about that? Any thoughts?
The only antidote I can imagine which might solve all the issues is a coronal mass ejection from the sun, a pole reversal and a global tsunami to wash it all clean! But that is me being super-dark, pitch back and fatalistic!
Until then I am trying to enjoy this rather typical British summer and ignore the soap opera we call geo-politics!