I watched the video, and I like that guy! Mostly because he thinks the way I do, he understands weather and climate stuff, and also because he's funny and very likable. I'd like to see some cells form in the US that will be interested in doing similar activity... I've been all about getting those fucking 5G towers down-- that's something we can do, and right away.
Piers is the older brother of our famous politician, Jeremy Corbyn.... he was leader of the Opposition in Parliament for years and very much loved by the public. Of course, the establishment and Zionist lobby destroyed his career with false accusations of anti-semitism and endless daily hit-pieces in the tabloids. I miss him. In his place we now have Sir Keir Starmer, his arch enemy.
Piers is peerless. Was arrested for protesting against lockdowns etc far too often. The establishment hate him because he doesn't swallow any of their narratives. They even tried to trap him with a £10,000 donation provided he change his tune. On camera, they were refused but edited the video to make it look as if he had accepted the money! https://odysee.com/@hugotalks:8/Piers-Corbyn-%C2%A310,000-Sting-Hugo-Talks--lockdown:4
Piers has led the fight against bogus Climate Change Alarmism in the UK. I am very fond of him. He has made a lot of videos which can be found on Bitchute & Odysee but not on YouTube. My favourite one was him explaining the gulf stream and ocean currents by suspending a ring of string over a balloon depicting the earth. The balloon kept deflating.... so funny! 🤣😂
I think any antiCovidvaxer who claims viruses aren't real are shooting themselves in the foot. It would mean there are no viral bioweapons and therefore no dangers from viral bioweapons and no genocidal plans based on viral bioweapons. I think such ideas that viruses don't exist are promoted by the funders of the viral bioweapons industry.
Good point Len. It seems there is quite a lobby afoot that denies the existence of a 'virus' and your point is well made (re:OffG). I use the expression: (toxic) Virus-like particles (VLP) which the medical profession appear to use:
You must have missed the vast majority of my posts. I don't believe in viruses and have seen enough nonsense from Igot ChewedOff to sink a battleship. He is a gatekeeper for big pharma but you won't even consider that possibility, will you?
Bio-weapons are not viral. They are toxic in a very different way.
I just subscribed recently and haven't read many of your posts.
If people can produce proof that DNA is real and that it is genetic material which controls cell division and cell nutrition etc, then it's certainly reasonable to suppose that this genetic material can be damaged and that this damaged genetic material can sometimes cause malfunctioning, such as harmful replication of material, which can be very harmful, or fatal. Damaged genetic material is what I would call a virus. And it's reasonable to suppose that people can engineer genetic material to do harm even worse than what occurs in nature.
So I'm skeptical that anyone has proven that no one can produce proof that DNA or genetic material cannot be damaged, or that damaged DNA or damaged genetic material cannot cause harmful replication of genetic material or other substances.
I guess I should just ask:
Do you claim that DNA cannot be damaged?
If so, do you have evidence for that?
Otherwise, do you claim that damaged DNA cannot cause harmful replication or other harm?
Do you object to damaged DNA being called a virus?
PS, I would consider anyone, including Igor, as an agent of anyone, if I saw evidence.
You have completely changed the subject! I thought we were discussing 'viruses' not DNA. I would prefer not to answer your questions because you completely failed to understand what I am saying even though I did provide you with enough material to fully appraise you of terrain theory and the inadequacy of germ theory.
Please check out some of my previous articles as linked in my previous comment to you.
I have been writing on the topic of human health for more than 30 years. I am a Barefoot Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine, so my understanding of human biology/physiology and electro-magnetic frequencies therein may seem alien to you.
I do not use medical terms from allopathy or the P-Harmaceutical industry.
Dec 2, 2022·edited Dec 2, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
I'm not Frances, but I have been looking exhaustively into the history of viroLIEgy since the start of this Covid hoax, and it's clear to me that there is no there there. By that I mean to say that I concur that nothing defined as a virus - which is supposed to infect the body from outside, then replicate inside cells and damage them - has ever been proven to exist. Nor has contagion, where one subject passes a virus from inside their body to that of another person, causing illness, ever been proven. And if one reads the papers that make such claims carefully it is clear that virology does not follow the scientific method, nor does it use valid controls and demonstrate repeatability.
Back to your post above, you say you would call "damaged genetic material" a virus. But that's not the widely accepted definition of a virus, at all.
Your definition also doesn't explain what causes this damage to genetic material.
If you meant to call something that causes genetic damage a virus, then EMF and 5G would fit your definition of a "virus," which is a word simply derived from the Latin meaning "poison."
If you're just beginning on the journey of discovering the truth of terrain and the falsehoods of germ theory, welcome. It's a fascinating and liberating journey.
Yes, very well said, Bono's M. I completely agree with you, and I, too, have been on this journey for nearly three years now. And it IS fascinating, and it IS liberating.
I'm guessing that quite a few virus-disbelievers assume that if viruses are real then vaccines would be justified. That's not the case. Neil Miller showed long ago that vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective and others have found that they reduce immunity.
You all apparently aren't interested in any opposing evidence. I'm not afraid of opposing evidence. I looked into Dr. Cowan's mention of Dr. Harold Hillman's findings that microbiology is not well-founded because staining and radiation from electron microscopes distort and kill living cells and components. I posted on
No layman should be too confident in their own views on matters they don't thoroughly understand. I have a pretty good background in microbiology, but I know I don't know it all. There are plenty of folks more knowledgeable than I am.
I think my post on Proof of Viruses is reasonably thorough and it convinces me that it's very probably true.
Haven't you heard of the theory that viruses evolved from damaged genetic material?
PS, @Bono. It should be obvious that DNA is always getting damaged. Every time any creature bumps something too hard, or falls down, or gets burned, or cut, or punctured, or poisoned, DNA gets damaged. This is likely how viruses evolved from early damaged DNA. But once a virus forms that has coding for replication, future viruses tend to form mostly by replication.
"Virus disbelievers"??? Really? That doesn't sound very scientific to me, it sounds pretty ad hominem, as in, you can't prove your theory so you attack the other personally. Lame.
What you sort of described above sounds like what some have called "Exosomes," which are created by the body when it's already sick or toxified, and which help to clean out the poisoned cells. The idea that a "virus" would exist outside the body and somehow ATTACK us and kill us sounds stupider and stupider as we begin to understand Terrain Theory. But it sure does work when there's a desire to terrorize people into doing something extremely dangerous, like submit to a syringe full of who-knows-what. In fact, vaccines are HARMFUL, it is becoming quite clear, all of them, and are responsible for VAST damage and death to human beings for some 200 years now... Fie.
Cell damage and decay causes exosomes which you seem to want to identify as 'viruses' but you do not know what the full functions of exosomes are nor how they function. This is why so many dis-eases are so far incurable. The entire medical profession is hooked on labelling everything as viruses when it is obvious that all they are doing is mislabelling and misidentifying outfections rather than infections. Listen to Dr Robert Young (I shared his video to you right at the start of this conversation but you must have overlooked it)
You say 'vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective and others have found that they reduce immunity.' Erm..... exactly. And WHY are they so bad? Because they are loaded with toxic excipients like aluminium, mercury, formaldehyde and god only knows what else! Those of us who do not believe in viruses, do not accept the need for any vaccines!
.....COULDN'T share THIS in the 'News Of The Week' notice due to PAYWALL restrictions but, MAY be ESSENTIAL reading, Frances - additionally, my former associate R.L. Poole's book could prove a VERY interesting resource itself, dealing as it does with LATVIAN native Ed Leedskalnin's secret communications to tobacco heiress (and apparent fellow SPY) Doris Duke; hoping to have it by month's end.....
So far, listening to the video, Piers mentioned weatheraction.com and stopthenewnormal.net. The second link doesn't work for me. Does anyone know if there's a way to access that site?
Thanks. I tried that once, but it didn't work. But it works now, which means I probably misspelled it. I mean I tried it with and without "the" in there.
In the interview toward the end, Piers advocates civil disobedience, which is what the establishment expects. That could work, at a cost, if participation is sufficient; but I prefer peaceful, decentralized boycotts.
No, Piers says that rioting is what the establishment expects. Civil disobedience is quite another thing. It involves not complying, passively. It means direct action. It happens in small ways by many people like this guy tried to suggest:
Dec 2, 2022·edited Dec 2, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
great interview, the last thing we need is North and South American versions of the EU, let alone a One World government. time for governments to be splintered… small , local, directly accountable to each of us.
A Brave and honorable man, who deserves more Respect from MSM, who with out a doubt could not walk in this man's shoes. Respect & X 2 All
I watched the video, and I like that guy! Mostly because he thinks the way I do, he understands weather and climate stuff, and also because he's funny and very likable. I'd like to see some cells form in the US that will be interested in doing similar activity... I've been all about getting those fucking 5G towers down-- that's something we can do, and right away.
Anyway, thanks Frances, good vid. xo
Piers is the older brother of our famous politician, Jeremy Corbyn.... he was leader of the Opposition in Parliament for years and very much loved by the public. Of course, the establishment and Zionist lobby destroyed his career with false accusations of anti-semitism and endless daily hit-pieces in the tabloids. I miss him. In his place we now have Sir Keir Starmer, his arch enemy.
Piers is peerless. Was arrested for protesting against lockdowns etc far too often. The establishment hate him because he doesn't swallow any of their narratives. They even tried to trap him with a £10,000 donation provided he change his tune. On camera, they were refused but edited the video to make it look as if he had accepted the money! https://odysee.com/@hugotalks:8/Piers-Corbyn-%C2%A310,000-Sting-Hugo-Talks--lockdown:4
Piers has led the fight against bogus Climate Change Alarmism in the UK. I am very fond of him. He has made a lot of videos which can be found on Bitchute & Odysee but not on YouTube. My favourite one was him explaining the gulf stream and ocean currents by suspending a ring of string over a balloon depicting the earth. The balloon kept deflating.... so funny! 🤣😂
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=piers%20corbyn&kind=video
Yeah, he's cool. :)
Also, his website https://www.stopnewnormal.net/ promotes activism in Britain, but apparently not in the U.S. (or elsewhere).
Does anyone know of similar activism help in the U.S. etc?
Piers seems to think that viruses aren't real. Does anyone know if that's what he thinks?
I have a post called Proof of Viruses at https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/china-lifts-lockdowns-shows-that/comment/10844200
I think any antiCovidvaxer who claims viruses aren't real are shooting themselves in the foot. It would mean there are no viral bioweapons and therefore no dangers from viral bioweapons and no genocidal plans based on viral bioweapons. I think such ideas that viruses don't exist are promoted by the funders of the viral bioweapons industry.
Good point Len. It seems there is quite a lobby afoot that denies the existence of a 'virus' and your point is well made (re:OffG). I use the expression: (toxic) Virus-like particles (VLP) which the medical profession appear to use:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161758/
Virus means poison in Latin. Virology is a deception and a failure. What you are seeing is a case of mistaken identity.
Agreed
You must have missed the vast majority of my posts. I don't believe in viruses and have seen enough nonsense from Igot ChewedOff to sink a battleship. He is a gatekeeper for big pharma but you won't even consider that possibility, will you?
Bio-weapons are not viral. They are toxic in a very different way.
https://rumble.com/v1ybh86-dial-up-a-pandemic-with-dr.-robert-young.html
I have written endless posts proving that nobody can produce proof of the existence of viruses.
The quantity is so huge I compiled an archive!
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/all-my-substack-articles-on-emfc19
I just subscribed recently and haven't read many of your posts.
If people can produce proof that DNA is real and that it is genetic material which controls cell division and cell nutrition etc, then it's certainly reasonable to suppose that this genetic material can be damaged and that this damaged genetic material can sometimes cause malfunctioning, such as harmful replication of material, which can be very harmful, or fatal. Damaged genetic material is what I would call a virus. And it's reasonable to suppose that people can engineer genetic material to do harm even worse than what occurs in nature.
So I'm skeptical that anyone has proven that no one can produce proof that DNA or genetic material cannot be damaged, or that damaged DNA or damaged genetic material cannot cause harmful replication of genetic material or other substances.
I guess I should just ask:
Do you claim that DNA cannot be damaged?
If so, do you have evidence for that?
Otherwise, do you claim that damaged DNA cannot cause harmful replication or other harm?
Do you object to damaged DNA being called a virus?
PS, I would consider anyone, including Igor, as an agent of anyone, if I saw evidence.
You have completely changed the subject! I thought we were discussing 'viruses' not DNA. I would prefer not to answer your questions because you completely failed to understand what I am saying even though I did provide you with enough material to fully appraise you of terrain theory and the inadequacy of germ theory.
Please check out some of my previous articles as linked in my previous comment to you.
I have been writing on the topic of human health for more than 30 years. I am a Barefoot Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine, so my understanding of human biology/physiology and electro-magnetic frequencies therein may seem alien to you.
I do not use medical terms from allopathy or the P-Harmaceutical industry.
I'm not Frances, but I have been looking exhaustively into the history of viroLIEgy since the start of this Covid hoax, and it's clear to me that there is no there there. By that I mean to say that I concur that nothing defined as a virus - which is supposed to infect the body from outside, then replicate inside cells and damage them - has ever been proven to exist. Nor has contagion, where one subject passes a virus from inside their body to that of another person, causing illness, ever been proven. And if one reads the papers that make such claims carefully it is clear that virology does not follow the scientific method, nor does it use valid controls and demonstrate repeatability.
Back to your post above, you say you would call "damaged genetic material" a virus. But that's not the widely accepted definition of a virus, at all.
Your definition also doesn't explain what causes this damage to genetic material.
If you meant to call something that causes genetic damage a virus, then EMF and 5G would fit your definition of a "virus," which is a word simply derived from the Latin meaning "poison."
If you're just beginning on the journey of discovering the truth of terrain and the falsehoods of germ theory, welcome. It's a fascinating and liberating journey.
Yes, very well said, Bono's M. I completely agree with you, and I, too, have been on this journey for nearly three years now. And it IS fascinating, and it IS liberating.
Cheers!
Nicely put, Bono's Mullet xx
I'm guessing that quite a few virus-disbelievers assume that if viruses are real then vaccines would be justified. That's not the case. Neil Miller showed long ago that vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective and others have found that they reduce immunity.
You all apparently aren't interested in any opposing evidence. I'm not afraid of opposing evidence. I looked into Dr. Cowan's mention of Dr. Harold Hillman's findings that microbiology is not well-founded because staining and radiation from electron microscopes distort and kill living cells and components. I posted on
that at https://ilki.substack.com/p/is-microbiology-real
No layman should be too confident in their own views on matters they don't thoroughly understand. I have a pretty good background in microbiology, but I know I don't know it all. There are plenty of folks more knowledgeable than I am.
I think my post on Proof of Viruses is reasonably thorough and it convinces me that it's very probably true.
Haven't you heard of the theory that viruses evolved from damaged genetic material?
PS, @Bono. It should be obvious that DNA is always getting damaged. Every time any creature bumps something too hard, or falls down, or gets burned, or cut, or punctured, or poisoned, DNA gets damaged. This is likely how viruses evolved from early damaged DNA. But once a virus forms that has coding for replication, future viruses tend to form mostly by replication.
"Virus disbelievers"??? Really? That doesn't sound very scientific to me, it sounds pretty ad hominem, as in, you can't prove your theory so you attack the other personally. Lame.
What you sort of described above sounds like what some have called "Exosomes," which are created by the body when it's already sick or toxified, and which help to clean out the poisoned cells. The idea that a "virus" would exist outside the body and somehow ATTACK us and kill us sounds stupider and stupider as we begin to understand Terrain Theory. But it sure does work when there's a desire to terrorize people into doing something extremely dangerous, like submit to a syringe full of who-knows-what. In fact, vaccines are HARMFUL, it is becoming quite clear, all of them, and are responsible for VAST damage and death to human beings for some 200 years now... Fie.
Cell damage and decay causes exosomes which you seem to want to identify as 'viruses' but you do not know what the full functions of exosomes are nor how they function. This is why so many dis-eases are so far incurable. The entire medical profession is hooked on labelling everything as viruses when it is obvious that all they are doing is mislabelling and misidentifying outfections rather than infections. Listen to Dr Robert Young (I shared his video to you right at the start of this conversation but you must have overlooked it)
You say 'vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective and others have found that they reduce immunity.' Erm..... exactly. And WHY are they so bad? Because they are loaded with toxic excipients like aluminium, mercury, formaldehyde and god only knows what else! Those of us who do not believe in viruses, do not accept the need for any vaccines!
In this post, SARSCov2 mRNA is SYNTHETIC, at https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sarscov2-mrna-is-synthetic
you seem to acknowledge that mRNA can do damage. That's genetic material. So I don't see what your problem is with viruses. That's a virus.
This looks good, I have to watch later.
.....COULDN'T share THIS in the 'News Of The Week' notice due to PAYWALL restrictions but, MAY be ESSENTIAL reading, Frances - additionally, my former associate R.L. Poole's book could prove a VERY interesting resource itself, dealing as it does with LATVIAN native Ed Leedskalnin's secret communications to tobacco heiress (and apparent fellow SPY) Doris Duke; hoping to have it by month's end.....
https://politicalmoonshine.substack.com/p/the-latvian-linchpin-how-latvia-interfaces?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1169844&post_id=88242451&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
https://smile.amazon.com/Key-Leedskalnin-Complete-Decryption-Every/dp/B09SYJ227D/ref=sr_1_10?crid=PHLT1ZZCV3FT&keywords=Leedskalnin&qid=1670005234&s=books&sprefix=leedskalnin%2Cstripbooks%2C64&sr=1-10
I was cross about being unable to comment on that News Of The Week which I cross-posted too!
I added a note and a meme to tonights Meme post (look for it at midnight)....
Thanks for the heads up on Latvia - figured something must be going down up north of Ukraine, too quiet for too long.
Also curious about the encrypted message within Leedskalnin's book..... very curious!
Also - I am fascinated by the life story of Doris Duke! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doris_Duke
That is providing me with lots of inspiration for my Lymp Duhdashian series, many thanks! xx
So far, listening to the video, Piers mentioned weatheraction.com and stopthenewnormal.net. The second link doesn't work for me. Does anyone know if there's a way to access that site?
https://www.stopnewnormal.net/ works for me!
Thanks. I tried that once, but it didn't work. But it works now, which means I probably misspelled it. I mean I tried it with and without "the" in there.
Great video. He got my attention many years ago. His science is solid. Glad to see he's still going strong.
Telegram: Piers_Corbyn_Stopnewnormal
Twitter: @RealPiersCorbyn
Web: https://stopnewnormal.net
In the interview toward the end, Piers advocates civil disobedience, which is what the establishment expects. That could work, at a cost, if participation is sufficient; but I prefer peaceful, decentralized boycotts.
No, Piers says that rioting is what the establishment expects. Civil disobedience is quite another thing. It involves not complying, passively. It means direct action. It happens in small ways by many people like this guy tried to suggest:
https://youtu.be/xz7KLSOJaTE
great interview, the last thing we need is North and South American versions of the EU, let alone a One World government. time for governments to be splintered… small , local, directly accountable to each of us.
This is great thanks. I would have liked to know about Piers Corbin. Have been a proselytizing advocate of the fact sun drives climate for decades.