While I can't say I agree with or understand all that you are postulating. I am intrigued by your dream sharing and hypothesises (if that's a word.) You have aunique perspective and I am searching for others who have profound truth to share. 100% accuracy is not necessary to factor in perspective, not saying your wrong about anything, I just don't have the knowledge or experience to digest all this info on the fly. I will look into it more. I invite you to peek over at my work, my testimonial that will give additional perspective to your view. Especially about the TIME we are living through. It's so exciting to find your work. I hope to hear more from you soon.
Thanks for getting in touch.... I accept your invitation. Having read a couple of chapters I like your writing style. I don't understand all the references but that is because I am not Jewish or American or even Canadian. I am British. I dare say if you were to read either of my two serialised books, here on Substack, there would be a number of references to British life that you would be puzzled over.
From an outsiders POV (American - non UK'er) and especially as I got older, the value of the monarchy seemed to be it's ability, to give the British, a common social and political point of allegiance, from which to operate from. I was in the U.S. Military and stationed in England for a time. I noticed in dealing with Brits (civilian or military), that they could be at each other's throats over opposing football teams, politics, or anything else people disagree on, but if you (an outsider) said something untoward about the queen...they all became one, united to defend the representation, of their national identity.
The Declaration and Constitution, used to be that for us, here in the States. It was what, connected us, through the political and social upheavals and differences. We could point (with pride) to those founding documents and say, "What makes me an American, are those documents and my allegiance to them."
Back to the U.K.
Past that nostalgic and homogenizing function, I never could figure the rest out.
I was always baffled by the fact, that just because of a family lineage, you would bow to someone...in deference to your own personal sovereignty...because it was accepted, that they were above you??
I will admit though, the spectacle and knightly premise, echoed back to those great images of chivalry, loyalty, bravery and sacrifice, I found in stories of King Arthur...so even though I saw some contradictions, those aspects of a monarchy were still an attractive draw.
Now maybe this is splitting semantic hairs, but I can see using a term of respect or even Sir or Ma'am, when addressing someone, who is above you in business rankings. I do for age as well, in recognition of their years of wisdom and endurance, in this world. I would never bow to them though.
Add in the money factors, you've touched on and I am baffled.
Yes, we do have basically the same thing, in a more convoluted version, but at least the political crooks are good enough to hide it somewhat...no rolling down the street in a gilded Tesla for FJB.
Our criminals just skim off the top, with insider trading and voting to prop up or destroy industry sectors, they have invested in or shorted...or laundering money through a country, their crackhead, deviant son set up businesses with.
As I said, I am an outsider. Had I been born and raised there, and seen my parents pride in their system of government, I too would have bowed or curtseyed (if I decided to identify as a...sorry, that's another substack entirely).
I guess, that was and is the case, for many here in America, our patriotism is based, in part, on the tradition and pride, we saw in our parents and grandparents.
After reading your article "What does the rule of law mean" it may all have been a pipe dream.
The flip side of the coin.
While I say I don't agree with/understand the function of the monarchy, in some way I do...which I stated previously. This will never happen, but imagine if they were abolished...no more. Some would no doubt be happy, but as with the erosion of a common allegiance in America, the British people (loyal subjects) would become a rudderless boat, where a shared national identity and ideology are concerned. With the rise in immigration and the fragmenting of common points of reference, being British, would be as ambiguous as being an American is today.
Thanks for the great writing and bring such important material to the public forum!
I was! The link you posted suggests we have to be concerned about the 30th September, doesn't it? Well, the date I have heard which is of greater concern is the 23rd September because we are expecting a CME on that day.
If the CME will happen what can we do about it. Something tangible such as switching from the currency as we know it now to a digital replacement is. By the way I have not believed in man made climate change for at least ten years, favouring the Sun as the main driver of any changes. I recently saw an interview with Randall Carlson which doesn't give confidence in the future of the human race. I hope there Ida God who intercedes on our behalf. Maybe the powers that be know something their not telling ,hope not!
If a CME is powerful it can take down the grid and the internet, maybe some satellites.... in which case the currency going digital would be impossible a week later! That is the point I am making here.
Digital currencies depend on the infrastructure continuing as it is.... too risky in my opinion.
Understood we’ll wait for the twenty third then. I hope that the twenty third and the thirtieth pass without incident. Sorry for seeming contentious but it’s in my nature.
The Windsors, of course, are part of the cabal. They've maintained their popularity by having frontmen like politicians and the WEF take the heat for them:
Frances at the beginning of your post I thought you were extolling the virtues of the royal family; thankfully you were not. I have believed for many years that our royal family was at best superfluous and at worst part of a giant conspiracy. I am as sorry to see anyone, who I don't know, who is 95 years old, die. No one should ever have the rights and wealth that the royal family enjoys, without having to work extremely hard and exhibit high intelligence, even then they should not be entitled to what our royal family has. It is time for the divine rights of ascension to be abolished Worldwide. I believe as you do Frances that our royals are not as benign as the media would have us believe. I don't think that the people are not really concerned about the death of the Queen, but are merely paying lip service so as not to appear an outsider; this is all driven by the media of course. Just wondered what are they going to slip in during all the hand wringing.
While we are distracted by the mourning period and then the funeral, they will foment a hot war with Russia and China. I expect a false flag event to act as the trigger. British ships are 'helping' Ukraine in the Black Sea.... delivering weapons and ammunition. The Ukrainians have mined the whole area so I would not be surprised if one of our older ships, otherwise only fit for decommissioning, goes BOOM and the media will screech "It was the Russians!"
It will definitely not be the first false flag event in human history. I must admit I no longer know who is on who's side. It seems that the network doesn't choose sides, they use sides.
Was talking to a neighbour regarding your post on why the exorbitant price rises on fuel. He said it's down to supply and demand, driven by countries who were formerly supplied by Russia now vying for a dwindling resource. Seems to make sense. Even more reason for the west to stop their NATO aspirations in the Ukraine and let Russia and Ukraine come to an agreement, without foreign interference
Neatly driving the price up so that North Sea oil & gas producers can make phenomenal profits selling OUR resources? That sounds like an agreement between the warmongers and the war-profiteers to me!
Queenie, the WEF prince, dark lords, drug and robber barons, Klaus Schwab square pants, and the Gates of hell are all products and prisoners of their families and upbringing, who truly believe they are doing the right thing. I hope they can all be set free.
If we focus on hating these people and thinking of them as psychopaths (we all experience absence of empathy when we're taught to see others as inferior to ourselves, the way most us have been conditioned to view animals farmed for food) and plan on getting our revenge on them, then there's no bright future for any of us.
I hope we can all become aware of our karma/conditioning/ego/fear so that it will dissolve and our true natures of compassion, forgiveness, curiousity and childlikeness will be set free!
.....HAVE to admit, did NOT see this coming from YOU what with previous postings, Frances - CERTAINLY is GRATIFYING to absolve Elizabeth, who SEEMS at FIRST to be a nice woman - SOMEwhat but, Charlie is WAY too much like Philip who can be said then to have POISONED his wife; exceedingly lacking BASIC respect and intellectual curiosity, demonstrating even monarchal CONTEMPT for multiple global communities.....
I am puzzled by your comment. Do you not detect that I have a certain amount of sympathy for the modern incumbents of the bloodlines? Obviously not until now. Hmm. I must work harder to convey that opinion. I believe that modern bloodlines are obliged by on-going last Wills & Testaments to adhere to the ancient plans on pain of being disinherited. Most of them fear poverty and obscurity due to being so accustomed to opulence.
Also it should be mentioned that the bloodlines have a nasty tendency to ensure that any rebellious offspring do not make it into adulthood or are suicided as soon as they fail to obey.
.....well, the 'Royal Babylon' documentary didn't seem especially KIND to Elizabeth (and LESS sympathetic where even DIANA's typically concerned, I admit) - hence, my Comment.....
Do not tar me with the words of others, I only shared that for shock value, to alert people to what really goes on among the Black Nobs. Read the stuff I actually wrote on that piece, please! You will see that I explained as I have done here.... don't know how you missed it.
No 'tarring' happened - my goal is to have a good grasp on one's position, feelings about any particular topic or concern - and yes, definitely did NOT discern your appreciation for Elizabeth; however, at SOME point those in SUCH lofty, rarified positions HAVE to display FAR more integrity than I believe EITHER (nor CHARLIE) have.....maybe it's because I'm an American (although there's abundant evidence MANY Europeans feel the same way) but, whole NOTION of monarchy, a RULING elite is just ALIEN to me - however much of an Anglophile I am.....
I would not call it appreciation for Elizabeth. It has always been a type of pity, really. I mixed with the children of the elite when I was young. They were, by and large, very weak physically and not very bright.
Americans make the mistake of not realising how duped they are by the Black Nobility. Most presidents and senators are Black Nob members or connected via family. America is fooled into believing that it is 'the land of the free' but it has never been free from the monarchs and hierarchical Black Nobility.
It is one of the 5 Eyes slave colonies, make no mistake about that.
Explains why the magna carta was (still is?) on display in the vaults under the Guildhall (in the City). Also of interest, is that St Pauls is built on the temple of Mithras.
Thank you Frances, we seem to be contemporaries, I'm of March '52 ! The info that you outline here came to me much later in life, and, of course, I was laughed at when I said that Wall St. et al was run from the Square Mile. I admit that I am having trouble getting my head around the non-existence of viruses, but I most certainly do not laugh at the notion. Thank you wholeheartedly for your investigations. Chris, (Brit ex-pat in Brazil)
Americans don't want to hear that their Constitution and Declaration of Independence are worthless. They think they are the 'land of the free'! It is a very hard mind worm to shift.
Thanks for getting in touch, I will subscribe to your newsletter forthwith, fellow alumni of March 52! xx
I am buying the book The Royal Law by L.L. Blake from a seller on Ebay.
The book description is interesting:
"The title of this book is taken from words addressed to the King or Queen during their coronation service which, the author points out, plays a much more important part in the life of our nation than is generally recognized. It is not just an empty ceremony but the occasion when Divine Law is acknowledged as the source of all our law. The service reminds not only the monarch but all those assembled in Westminster Abbey (with television the audience is worldwide) of a basic tenet of the British constitution, expressed by the 13th century lawyer Bracton, that the King or Queen "must be under no man but under God and the law, for the law makes the king". The barons, in forcing King John to sign Magna Carta, were insisting that he observe this principle and his coronation oath. This principle has frequently been compared, down the ages, with the Justinian precept, "What pleases the prince has the force of law", which lies behind continental Roman law. The civil freedom we enjoy in Britain today stems from Bracton's words, which regulate all our public servants, from prime minister to police officer, and which has enabled us to give freedom under law to large parts of the world - whereas in Brussels, what pleases the Commissioners has the force of law. Writing after the Second World War, where Britain had been fighting to preserve the rule of law, Professor R W Chambers emphasised the importance of this principle, enshrined in our constitution and coronation service: "Upon that difference - whether or no we place Divine Law in the last resort above the law of the State - depends the whole future of the world". The book also shows that there is government behind government, with a greater purpose and permanence than the changing spectrum of party political strife. This government consists of institutions, mostly of medieval origin, the monarchy, parliament, common law, jury system, church, universities and armed forces. The powers working through these institutions, which meet in the House of Lords, are made available to the government of the day, and may be retracted if and when they are abused - as the prime minister of Australia discovered in 1975. Two appendices are included, one containing parts of the coronation service of Queen Elizabeth II, the other an Anglo-Saxon document entitled Institutes of Polity, Civil and Ecclesiastical."
Talks about the big picture including the jurisdictions of Soil, Land, Sea and Air - but not War, which Clif High tips as incoming (https://tinyurl.com/57xsxvxm).
Sorry, Frances, what I meant was that High believes that the Law of War will replace Admiralty Law in the US legal system. A kinetic war is a different matter entirely. A state of emergency would be enough of a pretext for making the switch from Admiralty to War. High also suggests that it is significant that the Manual was amended and re-printed at the end of 2016.
Ah. Got ya now. It is under the Law of War that governments justify the internment of conscientious objectors and citizens with affiliations to the prescribed enemy. They justify the confiscation of property and land. They restrict movement. Even if there is only a sniff of kinetic war, or just a rumour spreading via the owned media, they could even implement conscription among the young and fit.
Please don't take James Corbett at face value, he has never struck me as the caring type. I think he is factual but not thorough. Apparently, he makes mega dosh from his enterprise. I am up for being proven wrong though.
He has quite a few subscribers and I've always wondered how he makes such professional content which I believe would be out of the scope of the amateur programme maker. He also puts his content together very quickly. so how does he do it with only him and Brock West? maybe I've listened to Brendon O'Connell too much. Have a listen to Brendon, I think I will try to contact him and ask the question.
I have heard all I need to hear from Brendan O'Connell. He is a gatekeeper for the Jesuits and determined to blame Jews for everything evil on earth. I do not trust him.
As for James Corbett, in this old podcast James tells us about himself. Listen from 13th minute onwards here:
CHARLES’ EMPIRE: THE ROYAL RESET RIDDLE
https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/04/15/charles-empire-the-royal-reset-riddle/
While I can't say I agree with or understand all that you are postulating. I am intrigued by your dream sharing and hypothesises (if that's a word.) You have aunique perspective and I am searching for others who have profound truth to share. 100% accuracy is not necessary to factor in perspective, not saying your wrong about anything, I just don't have the knowledge or experience to digest all this info on the fly. I will look into it more. I invite you to peek over at my work, my testimonial that will give additional perspective to your view. Especially about the TIME we are living through. It's so exciting to find your work. I hope to hear more from you soon.
Tim
Thanks for getting in touch.... I accept your invitation. Having read a couple of chapters I like your writing style. I don't understand all the references but that is because I am not Jewish or American or even Canadian. I am British. I dare say if you were to read either of my two serialised books, here on Substack, there would be a number of references to British life that you would be puzzled over.
You can access my two books:
The biography begins here: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/frances-leader-is-my-birth-name
The fictional but current affairs serial begins here: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-daily-grind-of-lymp-duhdashyan
My Substack is also shared free of charge.
From an outsiders POV (American - non UK'er) and especially as I got older, the value of the monarchy seemed to be it's ability, to give the British, a common social and political point of allegiance, from which to operate from. I was in the U.S. Military and stationed in England for a time. I noticed in dealing with Brits (civilian or military), that they could be at each other's throats over opposing football teams, politics, or anything else people disagree on, but if you (an outsider) said something untoward about the queen...they all became one, united to defend the representation, of their national identity.
The Declaration and Constitution, used to be that for us, here in the States. It was what, connected us, through the political and social upheavals and differences. We could point (with pride) to those founding documents and say, "What makes me an American, are those documents and my allegiance to them."
Back to the U.K.
Past that nostalgic and homogenizing function, I never could figure the rest out.
I was always baffled by the fact, that just because of a family lineage, you would bow to someone...in deference to your own personal sovereignty...because it was accepted, that they were above you??
I will admit though, the spectacle and knightly premise, echoed back to those great images of chivalry, loyalty, bravery and sacrifice, I found in stories of King Arthur...so even though I saw some contradictions, those aspects of a monarchy were still an attractive draw.
Now maybe this is splitting semantic hairs, but I can see using a term of respect or even Sir or Ma'am, when addressing someone, who is above you in business rankings. I do for age as well, in recognition of their years of wisdom and endurance, in this world. I would never bow to them though.
Add in the money factors, you've touched on and I am baffled.
Yes, we do have basically the same thing, in a more convoluted version, but at least the political crooks are good enough to hide it somewhat...no rolling down the street in a gilded Tesla for FJB.
Our criminals just skim off the top, with insider trading and voting to prop up or destroy industry sectors, they have invested in or shorted...or laundering money through a country, their crackhead, deviant son set up businesses with.
As I said, I am an outsider. Had I been born and raised there, and seen my parents pride in their system of government, I too would have bowed or curtseyed (if I decided to identify as a...sorry, that's another substack entirely).
I guess, that was and is the case, for many here in America, our patriotism is based, in part, on the tradition and pride, we saw in our parents and grandparents.
After reading your article "What does the rule of law mean" it may all have been a pipe dream.
The flip side of the coin.
While I say I don't agree with/understand the function of the monarchy, in some way I do...which I stated previously. This will never happen, but imagine if they were abolished...no more. Some would no doubt be happy, but as with the erosion of a common allegiance in America, the British people (loyal subjects) would become a rudderless boat, where a shared national identity and ideology are concerned. With the rise in immigration and the fragmenting of common points of reference, being British, would be as ambiguous as being an American is today.
Thanks for the great writing and bring such important material to the public forum!
Thank you for your careful observations from 'the outside', that was fascinating! xx
Sorry don't know what the acronym CME stands.
Sorry I was at cross purposes, thought you were replying to my youtube link.
I was! The link you posted suggests we have to be concerned about the 30th September, doesn't it? Well, the date I have heard which is of greater concern is the 23rd September because we are expecting a CME on that day.
https://www.youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bservers
If the CME will happen what can we do about it. Something tangible such as switching from the currency as we know it now to a digital replacement is. By the way I have not believed in man made climate change for at least ten years, favouring the Sun as the main driver of any changes. I recently saw an interview with Randall Carlson which doesn't give confidence in the future of the human race. I hope there Ida God who intercedes on our behalf. Maybe the powers that be know something their not telling ,hope not!
If a CME is powerful it can take down the grid and the internet, maybe some satellites.... in which case the currency going digital would be impossible a week later! That is the point I am making here.
Digital currencies depend on the infrastructure continuing as it is.... too risky in my opinion.
Understood we’ll wait for the twenty third then. I hope that the twenty third and the thirtieth pass without incident. Sorry for seeming contentious but it’s in my nature.
Coronal Mass Ejections
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/coronal-mass-ejections
in my times these were called 'solar flares' (what's in a word).
Has anyone seen this? https://youtu.be/nUreHX4CGR0
Yes! I heard from Dave that Suspicious Observers think it is the 23rd when we are likely to see a large CME.
Greg Reese did a good take down of Charles.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RdNkJvt5tjyB/
The Windsors, of course, are part of the cabal. They've maintained their popularity by having frontmen like politicians and the WEF take the heat for them:
https://helpfreetheearth.com/News_1600/news1660_enemies.html
Frances at the beginning of your post I thought you were extolling the virtues of the royal family; thankfully you were not. I have believed for many years that our royal family was at best superfluous and at worst part of a giant conspiracy. I am as sorry to see anyone, who I don't know, who is 95 years old, die. No one should ever have the rights and wealth that the royal family enjoys, without having to work extremely hard and exhibit high intelligence, even then they should not be entitled to what our royal family has. It is time for the divine rights of ascension to be abolished Worldwide. I believe as you do Frances that our royals are not as benign as the media would have us believe. I don't think that the people are not really concerned about the death of the Queen, but are merely paying lip service so as not to appear an outsider; this is all driven by the media of course. Just wondered what are they going to slip in during all the hand wringing.
While we are distracted by the mourning period and then the funeral, they will foment a hot war with Russia and China. I expect a false flag event to act as the trigger. British ships are 'helping' Ukraine in the Black Sea.... delivering weapons and ammunition. The Ukrainians have mined the whole area so I would not be surprised if one of our older ships, otherwise only fit for decommissioning, goes BOOM and the media will screech "It was the Russians!"
It will definitely not be the first false flag event in human history. I must admit I no longer know who is on who's side. It seems that the network doesn't choose sides, they use sides.
Was talking to a neighbour regarding your post on why the exorbitant price rises on fuel. He said it's down to supply and demand, driven by countries who were formerly supplied by Russia now vying for a dwindling resource. Seems to make sense. Even more reason for the west to stop their NATO aspirations in the Ukraine and let Russia and Ukraine come to an agreement, without foreign interference
Neatly driving the price up so that North Sea oil & gas producers can make phenomenal profits selling OUR resources? That sounds like an agreement between the warmongers and the war-profiteers to me!
Ooh, when did that last happen? WW2 wasn't it?
Will we see rationing of fuel next, do you think?
Yes I think so but executive jets and limos will not be affected though
Just a touch of humour from an Irish website. https://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2022/09/09/even-north-korean-state-media-thinks-this-is-a-bit-much/
🤣😂🤣😂
may charles the first be an inspiration to us all
OMG - I hope we are not that savage any more! 🤣😂
when it comes to these monsters and what they'll do to us, i am!
This is amazing and I think a profound truth.
Queenie, the WEF prince, dark lords, drug and robber barons, Klaus Schwab square pants, and the Gates of hell are all products and prisoners of their families and upbringing, who truly believe they are doing the right thing. I hope they can all be set free.
If we focus on hating these people and thinking of them as psychopaths (we all experience absence of empathy when we're taught to see others as inferior to ourselves, the way most us have been conditioned to view animals farmed for food) and plan on getting our revenge on them, then there's no bright future for any of us.
I hope we can all become aware of our karma/conditioning/ego/fear so that it will dissolve and our true natures of compassion, forgiveness, curiousity and childlikeness will be set free!
xxx
So mote it be! aka Amen to that! aka Yeah Baby! 👍👍
🌸🐒🙏🏽♥️🦋
.....HAVE to admit, did NOT see this coming from YOU what with previous postings, Frances - CERTAINLY is GRATIFYING to absolve Elizabeth, who SEEMS at FIRST to be a nice woman - SOMEwhat but, Charlie is WAY too much like Philip who can be said then to have POISONED his wife; exceedingly lacking BASIC respect and intellectual curiosity, demonstrating even monarchal CONTEMPT for multiple global communities.....
I am puzzled by your comment. Do you not detect that I have a certain amount of sympathy for the modern incumbents of the bloodlines? Obviously not until now. Hmm. I must work harder to convey that opinion. I believe that modern bloodlines are obliged by on-going last Wills & Testaments to adhere to the ancient plans on pain of being disinherited. Most of them fear poverty and obscurity due to being so accustomed to opulence.
Also it should be mentioned that the bloodlines have a nasty tendency to ensure that any rebellious offspring do not make it into adulthood or are suicided as soon as they fail to obey.
.....well, the 'Royal Babylon' documentary didn't seem especially KIND to Elizabeth (and LESS sympathetic where even DIANA's typically concerned, I admit) - hence, my Comment.....
Do not tar me with the words of others, I only shared that for shock value, to alert people to what really goes on among the Black Nobs. Read the stuff I actually wrote on that piece, please! You will see that I explained as I have done here.... don't know how you missed it.
No 'tarring' happened - my goal is to have a good grasp on one's position, feelings about any particular topic or concern - and yes, definitely did NOT discern your appreciation for Elizabeth; however, at SOME point those in SUCH lofty, rarified positions HAVE to display FAR more integrity than I believe EITHER (nor CHARLIE) have.....maybe it's because I'm an American (although there's abundant evidence MANY Europeans feel the same way) but, whole NOTION of monarchy, a RULING elite is just ALIEN to me - however much of an Anglophile I am.....
I would not call it appreciation for Elizabeth. It has always been a type of pity, really. I mixed with the children of the elite when I was young. They were, by and large, very weak physically and not very bright.
Americans make the mistake of not realising how duped they are by the Black Nobility. Most presidents and senators are Black Nob members or connected via family. America is fooled into believing that it is 'the land of the free' but it has never been free from the monarchs and hierarchical Black Nobility.
It is one of the 5 Eyes slave colonies, make no mistake about that.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/five-slave-nations
Maybe NOT for much LONGER - got this from a mutual associate of David's, Frances (less than THRILLED at the PLATFORM for a few reasons) - surprised though he DOESN'T make note of the WTC being CONDEMNED for unmitigatable asbestos in 1987, but.....https://rumble.com/v1iukvg-cowboy-logic-090522-dr.-david-martin.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cowboy%20Logic&ep=1&fbclid=IwAR1LsBCQ-he5HEONFdpbCNIiUbbihw3Z4rzUsTtHRIPbOwD-GyWKc-DqX1c
Explains why the magna carta was (still is?) on display in the vaults under the Guildhall (in the City). Also of interest, is that St Pauls is built on the temple of Mithras.
Thank you Frances, we seem to be contemporaries, I'm of March '52 ! The info that you outline here came to me much later in life, and, of course, I was laughed at when I said that Wall St. et al was run from the Square Mile. I admit that I am having trouble getting my head around the non-existence of viruses, but I most certainly do not laugh at the notion. Thank you wholeheartedly for your investigations. Chris, (Brit ex-pat in Brazil)
Americans don't want to hear that their Constitution and Declaration of Independence are worthless. They think they are the 'land of the free'! It is a very hard mind worm to shift.
Thanks for getting in touch, I will subscribe to your newsletter forthwith, fellow alumni of March 52! xx
Thank you, Frances! You and I seem to have much in common. Have you discovered the work of Marchell Abrahams?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq0Np5D-nmA
Also read the 'Architects of Deception' by Juri Lina
Thanks for the tip!
I am buying the book The Royal Law by L.L. Blake from a seller on Ebay.
The book description is interesting:
"The title of this book is taken from words addressed to the King or Queen during their coronation service which, the author points out, plays a much more important part in the life of our nation than is generally recognized. It is not just an empty ceremony but the occasion when Divine Law is acknowledged as the source of all our law. The service reminds not only the monarch but all those assembled in Westminster Abbey (with television the audience is worldwide) of a basic tenet of the British constitution, expressed by the 13th century lawyer Bracton, that the King or Queen "must be under no man but under God and the law, for the law makes the king". The barons, in forcing King John to sign Magna Carta, were insisting that he observe this principle and his coronation oath. This principle has frequently been compared, down the ages, with the Justinian precept, "What pleases the prince has the force of law", which lies behind continental Roman law. The civil freedom we enjoy in Britain today stems from Bracton's words, which regulate all our public servants, from prime minister to police officer, and which has enabled us to give freedom under law to large parts of the world - whereas in Brussels, what pleases the Commissioners has the force of law. Writing after the Second World War, where Britain had been fighting to preserve the rule of law, Professor R W Chambers emphasised the importance of this principle, enshrined in our constitution and coronation service: "Upon that difference - whether or no we place Divine Law in the last resort above the law of the State - depends the whole future of the world". The book also shows that there is government behind government, with a greater purpose and permanence than the changing spectrum of party political strife. This government consists of institutions, mostly of medieval origin, the monarchy, parliament, common law, jury system, church, universities and armed forces. The powers working through these institutions, which meet in the House of Lords, are made available to the government of the day, and may be retracted if and when they are abused - as the prime minister of Australia discovered in 1975. Two appendices are included, one containing parts of the coronation service of Queen Elizabeth II, the other an Anglo-Saxon document entitled Institutes of Polity, Civil and Ecclesiastical."
Frances, maybe this will also be of interest:
http://planetaryjurisdiction.org/index.html
Talks about the big picture including the jurisdictions of Soil, Land, Sea and Air - but not War, which Clif High tips as incoming (https://tinyurl.com/57xsxvxm).
Everyone tips war as incoming, surely? The writing has been on the wall for ages!
Sorry, Frances, what I meant was that High believes that the Law of War will replace Admiralty Law in the US legal system. A kinetic war is a different matter entirely. A state of emergency would be enough of a pretext for making the switch from Admiralty to War. High also suggests that it is significant that the Manual was amended and re-printed at the end of 2016.
Ah. Got ya now. It is under the Law of War that governments justify the internment of conscientious objectors and citizens with affiliations to the prescribed enemy. They justify the confiscation of property and land. They restrict movement. Even if there is only a sniff of kinetic war, or just a rumour spreading via the owned media, they could even implement conscription among the young and fit.
Quite a shift.....
Indeed, and it does make sense that they will have acquired a taste for it as a result of implementing COG, etc, after 9/11 :(
No, I am listening now! Thanks a lot xx
I went to Marchell's channel and found this, which is also very interesting!
https://youtu.be/YHvT64GuiXs
Yes, we've been having a bit of a debate in the comments!
Thanks Kieron, I do love to hear from Neil Oliver! xx
This one is great:
https://youtu.be/gV1Edqv_wk0
Please don't take James Corbett at face value, he has never struck me as the caring type. I think he is factual but not thorough. Apparently, he makes mega dosh from his enterprise. I am up for being proven wrong though.
Mega dosh? How?
He has quite a few subscribers and I've always wondered how he makes such professional content which I believe would be out of the scope of the amateur programme maker. He also puts his content together very quickly. so how does he do it with only him and Brock West? maybe I've listened to Brendon O'Connell too much. Have a listen to Brendon, I think I will try to contact him and ask the question.
I have heard all I need to hear from Brendan O'Connell. He is a gatekeeper for the Jesuits and determined to blame Jews for everything evil on earth. I do not trust him.
As for James Corbett, in this old podcast James tells us about himself. Listen from 13th minute onwards here:
https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-163-meet-james-corbett/
He went straight for the jugular! Goodness me!