14 Comments
User's avatar
Frances Leader's avatar

I have a rather sinister post-script to add here.

By claiming that gnostics and other 'pagan' believers are cultists hell-bent upon destroying Christianity, Mr Wolfe spins reality to fit a very ugly totalitarian agenda.

His attack on Tereza Corragio in his comments is so barbed, so holier-than-thou that it reveals a fanatical side of him which has, in the past, led to extreme persecution of innocent people. It should also be noted that he falsely claims that Hitler was a theosophist when he was actually a devout Catholic, supported by the Pope of the time.

The Impact is an 8.5 hour long documentary which explains how our freedoms are being limited and how groups are singled out for persecution. Listen and learn how easy it is to be classified as a terrorist by over-zealous authoritarians and religious fanatics.

https://rumble.com/v56stt1-the-impact-groundbreaking-documentary.html

Expand full comment
Dave Ellis's avatar

I did not read your post until I looked at the video feat-Terry Wolfe and only 25 mins in before my brain numbed , went back to your post which confirmed the reason why this was the case, and why you felt the need to point this nippy wolf out to others, LOL Baloney with a capital B hee hee , Well done Tereza, oh flippant me hee hee. Onwards ! Frances X . Respect & X 2 ALL

Expand full comment
Trace L Hentz's avatar

Thin and obtuse - this man is probably one of the ELITE anyway... they do mock us.

Expand full comment
matt Arnold's avatar

The meme is thought provoking as any I’ve ever read

Expand full comment
Flea Mason's avatar

Robert Sephyr😂 https://youtu.be/oxcXHrmLBwg?si=tCKMr77eo5TW40RM

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Eek! Oh that was so creepy and fake!

Expand full comment
Flea Mason's avatar

I was kind of surprised to see Robert on the list cause he seems to be in a world of his own, just had to post it🤣

Expand full comment
Tereza Coraggio's avatar

Thanks so much, Frances, complete with entertaining art and your powerful words set to meme. That completely encapsulates my philosophy. I will copy my comment from my thread:

Frances, this is HILARIOUS! I so hope it makes it into your posts because we all need the belly laughs. I will pin this because it's a perfect extension of my analysis, adding quotes, insight and so much flavor in descriptions like:

"At first I felt as if I was ear-wigging on a conversation between the reincarnation of the Witchfinder General and an ingratiating potential publicist, who stumbled and stuttered over his unbridled admiration for his guru."

Yes! And "fundamental Christians take the attitude that anyone who does not agree with them must be an embodied demon warranting a verbal exorcism." That's exactly what the Wolfe posing as shepherd is exhorting 'good Christians' to do--you can 'be holy' by castigating unbelievers and flaming them with your juvenile put-downs. Oooooh! "When we talk, we win." And that's why he refuses to engage.

So actually, Wolfe makes 21 straw men and 5 straw women arguments. He names people I too suspect of being sheepdogs herding the strays back to the slaughterhouse through a different route. My eventual disillusionment with Brand wasn't because of what he said but the company he was keeping, which included many of the named.

I think Wolfe sees women as gullible, not the masterminds of the 'Movement That Has No Name.' I doubt he even sees Blavatsky and Bailey as the brains, only the mouthpiece.

Excellent catch on the word SPIN. I love the idea of segmented, polycentric, integrated networks. Bring them on!

The comments heaping praise were one thing but even most of the critics were from a position of 'more fundamentalist than thou.' It's a shark-eat-shark or shepherd-eat-shepherd world out there.

Thank you so much for putting the time into this purgatory of illogic. I'm sure it will earn you absolutions in the etherworld!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

David Icke’s modus operandi is to monitor social media, glean trends from the zeitgeist and then present them in his books as his own work. It is a novel and legal form of plagiarism. If you want to know what is emerging from the collective consciousness - keep reading his books!

I did not say that I do not like anyone in the list I created. I said I ‘disregard’ them. None of them are anything more than stenographers reporting OUR ideas back to us.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

In the 1970s, 80s and 90s, here in UK, we communicated by word of mouth, flyers, meetings, phone-trees and a wonderful thing called Fanzines. I worked for a local Fanzine which carried lists of gigs and events and made just enough money to function from advertising. Each month we would include articles written on topics that interested us, extracts from books, or other Fanzines. We had a very efficient network of amateur reporters and investigators. During that time I remember one of the biggest scoops we came across was Project Bluebeam. We were able to get a copy and circulate it. Fanzines went out of fashion as the internet developed.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

You are too rude! I described social media as it was before you were born!!!!!

I am the same age as David Icke and I can assure you that the content of his early work simply reflected the subject matter under discussion in pubs and at festivals from the 70s onwards.

I am not accustomed to politely responding to sharp, demanding and curt questions. If you cannot thank me with good grace and manners then I recommend you do one. Rapidly. Otherwise I might drop the respect and treat you with more distain than you can handle.

Capiche?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 28
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Vanity.... for the most part! Also, I cannot bear being shouted at! As for being a former 'priest' of the 'Church of Satan' - give me a break! I don't believe him!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 28
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 28
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jane Harry's avatar

Speaking as a big fan of Passio here, I never trust anyone 100% (no, not even myself - myself least of all) and the more I like them or feel inclined to trust them the more I force myself to hold back....sad, but this is the world we live in. - anyway, about the 'priest in the church of satan...Anton LeVey' thing I never really got why Passio made so much of that, - so what? - not that I claim to know much about either, but I doubt very much it has much if anything to do with 'the Big Club' which runs the world - any more than you could say any church has much to do with the one true God....like them, it's probably nothing more than a bit of posturing, not even on the sidelines, but not even part of that world at all. It was nothing more than the 'cool gang' that Passio took up with when he was a kid. I can see why he would want to be up front about it, rather than have it 'discovered' and used against him, but I don't get why he uses it to burnish his credentials: it doesn't place him in the 'inner circle' or 'in the know' - his credentials really only come from the extensive research and reading he has evidently done since then, as an adult.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Anton LeVey was a con-artist! This extract from Encyclopaedia Britannica amused me immensely:

"LaVey’s persona was always greater than the Church of Satan, whose membership never exceeded about 2,000 people and which declined when a splinter group, the Temple of Set, formed in 1975 in response to LaVey’s selling of higher church offices. His fame was enhanced through his popular writings, the best known of which was The Satanic Bible. However, many of the claims he made about his past—including that he had had romantic affairs with the actresses Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield—were demonstrated by biographers and even by the Church of Satan to have been fabrications."

Chances are that Mark Passio BOUGHT his priesthood with cash or services rendered!! 😂🙄 There is more here:

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Anton-LaVey

Something that always confuses me about people who claim to be Satanists is the fact that, in order to believe in Satan, one first has to believe in the Biblical tale of angels being thrown out of heaven.

Mauro Biglino was contracted by the Vatican to make a fresh translation of original Hebrew and Greek copies of the Bible. He is a scholar of ancient languages. He discovered that many words and phrases had been completely misrepresented. When he presented his findings to the Vatican they were so upset that they cancelled his contract! They did not appreciate that he identified Yahweh as one of many 'gods'.

He publishes his work independently.

https://www.maurobiglino.com/en/video/

https://youtu.be/WijP_yczjbE?si=ujI5tinUGNP8tb4U

Expand full comment