Since writing this post I have been exploring other explanations. I found the following particularly interesting:
This video is 6 years old now but provides a surprising solution for electro-magnetic sensitivity.
Lookoutfercharlie tells us that our bodies are hosting a GMO fungal infection which forms a mostly invisible gluey surface on our skin and in our digestive system. He says that nano-particles of metals and fibres in the environment stick to the glue and turn us into antennae.
He has found a bathing protocol to break down that glue and stop it reforming.
Lots of weaselly "expert medical con-vid rats" are starting to leave the sinking Farma Ship for "calmer waters" to try to cover up/obfuscate their nefarious public comments/deeds/schemes. over the years. No peace for them. as they had a chance at the beginning to stand against the world-wide medical fascism & said things like: "Lock them down harder. - Bret Weinstein - May they all rot in hell forever.
Sabrina is painful to watch and there is something COINTELPRO about ingratiating groups (like Christians). Kingston and Mihalcea have both done it-makes me feel Christians are actually their enemy.
Here is a more rational way to give the same and even better info:
I am unimpressed by Sabrina Wallace now. I have tried very hard to substantiate her claims and to understand her lingo. I failed and now find her very irritating. Karen Kingston lost my attention when she pulled that ludicrous stunt to cover her holiday in Mexico. Dr Ana Mihalcea triggers my spidey sense and seems to be elbowing Dr Carnicom to one side by occupying the limelight which makes me think that he has the answer - i.e., we have synthetic bacteria species doing a lot of harm in the environment.
I get the impression, Proton, that we are very close to the target.... if not over it precisely.... I feel this way because recently I am constantly dealing with trolls and evangelists who comment on all my posts.
That Shawn Paul Melville bloke never misses an opportunity to ram his scalar wave devices down my throat on EVERY post I write. He is a mega pain the fucking arse.
A good summary of her work, if you're not too put off of her to listen, is here. Apparently the fellow that Jeff Rense interviewed on Nov. 8, 2023, Dr.
Eric Karlstrom, seems to have a pretty good grok of the situation that Sabrina has been trying to elucidate.
Since writing this post I have been exploring other explanations. I found the following particularly interesting:
This video is 6 years old now but provides a surprising solution for electro-magnetic sensitivity.
Lookoutfercharlie tells us that our bodies are hosting a GMO fungal infection which forms a mostly invisible gluey surface on our skin and in our digestive system. He says that nano-particles of metals and fibres in the environment stick to the glue and turn us into antennae.
He has found a bathing protocol to break down that glue and stop it reforming.
What is people's consensus on Sabrina? I watched about half a dozen of her videos, probably more, when Frances first mentioned her a couple of weeks ago. i was pretty impressed but also noticed that she couldn't be a scientist because she struggled with reading in general and especially with scientific words like "spectroscopy", putting the stresses in all the wrong places as though she had never heard the words spoken before. (There are a number of examples of this, most of which I can't immediately bring to mind.)
Now that's sort of fine by me and I'm generally more pro people who have done some thinking than those who have been endorsed by the now truly abysmal education system - it's astonishing the cretins they now roll out! But this half hour or so is just getting too batty and incoherent even for my very accomodating criteria. I'm usually fine with batty - not least because the spiritual side of this does take people to places that are awfully close to actual insanity (and some do briefly fall in and start believing they are Jesus/The Messiah etc.) so I'm happy to pick out the good bits from in between the paranoia and insane inferences. But I couldn't find a thread in this to hang on to, and I didn't really get the impression there was something she was trying to get across but just wasn't managing very well. I don't want to crush anyone who could well be perfectly sincere and that's why I'd like to know what other people's impressions are.
She's obviously naturally bright but that doesn't mean she intends to explain anything to anyone. The perfect example of this the Tattooed Monkey guy on Theoria Apophiosis (??sp). He's so intent you should believe he's hyper intelligent that he makes sure NOTHING is ever explained to you properly. He deliberately loses his audience in some quick-fire diatribe and then smugly crosses his arms, leans back and smirks, as though he's just concluded a session of blowing your mind. I have a reasonably solid science background, and if it's going over my head every time then he's not pitching it at a level where he wants it to be understood. Similarly with Sabrina, though we know there are some lacunae in her science understanding. Are we meant to have understood what she said (did anyone understand?) or are we meant to give her some benefit of the doubt because there are some personality elements that could be left over from government torture or difficult personal circumstances? Or is this the new trap for those who haven't been fully roped into of the many elaborate psyops on the Darpa menu today?
I've also watched a bunch of Sabrina's videos, and she's obviously been through some pretty traumatic stuff. What impresses me the most is how she can illustrate very technical concepts through the perspective of a network administrator, while tying it all into the human energy field and chakra. Not many people can fuse these two worlds. Much of it is over my head, but I see many people who I know and trust sharing her videos.
After Sabrina addressed me directly I listened several times to this particular video and chose to download it because Sabrina always removes such items from her Odysee channel. I had linked to several before only to be told that the links led nowhere after about a week.
I have never taken down a single article or video that I have made in all my time online so I found this very frustrating and suspicious.
I persisted in seeking out the spoken videos and listening to them intently, looking for some clarity. There has been none.
The first query that came to my mind centred around the assumption that we all have 'bio-sensors' in our bodies but when I researched the matter could find nothing whatsoever to confirm this and only saw such 'bio-sensors' being applied to sick people who required close monitoring. When I asked (in Odysee comments) I did not receive replies.
The next query I raised concerned Sabrina's insistence that our aura has been hijacked and depleted of energy. She also complains that the electrical nature of living things has been written out of education. I commented that this is untrue. We all know that electrical stimulation can restart a heart. We have seen it a thousand times on TV medical soap operas.
As you know, I studied and practised Traditional Chinese Medicine and in that modality the electrical circuitry of Qi or Chi is the most ancient and central premise.
I got a bit frustrated because none of my comments were being answered and then the videos were removed, so future replies were not likely to appear.
Since then, I have listened, often confused. Who is Sabrina addressing? Half the time she is raging against critics who are only named obliquely. Other times she is repeatedly flashing her marker pen cards which only serve to confuse me more.
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea has done a number of interviews in which she shows the nano technology that she has found in the blood of dozens of people. In her most recent substack post, she shows pictures of 'Septocaine Dental Anesthetic Mixed With Live Blood' Swarming with micro robots! You can't make this shit up. Sabrina's claims definitely don't seem that far out in this context!
Hi Frances (& Christian) - John Lukach has done independent work on same/similar subjects as those discussed by SW and explains very clearly how he believes
all this works. I've only read parts 1 & 2 thoroughly but I find his explanations much easier to understand than Sabrina's.
Take your time reading it Frances. It's not easy but much easier to understand than Sabrina. I'd love you to do an article on this. It would also be a logical follow-up to your article here. With the best will in the world, it's hard for average person to understand SW presentations. Lukach simplifies things for us. Maybe also share with your son to see what he thinks? I saw JL posted 1st 2 links under one of Latypova's recent articles. When I last looked, she'd still ignored. At least she's not calling him a nutjob. She wouldn't dare.
Kerrylyn, for me to post about this issue would require me to do a degree of study first. It just is not my area of knowledge. I am not a scientist so I will leave the exploration of this matter to others. However, if shilly Latypova ignores it then it is probably true! lol
Oh, good! That means it won't matter if I eventually lose interest too. :) :)
I am interested in this sort of stuff but I was wondering if I wasn't getting sucked into another meaningless rabbit hole. The shop fronts are getting VERY sophisticated these days and actually one of my worries was that she has that intelligence operative IQ of either side of the 120 mark which allows them to pull off most things (except obviously get a life of their own or develop a sense of shame).
Actually I'm not sure I know what I'm interested in any more. I hardly need to be warned of any more conspiracies in the world. If you want to go to a planet of lies, or where everything is absolutely upside down, then this would have to be the #1 Trivago destination. :) And on the spiritual development side I'm actually pretty shagged out with the whole thing and wouldn't mind a rest back in the material world for a while. :) The trouble is they can completely disempower you by keeping you distracted on some arm of nothingness for your entire life. The more I look at these things, the more I see sidelining people for entire lifetimes as one of their key aims. I think this is why they don't mind whole swathes of knowledge being on a foundation of complete fiction. The realm of viruses, for example, much of "theoretical" Physics and subatomic Physics as steered from 1913 onwards, and almost everything spiritual, especially if it's structured. My only aversion to taking a rest on the spiritual front is I do think it gives you a clearer mind, probably slightly higher intelligence but, most of all, a perspective that is not only higher (when you are in the right mood) but is also at the opposite end to the controllers' brand of smothering insanity.
"#1 Trivago destination" made me laugh! Can you see the potential intergalactic adverts? "Do you relish confusion? Love to try your hand at unravelling nonsense? Then come to Planet Earth, where you will be surrounded by some of the best nonsense that the indigenous can possibly dream up for your excursion! Take part in their topsy turvy illogical world and be infinitely grateful for your flight home!" 🤣😂
Yes, I missed my forte in advertising due to an irritating fundamental morality! I was so proud of that flight of imagination that I created a Substack Note from it -
Yup. Lying is written into the job contract. And, at the very least, you won't do well without it.
Actually, advertising has become a micromodel of the world today. Everything has an element of deception in it, which is assumed. They then wonder why they can't get at the truth and why they have this curious feeling all might not be quite right with the world. Yet at the same time they say out loud "They wouldn't lie to us, would they? Why would they lie to us?".
Glad to have made you laugh and glad to have helped inspire your little foray. Cxx
she's quite smart (Sabrina) but not on the spinning wobbly bouncing earth ball!! she needs to dig into that research. There is so much information on this subject.
Her comments have been misinterpreted here by you and others so I will clear it up. She DOES NOT believe in the heliocentric consensus of space/physics. She mentions the firmament and criticizes NASA and the space liars like Shatner/dick rocket boys extensively. Both are mentioned in this video:
Hi PM. Just subscribed to your substack. Read quite a few of your articles this weekend. You are very discerning so I was interested in the comments you've made here re. SW. I sort of agree, but I don't trust my judgement. I've already been "sucked in" by many. I'm trying to work out precisely why SW would be trying to distract us. All the info she presents on WBAN, biofields etc. can't be considered a distraction can it?
Thanks Kerrylyn! She's not distracting, her nutty demeanor, quirky placards she can't hold straight for 2 sec, rapid and hard to follow speech/messy room and self (in other vids) means she is associating true info with nutty people so that the masses (not people who know it's true) will conclude that anyone with the truths she says is nutty and the info is nutty. This video here is making a traumatized and quirky persona (w/the spooky music), this will help associate these traits with her other vids that tell the truth. That is a propaganda strategy called "discredit by association" also called poisoning the well. I don't think I said distraction nor that her info wasn't true, if I did pls send me the comment link and I will adjust it. She is taking up band width from more reasonable and rational presenters who have the same info as well. Take care.
Thanks PM. I was probably misinterpreting what you said. Who, in yr opinion, would be an easier person to listen to - i.e. someone who presents the same truth in a more reasonable way? I find SW really hard going, Also, do you think people who are studying nanotech in jabs are aware of her work? It seems relevant and would explain a lot of the questions they raise. I'm actually getting tired of watching Nixon's videos, for example. He doesn't try to draw any conclusions. Seems like he's having fun. He's also hard to listen to. Actually I'm probably being unfair.
but still, this is very murky area, a "complexity jungle" with a mix of real stuff and decoys, like what is mRNA doing with LNPs, what does it code for if anything, get into DNA? etc. There's references but these are lab studies, what part of all this is in the shots? I have never seen a Pharma CMC or preclin pk or pd study. Remember there's lots of studies on Sars-Cov-2 and even bioweaponed Covid, and sars genes put into DNA, but all of these are red herrings. We do know there is no Sars virus (or any virus) and that the shots have nanotech looking things, and no spike protein in shots. I would be very cautious before making conclusions about mechanisms and complexities but you can still take it in.
Just stay away from shots, eating animals that had shots. processed food, many drugs if not all, and any source of EMF. If you live in the US, well it's hard to get away from the air that they have poisoned....
This is what I suspected and mentioned in my previous comments , I ve heard these stories before very very similar. My heart goes out to all these beings, everyone should listen carefully and take this into consideration before quickly being critical. We are living in very real science fiction reality and have been for quite a while . SK
Truly a great read Francis. You are my number one person that I follow. I will be upgrading once I catch up on some credit card debt. Yes, i am enslaved like many. Not for long though.
Thanks, my daughter was talking about them last night. We watched a french movie years ago about Catherine, calle La reine Margot. I will check out your link, and I thank you very much!
She is so smart, but I find it a chasllenge to really understand what she is talking about. It is all over the place in just about every video. I would like to get to know her better and hear about her life story. Thanks for sharing, and I do believe we can learn so much from her.
Yes, I agree she is very genuine despite what other might be sensing. I think she is very special indeed and can be of importance to humanity. I would love to know her story and wish she would write a book.
Her personal history is not related to her engineering talk unless she is persona crafting, to get you to either feel sorry for her, or that she is nutty, or both.
She is clearly acting a role in order to poison the well of truthers who are warning of nanotech in shots and other ways of making humans part of a computer network. The music just adds to the theater.
I dont agree with that peception , I dont see any poison in the well with the ACTUALL info she has shown , whether you believe her story or not isnt the important thing , can you disprove the important info she has shown , and by the way , its very risky to do so.
I dont think you understand what poisoning the well is. It has nothing to do with THE CONTENT of what she says, it is because she attaches all her truths to her nutty demeanor and presentation making the masses disbelieve anyone who might talk about that. This is standard propaganda tool.
She doesn't fit your mold so she's an agent. Right.
"she attaches all her truths to her nutty demeanor and presentation making the masses disbelieve anyone who might talk about that. "
I disagree. Through lived experience she just gives zero f*cks to be anything but genuine/authentic. She won't bend to fit your or others molds... too bad... it doesnt cancel or devalue what she has to say especially when most of us can just see and accept it for what it is.
If you have a problem, take what you will that is truthful and present it in a manner you feel is better or will be effective.
I never said anything cancels or devalues WHAT she says, I have said above that what she says is true. So you are putting words in my mouth. I also never said anything about "molds" nor called her an "agent", so you are putting more words in my mouth. I do believe she is a "discredit by association" person, I didn't say that was by intent or not. You don't have to agree with that I really don't care. But that is not a mold I wish or do not wish, you are twisting what I said in many ways. I have also put many things that I think are truthful in my own substack in about 70 posts. Perhaps you can share what you have written or reported publicly to help the world, but I don't see a Substack attached to your name. Anyway, please try to be more polite in the comments.
Prompted by a comment to your post, I read an essay I had downloaded August 2021: "Hiroshima Is A Lie" by David Swanson. I was particularly taken by the following quote: "And he [Howard Zinn] blames everyone involved [in the bombing] . . . for the most powerful motive of all: the habit of obedience, the universal teaching of all cultures, not to get out of line, not even to think about that which one has not been assigned to think about, the negative motive or not having either a reason or a will to intercede."
My comment is about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, see the scientific proofs in the Palmer vid and try to debunk it. Then, in addition you can tell us why you think bridges and concrete bldgs survive a nuke which would be so hot as to scorch everything. If you see the dozens of Japanese cities in the
Why Explosive Nuclear Devices May Not Exist.pdf
post that were fire bombed, they look exactly like Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I've always liked that Trinity paper from Miles and I agree with him that it's horseshit from start to finish. But the truly compelling aspect is simply the decision over whether we should have bombed Japan at all, which is truly bizarre unless it's viewed from the perspective of what POWER would do. There was no pressing need or urgency to nuke Japan - even if one puts on one side the notional risks of letting off a nuke for the first or second time - and the story is that they had been looking for terms to bring their war to an end. So why would we put such an indelible blot on humanity if not to scare the world shitless? And if we go through all their "global scale" events they've never needed an actual or real threat to get the job done. But what they do love is bottomless pits for money to disappear into and nuclear definitely fits that bill (and still does).
And it's amazing what they get away with. A couple of years back they were upgrading the guidance on, I think, the B62 missile system. The photos I saw reminded me of nothing so much as something I might have knocked up in a metal workshop in an afternoon. There was nothing much above "handyman" level yet people were expected to look at these photos in awe, because they were "nuclear" missiles. The cost was something like $36 million a piece, which is one helluva return on half a day of artisanal wages!
Nukes would "exist" even if they didn't. And Japan would have been "nuked" even if they had had nothing to do it with (which they didn't). It's just FAR too valuable a propaganda moment to pass up.
(P.S. Incidentally, the political need to bomb Japan is a good identifier of Satan's shills and cocksucking minions. There was never any political need but they want you to not realise how great the power need for it was, and they will argue this point till the cows come home.)
Read this.... it leaves Sabrina Wallace standing in her fear porn!
https://archive.org/details/thomas-bearden-gravitobiology-a-new-biophysics/page/18/mode/1up
Since writing this post I have been exploring other explanations. I found the following particularly interesting:
This video is 6 years old now but provides a surprising solution for electro-magnetic sensitivity.
Lookoutfercharlie tells us that our bodies are hosting a GMO fungal infection which forms a mostly invisible gluey surface on our skin and in our digestive system. He says that nano-particles of metals and fibres in the environment stick to the glue and turn us into antennae.
He has found a bathing protocol to break down that glue and stop it reforming.
youtu.be/cXzKaKoW65U
Hi Frances - I hope you are doing better now & sending good energy /best wishes & much love.
Just posted my comment below as related to your video here (shared it) over at Sage Hana recent stack. https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dr-drew-originally-said-that-coronavirus/comment/47904260
A commenter there shared Sabrina Wallace links & asked Sage about whether s/he'd shared any info w/subs on Wallace. Here's the specific comment thread > https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dr-drew-originally-said-that-coronavirus/comment/47792074
Sages's article was on the so-called "freedom fighter" Dr Drew on his scam-demic flip flops in 2020. https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dr-drew-originally-said-that-coronavirus
Lots of weaselly "expert medical con-vid rats" are starting to leave the sinking Farma Ship for "calmer waters" to try to cover up/obfuscate their nefarious public comments/deeds/schemes. over the years. No peace for them. as they had a chance at the beginning to stand against the world-wide medical fascism & said things like: "Lock them down harder. - Bret Weinstein - May they all rot in hell forever.
Hi all.
It really helps for me to slow the videos down on playback. .75
Sabrina is painful to watch and there is something COINTELPRO about ingratiating groups (like Christians). Kingston and Mihalcea have both done it-makes me feel Christians are actually their enemy.
Here is a more rational way to give the same and even better info:
https://odysee.com/@WatchTheSpell:2/the-intra-body-nano-network-compilation:0
Yes, I have seen that video.
I am unimpressed by Sabrina Wallace now. I have tried very hard to substantiate her claims and to understand her lingo. I failed and now find her very irritating. Karen Kingston lost my attention when she pulled that ludicrous stunt to cover her holiday in Mexico. Dr Ana Mihalcea triggers my spidey sense and seems to be elbowing Dr Carnicom to one side by occupying the limelight which makes me think that he has the answer - i.e., we have synthetic bacteria species doing a lot of harm in the environment.
I get the impression, Proton, that we are very close to the target.... if not over it precisely.... I feel this way because recently I am constantly dealing with trolls and evangelists who comment on all my posts.
That Shawn Paul Melville bloke never misses an opportunity to ram his scalar wave devices down my throat on EVERY post I write. He is a mega pain the fucking arse.
A good summary of her work, if you're not too put off of her to listen, is here. Apparently the fellow that Jeff Rense interviewed on Nov. 8, 2023, Dr.
Eric Karlstrom, seems to have a pretty good grok of the situation that Sabrina has been trying to elucidate.
https://rense.com/general97/electronic-warfare-and-civilian-targeting-program.php
Another interesting summary is from Telestai on Substack:
https://telestai.substack.com/p/sabrina-wallace?r=10r0gt&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Since writing this post I have been exploring other explanations. I found the following particularly interesting:
This video is 6 years old now but provides a surprising solution for electro-magnetic sensitivity.
Lookoutfercharlie tells us that our bodies are hosting a GMO fungal infection which forms a mostly invisible gluey surface on our skin and in our digestive system. He says that nano-particles of metals and fibres in the environment stick to the glue and turn us into antennae.
He has found a bathing protocol to break down that glue and stop it reforming.
youtu.be/cXzKaKoW65U
🎯
What is people's consensus on Sabrina? I watched about half a dozen of her videos, probably more, when Frances first mentioned her a couple of weeks ago. i was pretty impressed but also noticed that she couldn't be a scientist because she struggled with reading in general and especially with scientific words like "spectroscopy", putting the stresses in all the wrong places as though she had never heard the words spoken before. (There are a number of examples of this, most of which I can't immediately bring to mind.)
Now that's sort of fine by me and I'm generally more pro people who have done some thinking than those who have been endorsed by the now truly abysmal education system - it's astonishing the cretins they now roll out! But this half hour or so is just getting too batty and incoherent even for my very accomodating criteria. I'm usually fine with batty - not least because the spiritual side of this does take people to places that are awfully close to actual insanity (and some do briefly fall in and start believing they are Jesus/The Messiah etc.) so I'm happy to pick out the good bits from in between the paranoia and insane inferences. But I couldn't find a thread in this to hang on to, and I didn't really get the impression there was something she was trying to get across but just wasn't managing very well. I don't want to crush anyone who could well be perfectly sincere and that's why I'd like to know what other people's impressions are.
She's obviously naturally bright but that doesn't mean she intends to explain anything to anyone. The perfect example of this the Tattooed Monkey guy on Theoria Apophiosis (??sp). He's so intent you should believe he's hyper intelligent that he makes sure NOTHING is ever explained to you properly. He deliberately loses his audience in some quick-fire diatribe and then smugly crosses his arms, leans back and smirks, as though he's just concluded a session of blowing your mind. I have a reasonably solid science background, and if it's going over my head every time then he's not pitching it at a level where he wants it to be understood. Similarly with Sabrina, though we know there are some lacunae in her science understanding. Are we meant to have understood what she said (did anyone understand?) or are we meant to give her some benefit of the doubt because there are some personality elements that could be left over from government torture or difficult personal circumstances? Or is this the new trap for those who haven't been fully roped into of the many elaborate psyops on the Darpa menu today?
I've also watched a bunch of Sabrina's videos, and she's obviously been through some pretty traumatic stuff. What impresses me the most is how she can illustrate very technical concepts through the perspective of a network administrator, while tying it all into the human energy field and chakra. Not many people can fuse these two worlds. Much of it is over my head, but I see many people who I know and trust sharing her videos.
After Sabrina addressed me directly I listened several times to this particular video and chose to download it because Sabrina always removes such items from her Odysee channel. I had linked to several before only to be told that the links led nowhere after about a week.
I have never taken down a single article or video that I have made in all my time online so I found this very frustrating and suspicious.
I persisted in seeking out the spoken videos and listening to them intently, looking for some clarity. There has been none.
The first query that came to my mind centred around the assumption that we all have 'bio-sensors' in our bodies but when I researched the matter could find nothing whatsoever to confirm this and only saw such 'bio-sensors' being applied to sick people who required close monitoring. When I asked (in Odysee comments) I did not receive replies.
The next query I raised concerned Sabrina's insistence that our aura has been hijacked and depleted of energy. She also complains that the electrical nature of living things has been written out of education. I commented that this is untrue. We all know that electrical stimulation can restart a heart. We have seen it a thousand times on TV medical soap operas.
As you know, I studied and practised Traditional Chinese Medicine and in that modality the electrical circuitry of Qi or Chi is the most ancient and central premise.
I got a bit frustrated because none of my comments were being answered and then the videos were removed, so future replies were not likely to appear.
Since then, I have listened, often confused. Who is Sabrina addressing? Half the time she is raging against critics who are only named obliquely. Other times she is repeatedly flashing her marker pen cards which only serve to confuse me more.
Upshot of all this?
I lost interest.
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea has done a number of interviews in which she shows the nano technology that she has found in the blood of dozens of people. In her most recent substack post, she shows pictures of 'Septocaine Dental Anesthetic Mixed With Live Blood' Swarming with micro robots! You can't make this shit up. Sabrina's claims definitely don't seem that far out in this context!
https://youtu.be/uAg-wSoYib8?si=V9w5C6HRIsnbSq_R you might find this interesting :)
Hi Frances (& Christian) - John Lukach has done independent work on same/similar subjects as those discussed by SW and explains very clearly how he believes
all this works. I've only read parts 1 & 2 thoroughly but I find his explanations much easier to understand than Sabrina's.
http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-one ;
http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-two ;
http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-three ;
http://estateartistry.com/blog/this-is-only-a-test ;
Take your time reading it Frances. It's not easy but much easier to understand than Sabrina. I'd love you to do an article on this. It would also be a logical follow-up to your article here. With the best will in the world, it's hard for average person to understand SW presentations. Lukach simplifies things for us. Maybe also share with your son to see what he thinks? I saw JL posted 1st 2 links under one of Latypova's recent articles. When I last looked, she'd still ignored. At least she's not calling him a nutjob. She wouldn't dare.
Kerrylyn, for me to post about this issue would require me to do a degree of study first. It just is not my area of knowledge. I am not a scientist so I will leave the exploration of this matter to others. However, if shilly Latypova ignores it then it is probably true! lol
Oh, good! That means it won't matter if I eventually lose interest too. :) :)
I am interested in this sort of stuff but I was wondering if I wasn't getting sucked into another meaningless rabbit hole. The shop fronts are getting VERY sophisticated these days and actually one of my worries was that she has that intelligence operative IQ of either side of the 120 mark which allows them to pull off most things (except obviously get a life of their own or develop a sense of shame).
Actually I'm not sure I know what I'm interested in any more. I hardly need to be warned of any more conspiracies in the world. If you want to go to a planet of lies, or where everything is absolutely upside down, then this would have to be the #1 Trivago destination. :) And on the spiritual development side I'm actually pretty shagged out with the whole thing and wouldn't mind a rest back in the material world for a while. :) The trouble is they can completely disempower you by keeping you distracted on some arm of nothingness for your entire life. The more I look at these things, the more I see sidelining people for entire lifetimes as one of their key aims. I think this is why they don't mind whole swathes of knowledge being on a foundation of complete fiction. The realm of viruses, for example, much of "theoretical" Physics and subatomic Physics as steered from 1913 onwards, and almost everything spiritual, especially if it's structured. My only aversion to taking a rest on the spiritual front is I do think it gives you a clearer mind, probably slightly higher intelligence but, most of all, a perspective that is not only higher (when you are in the right mood) but is also at the opposite end to the controllers' brand of smothering insanity.
"#1 Trivago destination" made me laugh! Can you see the potential intergalactic adverts? "Do you relish confusion? Love to try your hand at unravelling nonsense? Then come to Planet Earth, where you will be surrounded by some of the best nonsense that the indigenous can possibly dream up for your excursion! Take part in their topsy turvy illogical world and be infinitely grateful for your flight home!" 🤣😂
That's a great bit of copywriting! Form an orderly queue for the sequel to Total Recall. We take you to the planet where the insanity began! 🤣😂
Yes, I missed my forte in advertising due to an irritating fundamental morality! I was so proud of that flight of imagination that I created a Substack Note from it -
https://substack.com/@francesleader/note/c-41448009
Yup. Lying is written into the job contract. And, at the very least, you won't do well without it.
Actually, advertising has become a micromodel of the world today. Everything has an element of deception in it, which is assumed. They then wonder why they can't get at the truth and why they have this curious feeling all might not be quite right with the world. Yet at the same time they say out loud "They wouldn't lie to us, would they? Why would they lie to us?".
Glad to have made you laugh and glad to have helped inspire your little foray. Cxx
she's quite smart (Sabrina) but not on the spinning wobbly bouncing earth ball!! she needs to dig into that research. There is so much information on this subject.
Her comments have been misinterpreted here by you and others so I will clear it up. She DOES NOT believe in the heliocentric consensus of space/physics. She mentions the firmament and criticizes NASA and the space liars like Shatner/dick rocket boys extensively. Both are mentioned in this video:
https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f/trim.C2C6AE4C-ED1F-43F6-996E-AD205EA4BFE5:c
thanks for clarifying, this is very good news.
It's just another strange thing to make and take down your videos. A "get 'em while their hot" dig?
Hi PM. Just subscribed to your substack. Read quite a few of your articles this weekend. You are very discerning so I was interested in the comments you've made here re. SW. I sort of agree, but I don't trust my judgement. I've already been "sucked in" by many. I'm trying to work out precisely why SW would be trying to distract us. All the info she presents on WBAN, biofields etc. can't be considered a distraction can it?
Thanks Kerrylyn! She's not distracting, her nutty demeanor, quirky placards she can't hold straight for 2 sec, rapid and hard to follow speech/messy room and self (in other vids) means she is associating true info with nutty people so that the masses (not people who know it's true) will conclude that anyone with the truths she says is nutty and the info is nutty. This video here is making a traumatized and quirky persona (w/the spooky music), this will help associate these traits with her other vids that tell the truth. That is a propaganda strategy called "discredit by association" also called poisoning the well. I don't think I said distraction nor that her info wasn't true, if I did pls send me the comment link and I will adjust it. She is taking up band width from more reasonable and rational presenters who have the same info as well. Take care.
Thanks PM. I was probably misinterpreting what you said. Who, in yr opinion, would be an easier person to listen to - i.e. someone who presents the same truth in a more reasonable way? I find SW really hard going, Also, do you think people who are studying nanotech in jabs are aware of her work? It seems relevant and would explain a lot of the questions they raise. I'm actually getting tired of watching Nixon's videos, for example. He doesn't try to draw any conclusions. Seems like he's having fun. He's also hard to listen to. Actually I'm probably being unfair.
Maybe this guy, but I've just read him recently.
forgot link?
Ah, here
https://shawnpaulmelville.substack.com/p/mrna-graphene-quantum-dots-injection
Also Outraged Human on SS., Dr. Robert Young.
but still, this is very murky area, a "complexity jungle" with a mix of real stuff and decoys, like what is mRNA doing with LNPs, what does it code for if anything, get into DNA? etc. There's references but these are lab studies, what part of all this is in the shots? I have never seen a Pharma CMC or preclin pk or pd study. Remember there's lots of studies on Sars-Cov-2 and even bioweaponed Covid, and sars genes put into DNA, but all of these are red herrings. We do know there is no Sars virus (or any virus) and that the shots have nanotech looking things, and no spike protein in shots. I would be very cautious before making conclusions about mechanisms and complexities but you can still take it in.
Just stay away from shots, eating animals that had shots. processed food, many drugs if not all, and any source of EMF. If you live in the US, well it's hard to get away from the air that they have poisoned....
This is what I suspected and mentioned in my previous comments , I ve heard these stories before very very similar. My heart goes out to all these beings, everyone should listen carefully and take this into consideration before quickly being critical. We are living in very real science fiction reality and have been for quite a while . SK
What was the Medici part of what she said? Anybody?
She was referencing my work - Black Nobility 101. The Medici are an important family in global affairs. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
Truly a great read Francis. You are my number one person that I follow. I will be upgrading once I catch up on some credit card debt. Yes, i am enslaved like many. Not for long though.
Thanks, my daughter was talking about them last night. We watched a french movie years ago about Catherine, calle La reine Margot. I will check out your link, and I thank you very much!
She is so smart, but I find it a chasllenge to really understand what she is talking about. It is all over the place in just about every video. I would like to get to know her better and hear about her life story. Thanks for sharing, and I do believe we can learn so much from her.
This is how you know she is truly genius.
Yes, I agree she is very genuine despite what other might be sensing. I think she is very special indeed and can be of importance to humanity. I would love to know her story and wish she would write a book.
This video proves:
She can get her appearance together.
She can have a normal looking room.
She can speak normally for a few minutes.
Her personal history is not related to her engineering talk unless she is persona crafting, to get you to either feel sorry for her, or that she is nutty, or both.
She is clearly acting a role in order to poison the well of truthers who are warning of nanotech in shots and other ways of making humans part of a computer network. The music just adds to the theater.
I dont agree with that peception , I dont see any poison in the well with the ACTUALL info she has shown , whether you believe her story or not isnt the important thing , can you disprove the important info she has shown , and by the way , its very risky to do so.
I dont think you understand what poisoning the well is. It has nothing to do with THE CONTENT of what she says, it is because she attaches all her truths to her nutty demeanor and presentation making the masses disbelieve anyone who might talk about that. This is standard propaganda tool.
She doesn't fit your mold so she's an agent. Right.
"she attaches all her truths to her nutty demeanor and presentation making the masses disbelieve anyone who might talk about that. "
I disagree. Through lived experience she just gives zero f*cks to be anything but genuine/authentic. She won't bend to fit your or others molds... too bad... it doesnt cancel or devalue what she has to say especially when most of us can just see and accept it for what it is.
If you have a problem, take what you will that is truthful and present it in a manner you feel is better or will be effective.
I never said anything cancels or devalues WHAT she says, I have said above that what she says is true. So you are putting words in my mouth. I also never said anything about "molds" nor called her an "agent", so you are putting more words in my mouth. I do believe she is a "discredit by association" person, I didn't say that was by intent or not. You don't have to agree with that I really don't care. But that is not a mold I wish or do not wish, you are twisting what I said in many ways. I have also put many things that I think are truthful in my own substack in about 70 posts. Perhaps you can share what you have written or reported publicly to help the world, but I don't see a Substack attached to your name. Anyway, please try to be more polite in the comments.
With respect to Sabrina and all who believe in her, for me truth does not resonate here, but maybe that's just me getting it wrong.
Hmmm, my question on another thread is half answered
https://open.substack.com/pub/startlemag/p/utopia-pusher-memes?utm_source=share&utm_mediumx=android&r=b7m4j Watching now at silly o clock. Meanwhile enjoy....
Prompted by a comment to your post, I read an essay I had downloaded August 2021: "Hiroshima Is A Lie" by David Swanson. I was particularly taken by the following quote: "And he [Howard Zinn] blames everyone involved [in the bombing] . . . for the most powerful motive of all: the habit of obedience, the universal teaching of all cultures, not to get out of line, not even to think about that which one has not been assigned to think about, the negative motive or not having either a reason or a will to intercede."
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed
https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/michael-palmer-atomic
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
https://jermwarfare.docdroid.com/SIhL0M5/why-explosive-nuclear-devices-may-not-exist-pdf
Disagree and to those saying Nukes dont exist , I would say your very incorrect.
My comment is about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, see the scientific proofs in the Palmer vid and try to debunk it. Then, in addition you can tell us why you think bridges and concrete bldgs survive a nuke which would be so hot as to scorch everything. If you see the dozens of Japanese cities in the
Why Explosive Nuclear Devices May Not Exist.pdf
post that were fire bombed, they look exactly like Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Better if you have data not just statements.
I've always liked that Trinity paper from Miles and I agree with him that it's horseshit from start to finish. But the truly compelling aspect is simply the decision over whether we should have bombed Japan at all, which is truly bizarre unless it's viewed from the perspective of what POWER would do. There was no pressing need or urgency to nuke Japan - even if one puts on one side the notional risks of letting off a nuke for the first or second time - and the story is that they had been looking for terms to bring their war to an end. So why would we put such an indelible blot on humanity if not to scare the world shitless? And if we go through all their "global scale" events they've never needed an actual or real threat to get the job done. But what they do love is bottomless pits for money to disappear into and nuclear definitely fits that bill (and still does).
And it's amazing what they get away with. A couple of years back they were upgrading the guidance on, I think, the B62 missile system. The photos I saw reminded me of nothing so much as something I might have knocked up in a metal workshop in an afternoon. There was nothing much above "handyman" level yet people were expected to look at these photos in awe, because they were "nuclear" missiles. The cost was something like $36 million a piece, which is one helluva return on half a day of artisanal wages!
Nukes would "exist" even if they didn't. And Japan would have been "nuked" even if they had had nothing to do it with (which they didn't). It's just FAR too valuable a propaganda moment to pass up.
(P.S. Incidentally, the political need to bomb Japan is a good identifier of Satan's shills and cocksucking minions. There was never any political need but they want you to not realise how great the power need for it was, and they will argue this point till the cows come home.)
I agree with your perspective here this topic. We can agree to disagree on other things... that's human and respectful.