16 Comments
User's avatar
Ivan M. Paton's avatar

Hi Frances, thanks for the link to this article of yours. This confirms a suspicion I have long had about the Enclosure Acts, which began in the early 1700s and continued until about 1900, broke the "Social Contract" drove the serfs, read SLAVES, off the lands and into the ghettos, where they died in great numbers, were reduce to utter poverty, terrible health, and wage slavery, which the British establishment had worked out was cheaper and more profitable than serfdom, and I believe this is the REAL REASON that Britain worked to end slavery worldwide, which in many places, (e.g. Thailand), was not as cruel and vicious as western slave owners, and thus not only gave slaves homes, food, and a roof over their heads, but that made it difficult for the global Monopoly Capitalists to compete - so they worked over time to end slavery, to bring everyone down to their parasitic level.

Ah, I rant. So much to rant about. 2,000 years of catching up.

Expand full comment
Kerry's avatar

Thanks for a great article and a timely warning. The reason for the creation of the education system by the British Empire is similar according to Sugata Mitra. He calls it the bureaucratic administrative machine. I remember the first time I heard this talk how excited I felt about the idea of education that expands the mind rather than put it in a box. https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_build_a_school_in_the_cloud I don't have children but I get the strong impression that most schooling is still about indoctrination of one kind or another and not sadly, on learning to be human.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Excellent article, as usual, my lovely.

How cynical we have all become, eh? But with DAMN GOOD REASON, as the real cynicism lies in the hearts of the heartless, and those whose minds are utterly depraved by psychosis...

I hope God aka The Divine aka The Holy Whateveritis will have mercy on their broken souls, because I certainly can't do it, don't wanna do it, won't do it. I would only be interested in an nice, cold, grey cell for them, and in single occupancy...

Baaaarrrrrrrrrroof!

xo xo

Expand full comment
Ivan M. Paton's avatar

A bullet works better. And it's cheaper.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Well, yes. That's one way. I'd rather see things be less bloody, because it's rarely one-sided. But I certainly understand the impulse!

Expand full comment
MoonshineJones's avatar

Good ideas, & movements always seem to be subverted at some point, in this world, maybe its the nature of this construct.

Thank you for sharing, have a great day.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

It's pretty much how the nutritional and dietary guidance was created.

The RDI and vitamin mineral limits are based on what does it take to adequately keep a human alive.

Not what makes a human thrive.

All countries have their daily RDI tables and governmental standards based on data collated to keep a human "fit for duty". Slight variations from country to country but so minimally as to be irrelevant. Yet we still have public health and private practices operating on this flat out BS.😐🤔🤔🤨

In fact we have another pharma funded supplementation industry, full of BS, fillers, toxic excipients and plasticised nanoparticulates, all using this same garbage paradigm. Vitamins sand minerals are not BS, but supplements are. Flat out reason- the body does not utilise them the same way it does when obtained via food and environment. BUT the food systems and environment is in no way, at the same standard it was 100 years ago. 😐🤔🤔

This is why regenerative farming (which restores the vitamin and mineral content AKA known as electrons😉), is the only practice that creates healthy food. Which is why Hippocrates, a lifestyle advocate physician in ancient Greece, is often attributed the popular quote, "Let food be your medicine, and medicine your food."

Expand full comment
:Carl-david:'s avatar

A primary reason for calling on the 'colonials' in war was because they tended to be very fit and healthy. My Grandfather told us about the miserable and sick British soldiers.

Expand full comment
Paul Black's avatar

Fascinating article. I knew a little but this fills in all the gaps. Will dig out some stuff I found more recently that should interest you.

Expand full comment
Paul Black's avatar

Found it. Sent to a pal a few years ago. Yes the myth about the NHS has been deliberately propagated. In early January 2021 Julia Hartley-Brewer had an interview with Chris Hopson the chief executive of NHS Providers who was uber arrogant and demanding apologies from her over misinformation! https://www.facebook.com/1755738667993232/posts/2991258291107924/

After the Hartley Brewer interview I found this transcript and slideshow from 2016...

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/.../chris-hopson...

At 4 minutes he talks about the expected funding gaps in 20/21 (see slide).

"So effectively, here is the 2021 money problem and money gap, and our view is that we think there are two different ways of describing this. One way effectively starts from today and the other way is you start from a 2021 gap and work back, and our observation would be one way you could describe it is “look guys if you look at the CCG allocations for the next three or four years, they effectively are gonna only go up by 2% and we know there’s likely to be a 4% annual demand and cost increase”. So there is a gap there each year, so effectively the question that you’re asking, if you ask the question that way is “how do you cope with that gap?”.

Now our argument would be that if you asked the question in that way, I think there’s a sense of it might look possible, it certainly feels realistic and it seems to us where that kind of tends to point you towards is perhaps more on demand avoidance and efficiencies. They probably looked, because you’re starting from the left today, and looking forward, it may not encourage you to perhaps look at radical transformation. Our view is that we’ve potentially got ourselves into a pickle by looking at it in the other way and this is what we think has happened, which effectively is, we’ve monetised, we’ve turned into a financial figure that 4% demand and cost growth to 2020/2021 and you will all be familiar with that £30 billion figure in the five year forward view, so what we’ve done effectively is to chop that £30 billion figure up between the 44 STP footprints and effectively said to each STP footprint here is your 2020/21 financial gap and you’ve got to effectively, working backwards, work out how you’re going to fill it.

One of the observations that a number of our provider chief executives have been making is that actually that gap may not be accurate and I think more importantly potentially, in most STP areas that looks like a scarily large gap. So we know for example that in one of the biggest STPs, so we’re talking about West Yorkshire which covers a population base of over 2 million, they have a £billion gap by 2021 to cover, most of the STP gaps look like that in that 300 to 900 million range." Then I started looking at NHS STP. Beds dropped from 240000 in 2000 to 165000 now. The amalgamation of Social Care, NHS and Health initiatives in the community to reduce demand still further was supposed to be complete by April 2021. But then the Plandemic was announced and here we are. UK Column already covered the Cygnus report which was also suppressed to prevent public panic! https://www.ukcolumn.org/.../exercise-cygnus-uk...

I just found it oddly convenient we had a year where the NHS was running a skeleton service (No pun intended!) and democide happened under a so called pandemic. It was planned and modelled with accompanying messaging and behavioural psychology techniques to mess with public perceptions and emotional blackmail. Still "Protecting the NHS" is a mantra but very few realise it was a "false flag" of the governments making. For further background this article is worth reading properly https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/.../health-wellbeing-boards...

Also the wealth transfer to SERCO for contact tracing, PPE procurement scandal, PCR testing, vaccine costs when cheap treatments are available etc etc.

Evil Genius and long planned.

Expand full comment
Kurt Schutzmann's avatar

The NHS was never intended to help anyone … “healthcare” is a means to an end … how to have people corral themselves and then cull themselves … we are in for some very dark times … these bastards are just getting warmed up …

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Agreed. They are setting up their mother of all false flag events:

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-mother-of-all-false-flag-events

Expand full comment
Kurt Schutzmann's avatar

And what better way to monitor the impact of the things they do than to “care” for those impacted using “healthcare” …

Expand full comment
Mrs S's avatar

Yes the NHS was produced to produce fit cannon fodder.

It was set up to use Rockefeller allopathic medicines which don't cure anything. They just 'treat' (suppress) the symptoms, enabling the unwell person to return quickly to the battlefield.

Rockefeller used homeopathy for himself and his family. So do the royal family.

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

interesting. especially considering another travesty that happened in 1948 (a sovereign nation being handed over to the control of and violent settlement by a well known moneyed religious group)

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

It was a year of great preparation for WW3, wasn't it? Even the UN was just formed and produced their Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.

I find that document particularly galling because we still have not seen the first Article activated in the world..... sigh.

"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Expand full comment