Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frances Leader's avatar

This video was submitted by Angie as a better explanation of Sabrina's message:

https://old.bitchute.com/video/6W8Yi37LEZBw/

It is very useful from the 20th minute forward BUT the implementation of nanotech in healthy people has NO EVIDENCE ANYWHERE.

From the 50th minute the video has diverted to talk about mRNA vaccine injuries and that is when the commentary is PURE SPECULATION. Yes, we know that the vaccine formula contains hydrogel but we DO NOT know that the hydrogel conceals self-assembling nanotech or graphene particles. Any substance dried out on a microscope slide will present crystallised metals and salts! I have seen them myself back in the 70s when I was studying biology!

A couple investigating all vaccines in Italy discovered particulates of multiple metals in the vials. Their lab was shut down by authorities and their equipment confiscated.

So this is NOT a new thing at all.

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/in-2018-italian-scientists-were-silenced

From the 59th minute the narrative recommends Dr Ian Akyldiz's work. I researched him and his studies. He is developing to HEAL sick people and NOT to deliver nanotech to the entire population. I noticed the narrative quickly skipped on to talk about MAC addresses detected by Bluetooth Low Energy Smart Ready (BLE), in people who had taken a PCR test or vaccine. This information only tells us that authorities are able to identify and monitor who has had a vaccine - it does not suggest that the tech is a sign of self-assembling devices within the body. The non-vaccinated are not shown to be BLE active.

The MAC addresses are not randomised. Logic tells you that BLE is picking up a different marker each time! Apparently there are many markers in mRNA vaccines.

More terrorising speculations follow about BLE hacking and transhumanism..... ffs.

The narrator then returns to scare us into believing that MOF tech is being added to food via pesticides!

Zero Trust Architecture is a cyber security approach which means not trusting ANYTHING or ANYONE. Surely this is paranoia gone extreme? Forcing us to feel more and more isolated like people in Orwell's 1984. Providing proof of identity protects us from identity theft. It is more important now due to the development of internet transactions. Yes, we NEED to be able to securely identify ourselves.

The "Gaming the Future" book only scares those who have Zero Trust..... hmm!

Finally, the video looks at CBDC - Central Bank Digital Currency, which is already with us in contactless cards and potentially in implants.

Biological Digital Convergence (courtesy of Bill Gates) gets a mention - but has only been added as a postscript which goes NOWHERE except into our consciousness as YET ANOTHER thing to be very afraid of.....

So...... Do you NOW see why I am furious with Sabrina and all the nano-graphene-self assembly panic merchants? I hope you do.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

The top ten UK nanotech companies are all very small with less than 48 employees and NOT ONE of them is manufacturing nanotech for medical products. All are for industrial purposes.

So shillies.... what have you got to say now?

You might need to get together for a pow-wow because you are EXPOSED.

https://builtin.com/companies/type/nanotechnology-companies

Expand full comment
313 more comments...

No posts