Related previous post:
Welcome to the very first episode of The Ecocide Report - a new podcast from Stop Ecocide International. In this episode Chidi and Jojo dive into the basics of ecocide law and talk about some of the big opportunities currently in the pipeline (Sept 2022) including European Union revising it's Crime Directive, New York Climate Week and the Walk To Stop Ecocide (part of the Global Climate Strike).
Endorse the EU Crime Directive Position Paper:
https://www.stopecocide.earth/eu-crime-directive-position-paper
UPDATE ON ECOCIDE LAW!
I first wrote an interpretation of Agenda 2030 during September of 2015 for a Facebook article.
Since then it has been very popular and has achieved many thousands of shares.
My recent experience, however, has led to a revision, which I have created here:
I cannot emphasise enough how important Agenda 2030 is to every human alive today and even those unborn.
Please consider what the United Nations, in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, is really doing and sign the petition attached at the foot of this article.
Here are the Global Goals of Sustainability and my interpretation of the meaning behind each one.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/agenda-2030-no-escape-no-objections
Yes. Ultimately, what you say is true. I, for one- however, do not attribute the Rockefellers with all that.
Giving the impression that the GA would hold any sway was a significant objective. Inviting small, powerless nations into the fold gave the appearance of 'collective security' when, in truth, their membership was a sneaky way to strip them of resources and sovereignty.
I studied international law under a Lebanese-American who attended the signing of the Charter in San Francisco in 1945. Even rode the train to that city from Washington, DC with many of the 'dignataries' who adopted the Charter.
She was an optimist who believed in the language of the pact. She was the youngest attendee. Just a support person.
But her enthusiasm for the impetus affected some of my views.
Considering the League of Nations was where the ground work for the UN was founded, both bodies coming after world wars, it's highly possible that you are correct .
The actions of the UN all these years on may betray the language of the Charter- but I would be willing to bet those who signed on originally did not have devious inclinations in doing so.
Legitimizing the concept of 'collective security' has a nice ring to it, eh?
Alas, yet another pillar to dismantle I suppose.