I feel sick to my stomach about this. I haven’t been following Coach for a month or so - but I know he wouldn’t just disappear. Praying for his safety.
A personal friend? Are you sure you want my opinion?
OK.....
This woman only follows the lead of others. It is trendy to like Kennedy's take-down of Fauci so she accepts his word about HIV being unrelated to AIDS. She is unable to extrapolate from that starting point and question the validity of virology - and she won't.... not until a safe and popular book gets written. She is afraid of being seen as a "virus denier", so much so that she has not even tried to research and understand Terrain Theory. She is a sheep masquerading as a leader.
I don't think she is smart enough to be controlled opposition.
I think she is, and will always be, a follower. She is too cowardly and obsessed with appearances to ever change. There is no point trying to pull the wool out of her eyes, she grew it for a reason.
That said, I agree with your assessment. I get a little bit of Asch Experiment actor from her writings. She is good at sparring though no doubt, and can go after the Covidians. I don’t care enough to. Lol
It is not really kind or appropriate to try pull it off without their consent or force someone to drink - I prefer coffee shops that open one of the those nice chalk boards letting me know what is on offer in an inviting way over high pressured sales or being yelled at to buy something - whether it's a belief or an insurance plan, a dress or coffee. Also being more in the way of helping people develop their own intuition leads to sovereign people rather than sheep who simply follow a different leader who has the truth you resonate guiding them. So you have to b able to tolerate dissent, disagreement and people who aren't interested in the other 10% or who are but see it a differently. That is freedom. I personally was a bit strong armed by someone devoted to the truth deeply espoused by this pages author. I set a kind boundary and received kindness in return, but it was stressful, jarring and it felt like an evangelist who NEEDED to convince me rather than offering something for me to consider if it aligned to my inner compass, while considering me a friend simply because I care also about things like integrity, love, freedom and so on. They felt that if I could just 100% agree with themit would all be SIMPLE...freedom needs to allow people's journeys without pressure and with open invitations that are respectful of timing. I prefer to do my exploring free of pressure and I think most people are the same. Sharing information is different than trying to get someoe to see it your way if they indicate that's not where they are at. I personally think the GOAL of what we are going through as a humanity is HOW MUCH DIVERSITY (intellectually, racially etc etc) can we embrace and still allow one another to be fully who they are in an environment that is simultaneously free and respectful of others freedom; compassionate as well as curious and open to learning from one another.
Yes that's quite true. That could also be used to gaslight or shame someone into investigating an area that may not be for them at that time. Just like the approaches used to get compliance on the shot always use peoples own values. Notice I have not said I am not exploring this issue. As a matter of fact I am, but I prefer not to discuss it with y'all at this time because this space doesn't feel safe.
Not claiming to know the truth.... just viewing it as a process.... not to say that we are not deceived from time to time. That is the only way to sharpen the skill required to become reasonably discerning.
Rule of thumb = If they have a huge following, no money worries or are constantly begging for funds; if they are prolific posters and quoted in the MSM; if they are scathing about other campaigners; if they seem to be in your face 24/7.... then you are looking at a paid gatekeeper who probably works for one of the alphabetti agencies like FBI, CIA or MI5/6 depending on the issue.
LOL!! The veiled bitchcraft in Madam's comment to you was professional..... there was too much spite hidden in her good manners. She has spent a lifetime sneering down her nose at people, but always in the BEST POSSIBLE TASTE! Amusingly, she reminds me of this:
I doubt that many people have seen this documentary on Donbas. Really worth a watch.
https://rumble.com/v123oxs-donbas-2022.html
I feel sick to my stomach about this. I haven’t been following Coach for a month or so - but I know he wouldn’t just disappear. Praying for his safety.
Eva Bartlett is concerned for Gonzalo Lira.
https://azradale.substack.com/p/still-looking-for-confirmation-on?s=r
A report from SouthFront:
https://odysee.com/last-chance-of-ukrainian-nationalists-in-mariupol:ead84afb75037cff6773c12ab8d51689b8d41554
A report from RT:
https://odysee.com/mariupol-fighting-nationalists:c019810fa1ac49c43156ff4a1798e25ddc2b1b13
A lot of video clips on this post:
https://azradale.substack.com/p/testimonials-from-donbass-residents?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2&s=r
I don't think he's in this plane anymore.
💔
A personal friend? Are you sure you want my opinion?
OK.....
This woman only follows the lead of others. It is trendy to like Kennedy's take-down of Fauci so she accepts his word about HIV being unrelated to AIDS. She is unable to extrapolate from that starting point and question the validity of virology - and she won't.... not until a safe and popular book gets written. She is afraid of being seen as a "virus denier", so much so that she has not even tried to research and understand Terrain Theory. She is a sheep masquerading as a leader.
I don't think she is smart enough to be controlled opposition.
I think she is, and will always be, a follower. She is too cowardly and obsessed with appearances to ever change. There is no point trying to pull the wool out of her eyes, she grew it for a reason.
Interesting. I commented on a thread about homeopathy and she said maybe she hadn’t given it a fair shot. https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dispatches-from-the-new-normal-front-d2c/comment/6126080?s=r
That said, I agree with your assessment. I get a little bit of Asch Experiment actor from her writings. She is good at sparring though no doubt, and can go after the Covidians. I don’t care enough to. Lol
OMG - I read your brief exchange and then went to read the post it came from.... I wish I hadn't. Verbal diarrhoea or what?
It is not really kind or appropriate to try pull it off without their consent or force someone to drink - I prefer coffee shops that open one of the those nice chalk boards letting me know what is on offer in an inviting way over high pressured sales or being yelled at to buy something - whether it's a belief or an insurance plan, a dress or coffee. Also being more in the way of helping people develop their own intuition leads to sovereign people rather than sheep who simply follow a different leader who has the truth you resonate guiding them. So you have to b able to tolerate dissent, disagreement and people who aren't interested in the other 10% or who are but see it a differently. That is freedom. I personally was a bit strong armed by someone devoted to the truth deeply espoused by this pages author. I set a kind boundary and received kindness in return, but it was stressful, jarring and it felt like an evangelist who NEEDED to convince me rather than offering something for me to consider if it aligned to my inner compass, while considering me a friend simply because I care also about things like integrity, love, freedom and so on. They felt that if I could just 100% agree with themit would all be SIMPLE...freedom needs to allow people's journeys without pressure and with open invitations that are respectful of timing. I prefer to do my exploring free of pressure and I think most people are the same. Sharing information is different than trying to get someoe to see it your way if they indicate that's not where they are at. I personally think the GOAL of what we are going through as a humanity is HOW MUCH DIVERSITY (intellectually, racially etc etc) can we embrace and still allow one another to be fully who they are in an environment that is simultaneously free and respectful of others freedom; compassionate as well as curious and open to learning from one another.
Yes that's quite true. That could also be used to gaslight or shame someone into investigating an area that may not be for them at that time. Just like the approaches used to get compliance on the shot always use peoples own values. Notice I have not said I am not exploring this issue. As a matter of fact I am, but I prefer not to discuss it with y'all at this time because this space doesn't feel safe.
It is a sign of respect to trust someone's journey and not try to manipulate them in any way.
Not claiming to know the truth.... just viewing it as a process.... not to say that we are not deceived from time to time. That is the only way to sharpen the skill required to become reasonably discerning.
Try half a teaspoon of bicarbonate of soda in a pint of water. It works for me!
Rule of thumb = If they have a huge following, no money worries or are constantly begging for funds; if they are prolific posters and quoted in the MSM; if they are scathing about other campaigners; if they seem to be in your face 24/7.... then you are looking at a paid gatekeeper who probably works for one of the alphabetti agencies like FBI, CIA or MI5/6 depending on the issue.
LOL!! The veiled bitchcraft in Madam's comment to you was professional..... there was too much spite hidden in her good manners. She has spent a lifetime sneering down her nose at people, but always in the BEST POSSIBLE TASTE! Amusingly, she reminds me of this:
https://youtu.be/cs34quE_BXY