That number of COVID deaths map of UK does not look to be population adjusted, it looks like absolute numbers - meaning, the images are tautologically similar, in that they both (total COVID deaths and 5G coverage) just essentially represent population density.
If this is not the case, then the death map should be clearly marked as per unit of population.
Look at cities that did not have 5G when the image was created in 2020. Some of them with large populations also do not have Covid deaths. That is how you can see that the map is not representing population density.
I’m not disagreeing that Covid is a farce and that other things are going on, nor that electromagnetic pollution is a problem. But I don’t like seeing woolly arguments about it.
I’m not looking for you to reply or an argument, but rhetorically would ask, could you be specific? What city in that map with high population density received little 5g and therefore few Covid deaths?
On the contrary side, Bristol for example on that map has lots of 5g and fewer Covid deaths.
I repeat, I think the correlation is largely tautological. Seeing what you want to see in the data is just doing the same as the Covid fanatics.
Exeter, Bournemouth + Poole are all near me and this part of the country has been remarkably low on Covid deaths. We do not have 5G yet.
Bristol does not have "lots of 5G" in fact Bristol protesters put up a brilliant fight to protect residential areas from towers. The University was the first to get 5G and remarkably suffered a spate of suicides immediately afterwards.
Do not accuse me of "seeing what I want to see" - I am living HERE in the west country. Where are you?
You are wildly overreacting. Seeing what you want to see is human and everyone- including me - does it and should be guarding against it.
Not that it matters now, but that very map shows four big red blobs right over Bristol while the surroundings are fairly sparse. Which is where I live btw. And this map shows how Bristol has coverage from every network.
Not avoiding anything. I agree - low absolute numbers of deaths in those places. But you are cherry picking. There is also lower population there than, say, Birmingham. So, it depends what you mean by “low”. Bristol also had “low” deaths and, as is clear, has at least some 5g right? And in the map you are showing, Newcastle had only three red blobs similar to Bristol and yet a giant area of green showing deaths, way beyond the 5g reach.
This is why those maps you showed prove absolutely nothing without doing it properly, ie. per unit of population. You obviously don't/won't/can't accept or understand this - my first comment was polite and I thought I might be helping you strengthen your article, because I analyse systems with numbers every day for a living and can see immediately that map was totally worthless. But now I see I was wasting my time, that you don’t want such feedback and are emotionally attached to being right and to your conclusions.
Rubik B and Brown RR (2021) Evidence for a Connection Between COVID-19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves. ----> https://osf.io/9p8qu/
Very happy to see someone on substack being a Jon Rappoport disciple, since all of the alt COVID people refuse to question the existence of the virus.
But listen to Rappoport more. COVID is not just 5G. It's everything, mainly a manufactured cover story about a made up virus, explaining all toxic environmental factors.
The people who don't get that COVID is not real are going to fall for the next made up more deadly "new virus", which will be yet another cover story for the next way(s) that they kill millions of people.
I am no man's disciple. I reached my conclusions much earlier & was, in fact, quoted by Jon Rappaport when I exposed the UK MHRA deception as described here:
That number of COVID deaths map of UK does not look to be population adjusted, it looks like absolute numbers - meaning, the images are tautologically similar, in that they both (total COVID deaths and 5G coverage) just essentially represent population density.
If this is not the case, then the death map should be clearly marked as per unit of population.
Look at cities that did not have 5G when the image was created in 2020. Some of them with large populations also do not have Covid deaths. That is how you can see that the map is not representing population density.
I’m not disagreeing that Covid is a farce and that other things are going on, nor that electromagnetic pollution is a problem. But I don’t like seeing woolly arguments about it.
I’m not looking for you to reply or an argument, but rhetorically would ask, could you be specific? What city in that map with high population density received little 5g and therefore few Covid deaths?
On the contrary side, Bristol for example on that map has lots of 5g and fewer Covid deaths.
I repeat, I think the correlation is largely tautological. Seeing what you want to see in the data is just doing the same as the Covid fanatics.
Exeter, Bournemouth + Poole are all near me and this part of the country has been remarkably low on Covid deaths. We do not have 5G yet.
Bristol does not have "lots of 5G" in fact Bristol protesters put up a brilliant fight to protect residential areas from towers. The University was the first to get 5G and remarkably suffered a spate of suicides immediately afterwards.
Do not accuse me of "seeing what I want to see" - I am living HERE in the west country. Where are you?
Ok probably more like two blobs actually.
You are wildly overreacting. Seeing what you want to see is human and everyone- including me - does it and should be guarding against it.
Not that it matters now, but that very map shows four big red blobs right over Bristol while the surroundings are fairly sparse. Which is where I live btw. And this map shows how Bristol has coverage from every network.
https://www.signalchecker.co.uk/maps/5g
So we can argue about what “lots” means and it was a bad choice of word. But you acting like I’m a moron seems somewhat unnecessary.
I repeat. The Covid deaths map, in order to show what you want, must be per unit of population to mean anything at all in that context.
Cheeky! I am NOT acting like you are a moron. In fact, it is YOU who has been very confrontative and may actually be treating me like an effin moron.
I note that you avoided discussing the highly populated Bournemouth + Poole area where we are still numbering cases in single digits.
Get outta here. You are antagonising me deliberately and that is damned rude.
Not avoiding anything. I agree - low absolute numbers of deaths in those places. But you are cherry picking. There is also lower population there than, say, Birmingham. So, it depends what you mean by “low”. Bristol also had “low” deaths and, as is clear, has at least some 5g right? And in the map you are showing, Newcastle had only three red blobs similar to Bristol and yet a giant area of green showing deaths, way beyond the 5g reach.
This is why those maps you showed prove absolutely nothing without doing it properly, ie. per unit of population. You obviously don't/won't/can't accept or understand this - my first comment was polite and I thought I might be helping you strengthen your article, because I analyse systems with numbers every day for a living and can see immediately that map was totally worthless. But now I see I was wasting my time, that you don’t want such feedback and are emotionally attached to being right and to your conclusions.
IMPORTANT SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FROM DR STEFAN LANKA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0MVOAQ4YBZyO/
Acute Radiation Sickness causes flu-like symptoms - Covid? -
https://rumble.com/vtgp10-acute-ra...
Rubik B and Brown RR (2021) Evidence for a Connection Between COVID-19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves. ----> https://osf.io/9p8qu/
Very happy to see someone on substack being a Jon Rappoport disciple, since all of the alt COVID people refuse to question the existence of the virus.
But listen to Rappoport more. COVID is not just 5G. It's everything, mainly a manufactured cover story about a made up virus, explaining all toxic environmental factors.
The people who don't get that COVID is not real are going to fall for the next made up more deadly "new virus", which will be yet another cover story for the next way(s) that they kill millions of people.
I am no man's disciple. I reached my conclusions much earlier & was, in fact, quoted by Jon Rappaport when I exposed the UK MHRA deception as described here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-virus?r=163lv
People are sick due to bad food and other toxins not just 5g. Good article otherwise