Crikey! That is way beyond me! Sometimes I wonder if these sorts of reports are created purely to frighten and intimidate us. "Look silly useless eater! We are so superior, you can't possibly compete!" But it is all an illusion....
I bet they can't cook on an open fire in the rain..... I can! 😂
I think Mr. Morgan is quite full of himself to think that they can do all the things they can do. In controlled experiments, okay. But to portray themselves as capable of performing this on whomever, wherever, whenever they choose to 'splice this in and send this there and implement this program' is foolhardy. But then again, that's a great part of the magic - getting us to believe it all and live in fear of it, dedicating our life energy to it.
There are way to many people telling their stories of being remote targeted to assume they are wrong or crazy and this can only be done in controlled circumstances. I have personally met several , and several very real MK ULTRA trauma tortured controlled operators.. This has been done to many many women.
Check this out my dear , I just heard on the radio they now have and A.I. APP you can download , and pay for Im sure , and utilize to CONTACT and COMMUNICATE to your recently departed family or friends [Im serious] Now where would the A. I . get the info to pull this off with even slightest chance of being believed. So what is this A.I. what is it connecting with or to, how would it mimic in voice or visuals, or have any info that could pass a "test", and WHY OH WHY would anyone trust doing this on their cell phone? Looks like trance and seance mediums will be out of business lol SK
to each their own opinion. however, the paradigm of victimhood is a spell and their "scientific" ideas are not so absolute as the professionals may claim.
i am not saying there is zero premise for such claims, but instead pointing out what exists in between, in the periphery, or what is even more poorly understood.
to claim there is no magic (the spell of suggestion, via images supplied to the retina - just as Morgan claims in his presentation - causing people to believe to have memories of things that never happened) is to reveal one's ignorance of the complexity of this procedure and the lack of awareness of what power we truly have.
In the bible they speak of it as 'strong delusions' ... and yes, the jab is one huge strong delusion if I ever saw one... I think they can do both more and less than they whisper or speak of. As in, yes we can do *under very controlled correct situation* but perhaps not when too many random chaos variables are in the mix?
As people who have argued against the idea of geo-engineering or climate manipulation, there are far too many variables to control. But, then again, airplanes work for a reason. The internet works, relatively consistently, for a reason. There are gross and sublime factors that are sought out to be manipulated. I think we are now addressing sublime factors.
I noticed that Sabrina has removed many videos overnight. I really don't know why she does that but she has done it several times in the past too. I am glad I downloaded her pdf because that has gone too now!
Documentary images and links to support what she is saying. It is titled: Psinergy Intro Class on the Human Biofield *ALWAYS FREE*
“The photon generating dna wave propogating electrical homeostasis facilitating body part formerly known as the ‘aura’ is 80% of
the Immune System and 40-60% of the Endocrine system.”
It continues:
"Biophotons as Subtle Energy Carriers
In the tangible domain, two subtle energy carriers come to mind: biophotons and
bioelectrons. Biophotons are photons (light particles) that are generated
within the body, and these could be measured as they emanate from the skin.
Similarly, bioelectrons are available from within the body; these are measured in instruments such as electro-photonic imaging. This aspect will be taken in a later presentation.
She emphasises: “Energy not used in creation inevitably will lead to
destructive behavior. The font of creativity is inherent within human souls.”
So interesting, I just came across Sabrina yesterday! Started watching some of her videos. She's a lot to take in, (meaning I have a lot to catch up on) but man my gut on her is good. Thanks for confirming, however inadvertently.
By now I have realized that I don't know anything and cannot know anything. The DOD revelations from Sasha L are interesting and I think important. The connection she made, between the lethal drug Remdesivir, brand name Veklury, to the Valkyries who bring dead warriors to Walhalla, is a big thing I think. What I keep reminding me of however is that she is Ukrainian if I am correctly informed. And her theses are always apt to weaken trust of Americans in their military and more recently in their hospital staff. What is very interesting is Jonathan Couey's recent commentary on her telling the story of her relative escaping from a hospital, on the Shannon Joy show. Couey generally always, always has really good questions and observations.
I have gone off my implicit belief in virology too. Which however doesn't make me know automatically that viruses don't exist. I don't really know that either, but I have become aware of alternative possibilities and I am diffident of the virus concept because it alone has been able to.provide the frame for a lot of very invasive measures starting with traditional vaccine injections for military correlating with the Spanish flu (and with electrification), then the very intense childhood vaccination schedules, then the HIV scare distancing people from each other, poisoning especially the previously more spontaneous, "innocent" in a way, sexual relationship between male and female and certainly lowering "spontaneous birth rate' favoring a more planned, rational approach. And then the limitations to freedom that this concept allowed since 2020. All this, plus Foucault on the plague, is what makes this frame suspicious to me. Not entirely u plausible but he one that is too convenient. Yet I think Couey's focus is on artificially built harmful particles and I think his concept of harmful clones of something that elicits an immunological harmful response from the body, works also in absence of a belief in self replication. I think he said that a decision on virus vs no virus is not necessary for his concept. I think he said something like that. I think he said it can also be exosomes. I recently saw that the first thing to be declared a virus, in 1935 (four years after that death of the first discoverer, Beijerinck) by a Rockefeller affiliated chemist, was the tobacco leaf mosaic virus. Its earlier discoverers were two people independent of each other in the 19th century, Beijerinck and a Russian. Beijerinck hypothesized that it was contagious. He found it to be smaller than a bacterium. He wrote about it in Latin in this text:
and there he referred to it as a poison, because Latin virus is English poison. So that use of the word poison, for me does not yet necessarily mean someone was referring to what now is denoted a virus. It was rather the power to harm that was denoted there. The other, Ivanovsky, explicitly tended to consider it a (mere) toxin but not contagious in the sense of replication competent. He said that the Agar diffusion experiment or observation of Beijerinck was not compelling with regard to contagion because for example ink, too, was able to cross the agar, yet was not contagious. It just was able to spread through barriers. So the first person to call that tobacco mosaic leaf pathogen, a contagious self replication competent entity and call it the first VIRUS in today's meaning of virus, was that Rockefeller affiliated guy in 1935, four years after the death of Beijerinck while Ivanovsky was already dead since 1920. To come back to Couey, whatever he says about that entity that made some people sick (and he sees relabeling of influenza and all that trickery) to me allows me to consider that pathogen as a toxin or virus in Ivanovsky's sense of it, as being poisonous to the organism maybe, but for as yet not fully uncovered reasons. Couey also points out that the educational little films that were produced, where we saw how the virus was entering the cell and what it did there, were total speculation and dishonestly suggested that we knew stuff that we don't, to make it look scientifically robust.
In my opinion JJ Couey is obfuscating and dismissing the elephant in the room which is electro-magnetic radiation. That is my yardstick. If a scientist refuses to admit the influence of EMFs then he or she is a gatekeeper for Big Tech.
Could be. He is also close to RFK which to me is not a recommendation. But it alone doesn't say a lot. I just don't really know anything at this point. It seems to be true that many people contribute interesting and in part probably valid aspects, and at the same time they are taking stances on other things, or, ignore other things. Firstly , I have no way of definitely knowing why they do that (some possible reasons would discredit that person, others wouldn't, and I don't know which reason is applicable so can't draw that conclusion), and second, because first puts me in a difficult place, I tend to take that part that I like if I find it compelling - except perhaps where the behavior on other things is too much of a red flag for me. - See above btw if you like, I added a bit in the comment.
Wow Frances. I'd like to see what she called you out on, just curious. Since I've been on SS, reading various authors, you definitely do develop a sense of who they are by what they say, how they say it and their interactions in the comment section. Alot of the Uber technical stuff whether I understand it or not can send it's own messages. I'm usually pretty good at reading between the lines. I'm not going to comment here as it will really serve no purpose, I've gotten into enough cat fights on my own w a couple of 'authors'. I've had my say and promptly unsubbed. Thank you for the eyeopener and let's just say I will be glad to remain unscathed here! Cheers!
It was 5G and I cannot even remember where we crossed swords! I was shocked because up til then Sasha had always liked my comments.... and my opinions have been totally consistent since I joined Substack. It was weird, as if she suddenly decided to chew a lump off me and she got very offensive..... don't worry, I didn't let her away with it.
I have a similar history with her - she has also liked some of my posts.
But I recently had a similar exchange with her - she called concerns about 5G "hype". I told her about my recent stay in the ICU being treated for 5G radiation and linked a very well cited post about the weaponization of 5G and asked her why vaccines and not 5G. Her reply was weird. The next day she put up a disjointed post about why she has taken that position.
So, Sabrina Wallace is completely out of her mind with her proof of WBAN and mind/body control from the inside out manipulated through the IEEE platform?
author
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
yes, that lady is nuts and it was obvious from the start. Another distraction into bullshit sci-fi narratives.
James Filbird
Writes Nirvana Nation
Sep 23
Hi Sasha, please inform me of what is so obvious about her theories, hypotheses and research on this subject that make her look nonsensical?
author
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
I explained it in this article. I don't follow her, and don't have time to evaluate her stuff because her theory is nonsense. And by the way she is a plant designed to distract you into watching hours of bullshit and diving down the rabbit holes. It is another narrative spinner, new flavor, specifically designed for the "redpilled".
LIKE (6)
BKBlair
Sep 23
Who do you think "planted" her?
nymusicdaily
Sep 23
Liked by Sasha Latypova
her dad was a cia spook. she talks about this
also, notice how all the doom porn substacks and trolls are amplifying her
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
doom stories sell like hotcakes since the ancient Egyptian times!
James Filbird
Writes Nirvana Nation
19 hrs ago
What about this story? Pretty hard to refute this evidence concerning Internet Of Bodies.
I also suggested to James Filbird/Nirvana Nation to create a Sabrina vs Sasha meme or at least post Sabrina's response but I'm sure Sasha will have seen it by now. I think she'll probably just ignore it given there's no way she can counter her arguments.
She hasn't replied after 36 hours and doubt she will. She knows she's been called out. I unfollowed her and Karen Kingston today. They're useless shills and working for the dark side.
What Sabrina exposes is possible or it will soon be. The gov funds operations like this. They've already done the studies on mice controlling them. Now they have nano tech. Minimizing it like Sasha does, calling someone a nutjob doesn't make it go away no matter how much she wants it to.
I adore this brilliant courageous point blank truthful women, wish I could meet her and now hope she will stay with us through the search for remedies and SOLUTIONS.
Yes. It is appalling. Go see. I can't get you the link because I am banned for calling her out days ago! Mind you, I was not nearly so brilliant as Sabrina is in the video above!
My argument with Sasha was days ago and not related to Sabrina. I was informed that Sasha had called Sabrina crazy by a friend this morning and then I saw two videos by Sabrina mentioning it. I haven't personally seen the offending post.
My son has autism because of people like her. From my vantage she is full of pride. She doesnt appear to have deep human connection and compassion to even understand a person's aura let alone the potential for mind control. It's people like her who would have said radio is impossible, called it dangerous and made the religious leader burn people at the stake for even thinking it. Getting on her page right now felt toxic
Sabrina addressed me directly with this video. It is very interesting.
https://odysee.com/@FrancesLeader:b/SABRINA-TALKING-TO-ME-VIDEO:2
check this one out my dear
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lbKRSknvNA quantum computing?
What possible good can come from this in a world still owned and controlled by very evil people ?
Crikey! That is way beyond me! Sometimes I wonder if these sorts of reports are created purely to frighten and intimidate us. "Look silly useless eater! We are so superior, you can't possibly compete!" But it is all an illusion....
I bet they can't cook on an open fire in the rain..... I can! 😂
just went to the original link and there's nothing there. the link to sabrina's video
I think Sabrina has taken down most of her videos overnight. I don't know why she does that but I have seen it happen before.
I think Mr. Morgan is quite full of himself to think that they can do all the things they can do. In controlled experiments, okay. But to portray themselves as capable of performing this on whomever, wherever, whenever they choose to 'splice this in and send this there and implement this program' is foolhardy. But then again, that's a great part of the magic - getting us to believe it all and live in fear of it, dedicating our life energy to it.
There are way to many people telling their stories of being remote targeted to assume they are wrong or crazy and this can only be done in controlled circumstances. I have personally met several , and several very real MK ULTRA trauma tortured controlled operators.. This has been done to many many women.
...it's another case of 'yes, and...'
I believe that is true.
If you listen to Sabrina Wallace she assures us that they can do far more to ANYONE. There is no magic. Just electro-magnetic frequencies.
Check this out my dear , I just heard on the radio they now have and A.I. APP you can download , and pay for Im sure , and utilize to CONTACT and COMMUNICATE to your recently departed family or friends [Im serious] Now where would the A. I . get the info to pull this off with even slightest chance of being believed. So what is this A.I. what is it connecting with or to, how would it mimic in voice or visuals, or have any info that could pass a "test", and WHY OH WHY would anyone trust doing this on their cell phone? Looks like trance and seance mediums will be out of business lol SK
OMG.... speechless!
to each their own opinion. however, the paradigm of victimhood is a spell and their "scientific" ideas are not so absolute as the professionals may claim.
i am not saying there is zero premise for such claims, but instead pointing out what exists in between, in the periphery, or what is even more poorly understood.
to claim there is no magic (the spell of suggestion, via images supplied to the retina - just as Morgan claims in his presentation - causing people to believe to have memories of things that never happened) is to reveal one's ignorance of the complexity of this procedure and the lack of awareness of what power we truly have.
In the bible they speak of it as 'strong delusions' ... and yes, the jab is one huge strong delusion if I ever saw one... I think they can do both more and less than they whisper or speak of. As in, yes we can do *under very controlled correct situation* but perhaps not when too many random chaos variables are in the mix?
As people who have argued against the idea of geo-engineering or climate manipulation, there are far too many variables to control. But, then again, airplanes work for a reason. The internet works, relatively consistently, for a reason. There are gross and sublime factors that are sought out to be manipulated. I think we are now addressing sublime factors.
You make great points John, thanks a lot. I see what you are driving at now.
The second link goes to a dead odysee page.
I noticed that Sabrina has removed many videos overnight. I really don't know why she does that but she has done it several times in the past too. I am glad I downloaded her pdf because that has gone too now!
If you don't mind me asking, what's in the pdf?
Documentary images and links to support what she is saying. It is titled: Psinergy Intro Class on the Human Biofield *ALWAYS FREE*
“The photon generating dna wave propogating electrical homeostasis facilitating body part formerly known as the ‘aura’ is 80% of
the Immune System and 40-60% of the Endocrine system.”
It continues:
"Biophotons as Subtle Energy Carriers
In the tangible domain, two subtle energy carriers come to mind: biophotons and
bioelectrons. Biophotons are photons (light particles) that are generated
within the body, and these could be measured as they emanate from the skin.
Similarly, bioelectrons are available from within the body; these are measured in instruments such as electro-photonic imaging. This aspect will be taken in a later presentation.
She emphasises: “Energy not used in creation inevitably will lead to
destructive behavior. The font of creativity is inherent within human souls.”
It has 26 pages thereafter.
We've both looked into some of this so I can see why it interests you. Is there any way you can make that available?
Kyle, I see that Sabrina has uploaded more pdfs and documents to support her hypothesis on her channel:
https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f
Take a peek!
My son isn't home atm (he is the techie in this house).... when he returns I will ask him to help me get the pdf publicised.
So interesting, I just came across Sabrina yesterday! Started watching some of her videos. She's a lot to take in, (meaning I have a lot to catch up on) but man my gut on her is good. Thanks for confirming, however inadvertently.
By now I have realized that I don't know anything and cannot know anything. The DOD revelations from Sasha L are interesting and I think important. The connection she made, between the lethal drug Remdesivir, brand name Veklury, to the Valkyries who bring dead warriors to Walhalla, is a big thing I think. What I keep reminding me of however is that she is Ukrainian if I am correctly informed. And her theses are always apt to weaken trust of Americans in their military and more recently in their hospital staff. What is very interesting is Jonathan Couey's recent commentary on her telling the story of her relative escaping from a hospital, on the Shannon Joy show. Couey generally always, always has really good questions and observations.
https://m.twitch.tv/videos/1927511162
JJ Couey does not impress me either. I do not believe in virology.
I have gone off my implicit belief in virology too. Which however doesn't make me know automatically that viruses don't exist. I don't really know that either, but I have become aware of alternative possibilities and I am diffident of the virus concept because it alone has been able to.provide the frame for a lot of very invasive measures starting with traditional vaccine injections for military correlating with the Spanish flu (and with electrification), then the very intense childhood vaccination schedules, then the HIV scare distancing people from each other, poisoning especially the previously more spontaneous, "innocent" in a way, sexual relationship between male and female and certainly lowering "spontaneous birth rate' favoring a more planned, rational approach. And then the limitations to freedom that this concept allowed since 2020. All this, plus Foucault on the plague, is what makes this frame suspicious to me. Not entirely u plausible but he one that is too convenient. Yet I think Couey's focus is on artificially built harmful particles and I think his concept of harmful clones of something that elicits an immunological harmful response from the body, works also in absence of a belief in self replication. I think he said that a decision on virus vs no virus is not necessary for his concept. I think he said something like that. I think he said it can also be exosomes. I recently saw that the first thing to be declared a virus, in 1935 (four years after that death of the first discoverer, Beijerinck) by a Rockefeller affiliated chemist, was the tobacco leaf mosaic virus. Its earlier discoverers were two people independent of each other in the 19th century, Beijerinck and a Russian. Beijerinck hypothesized that it was contagious. He found it to be smaller than a bacterium. He wrote about it in Latin in this text:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contagium_vivum_fluidum
and there he referred to it as a poison, because Latin virus is English poison. So that use of the word poison, for me does not yet necessarily mean someone was referring to what now is denoted a virus. It was rather the power to harm that was denoted there. The other, Ivanovsky, explicitly tended to consider it a (mere) toxin but not contagious in the sense of replication competent. He said that the Agar diffusion experiment or observation of Beijerinck was not compelling with regard to contagion because for example ink, too, was able to cross the agar, yet was not contagious. It just was able to spread through barriers. So the first person to call that tobacco mosaic leaf pathogen, a contagious self replication competent entity and call it the first VIRUS in today's meaning of virus, was that Rockefeller affiliated guy in 1935, four years after the death of Beijerinck while Ivanovsky was already dead since 1920. To come back to Couey, whatever he says about that entity that made some people sick (and he sees relabeling of influenza and all that trickery) to me allows me to consider that pathogen as a toxin or virus in Ivanovsky's sense of it, as being poisonous to the organism maybe, but for as yet not fully uncovered reasons. Couey also points out that the educational little films that were produced, where we saw how the virus was entering the cell and what it did there, were total speculation and dishonestly suggested that we knew stuff that we don't, to make it look scientifically robust.
In my opinion JJ Couey is obfuscating and dismissing the elephant in the room which is electro-magnetic radiation. That is my yardstick. If a scientist refuses to admit the influence of EMFs then he or she is a gatekeeper for Big Tech.
Could be. He is also close to RFK which to me is not a recommendation. But it alone doesn't say a lot. I just don't really know anything at this point. It seems to be true that many people contribute interesting and in part probably valid aspects, and at the same time they are taking stances on other things, or, ignore other things. Firstly , I have no way of definitely knowing why they do that (some possible reasons would discredit that person, others wouldn't, and I don't know which reason is applicable so can't draw that conclusion), and second, because first puts me in a difficult place, I tend to take that part that I like if I find it compelling - except perhaps where the behavior on other things is too much of a red flag for me. - See above btw if you like, I added a bit in the comment.
Wow Frances. I'd like to see what she called you out on, just curious. Since I've been on SS, reading various authors, you definitely do develop a sense of who they are by what they say, how they say it and their interactions in the comment section. Alot of the Uber technical stuff whether I understand it or not can send it's own messages. I'm usually pretty good at reading between the lines. I'm not going to comment here as it will really serve no purpose, I've gotten into enough cat fights on my own w a couple of 'authors'. I've had my say and promptly unsubbed. Thank you for the eyeopener and let's just say I will be glad to remain unscathed here! Cheers!
It was 5G and I cannot even remember where we crossed swords! I was shocked because up til then Sasha had always liked my comments.... and my opinions have been totally consistent since I joined Substack. It was weird, as if she suddenly decided to chew a lump off me and she got very offensive..... don't worry, I didn't let her away with it.
I doubt anyone trying to do that to you would get away with it . LOL
I have a similar history with her - she has also liked some of my posts.
But I recently had a similar exchange with her - she called concerns about 5G "hype". I told her about my recent stay in the ICU being treated for 5G radiation and linked a very well cited post about the weaponization of 5G and asked her why vaccines and not 5G. Her reply was weird. The next day she put up a disjointed post about why she has taken that position.
Perhaps she's being targeted.
If I were targeted I would not change my opinions. At the most I would use a VPN, change my name and carry on regardless!
Nor would I. But maybe they have something else on her.
Oh my!
Too much horilka maybe?
This is one of the threads on https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/why-i-dismiss-nanotechnology-and/comments where she called Sabrina a nutjob:
James Filbird
Writes Nirvana Nation
Sep 23
So, Sabrina Wallace is completely out of her mind with her proof of WBAN and mind/body control from the inside out manipulated through the IEEE platform?
author
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
yes, that lady is nuts and it was obvious from the start. Another distraction into bullshit sci-fi narratives.
James Filbird
Writes Nirvana Nation
Sep 23
Hi Sasha, please inform me of what is so obvious about her theories, hypotheses and research on this subject that make her look nonsensical?
author
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
I explained it in this article. I don't follow her, and don't have time to evaluate her stuff because her theory is nonsense. And by the way she is a plant designed to distract you into watching hours of bullshit and diving down the rabbit holes. It is another narrative spinner, new flavor, specifically designed for the "redpilled".
LIKE (6)
BKBlair
Sep 23
Who do you think "planted" her?
nymusicdaily
Sep 23
Liked by Sasha Latypova
her dad was a cia spook. she talks about this
also, notice how all the doom porn substacks and trolls are amplifying her
Sasha Latypova
Sep 23
Author
doom stories sell like hotcakes since the ancient Egyptian times!
James Filbird
Writes Nirvana Nation
19 hrs ago
What about this story? Pretty hard to refute this evidence concerning Internet Of Bodies.
https://substack.com/@boodicca/note/c-40567760?r=1v80x0&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
No reply from SL to last comment
I'm tempted to post as a Stack but will most likely get in trouble for calling her out. After all, she is paid by big pharma, the evil killers.
Very good, Kerylyn. Thanks for posting this.
Well done, Kerrylyn! xx
James F. just replied here https://james23444.substack.com/p/a-mondays-memes/comments#comment-40628355
I also suggested to James Filbird/Nirvana Nation to create a Sabrina vs Sasha meme or at least post Sabrina's response but I'm sure Sasha will have seen it by now. I think she'll probably just ignore it given there's no way she can counter her arguments.
She hasn't replied after 36 hours and doubt she will. She knows she's been called out. I unfollowed her and Karen Kingston today. They're useless shills and working for the dark side.
Thank you for the links. 🙏
What Sabrina exposes is possible or it will soon be. The gov funds operations like this. They've already done the studies on mice controlling them. Now they have nano tech. Minimizing it like Sasha does, calling someone a nutjob doesn't make it go away no matter how much she wants it to.
I adore this brilliant courageous point blank truthful women, wish I could meet her and now hope she will stay with us through the search for remedies and SOLUTIONS.
Me too!
Here is the link for the 1954 Documents so you can see them for yourself and print them for your records! https://www.mediafire.com/file/ny7ujc0jc318n80/Silent_Weapons_for_Quiet_Wars_Original_Document_Copy.pdf/file
Thank you 🙏⚘
Here is a YouTube link for people who prefer to listen, need to multitask
https://youtu.be/kE8ZL1PlfJc?si=9cQhkWJuj2ixCdCp
Thank You Girlfriend ! :)
😘💕
"Sasha Latypova’s bitchcraft"
🤣🤣🤣🙏💞
Waters appear to be deeper than they look.
Did you read it? No other word would describe that bilge.
I havent. Are you saying Sasha tore into Sabrina?
Wow, all this news about Sasha is new to me. You literally can trust no one...
Yes. It is appalling. Go see. I can't get you the link because I am banned for calling her out days ago! Mind you, I was not nearly so brilliant as Sabrina is in the video above!
I'll get on her page and check it out. She hasn't banned me because I dont go on her page.
I couldnt find it. Maybe your comments were deleted when she banned you
My argument with Sasha was days ago and not related to Sabrina. I was informed that Sasha had called Sabrina crazy by a friend this morning and then I saw two videos by Sabrina mentioning it. I haven't personally seen the offending post.
Be sure to pass a link to this page.... I am sure she will love it.
yes...I want to see i too? thx
❤❤❤⚘
Please tell us how you really feel about her !!!
😉
🤣
My son has autism because of people like her. From my vantage she is full of pride. She doesnt appear to have deep human connection and compassion to even understand a person's aura let alone the potential for mind control. It's people like her who would have said radio is impossible, called it dangerous and made the religious leader burn people at the stake for even thinking it. Getting on her page right now felt toxic
Thanks a lot for the links, Fleur! xx