There was a "Hot Mic" moment, no longer searchable after Dianna's "Accidental Death" where Queen Elizabeth was heard calling her a commoner, prior to the marriage. Commoner is a nice word for serf. As I said, she was considered a Muckblood, because she was not pure blood, therefore, unworthy. The Queen strongly opposed their marriage, and used that as her reasoning for not abdicating the thrown. Truth is, she's not really able to.
Correct or not, my information will not be proven accurate or inaccurate until after the Queen passes. But the Queen herself is not of true British Royal Blood. So pretty hypocritical of her judgement, to say the least.
According to the accepted rules of the Aristocratic Code, if an heir is not named, the bloodline ends. Alexander did not pass off his ring, because his chosen heir was not at his bedside. Islam has been at war with itself for over 1500 years because Mohamed failed to name an heir. It's a strangely hard fast rule they all abide by. Many do believe the crown is Prince Charles' birthright, and automatic once the queen passes. But a birthright, as next in line, is not the same as being named, or ordained by the church. The Seven remaining bloodlines in control will not accept him as a king, if not chosen and ordained.
The documented, but not published history of the kingdoms can be learned from what could be argued as the world's first trade union, when they refused to become owned by the Vatican. They were simple men, and their families, who were very specialized in their trade. So specialized that those who needed their services, skills and knowledge around the world, hired them to do what they do. They were men of all religions, because they traveled the globe to do what they do, because only the very wealthy could have built what they built, Castles, Synagogues, Mosques, Forts, Embattlements, and etc. They were called Masons. When they refused the Church, the became Free Masons. They have been demonized ever since the early 1400 when the told the Church to "Kiss My Ass."
They had tradesmen from all over the world, or every ethnic group, and every religion. So FREEDOM of religion was very important to them. They just wanted to provide for their families, do what they did, build things of stone, masons.
Parliament can literally use the fact that Queen Elizabeth cannot prove Pure Bloodline, hence why she's considered Queen Regnant, only as a matter of right of assertion is she considered a ruler, a ruler with little to no authority. Charles is the only viable possibility, as the boys are Muggle born because of their once serf mother, a simple school teacher.
Diana, Princess of Wales, formerly Lady Diana Frances Spencer, was born on 1 July 1961 at Park House near Sandringham, Norfolk. She was the youngest daughter of the then Viscount and Viscountess Althorp, now the late (8th) Earl Spencer and the late Hon. Mrs Shand-Kydd, daughter of the 4th Baron Fermoy.
She was no serf and worked as a nursery assistant through choice!
Like Hinduism, it's not written. It's a code which the kingdoms have abided by for centuries. It's not something you just look up on Google. You have to have rubbed elbows.
As for the UK and Parliamentary Rules, the British Constitution removed almost ALL powers from the Royalty, and gave them to Parliament. Parliament is predominately owned and controlled by Aristocrats, who have instructed Parliament to never approve. Why do you think that little brat Meagan talked her little prince into breaking away from the family? Because she leaned that he will NEVER have a chance to be King, even if he's the last male royal.
The reduction of the Royal Families around the world began in earnest in the late 1300 and became accepted by 7 bloodlines at the seven corners of the world, mentioned in the Christian Bible with the lesson of the Tower of Babble. There is no longer a kingdom, or ruling family in Russia, France, Germany, Japan, and many many other nations. Some were killed off, (Romanovs) and others were forced to die off. When George VI openly defied the Church in Rome, the position of King was abolished upon his death.
7 rings, and one to rule them all. At the top of the Holy Roman Catholic Church is an organization which is the most powerful corporation, because it actually owns the many of the most powerful corporations. Ever wonder way all world leaders kiss the pope's ring when in the Chambers of the Pius? And one ring to rule them all. They own the most secret banks in Switzerland. That's where the world's riches went, during the time period when the Knight's Templar were basically the Wells Fargo of the Church. They were taking the deposits of the chosen kingdoms into those vaults. Those who are the depositors, are the Seven Kingdoms.
The UK created the Anglican Church. That was the beginning of the end.
The Windsors are actually of German descent. They are members of the Saxe-Coburg & Gotha Nobility bloodline who took over the British throne when James II fled the country in 1688, Parliament held that he had 'abdicated the government' and that the throne was vacant. The throne was then offered, not to James's young son, but to his daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange, as joint rulers.
"When George VI openly defied the Church in Rome, the position of King was abolished upon his death." - this refers to Queen Elizabeth's father who was a very religious man and died in 1952. He owed no allegiance to Rome because England has been protestant since Henry VIII was refused a divorce by Rome. Parliament passed the Act of Supremacy in 1534 & solidified the break from the Catholic Church making the king the Supreme Head of the Church of England.
Correct. I should expect that you would know British Royalty history. Yes, George VI was a deeply religious man, who relied heavily upon his life partner, his wife, as his moral compass. Probably one of the few altruistic kings England had ever had. None the less, the real power, rests in Rome. The Church is the banker of the most powerful royal families. That's what the Knight's Templar were doing, taking deposits. When they finally realized what they were doing, and the absolute power the Church was obtaining by controlling the physical possession of the worlds wealth, they conspired to start hiding it from the church. When their plan was discovered, the church had them hunted down. The Church owns those Swiss banks who's entries are at the base of granite mountains. That's where their "Guards" come from. They are an elite group of men, bred, born, raised, and trained to do one thing, and one thing only. They know nothing else. They are hard core believers, because they have not been allowed any other knowledge. They are raised for one purpose only, to protect and serve the Priory.
It's sounds like such a lovely place to live, I'm sure they will be quite content!
If I ruled the world. . . well it wouldn't look like this.
But you'll find me on my hands and knees looking at the tiniest of flowers and the amazing diversity of insect life. While dreaming of a small passive house, with glorious thermal mass walls and floors.
Time to turn the snow globe upside down!!! Just one hearty shake should do it!
Great post! Exactly the direction we are being thrust towards. Another source warning of the upcoming dangers of Technocracy. Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood.
I've been saying to my wife for the last 5 years we're heading a Venus project technocracy.
Fresco used to say it would take 10 years to change the shape of the Earth. Coincidentally mf Klaus says it will take 10 years for the great reset to be fully on.
One just need to pay close attention to his speeches to realise what's inside his mind.
Peter Joseph also. All scumbags that are pushing us straight to a technocracy. What scares me most is how easily young people fall on that bs talk they have. Everything is rainbow, birds and shiny on their future society. Resource based economy my ass. What they want is to fully control all earth resources and let the crumbles for us.
The Agenda of The TECHNOCRATS is a discussion between Patrick Wood and Celeste Solum.
https://celestialreport.com/programs/patrickwood_1_14_22-91e7ce
There was a "Hot Mic" moment, no longer searchable after Dianna's "Accidental Death" where Queen Elizabeth was heard calling her a commoner, prior to the marriage. Commoner is a nice word for serf. As I said, she was considered a Muckblood, because she was not pure blood, therefore, unworthy. The Queen strongly opposed their marriage, and used that as her reasoning for not abdicating the thrown. Truth is, she's not really able to.
Correct or not, my information will not be proven accurate or inaccurate until after the Queen passes. But the Queen herself is not of true British Royal Blood. So pretty hypocritical of her judgement, to say the least.
GB was sold out by the true rulers a long time ago. Why do you think the Queen hasn't named an Heir to the throne? She's not allowed to.
She does not need to name Prince Charles as her heir. It is his right of succession.
According to the accepted rules of the Aristocratic Code, if an heir is not named, the bloodline ends. Alexander did not pass off his ring, because his chosen heir was not at his bedside. Islam has been at war with itself for over 1500 years because Mohamed failed to name an heir. It's a strangely hard fast rule they all abide by. Many do believe the crown is Prince Charles' birthright, and automatic once the queen passes. But a birthright, as next in line, is not the same as being named, or ordained by the church. The Seven remaining bloodlines in control will not accept him as a king, if not chosen and ordained.
I have never heard of this "aristocratic code".
This article explains how the UK Royals' succession works & note that the British parliament must approve.
https://www.royal.uk/succession
So now I send you down a very deep and dark rabbit hole.
Who did Hitler have a deal with to not harm its followers?
Where was Hitler before returning to Germany?
Where did Hitler get the idea of Blonde Hair, Blue eyes?
Germans are not predominantly Blonde Haired, Blue Eyed.
Why are there Swiss Guards in the Vatican in Rome?
Why not Italian citizens?
Who are these people, and where is do they come from?
There isn't an application or school one can apply to.
Why is the Vatican a sovereign city in Italy?
Where are the most secret banks in the world?
Why is the common most import and export, BACK AND FORTH, from Italy, Germany, and Switzerland, BLOOD?
The documented, but not published history of the kingdoms can be learned from what could be argued as the world's first trade union, when they refused to become owned by the Vatican. They were simple men, and their families, who were very specialized in their trade. So specialized that those who needed their services, skills and knowledge around the world, hired them to do what they do. They were men of all religions, because they traveled the globe to do what they do, because only the very wealthy could have built what they built, Castles, Synagogues, Mosques, Forts, Embattlements, and etc. They were called Masons. When they refused the Church, the became Free Masons. They have been demonized ever since the early 1400 when the told the Church to "Kiss My Ass."
They had tradesmen from all over the world, or every ethnic group, and every religion. So FREEDOM of religion was very important to them. They just wanted to provide for their families, do what they did, build things of stone, masons.
In Portugal they´re known as knight templars.
They were called by many names in different parts of the world I'm sure. Probably a few rather unflattering names.
Parliament can literally use the fact that Queen Elizabeth cannot prove Pure Bloodline, hence why she's considered Queen Regnant, only as a matter of right of assertion is she considered a ruler, a ruler with little to no authority. Charles is the only viable possibility, as the boys are Muggle born because of their once serf mother, a simple school teacher.
Diana, Princess of Wales, formerly Lady Diana Frances Spencer, was born on 1 July 1961 at Park House near Sandringham, Norfolk. She was the youngest daughter of the then Viscount and Viscountess Althorp, now the late (8th) Earl Spencer and the late Hon. Mrs Shand-Kydd, daughter of the 4th Baron Fermoy.
She was no serf and worked as a nursery assistant through choice!
Like Hinduism, it's not written. It's a code which the kingdoms have abided by for centuries. It's not something you just look up on Google. You have to have rubbed elbows.
As for the UK and Parliamentary Rules, the British Constitution removed almost ALL powers from the Royalty, and gave them to Parliament. Parliament is predominately owned and controlled by Aristocrats, who have instructed Parliament to never approve. Why do you think that little brat Meagan talked her little prince into breaking away from the family? Because she leaned that he will NEVER have a chance to be King, even if he's the last male royal.
The reduction of the Royal Families around the world began in earnest in the late 1300 and became accepted by 7 bloodlines at the seven corners of the world, mentioned in the Christian Bible with the lesson of the Tower of Babble. There is no longer a kingdom, or ruling family in Russia, France, Germany, Japan, and many many other nations. Some were killed off, (Romanovs) and others were forced to die off. When George VI openly defied the Church in Rome, the position of King was abolished upon his death.
7 rings, and one to rule them all. At the top of the Holy Roman Catholic Church is an organization which is the most powerful corporation, because it actually owns the many of the most powerful corporations. Ever wonder way all world leaders kiss the pope's ring when in the Chambers of the Pius? And one ring to rule them all. They own the most secret banks in Switzerland. That's where the world's riches went, during the time period when the Knight's Templar were basically the Wells Fargo of the Church. They were taking the deposits of the chosen kingdoms into those vaults. Those who are the depositors, are the Seven Kingdoms.
The UK created the Anglican Church. That was the beginning of the end.
The Windsors are actually of German descent. They are members of the Saxe-Coburg & Gotha Nobility bloodline who took over the British throne when James II fled the country in 1688, Parliament held that he had 'abdicated the government' and that the throne was vacant. The throne was then offered, not to James's young son, but to his daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange, as joint rulers.
"When George VI openly defied the Church in Rome, the position of King was abolished upon his death." - this refers to Queen Elizabeth's father who was a very religious man and died in 1952. He owed no allegiance to Rome because England has been protestant since Henry VIII was refused a divorce by Rome. Parliament passed the Act of Supremacy in 1534 & solidified the break from the Catholic Church making the king the Supreme Head of the Church of England.
Correct. I should expect that you would know British Royalty history. Yes, George VI was a deeply religious man, who relied heavily upon his life partner, his wife, as his moral compass. Probably one of the few altruistic kings England had ever had. None the less, the real power, rests in Rome. The Church is the banker of the most powerful royal families. That's what the Knight's Templar were doing, taking deposits. When they finally realized what they were doing, and the absolute power the Church was obtaining by controlling the physical possession of the worlds wealth, they conspired to start hiding it from the church. When their plan was discovered, the church had them hunted down. The Church owns those Swiss banks who's entries are at the base of granite mountains. That's where their "Guards" come from. They are an elite group of men, bred, born, raised, and trained to do one thing, and one thing only. They know nothing else. They are hard core believers, because they have not been allowed any other knowledge. They are raised for one purpose only, to protect and serve the Priory.
It's sounds like such a lovely place to live, I'm sure they will be quite content!
If I ruled the world. . . well it wouldn't look like this.
But you'll find me on my hands and knees looking at the tiniest of flowers and the amazing diversity of insect life. While dreaming of a small passive house, with glorious thermal mass walls and floors.
Time to turn the snow globe upside down!!! Just one hearty shake should do it!
I prefer your vision too! xx
Charles Eisenstein posted an interesting writing titled Parallel Timelines.
Yes, thanks for the tip.
Great post! Exactly the direction we are being thrust towards. Another source warning of the upcoming dangers of Technocracy. Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood.
Back in 1974 seeds were already being planted.
https://youtu.be/lBIdk-fgCeQ
Following 911 zeitgeist movement came with Venus project from fresco attached.
When I saw this https://www.thevenusproject.com/united-nations-award-given-jacque-fresco-city-designcommunity/ everything turned crystal clear in my mind.
I've been saying to my wife for the last 5 years we're heading a Venus project technocracy.
Fresco used to say it would take 10 years to change the shape of the Earth. Coincidentally mf Klaus says it will take 10 years for the great reset to be fully on.
Another good post Frances. Thanks 👍🏻💪🏻♥️
Jacque Fresco had a similar effect on me! Shudders!
Another mf with mouse face.
One just need to pay close attention to his speeches to realise what's inside his mind.
Peter Joseph also. All scumbags that are pushing us straight to a technocracy. What scares me most is how easily young people fall on that bs talk they have. Everything is rainbow, birds and shiny on their future society. Resource based economy my ass. What they want is to fully control all earth resources and let the crumbles for us.