That "97% of Scientists" claim is total fabrication.
In 2009 Peter Doran and Maggie Zimmerman of the University of Illinois in Chicago sent out a survey to 10,257 scientists. Only 3,146 bothered to answer the stupid thing. 79 Scientists who answered the survey claimed to be "Climate Scientists". The 97% is based on these 79 "Scientists" answers throwing out the other 3049 responses. 76 of those 79 "Climate Scientists" agreed that there is climate change, there is Global Warming and Man is the cause. 76 of 79 is 97% when in actuality it's 76 of 10,257 (.0094%) or 76 of 3,146 (.03%). So either .0094% or .03% of "Scientists" actually believe in man-made Global Warming according to the oft quoted survey.
Sorry, I don't know how else I can send you this message, but your positive feedback is always most valuable to me, especially after we had a disagreement, but were kind and intelligent enough to retain respect for each other. We are also reading each other, which seems to indicate that you and I belong to the minority that is still not compromised!
I appreciate your work!
I offer only bonuses to paid subscribers, but having to spend 10-14 hours a day on reading, writing, and housekeeping is not exactly easy to do for free and the return are pennies on the hours. I never intended to do this for money and never lock anyone out of anything for not paying, but I am still grateful for the support of those, who realize this.
.....honestly, been immersed in HOURS of revisiting myriad 9-11, Sandy Hook inconsistencies, sacred geometry these past few days - will share a link below to what's INARGUABLY, the most comprehensive associated video ever produced, by Scott.....Onsott (?) called, 'Secrets Hiding In Plain Sight' (agree with about 95% of his conclusions) and I admittedly DON'T have the patience to review Happer's arguments - greenhouse gases are certainly NOT a PRIMARY concern as to ecosystemic deterioration and existential threat; will ONLY say that IF he's also dismissive (like TOO many identifying as 'conservative', I'm increasingly finding) of what is CLEARLY cause for CONSIDERABLE, clear evidence of DEVASTATING global-scale cataclysms (6-8 of 'em) in the past 100,000 years it's a incredibly UNiformed, oblivious stance - we've got a RUNAWAY pair of geomagnetic poles even NOW and AS someone with SOUND physics instincts, can assert it's just SANE to at least provide SOME sort of RESPONSIVE contingency to which I've spoken and identified; that SAID, Herndon & Whiteside's indictment of DELIBERATELY-deposited 'coal fly ash' (RATHER than 'CFCs') for a significantly-eviscerated ozone layer, confirms what I came to suspect last month is the REAL reason/s why elites been SO hellbent upon eliminating INCANDESCENT light bulbs: they aren't stable enough to allow for encapsulated TRACKING sensors (while LED illumination can't fully approximate natural illumination, such as by the Sun; may lessen effectiveness of certain biological functions, and those SCARY-looking, toxic CFL spiraled tubes, were just a BIG ol' SCAM.....) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHhgLnIvuAs
Thank you, Frances, for addressing the big fat elephant in the room, geo-engineering. It's mind-blowing how ignorant most people are of this issue. I'm sure you've probably seen it already, but FrankenSkies is a good documentary for people to start with. Along with The Dimming, of course. While people are all jazzed up about their electric cars, they won't even question what all those big fat white stripes in the sky are. Or where that deep blue sky went. Thanks for all of your digging. You are amazing!
AWESOME series. I have been lecturing and educated on this lie for a long time. It is all part of UN Agenda 21/Global Biodiversity Assessment/Wildlands Project.
Dear Frances 100% agree without any hesitation. I have been talking to people, "inspiring" critical thinking for years now . I honestly think Green Energy has become like a religion to most. There is no scientific debate- absolutely none. It has become like a Cult - Religion. It is based on irrational beliefs, on thinking fallacies and it is fuelled by manipulators. It feels to me the objective is not really "green' energy but total destruction. Otherwise, we would actually have some real conversations about how we could become more "green" what being "green" actually means and how it really looks like in the context of us, our planet, future... What is being pushed as "green" is total bullshit. It is a cult. You can't argue with cult followers.
Report finds 'no evidence of a climate emergency" ~ Italian study reported by Sky Australia.
https://youtu.be/k7P4zyxM8zc
Climate change denial now a 'mental condition'!
https://youtu.be/vsafxsxY-fU
REMEMBER!
That "97% of Scientists" claim is total fabrication.
In 2009 Peter Doran and Maggie Zimmerman of the University of Illinois in Chicago sent out a survey to 10,257 scientists. Only 3,146 bothered to answer the stupid thing. 79 Scientists who answered the survey claimed to be "Climate Scientists". The 97% is based on these 79 "Scientists" answers throwing out the other 3049 responses. 76 of those 79 "Climate Scientists" agreed that there is climate change, there is Global Warming and Man is the cause. 76 of 79 is 97% when in actuality it's 76 of 10,257 (.0094%) or 76 of 3,146 (.03%). So either .0094% or .03% of "Scientists" actually believe in man-made Global Warming according to the oft quoted survey.
Sorry, I don't know how else I can send you this message, but your positive feedback is always most valuable to me, especially after we had a disagreement, but were kind and intelligent enough to retain respect for each other. We are also reading each other, which seems to indicate that you and I belong to the minority that is still not compromised!
I appreciate your work!
I offer only bonuses to paid subscribers, but having to spend 10-14 hours a day on reading, writing, and housekeeping is not exactly easy to do for free and the return are pennies on the hours. I never intended to do this for money and never lock anyone out of anything for not paying, but I am still grateful for the support of those, who realize this.
.....honestly, been immersed in HOURS of revisiting myriad 9-11, Sandy Hook inconsistencies, sacred geometry these past few days - will share a link below to what's INARGUABLY, the most comprehensive associated video ever produced, by Scott.....Onsott (?) called, 'Secrets Hiding In Plain Sight' (agree with about 95% of his conclusions) and I admittedly DON'T have the patience to review Happer's arguments - greenhouse gases are certainly NOT a PRIMARY concern as to ecosystemic deterioration and existential threat; will ONLY say that IF he's also dismissive (like TOO many identifying as 'conservative', I'm increasingly finding) of what is CLEARLY cause for CONSIDERABLE, clear evidence of DEVASTATING global-scale cataclysms (6-8 of 'em) in the past 100,000 years it's a incredibly UNiformed, oblivious stance - we've got a RUNAWAY pair of geomagnetic poles even NOW and AS someone with SOUND physics instincts, can assert it's just SANE to at least provide SOME sort of RESPONSIVE contingency to which I've spoken and identified; that SAID, Herndon & Whiteside's indictment of DELIBERATELY-deposited 'coal fly ash' (RATHER than 'CFCs') for a significantly-eviscerated ozone layer, confirms what I came to suspect last month is the REAL reason/s why elites been SO hellbent upon eliminating INCANDESCENT light bulbs: they aren't stable enough to allow for encapsulated TRACKING sensors (while LED illumination can't fully approximate natural illumination, such as by the Sun; may lessen effectiveness of certain biological functions, and those SCARY-looking, toxic CFL spiraled tubes, were just a BIG ol' SCAM.....) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHhgLnIvuAs
Thank you, Frances, for addressing the big fat elephant in the room, geo-engineering. It's mind-blowing how ignorant most people are of this issue. I'm sure you've probably seen it already, but FrankenSkies is a good documentary for people to start with. Along with The Dimming, of course. While people are all jazzed up about their electric cars, they won't even question what all those big fat white stripes in the sky are. Or where that deep blue sky went. Thanks for all of your digging. You are amazing!
HELIOS has arrived:
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/lockheed-martin-laser-us-navy
AWESOME series. I have been lecturing and educated on this lie for a long time. It is all part of UN Agenda 21/Global Biodiversity Assessment/Wildlands Project.
Nature can never be murdered. It always fights back https://youtu.be/VTW2Sczq2NA
Dear Frances 100% agree without any hesitation. I have been talking to people, "inspiring" critical thinking for years now . I honestly think Green Energy has become like a religion to most. There is no scientific debate- absolutely none. It has become like a Cult - Religion. It is based on irrational beliefs, on thinking fallacies and it is fuelled by manipulators. It feels to me the objective is not really "green' energy but total destruction. Otherwise, we would actually have some real conversations about how we could become more "green" what being "green" actually means and how it really looks like in the context of us, our planet, future... What is being pushed as "green" is total bullshit. It is a cult. You can't argue with cult followers.