Whoops! It looks like the US has shot itself in the foot but isn't that exactly what the globalists want?
I have the impression that globalism (if it succeeds) will be a unipolar world run by the WEF/UN - no exceptionalism required.... maybe the current financial war on Russia is cleverly designed to trap the bigger fish.... just a thought.
The UK Imperialist have infiltrated the US Corporation with treasonous operatives since 1800's. Dr John Coleman committee of 300 lists the main players. Since Us is tied to the NWO agenda mob (Mafia) Nato agreement, the real agenda is force Putin to attack a nato country so US will fall under Military Marshall law under Joe Stalin Jesuit psycho can steal whatever brain dead mericans think they own! They only have rights to so called fiat assets. All rights surrendered so debt bomb that is ready to explode can be saved for the Banksters and Davos crowd. A digital CBD is coming with a monstorous dillution of wealth for the masses, so Gates can build his 50 million $$ bachelor pad and be protected by the Mercs. WHO has already stated next pandemic Medical martial law will be enacted. SEc of state takes its orders from MI6, and it is revealed today Blinkens parents are in with George Soros! The marriage of Khazarian mafia and Jesuit Mafia bank Goldman Sachs sums it all up!
"The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as “the rule of law”. In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the “rule of law”:
“Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law.” – Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C."
There are 2 forms of law-common law and contract law. Corporations modify contract laws every day. Washington DC was incorporated early 1800 ;s Bush said the constitution is a piece of paper, only to be shredded by loopholes. Putin said it best: Any country that has destroyed whole nations by acts of war under false pretense of national security has no moral authority to lecture others about freedom and Democracy.
Please read the link I provided. The "rule of law" is not about law. It is legalese for the power and supremacy of the Temple Bar. It is a deceptive phrase which has trapped whole countries into obeying international law under the mistaken impression that this is what the phrase signifies. IT DOES NOT.
The scam is described:
"Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln’s Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300)."
I have a brother who is a very prominent US atty and we do not see eye to eye on many issues. As long as license to practice is policy, these institutions will flourish. Its not a revolution if your fighting for the truth! Lawyers use precedents from past decisions to make a legal argument. My experience in trying to fight a patent rejection from the English controlled Searco (which Bush shipped out in 2006 because Pfizer keep losing patents to US examination, was to complete the monopoly of the bioweapon. What you are saying in the formation of Corporate/monopoly formation of contract law. Under contract law, one party has dominance over the other. Since courts make the final decision its easy to see the corruption and arrogance of the Davos/WEF clowns.
"one party has dominance over the other" provided that both parties don't belong to the same Temple Bar club.... which, in the case of the US Constitution, is the whole deception. Both signees belonged to the same Temple Bar club making the document void.
I asked you to read the link..... please do so. I am not talking about the "rule of law" as in legal arguments!
US revolution was exactly to break away from that chain of slavery that are talking about. The constitution was authored by 2 brilliant minds Franklin and Jefferson. Are you saying they caused the war of 1776 because both were members of the temple bar club? Americas tombstone will read the country was a criminal corporation because it supported individual freedom and that tree of liberty.
Under globalist influence RAND Corp scripted U.S. war policy against Russia in 2019:
March 28 (EIRNS)—In 2019, the RAND Corporation published a 354-page report entitled “Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground.” It is a script for a policy of geopolitical confrontation against Russia, intended to weaken and undermine Russia as a state, EIR reported at the time that the RAND synopsis of the report said it all: “As the U.S. National Defense Strategy recognizes, the United States is currently locked in a great-power competition with Russia. This report seeks to define areas where the United States can compete to its own advantage. It examines Russian vulnerabilities and anxieties; analyzes potential policy options to exploit them; and assesses the associated benefits, costs, and risks, as well as the likelihood of successful implementation.”
Many of the steps towards confrontation proposed in the report have since been taken by the United States, as Rick Sterling, a San Francisco area-based investigative journalist, shows in an article, “Rand Report Prescribed U.S. Provocations against Russia and Predicted Russia Might Retaliate in Ukraine,” in Dissident Voice. “Rather than ‘trying to stay ahead’ or trying to improve the U.S. domestically or in international relations, the emphasis is on efforts and actions to undermine the designated adversary Russia,” Sterling writes. The report, he continues, “notes that Russia has ‘deep seated’ anxieties about Western interference and potential military attack. These anxieties are deemed to be a vulnerability to exploit. There is no mention of the cause of the Russian anxieties: They have been invaded multiple times and had 27 million deaths in WW2.”
Sterling notes that among the provocations proposed in the report are the following:
“• Repositioning bombers within easy striking range of key Russian strategic targets
“• Deploying additional tactical nuclear weapons to locations in Europe and Asia
“• Increasing U.S. and allied naval force posture and presence in Russia’s operating areas (Black Sea)
“• Holding NATO war exercises on Russia’s borders
“• Withdrawing from the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.”
“These and many other provocations suggested by Rand have, in fact, been implemented,” Sterling writes. “For example, NATO conducted massive war exercises dubbed ‘Defender 2021’ right up Russia’s border. NATO has started ‘patrolling’ the Black Sea and engaging in provocative intrusions into Crimean waters. The U.S. has withdrawn from the INF Treaty.”
What the RAND report does, he says later, is assess the costs and benefits of various U.S. actions. “It is considered a ‘benefit’ if increased U.S. assistance to Ukraine results in the loss of Russian blood and resources. Speculating on the possibility of Russian troop presence in Ukraine, the report suggests that it could become ‘quite controversial at home, as it did when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.’ ”
Peace, on the other hand, Sterling says, is considered “disadvantageous.” “A peace settlement that guaranteed basic rights for all Ukrainians and state neutrality in the rivalry of big powers, would be advantageous to most Ukrainians,” he writes. “It is only the U.S. foreign policy establishment including the U.S. military media industrial complex, and Ukrainian ultra-nationalists who would be ‘disadvantaged.’ ”
Whoops! It looks like the US has shot itself in the foot but isn't that exactly what the globalists want?
I have the impression that globalism (if it succeeds) will be a unipolar world run by the WEF/UN - no exceptionalism required.... maybe the current financial war on Russia is cleverly designed to trap the bigger fish.... just a thought.
https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/currency-wars-center-on-russias-gold.html
The UK Imperialist have infiltrated the US Corporation with treasonous operatives since 1800's. Dr John Coleman committee of 300 lists the main players. Since Us is tied to the NWO agenda mob (Mafia) Nato agreement, the real agenda is force Putin to attack a nato country so US will fall under Military Marshall law under Joe Stalin Jesuit psycho can steal whatever brain dead mericans think they own! They only have rights to so called fiat assets. All rights surrendered so debt bomb that is ready to explode can be saved for the Banksters and Davos crowd. A digital CBD is coming with a monstorous dillution of wealth for the masses, so Gates can build his 50 million $$ bachelor pad and be protected by the Mercs. WHO has already stated next pandemic Medical martial law will be enacted. SEc of state takes its orders from MI6, and it is revealed today Blinkens parents are in with George Soros! The marriage of Khazarian mafia and Jesuit Mafia bank Goldman Sachs sums it all up!
It is so much more complex than you imagine!
"The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as “the rule of law”. In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the “rule of law”:
“Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law.” – Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C."
https://steemit.com/all/@belisoful/the-templar-bar-crown-corporation-the-crown-temple-by-rule-of-mystery-babylon-city-of-london
Was Putin aware of the significance of the use of the phrase "rule of law"?
I would doubt it.
There are 2 forms of law-common law and contract law. Corporations modify contract laws every day. Washington DC was incorporated early 1800 ;s Bush said the constitution is a piece of paper, only to be shredded by loopholes. Putin said it best: Any country that has destroyed whole nations by acts of war under false pretense of national security has no moral authority to lecture others about freedom and Democracy.
Please read the link I provided. The "rule of law" is not about law. It is legalese for the power and supremacy of the Temple Bar. It is a deceptive phrase which has trapped whole countries into obeying international law under the mistaken impression that this is what the phrase signifies. IT DOES NOT.
The scam is described:
"Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln’s Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300)."
I have a brother who is a very prominent US atty and we do not see eye to eye on many issues. As long as license to practice is policy, these institutions will flourish. Its not a revolution if your fighting for the truth! Lawyers use precedents from past decisions to make a legal argument. My experience in trying to fight a patent rejection from the English controlled Searco (which Bush shipped out in 2006 because Pfizer keep losing patents to US examination, was to complete the monopoly of the bioweapon. What you are saying in the formation of Corporate/monopoly formation of contract law. Under contract law, one party has dominance over the other. Since courts make the final decision its easy to see the corruption and arrogance of the Davos/WEF clowns.
"one party has dominance over the other" provided that both parties don't belong to the same Temple Bar club.... which, in the case of the US Constitution, is the whole deception. Both signees belonged to the same Temple Bar club making the document void.
I asked you to read the link..... please do so. I am not talking about the "rule of law" as in legal arguments!
US revolution was exactly to break away from that chain of slavery that are talking about. The constitution was authored by 2 brilliant minds Franklin and Jefferson. Are you saying they caused the war of 1776 because both were members of the temple bar club? Americas tombstone will read the country was a criminal corporation because it supported individual freedom and that tree of liberty.
Under globalist influence RAND Corp scripted U.S. war policy against Russia in 2019:
March 28 (EIRNS)—In 2019, the RAND Corporation published a 354-page report entitled “Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground.” It is a script for a policy of geopolitical confrontation against Russia, intended to weaken and undermine Russia as a state, EIR reported at the time that the RAND synopsis of the report said it all: “As the U.S. National Defense Strategy recognizes, the United States is currently locked in a great-power competition with Russia. This report seeks to define areas where the United States can compete to its own advantage. It examines Russian vulnerabilities and anxieties; analyzes potential policy options to exploit them; and assesses the associated benefits, costs, and risks, as well as the likelihood of successful implementation.”
Many of the steps towards confrontation proposed in the report have since been taken by the United States, as Rick Sterling, a San Francisco area-based investigative journalist, shows in an article, “Rand Report Prescribed U.S. Provocations against Russia and Predicted Russia Might Retaliate in Ukraine,” in Dissident Voice. “Rather than ‘trying to stay ahead’ or trying to improve the U.S. domestically or in international relations, the emphasis is on efforts and actions to undermine the designated adversary Russia,” Sterling writes. The report, he continues, “notes that Russia has ‘deep seated’ anxieties about Western interference and potential military attack. These anxieties are deemed to be a vulnerability to exploit. There is no mention of the cause of the Russian anxieties: They have been invaded multiple times and had 27 million deaths in WW2.”
Sterling notes that among the provocations proposed in the report are the following:
“• Repositioning bombers within easy striking range of key Russian strategic targets
“• Deploying additional tactical nuclear weapons to locations in Europe and Asia
“• Increasing U.S. and allied naval force posture and presence in Russia’s operating areas (Black Sea)
“• Holding NATO war exercises on Russia’s borders
“• Withdrawing from the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.”
“These and many other provocations suggested by Rand have, in fact, been implemented,” Sterling writes. “For example, NATO conducted massive war exercises dubbed ‘Defender 2021’ right up Russia’s border. NATO has started ‘patrolling’ the Black Sea and engaging in provocative intrusions into Crimean waters. The U.S. has withdrawn from the INF Treaty.”
What the RAND report does, he says later, is assess the costs and benefits of various U.S. actions. “It is considered a ‘benefit’ if increased U.S. assistance to Ukraine results in the loss of Russian blood and resources. Speculating on the possibility of Russian troop presence in Ukraine, the report suggests that it could become ‘quite controversial at home, as it did when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.’ ”
Peace, on the other hand, Sterling says, is considered “disadvantageous.” “A peace settlement that guaranteed basic rights for all Ukrainians and state neutrality in the rivalry of big powers, would be advantageous to most Ukrainians,” he writes. “It is only the U.S. foreign policy establishment including the U.S. military media industrial complex, and Ukrainian ultra-nationalists who would be ‘disadvantaged.’ ”