28 Comments

Frances, thanks for your post. I agree with your analysis. Personally, Ithink that nearly every music video coming out of what I "lovingly" call Hellyweird is a Satanic (and I would add Luciferian) ritual. But I can't leave out the fact that it's also pornographic. So viewers are bombarded with all that psychologically manipulating symbology while being sexually manipulated — and they have no idea because they're so GONE.

Do "people" care about doing internal work to fix their broken psychology, to individuate and mature? It's a seemingly lost art (necessity) for the vast majority of humanity.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 27, 2022·edited Mar 27, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment

"...mention some of the horrible qualities of Lucifer, Vassago, Samael, or Satan, etc."

IDK. Not enough wah-wah pedal; poorly composed bass solos; entirely missing guitar harmonies in first track, to name a few.

Expand full comment
Mar 24, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

good god what pure filth, its almost as if they wish to turn this planet into a cesspit for the return of their false idol

Expand full comment

Not sure that symbols rule, but they certainly tell a hidden story and represent a quick and easy way to identify group loyalty. Hitler exploited that brilliantly with the ancient symbol of the Hakenkreuz, after all.

Expand full comment

That is revolting, that video. It's obscene, and I don't mean in a "sexy" way. I agree with your assessment... There's nothing at all "feminist" about this, imo. It's antithetical to feminism. It seems to be saying, in my opinion, that women are EVIL. I think I'll go now and vomit.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 26, 2022·edited Mar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Sure, some women are evil, that's undeniable when one considers the Queen of England.... But some men are evil, too... and men run the world, mostly. So... looks to me like evil is an equal opportunity soul eater.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 27, 2022·edited Mar 27, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

It is only manly on the surface. The masonic women are astonishingly evil. (Personal experience here!)

Expand full comment

The video is disgusting. It reminds me of Lady Gaga's work except that it displays a far lower level of musical and performance and production talent. (and then there's the even worse "wet-ass p***sy" idiot whose name is not worth remembering) And Gaga's work and her activities leads us right to her mentor Marina Abramovic which leads us to the Podesta brothers and Tony Podesta's pedophile themed "art" he displayed in his house. Also John's emails which Wikileaks published with their talk of "hotdogs" and "maps" and other pedophile code words. And "Pizza" James Alefantis and his Clinton connected boyfriend David Brock of Media Matters. Also to the issue of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and their connections to the CIA, MI6 and Mossad and naturally to the CIA's long involvement with torture-induced mind control and identity destruction. (I recommend Dave McGowan's "Weird Scenes in the Canyon" and Tom O'Neill's "Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA and the Secret History of the Sixties") The NXIVM case cannot be left out of this mix; our Canadian PM's chief fundraiser is Stephan Bronfman, brother of Clare and Sarah Bronfman, confessed and convicted of racketeering, sex trafficking, torturing and branding women, including underage women you can bet! This provides a background to Donald Trump's attempt to make war on child sex traffickers with Operation Talon. These real indications of a high level international child sex trafficking industry involving CIA/MI6/Mossad and the most powerful and richest elites in Britain, Europe the USA and Canada leads me to feel that this stories of "Khazarians", however fact based they may be (and I haven't seen anything really solid) are a distraction. Certainly I have seen material and videos which seem like distractions to me; certainly this line is so potentially useful to Intelligence "limited hangout" projects its almost ready made for the purpose. I can't but think of the understandable reaction which investigators of international child sex trafficking would have to this type of material, which would be annoyance, wouldn't it? The flood of symbols we see in these music videos combined with all the very doubtful talk of Ghengis Khan's religion and other very weakly supported stories of centuries past serves the obvious function of making the whole idea that there is high level involvement in child sex trafficking seem like a ridiculous fantasy of overwrought right-wingers – it certainly can be used for painting that picture in the public mind. Why are we to go back 1000 years when there is the history of the Vietnam War and Operation Phoenix, and also the concurrent MKULTRA experiments including the creation of the Haight Ashbury scene including the CIA's Dr Jolyon West so well documented? Ghengis Khan is dead, the CIA lives.

One must be less naive about what the high level pedophiles and world bankers and CIA blackmailers are doing with their ownership of mass media, legacy and digital. Mind control!

Expand full comment
author

You are kidding me, surely? I wrote about the history of the steppes people and their religion to illustrate the modern objectives of the hidden hands. Astana in Kazakhstan is very much NOW.... I notice you don't want to acknowledge that.

Why should I let you tell me what I should focus on? Do you think I haven't been 100% aware of EVERYTHING you mentioned?

What I am trying to do (with no gratitude from you) is point out the hidden motivation behind all the filth especially the CIA.

Tell me WHO do you think the CIA actually get their orders from?

Expand full comment

Can I just say this? I like both of your blogs, I've known James for a while, and I think you might both back up, slow down and try to not necessarily take offense from each other, because I think you're both on the same page, with different means of getting there...

I wonder about the CIA taking orders from ANYONE... ? Thought they were beyond that... but if you know something, tell me! lol I would only guess the Queen, maybe?

Expand full comment
author

Originally the CIA were the OSS for a brief period during WW2. This article explains that OSS is the Order of Saint Sylvester and also the Office of Strategic Services.

http://churchandstate.org.uk/2012/10/cia-and-the-vaticans-intelligence-apparatus/

Expand full comment

The OSS was the US Govt's pre-CIA agency, responsible for intelligence-gathering. Its connections to the Vatican, I believe, came towards the tail end, or AFTER WWII, when it became the CIA, which then mutated into an Empire-serving, meddling, evil cohort of spies and influence-peddlers that answers to no one, and takes out anybody that bothers them or gets in the way of taking over any country or anything else they decide they want to crush. I know the Vatican is involved in FAR more than religion... and not in nice ways. I have to go run errands soon, but I'll try to read this later today (the link you provided). I may be wrong about certain dates of the OSS--CIA. I've never heard of the Order of Saint Sylvester... isn't he a cat? ha ha

Expand full comment
author
Mar 23, 2022·edited Mar 23, 2022Author

After you have digested the article I shared above. You will realise that official narratives are never true.

The next question to ask is:

Who founded the Vatican?

Finally we will arrive at the tip of the pyramid of power.

The Black Nobility, direct descendants of the Roman Senate.

https://www.history.com/topics/religion/vatican-city

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_nobility

The Roman Empire never fell. It merely concealed its identity, relocated a few times and rebranded itself. It was the British Empire, the Empire which was never British, and is now the clandestine and active New World Order controlling the WEF & UN with all its little sticky tentacles.

Expand full comment

I have long known official narratives are never true. The English monarchy is actually full of GERMANS. The Christian religion was founded by Rome, yes, indeed. I agree with you. This is not secret, just maybe not widely acknowledged. But yeah. I haven't yet left to do my errands, but I will try to get to these links soon anyway! ^_^

Expand full comment

beyond disgusting... the ‘feminist’ movement has been an absolute con from day one... and a degrading con at that.

Expand full comment

What?? Day one, back in the 1920's, and earlier?

Expand full comment

1960’s on... liberal feminism = sick joke

Expand full comment

Let me guess... you're quite young? I'm not trying to insult you, but I find your statements insulting-- as a feminist. In MY version of the term.

Expand full comment
Mar 23, 2022·edited Mar 23, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

liberal feminism did the heavy lifting, paving the way for ‘trans humanism’ & ‘equity’ movements as well as the scrubbing of God.

Expand full comment
author

I never heard the word "feminist" used until the 1960s. I attended a school founded by a suffragette and that was the origins of "women's liberation", which was the term that was later replaced by "feminism" after my years at school.

Suffrage made perfect sense to me. Liberation less so.... I mean, what were we liberated from? As far as I could tell we were being burdened with expectations of being wives/mothers and career women all at once.

It was only after Germaine Greer wrote the Female Eunuch that feminism became the toxic man-hating version which has robbed us of much femininity and the respect of our menfolk (in my opinion).

Expand full comment

agree.🐱

Expand full comment

The chili peppers said it best-I dream of Kalifornication-its the heartbeat of a decaying civilization! And your wiseman dont know it feels to be thick as a brick(Ian Anderson).

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 26, 2022·edited Mar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

I did NOT expect monster magnet. Thank you! Great song, hadn’t seen the video. The flying phalluses at the end are very... pretty? And ominous. The first comment is spot on about the band being criminally underrated. I wonder if that has to do with the band choosing to be dark & satanic on their own terms. Maybe they were satisfied with their limited audience and fame in exchange for not being controlled. I’d like to think that. Haven’t looked deeply into their background. I have a soft spot for “god says no” https://youtu.be/riAkBFKRqz0 ... and for butthole surfers, even after they started adulterating their music with mainstream sounds.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

Exclusively? Never mind. I’ll go to your substack and get outta here before I’m kicked out for changing the subject altogether. Glad to have found this substack through you, though, plus others to check out that I see in the comments.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 26, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
Comment removed
Expand full comment

That's an interesting insight, and I agree. The "Free Love" of the sixties was about trying to get women to be as devil-may-care about sex as a lot of men are... But women are the ones who get pregnant... so even though almost all the birth control was aimed at women, which is a far more complicated matter, women still have a tendency to protect themselves from predatory sex partners... understandably. But that is still, and more forcefully now, being bombarded with pressure to be, in the nicest term I can think of for it, a slut. I think this is a continuing effort of Patriarchy, to denigrate and disempower the Feminine, and I'm not talking just about women, but about the Archetype. The Feminine, and the Masculine, are spiritual... we all have both. It's the Yin/Yang idea.

Expand full comment
RemovedMar 27, 2022·edited Mar 27, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment

No, I'm not fucking kidding you. I've been preyed upon my entire life. Anecdotal evidence when taken as individual instances in individual's lives is proof of individual's experience. You seem to think I am leaving out ALL exceptions. I am not intentionally disregarding your trouble, I didn't even know about it. I'm really sorry you were victimized as a small child... I do understand, and relate, and sympathize; and while a twelve-year-old girl is probably just curious, it doesn't mean she isn't a predator.

That said, the VAST amount of victimization between people is men assaulting/abusing women, girls and boys, too, probably partly due to hormonal issues, previous abuse done to them, or mental health issues, but also clearly due to the differences in body weight and upper body strength. These are facts, too.

Again, I hear you, and I do not dismiss your pain. I feel it. Just like I feel mine, and others'. It's not fair, what happens to us that way, it's not right, it's not OK. xo

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment