I have been very concerned recently.
I will try to put it into words as briefly as possible.
When I was reading the Rockefeller 2010 document a couple of years ago, a "newspeak" word jumped out at me.
It was PUSHBACK. I spotted that the predator class had game-planned for this PUSHBACK.

https://www.academia.edu/42295029/Rockefeller_Vakf%C4%B1n%C4%B1n_May%C4%B1s_2010_Raporu_Scenarios_for_the_Future_of_Technology_and_International_Development_

In all my years of activism I never saw this word used to describe resistance to any government policy or decision, it struck me as odd.
At the grass root level we called our action protest, demonstration, rally etc., but chiefly we were resisting.

Now, whenever I hear this new term "pushback" being used I recognise it as the chosen term of the controllers. They are pushing us, they admit that by simply using this word. They have PLANNED ahead for the "pushback" but, psychologically, they have narrowed the possibilities of resistance to simply that..... pushback.

Hmm.

There are multiple ways to resist which fall outside of simply PUSHING.
We can:
Ignore, refute, disobey, disrupt, blockade, boycott, & so on.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/resistance

Social media is full of video makers, speakers & groups which are trying to lead the resistance into activities which have been planned for. These are controlling the opposition & at this time, our horizon is entirely dominated by them.

Remember this?
https://odysee.com/@OracleFilms:1/The-Push-back-Oracle-Films-2021-World-Wide-Rally-WWD-Global-protest-UK:7

I have NEVER seen so many obvious operatives as I see now.
Controlling our reaction is clearly crucial to the purveyors of the Great Reset.

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset

So let's keep a watchful eye on those who use the term "pushback" rather than the more powerful words like resistance, refusal, deny, battle, reject but above all let’s not forget the most important of all:

SELF DEFENCE

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/self-defence-and-prevention-crime

Words of Lord Morris in (Palmer v R 1971 AC 814):

"If there has been an attack so that self defence is reasonably necessary, it will be recognised that a person defending himself cannot weigh to a nicety the exact measure of his defensive action. If the jury thought that, in a moment of unexpected anguish, a person attacked had only done what he honestly and instinctively thought necessary, that would be the most potent evidence that only reasonable defensive action had been taken ..."

Needless to say, there will be no mere pushback from me.
There will be full on self defence.

70 Roaring Lion Facts That You Never Knew About

“Self-defence is Nature’s eldest law.”- John Dryden 1631-1700
(England’s first Poet Laureate)

Uncensored

NATURE'S OLDEST LAW