I learned about John Coleman's opinions regarding the Beatles and Tavistock decades ago. He declared that the Beatles and others had been selected, engineered and promoted to mislead my generation into the 'New Age'. I have had plenty of time to consider those ideas and have dismissed them as ridiculous.
I was there. I was a young teenager at the time and I know that the Beatles were promoted by the very best at EMI but nothing, not even Tavistock, could have engineered the tremendous reception that the Beatles received from the public. I don't believe that their songs were created for them. I do think that after they went to Munich, something fundamental changed but that appeared to be the result of EMI assigning good producers to their tracks.
In 1968 I took part in a recording of Hey Jude, at an aircraft hanger. We were picked up in Victoria Station and taken by the Magic Bus to the studio. It was a fantastic evening in which the Beatles rehearsed us to run forward and perform the chorus with them. They were very kind and natural. Above all, they were splendid musicians. I met Yoko Ono who was sitting underneath a camera tripod meditating. I asked her what she was doing and she explained to me about transcendental meditation which I had never heard of..... she was very sweet. I later learned to do it myself and used it to cope with the delivery of my 9.5 lb baby boy in 1972.
One of the psychological games that I have observed being pulled by the Tavistock and others is the destruction of heroes. I think that is what John Coleman was disseminating. If you read his work he sets out to instil as much fear of the future as he possibly could. Nowadays I see all heroes are built up for a time by the media and then they are torn down. This makes people despair that nobody is genuine. It is a psy-ops indeed but the opposite from what we are told.
The pundits also said that the entire hippy movement and its music was also engineered by psyops. I don't believe that either. I used to attend the Marquee Club in Soho, London from 1966 - 1969 and I knew Phil Collins, David Bowie, Pete Frampton and the members of Fleetwood Mac and the Who. None of them were famous then. They were all very young and sharing equipment, getting by on a shoe-string. They were mostly students at the local art colleges or music schools. We were very Avant Garde, and Bohemian in our style of dressing, later described as 'hippy'. We grew our hair long and wore no shoes to be in touch with the earth. These were fashions we created ourselves. We could not buy such things then. I made my clothes from old lacey table cloths and by taking 2nd hand clothes to pieces and redesigning them.
Tavistock et al may CLAIM that they engineered all this but they did not. They want to destroy our heroes and our memories. They want to lay claim to our inventions and our culture. They lie.
Give David Icke some of your time, he does a great job of distilling the zeitgeist of modern thought. He is as powerful as ever. I am encouraged by the fact that he mentioned me in his most recent book, "Perceptions Of A Renegade Mind":
He wrote: ""Further confirmation came in an email exchange between British citizen journalist Frances Leader and the government's Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (the Gates-funded MHRA)....The agency admitted that the 'vaccine' is not based on an isolated 'virus', but comes from a computer-generated model. Frances Leader was naturally banned from Cult-owned fascist Twitter for making this exchange public."
I knew they were on the verge of announcing this.... King Charles III gave hints in his write-up in the Carta Terra document. This was why I wrote about it in my Lymp Duhdashian fiction series. It is the only way I could get the info out without being censored or deplatformed.
I had read this post of yours, which is why I had become aware of the advances in this technology. Mike Adams' large following now hearing about it too is a good thing. You were ahead of the curve!
Contrary to your perspective, Love Your Enemy and Turn The Other Cheek ABSOLUTELY DO NOT APPLY to dealing with psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians. These people have no ability to empathize, no ability to love, no ability to care. You can turn all the cheeks you have, and they will continue spanking until you are wrung dry of whatever it is they want from you.
No, Love Your Enemy applies ONLY to people who have a conscience. IOW, the other 98% of humanity.
Indeed... Eliminating all psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians would HUGELY open the gates to profound human potential. These ARE the characters who have held back humanity for millennia.
Agreed. Throughout my life, on many notable occasions of subtle or overt 'attack', I have become quiet and summoned understanding, caring, kindness and compassion - turning the other cheek - in circumstances where it would have been very easy to do otherwise. 9 times out of 10 the reaction of the attacker quickly subsides. On several occasions the rapid change elicited interesting responses, "I lost my urge for conflict," "Somehow I felt instantly disarmed," "Sorry about that... I don't know what came over me."
IOW, the 98% always, to at least some degree, respond favorably to Love.
But there remains the 2% who experienced my 'other cheek'... the reaction was stark. I instantly saw the evil fire in their eyes flare up even higher. They immediately saw my attempt at reflecting their previous actions/words as weakness and vulnerability on my part. They then move in for the 'kill'.
Strong, clear and piercing discernment is called for when dealing with the 2%. The easiest response, of course, is to exit the encounter with the psychopath. Certainly that is better for your mental health, and perhaps physical health. However, you are letting the 'killer' go free... on to harm others.
Where does it stop?
It doesn't. Until they are stopped.
Perhaps Frances believes all psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians can be loved into rehabilitation?
I don't know what she believes, but to me that is most certainly a FALSE BELIEF. Most every Christian holds similar beliefs... beliefs no doubt cultivated by the same sort of personalities who have steadily infiltrated religious institutions as they have infiltrated all other institutions that have any sort of extra-ordinary power over other people.
Bottom line: If these 2% are not identified, routed out and their capacity to cause harm terminated, the human social merry-go-round continues ad infinitum.
Agreed about reincarnation, and I have spent a lot of time pondering it. I'd say the overall scheme could be called Spiritual Justice. Religionists seem to believe that it is 'godly' to suck it up, absorb the abuse/violence/death, hoping/believing that god will take care of things over several hundred lifetimes. While ultimately this is true, that POV can also be twisted and seen as a convenient cop-out that causes people to defer from listening their own conscience and free will, and then administering their own proper spiritual justice here and now. IOW, a belief that legitimizes the fear of taking action.
This same fear of taking action is present in all of us, to some degree. We have seen it in spades with the whole covid madness... deferring to 'authority'.
If I administer my own spiritual justice, do I claim I am above God? Not at all. If God provides me free will, moral conscience and the ability to act, then I get on with it. If I am being harmed by a sadistic personality, then I will first attempt to stop it with love. If the abuse continues, I either exit or terminate the abuse however is necessary. If I see an innocent someone else being harmed, I will act as my conscience dictates. I have no problem administering my own spiritual justice in the moment, exactly as my conscience tells me.
Finally, to paraphrase you, "I don't think you have much understanding of what psychopathy actually means."
I am sad that you seem to have missed the most important point I tried to make to you. I will repeat:
If a person is not cured of their hatred and fear during this life then they carry it forward to the next. I did not suggest that we permit psychopathy to continue on "hoping/believing that god will take care of things over several hundred lifetimes" - you also associate reincarnation with a belief in God. I don't.
Fine, let them take their malevolence into their next life. Meanwhile, in this lifetime, if you are being mentally, emotionally and possibly physically smashed by a psychopath, what is your response?
If you say, "Love them"... and that particular flavor of love equals passivity... then you have missed the most important point of what I am saying.
As well, that response would make it clear that you have never had to deal with a true psychopath in this lifetime. I can unequivocally say that loving them will only make matters worse... exponentially worse.
I'll leave you with a suggestion: study up about psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians.
And I'll leave you with a nice quote:
"New age spirituality is particularly dangerous in teaching people to adopt a certain naivety about the dark realities of this world. We are told that "all is one" to the point where lines between distinct right and wrong are blurred or non existent.
This talk of non duality is a perfect place for abusive predators to hide, for as long as there is no "right" or "wrong," harmful behavior goes undetected and no one is held accountable."
Working with various kinds of attachments and influences on a regular basis with my clients, as an energy healer, my experience tells me otherwise. Just simple "things" like emotions, or thought forms: they have an intelligence of their own, and the negative ones do not want to leave the body they are attached to. The more of them that accumulate over the years and the lifetimes, the bigger and more influential they become, until the "subject" - the human being - hardly has any free will left. Addictions are one possible consequence, since these entities need food in the form of negative energy. They will push the person to feel triggered and to create drama in their lives.
I did not know about miasms and other entities when I had a powerful experience that made me look into it. In my craniosacral training, I was working with a classmate who had a terrible headache. As I synchronized my breathing with hers, I felt something literally jump on me; it had a presence and a weight. My classmate got up and said her headache was gone. I, on the other hand, was in intense pain. Several classmates and the teacher worked with me for hours to try to get me back to normal. But the nasty headache persisted, despite seeing various other therapists in the following weeks, for a month and a half! That's when a particularly skilled craniosacral teacher managed to free me of what remained of that energy and rebalanced my system.
Later, when I was teaching craniosacral therapy myself, we would often have three students practice together: one on the table, one practicing the craniosacral and miasm release work, and the third one to remove the miasm - negative energies - from the one practicing who had picked it up from the first one. This way we avoided nasty experiences like mine. (By the way, that wasn't my idea, but that of the head of the training institute, who specialized in miasm release. The things we experienced in those classes! You had to be there to believe it.)
The release of negative energies and entities is part of shamanic work. Exorcism, as I understand it, would be another name for it. However, since the catholic approach is fear-based, it isn't terribly effective as you can't chase a fear-based energy/entity with fear. In fact, you feed it and offer it new entry points into the system.
It's not that invisible, 4th dimensional entities don't exist. The problem I think is that we are made to fear low vibrational entities and bow down to high vibrational ones, or what we are told are beings more powerful than us. Fear one kind and surrender our discernment and free agency to the other, that seems to be the control mechanism to me.
Judging by the symbols they have been using for centuries, the Vatican's inhabitants are very aware of 4th dimensional entities and how to work with them - or how to invite them in so they can work through the priests - to fill the Vatican Bank and their other accounts! But they are not alone: Hinduism for instance uses a lot of magic too.
Anyway, it's a huge topic and I can't do it justice in a few lines. But I can assure you that my point of view doesn't stem from indoctrination - catechism never did it for me, nor did atheism when I was exposed to it in my teens. I didn't believe in heaven or hell, but thought that the Golden Rule ought to be our guiding light. I officially left the catholic church in my twenties, when I decided I wasn't going to keep financing that corrupt organization. I looked at other religions but never felt the need to adopt one. Got sucked into New Ageism, explored that quite thoroughly, and found my way out again. But I have been working with clients from all over the world and with various beliefs, helping them release the burden of lifetimes of negativity, so they can become more of who they truly are and choose to lead healthier and happier lives. Releasing these entities and reprogramming dysfunctional beliefs is transformative!
I am a Barefoot Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine. I had to unlearn everything I previously understood, or believed in about medicine and healing. I had to start again.
In TCM the body, mind and spirit each can affect each other.
There are 6 pairs of electro-magnetic channels, each associated with a particular vital organ and an emotion. There is one more pair of channels, called the governing channel which circuits from the head, to the groin and up the spine, back to the head.
If a person exhibits an imbalance of pulses on any particular channel, and/or discoloration or distortion of any particular part of the tongue (a map of the organs) we can diagnose an imbalance in the corresponding emotion and vital organ.
Therefore, where your system of beliefs might presume an 'entity', mine would presume an imbalance of energetic function or a blockage or even a pathogen (like a parasite or fungus).
The way to heal the client would be to address the imbalance physically first i.e., with an intervention of herbs or acupuncture or massage. The healing on a physical level would clear the mind and the spirit would be calmed.
However, the physical body may have been weakened and thus susceptible to a relapse so the good healer would not only heal, but nourish in order to bolster the defences against further dis-ease.
This can be done by identifying which emotion went out of sorts in the first place.
Kidney - fear
Liver - anger
Spleen - worry
Heart - joy
Lungs - sadness
Brain - self esteem
Teaching each client to address the emotional imbalance that made the vital organ vulnerable is quite an artform of itself.
This is so well said/written, Frances. I am the eternal Sagittarian optimist and so I will live until my dying day doing what I can to make this planet a better place in spite of the extreme dark oppositional forces. We have to stay awake/aware and sound the alarm when need be but never stop living from our heart. 💗
I have the distinct and saddening impression that "the powers that be" have been in power and have had control for eons on this planet. Money is just a tool to control us - they don't need it (which will become obvious once CBDCs are the currency of the world - it will be even easier for them to conjure it out of thin air than with fiat money).
I think "The Matrix" is spot on about the control-grid. We are their farm animals from which they extract "loosh", the "energy drink" produced by negative emotions. What is done to children to harvest adrenochrome is really done to all of us at the etheric level. Hence the suffering which Buddha thought was a condition of human life. It seems to me it's a condition of the human farm animal that needs to be tortured in all kinds of ways - be it through wars, the concept of scarcity - hence the fear of lack and the ensuing greed, wars etc. - or through all kinds of other dysfunctional beliefs we have been programmed with. That would include our feeling of powerlessness and deference to authority.
We have creative power and imagination, which the controllers with their hive mind and AI lack. These powers of ours have to be curtailed (which explains our "education system") so that we remain small and slavish while they continue to prod us so that we produce their food.
Currently, at the end of the Kali Yuga, humanity is probably in a better position to wake up and smell the coffee... So rather than lose control, the herd is to be hooked up to the AI hive mind through the ingredients in the injectable bioweapon (and the chemtrails, and the food- and water supply etc.) and decimated to a more manageable level. In the process, through our fear and suffering, we produce even more loosh for them!
So yes, love is the answer, as love would starve these entities. Not what most understand the concept of love to be - sentimental, romantic love - but the high vibration of love that is neutral and doesn't have a polarity. As long as there is a polarity - fear - we will oscillate between the two sides of the coin. I don't think many of us have been able to transcend the duality to elevate ourselves to this vibration yet though.
These are my current thoughts on the topic and are subject to change as I keep exploring the reality we are trapped in... :)
I read your Comments with interest. And I found it particularly interesting that you rejected not only atheism, but also New Ageism which seems to swallow people up Jonah-like whole.
As to love, it is an unquestioning unconditional 'love' which has been used by the Wicked Ones as an implement to level the Christian Church. And the promotion of the 'all you need is love' theme with great success has done us a great violence.
I might quibble here and there ... but basically, I think you have said it straight. And this must have taken a whole lot of sorting things out on your part. No easy task!
Oh, the sorting out never ends, Francis..! Instead of prison bars, this matrix we are caught in has layer upon layer of lies and deception to keep us trapped and ignorant of reality. It would be so much more comfortable to have a belief system to hold on to - and at times I do, for a while, until I discover a hole in it. But the end of "The Truman Show" is not the real end, is it! Where one illusion ends, a new one begins... That has been my experience, anyway.
Isn't 'loosh' our psychic and imaginative ability? Our inventiveness too perhaps? I note that any patent worth its salt gets taken over by DARPA or the British equivalent - supposedly in the interests of 'national security' - which is just another way of saying STOLEN.
I found this definition (and other interesting ones on the website below) that explains how I employ this term:
"Reversal Networks * are collecting life force from the collective fields of all earth inhabitants and producing more subtle black forces and miasma. The much sought after spiritual energy contained in these fields is called energetic by the cabals. In this context, loosh is referred to as the emotional energy radiated by animals and humans when feeling threatened, harmed or being killed, that results in the traumatizing pain and suffering that is experienced and recorded in the body, mind and soul. This trauma and pain gets recorded in the earth body itself. For centuries the NAA have developed and exploited multidimensional occult practices through reversal creation code. This has been given to secret societies and institutions for the purpose of Mind Control and Social Engineering, in order to harvest Negative Emotional Energy or loosh from the masses..."
In this definition, it means the low vibrational energy that we emit (of which adrenaline is the physical expression), not our high vibrational emissions. I sense that the latter are rather likely to create indigestion for the low vibrational forces that control us.
As to the military industrial pharmaceutical +++ complex stealing the patents of technologies that could set us free, I think it's quite clear why. After all, they are fully under the control, or emanations, of the controlling network/force/AI.
Is there a way out? Raising our consciousness and vibration are key ingredients (pun intended). But there is more to it, according to my current line of inquiry. I haven't properly digested the new information I have found yet, so I haven't come to a conclusion that I could present here.
So - loosh could have been accumulating via billions of people who read and believe the terrorising 'prophesies' in Revelation (just one historically significant example).... which is, as I previously stated, harvesting the energy of people's imaginations!
I would call it people's fears, triggered by prophecies and other thought forms that we have been fed. I employ the term imagination in a more creative, or active way, but I understand what you mean. The fear porn we have been subjected to the last three years, with that "imaginary" spike-ball called cov.19 that has been burnt into our "imagination", is a good example. As to Revelation: predictive programming, fear porn or prophecy? And, what is a prophecy anyway? Is it the reading of the script?
Nope. I am not at all convinced of the existence of 'occult hostile forces' or 'entity attachments'. I listened to the video and found the whole topic ludicrous.
Belief is everything.
If you believe a thing, it is true but only FOR YOU.
Not for me.
For example, lots of people believe in the existence of a Devil and his mates, Demons. I never have. Such twisted stories have been fed into our imaginations for thousands of years to generate fear (fear is just negative imaginings btw) and, above all, obedience.
How convenient for the Roman Empire that they hijacked a nascent religion and promoted it to their conquered slaves! The wealthy Roman Senators ceased to need an expensive military at that point, because fear of retribution from 'God' would do the job of control for them! They could employ a few Priests, dressed ominously in black to monitor the mind control and to inflict punishment to 'unbelievers'. While they sat around laughing in the bath houses of Rome.
They could sell 'indulgences' to the terrorised 'sinners' and make a nice fat income which would keep the ruling predators in fine silks and fancy homes.
2,000 years later the Vatican has a bank account in Basel, Switzerland which counts its wealth in the multi-trillion!
Funny, I just listened to it this afternoon! Yes, Bernhard has collected a lot of information on loosh, miasms, Wetiko etc. The 4th dimension is a busy place!!
No it isn't..... the 4th dimension is the realm of imagination and can be a very peaceful place. Belief is everything. If you believe in negative external forces, then that is true FOR YOU. Not for me.
A rose by any other name will still smell as sweet.
Most people know who I mean when I write 'Jesus'.
As it goes I have been known as:
Frances, Frank, Fran, Frankie, Franifernackapan, Frantic, Froggy, Boodicca, Boodie, Mum, Nan and accused of giving everyone a right old Frannying loaded with Frannyisms.
Oddly, I have answered to all the above, often in good humour, so I imagine that, regardless of what Jesus is also known as, he was a good enough bloke not to worry what people called him.
Do you seriously believe that whoever wrote Acts 4 actually had the authority and knowledge to make such a statement?
I don't.
I have no doubt that all of the characters in the New Testament were known by other names. They spoke Aramaic, didn't they? So Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Luke, Peter, John, Mary, Martha, Barrabas, Judas, Andrew, Thomas et al were ALL known by different names from those we see in English translations of the writings.
You are being pedantic about the use of names.
Secondly, you are relying on the integrity of others, those who translated the Apostles written words from Aramaic, to Greek, to Latin and then into English! So we can assume that the original intent of any phrase or word may have become distorted or misinterpreted over time. The whole story may have been tweaked to suit the prevailing belief systems of the time in which they were translated. I have seen an Italian translator, who worked for the Vatican, giving lectures explaining how to interpret the original Aramaic scriptures and the meanings were quite different throughout!
Acts 4 includes this at verse 12: "Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.”
Bit of a sweeping generalisation don't you think?
A bunch of semi literates living and teaching in a very small country at the arse end of the Mediterranean can hardly be presumed to know everything that was going on 'under heaven'! That was just their subjective point of view. It does not mean that Jesus was the ONLY deliverer of 'salvation'.
You strike me as far too fundamentally rigid and not at all realistic over your love of the man from whom we derive the foundation of Christianity.
There have been many beings who embodied a holy life and it should be acknowledged that they have set great examples. Not all of them were Christian.
"Belief is everything. If you believe a thing, it is true but only FOR YOU. Not for me." (If this is a true statement, then we cannot know anything.)
" You strike me as far too fundamentally rigid ..." (This may be said of all of us, especially when a clash of presuppositional basis of worldview is controlling the conversation.)
What authority do you stand on? Your own? We are 'Sola scriptura', no doctrines of men. If you are the beginning and end, then for you there's no God, no hope. Studied for 40 years, gets more true, not less. Thanks.
I well understand 'Sola Scriptura, no doctrines of men.' And I understand that the atheist denies God and God's Righteous Law Order so that he may invent his own god or gods. Or even elevate himself to god-like status. On all of this, I will only say that Ecclesiastes is one of my favorite books of the Bible.
Time to shake the dust off of my feet, and move on.
What are you on about? Why would I need an authority to 'stand on'? I have no need of authority and do not grant authority over me to anyone or anything.
Sola scriptura is full of the doctrines of men. Who else wrote the scriptures?
thank you so much for this Frances, so beautifully reconciling the truth of the 'elites' message with their unenlightened and egotist reasons for saying it- they know not what they say!
I really struggle when people go on sarcastically repeating 'you will own nothing and be happy'- like it's a terrible thing and shows how evil the elites are, when owning nothing will indeed make us happy - as will realising that we in fact already own nothing!, it's just an illusion. What we are here for is not to gain more and more things but to love each other and every one else we share the planet with.
I struggle when people say they will use my compassion for animals and concern for the destruction of the planet to control me. I'm vegan because I know it is the right, beautiful, life giving path for me. Veering from my path because it is what the elites are hypocritically saying, would be insane. They know not what they say. But hopefully they will discover. That is my prayer.
Love is not a religion, nor has it been seen in genocides or democides or nationalism. Yes, sins have been committed in the 'NAME' of love, but was it genuine love? It could not have been.
My son is the science buff in this house and I once asked him what he thinks gravity is.... he said, "Oh no! I am not going to do my head in trying to unravel THAT one!" lol
I learned about John Coleman's opinions regarding the Beatles and Tavistock decades ago. He declared that the Beatles and others had been selected, engineered and promoted to mislead my generation into the 'New Age'. I have had plenty of time to consider those ideas and have dismissed them as ridiculous.
I was there. I was a young teenager at the time and I know that the Beatles were promoted by the very best at EMI but nothing, not even Tavistock, could have engineered the tremendous reception that the Beatles received from the public. I don't believe that their songs were created for them. I do think that after they went to Munich, something fundamental changed but that appeared to be the result of EMI assigning good producers to their tracks.
In 1968 I took part in a recording of Hey Jude, at an aircraft hanger. We were picked up in Victoria Station and taken by the Magic Bus to the studio. It was a fantastic evening in which the Beatles rehearsed us to run forward and perform the chorus with them. They were very kind and natural. Above all, they were splendid musicians. I met Yoko Ono who was sitting underneath a camera tripod meditating. I asked her what she was doing and she explained to me about transcendental meditation which I had never heard of..... she was very sweet. I later learned to do it myself and used it to cope with the delivery of my 9.5 lb baby boy in 1972.
One of the psychological games that I have observed being pulled by the Tavistock and others is the destruction of heroes. I think that is what John Coleman was disseminating. If you read his work he sets out to instil as much fear of the future as he possibly could. Nowadays I see all heroes are built up for a time by the media and then they are torn down. This makes people despair that nobody is genuine. It is a psy-ops indeed but the opposite from what we are told.
The pundits also said that the entire hippy movement and its music was also engineered by psyops. I don't believe that either. I used to attend the Marquee Club in Soho, London from 1966 - 1969 and I knew Phil Collins, David Bowie, Pete Frampton and the members of Fleetwood Mac and the Who. None of them were famous then. They were all very young and sharing equipment, getting by on a shoe-string. They were mostly students at the local art colleges or music schools. We were very Avant Garde, and Bohemian in our style of dressing, later described as 'hippy'. We grew our hair long and wore no shoes to be in touch with the earth. These were fashions we created ourselves. We could not buy such things then. I made my clothes from old lacey table cloths and by taking 2nd hand clothes to pieces and redesigning them.
Tavistock et al may CLAIM that they engineered all this but they did not. They want to destroy our heroes and our memories. They want to lay claim to our inventions and our culture. They lie.
Give David Icke some of your time, he does a great job of distilling the zeitgeist of modern thought. He is as powerful as ever. I am encouraged by the fact that he mentioned me in his most recent book, "Perceptions Of A Renegade Mind":
He wrote: ""Further confirmation came in an email exchange between British citizen journalist Frances Leader and the government's Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (the Gates-funded MHRA)....The agency admitted that the 'vaccine' is not based on an isolated 'virus', but comes from a computer-generated model. Frances Leader was naturally banned from Cult-owned fascist Twitter for making this exchange public."
https://freedomplatform.tv/rose-icke-8-banned/
Not related. But I thought of Khan and you when I listened to the part on cold fusion. Seemingly this information is starting to seep into the news.
https://www.brighteon.com/19322dd0-bbe6-4b08-b3a4-a24a6a8e6336
Many thanks, Athena!
I knew they were on the verge of announcing this.... King Charles III gave hints in his write-up in the Carta Terra document. This was why I wrote about it in my Lymp Duhdashian fiction series. It is the only way I could get the info out without being censored or deplatformed.
Here is the original mention in my series:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/lymp-goes-down-the-rabbit-hole
I had read this post of yours, which is why I had become aware of the advances in this technology. Mike Adams' large following now hearing about it too is a good thing. You were ahead of the curve!
Contrary to your perspective, Love Your Enemy and Turn The Other Cheek ABSOLUTELY DO NOT APPLY to dealing with psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians. These people have no ability to empathize, no ability to love, no ability to care. You can turn all the cheeks you have, and they will continue spanking until you are wrung dry of whatever it is they want from you.
No, Love Your Enemy applies ONLY to people who have a conscience. IOW, the other 98% of humanity.
Indeed... Eliminating all psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians would HUGELY open the gates to profound human potential. These ARE the characters who have held back humanity for millennia.
That comment is as psychopathic as the characters you fear. In love is the potential to heal rather than 'turn the other cheek'.
Agreed. Throughout my life, on many notable occasions of subtle or overt 'attack', I have become quiet and summoned understanding, caring, kindness and compassion - turning the other cheek - in circumstances where it would have been very easy to do otherwise. 9 times out of 10 the reaction of the attacker quickly subsides. On several occasions the rapid change elicited interesting responses, "I lost my urge for conflict," "Somehow I felt instantly disarmed," "Sorry about that... I don't know what came over me."
IOW, the 98% always, to at least some degree, respond favorably to Love.
But there remains the 2% who experienced my 'other cheek'... the reaction was stark. I instantly saw the evil fire in their eyes flare up even higher. They immediately saw my attempt at reflecting their previous actions/words as weakness and vulnerability on my part. They then move in for the 'kill'.
Strong, clear and piercing discernment is called for when dealing with the 2%. The easiest response, of course, is to exit the encounter with the psychopath. Certainly that is better for your mental health, and perhaps physical health. However, you are letting the 'killer' go free... on to harm others.
Where does it stop?
It doesn't. Until they are stopped.
Perhaps Frances believes all psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians can be loved into rehabilitation?
I don't know what she believes, but to me that is most certainly a FALSE BELIEF. Most every Christian holds similar beliefs... beliefs no doubt cultivated by the same sort of personalities who have steadily infiltrated religious institutions as they have infiltrated all other institutions that have any sort of extra-ordinary power over other people.
Bottom line: If these 2% are not identified, routed out and their capacity to cause harm terminated, the human social merry-go-round continues ad infinitum.
I believe in reincarnation. If a person is not cured of their hatred and fear during this life then they carry it forward to the next.
I don't think you have much understanding of what the word love actually means.
Agreed about reincarnation, and I have spent a lot of time pondering it. I'd say the overall scheme could be called Spiritual Justice. Religionists seem to believe that it is 'godly' to suck it up, absorb the abuse/violence/death, hoping/believing that god will take care of things over several hundred lifetimes. While ultimately this is true, that POV can also be twisted and seen as a convenient cop-out that causes people to defer from listening their own conscience and free will, and then administering their own proper spiritual justice here and now. IOW, a belief that legitimizes the fear of taking action.
This same fear of taking action is present in all of us, to some degree. We have seen it in spades with the whole covid madness... deferring to 'authority'.
If I administer my own spiritual justice, do I claim I am above God? Not at all. If God provides me free will, moral conscience and the ability to act, then I get on with it. If I am being harmed by a sadistic personality, then I will first attempt to stop it with love. If the abuse continues, I either exit or terminate the abuse however is necessary. If I see an innocent someone else being harmed, I will act as my conscience dictates. I have no problem administering my own spiritual justice in the moment, exactly as my conscience tells me.
Finally, to paraphrase you, "I don't think you have much understanding of what psychopathy actually means."
I am sad that you seem to have missed the most important point I tried to make to you. I will repeat:
If a person is not cured of their hatred and fear during this life then they carry it forward to the next. I did not suggest that we permit psychopathy to continue on "hoping/believing that god will take care of things over several hundred lifetimes" - you also associate reincarnation with a belief in God. I don't.
Fine, let them take their malevolence into their next life. Meanwhile, in this lifetime, if you are being mentally, emotionally and possibly physically smashed by a psychopath, what is your response?
If you say, "Love them"... and that particular flavor of love equals passivity... then you have missed the most important point of what I am saying.
As well, that response would make it clear that you have never had to deal with a true psychopath in this lifetime. I can unequivocally say that loving them will only make matters worse... exponentially worse.
I'll leave you with a suggestion: study up about psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists, machiavellians.
And I'll leave you with a nice quote:
"New age spirituality is particularly dangerous in teaching people to adopt a certain naivety about the dark realities of this world. We are told that "all is one" to the point where lines between distinct right and wrong are blurred or non existent.
This talk of non duality is a perfect place for abusive predators to hide, for as long as there is no "right" or "wrong," harmful behavior goes undetected and no one is held accountable."
EMMA LUME
Wonderful comment, thank you! xx
Working with various kinds of attachments and influences on a regular basis with my clients, as an energy healer, my experience tells me otherwise. Just simple "things" like emotions, or thought forms: they have an intelligence of their own, and the negative ones do not want to leave the body they are attached to. The more of them that accumulate over the years and the lifetimes, the bigger and more influential they become, until the "subject" - the human being - hardly has any free will left. Addictions are one possible consequence, since these entities need food in the form of negative energy. They will push the person to feel triggered and to create drama in their lives.
I did not know about miasms and other entities when I had a powerful experience that made me look into it. In my craniosacral training, I was working with a classmate who had a terrible headache. As I synchronized my breathing with hers, I felt something literally jump on me; it had a presence and a weight. My classmate got up and said her headache was gone. I, on the other hand, was in intense pain. Several classmates and the teacher worked with me for hours to try to get me back to normal. But the nasty headache persisted, despite seeing various other therapists in the following weeks, for a month and a half! That's when a particularly skilled craniosacral teacher managed to free me of what remained of that energy and rebalanced my system.
Later, when I was teaching craniosacral therapy myself, we would often have three students practice together: one on the table, one practicing the craniosacral and miasm release work, and the third one to remove the miasm - negative energies - from the one practicing who had picked it up from the first one. This way we avoided nasty experiences like mine. (By the way, that wasn't my idea, but that of the head of the training institute, who specialized in miasm release. The things we experienced in those classes! You had to be there to believe it.)
The release of negative energies and entities is part of shamanic work. Exorcism, as I understand it, would be another name for it. However, since the catholic approach is fear-based, it isn't terribly effective as you can't chase a fear-based energy/entity with fear. In fact, you feed it and offer it new entry points into the system.
It's not that invisible, 4th dimensional entities don't exist. The problem I think is that we are made to fear low vibrational entities and bow down to high vibrational ones, or what we are told are beings more powerful than us. Fear one kind and surrender our discernment and free agency to the other, that seems to be the control mechanism to me.
Judging by the symbols they have been using for centuries, the Vatican's inhabitants are very aware of 4th dimensional entities and how to work with them - or how to invite them in so they can work through the priests - to fill the Vatican Bank and their other accounts! But they are not alone: Hinduism for instance uses a lot of magic too.
Anyway, it's a huge topic and I can't do it justice in a few lines. But I can assure you that my point of view doesn't stem from indoctrination - catechism never did it for me, nor did atheism when I was exposed to it in my teens. I didn't believe in heaven or hell, but thought that the Golden Rule ought to be our guiding light. I officially left the catholic church in my twenties, when I decided I wasn't going to keep financing that corrupt organization. I looked at other religions but never felt the need to adopt one. Got sucked into New Ageism, explored that quite thoroughly, and found my way out again. But I have been working with clients from all over the world and with various beliefs, helping them release the burden of lifetimes of negativity, so they can become more of who they truly are and choose to lead healthier and happier lives. Releasing these entities and reprogramming dysfunctional beliefs is transformative!
I am a Barefoot Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine. I had to unlearn everything I previously understood, or believed in about medicine and healing. I had to start again.
In TCM the body, mind and spirit each can affect each other.
There are 6 pairs of electro-magnetic channels, each associated with a particular vital organ and an emotion. There is one more pair of channels, called the governing channel which circuits from the head, to the groin and up the spine, back to the head.
If a person exhibits an imbalance of pulses on any particular channel, and/or discoloration or distortion of any particular part of the tongue (a map of the organs) we can diagnose an imbalance in the corresponding emotion and vital organ.
Therefore, where your system of beliefs might presume an 'entity', mine would presume an imbalance of energetic function or a blockage or even a pathogen (like a parasite or fungus).
The way to heal the client would be to address the imbalance physically first i.e., with an intervention of herbs or acupuncture or massage. The healing on a physical level would clear the mind and the spirit would be calmed.
However, the physical body may have been weakened and thus susceptible to a relapse so the good healer would not only heal, but nourish in order to bolster the defences against further dis-ease.
This can be done by identifying which emotion went out of sorts in the first place.
Kidney - fear
Liver - anger
Spleen - worry
Heart - joy
Lungs - sadness
Brain - self esteem
Teaching each client to address the emotional imbalance that made the vital organ vulnerable is quite an artform of itself.
This is so well said/written, Frances. I am the eternal Sagittarian optimist and so I will live until my dying day doing what I can to make this planet a better place in spite of the extreme dark oppositional forces. We have to stay awake/aware and sound the alarm when need be but never stop living from our heart. 💗
I have the distinct and saddening impression that "the powers that be" have been in power and have had control for eons on this planet. Money is just a tool to control us - they don't need it (which will become obvious once CBDCs are the currency of the world - it will be even easier for them to conjure it out of thin air than with fiat money).
I think "The Matrix" is spot on about the control-grid. We are their farm animals from which they extract "loosh", the "energy drink" produced by negative emotions. What is done to children to harvest adrenochrome is really done to all of us at the etheric level. Hence the suffering which Buddha thought was a condition of human life. It seems to me it's a condition of the human farm animal that needs to be tortured in all kinds of ways - be it through wars, the concept of scarcity - hence the fear of lack and the ensuing greed, wars etc. - or through all kinds of other dysfunctional beliefs we have been programmed with. That would include our feeling of powerlessness and deference to authority.
We have creative power and imagination, which the controllers with their hive mind and AI lack. These powers of ours have to be curtailed (which explains our "education system") so that we remain small and slavish while they continue to prod us so that we produce their food.
Currently, at the end of the Kali Yuga, humanity is probably in a better position to wake up and smell the coffee... So rather than lose control, the herd is to be hooked up to the AI hive mind through the ingredients in the injectable bioweapon (and the chemtrails, and the food- and water supply etc.) and decimated to a more manageable level. In the process, through our fear and suffering, we produce even more loosh for them!
So yes, love is the answer, as love would starve these entities. Not what most understand the concept of love to be - sentimental, romantic love - but the high vibration of love that is neutral and doesn't have a polarity. As long as there is a polarity - fear - we will oscillate between the two sides of the coin. I don't think many of us have been able to transcend the duality to elevate ourselves to this vibration yet though.
These are my current thoughts on the topic and are subject to change as I keep exploring the reality we are trapped in... :)
I read your Comments with interest. And I found it particularly interesting that you rejected not only atheism, but also New Ageism which seems to swallow people up Jonah-like whole.
As to love, it is an unquestioning unconditional 'love' which has been used by the Wicked Ones as an implement to level the Christian Church. And the promotion of the 'all you need is love' theme with great success has done us a great violence.
I might quibble here and there ... but basically, I think you have said it straight. And this must have taken a whole lot of sorting things out on your part. No easy task!
Oh, the sorting out never ends, Francis..! Instead of prison bars, this matrix we are caught in has layer upon layer of lies and deception to keep us trapped and ignorant of reality. It would be so much more comfortable to have a belief system to hold on to - and at times I do, for a while, until I discover a hole in it. But the end of "The Truman Show" is not the real end, is it! Where one illusion ends, a new one begins... That has been my experience, anyway.
Isn't 'loosh' our psychic and imaginative ability? Our inventiveness too perhaps? I note that any patent worth its salt gets taken over by DARPA or the British equivalent - supposedly in the interests of 'national security' - which is just another way of saying STOLEN.
I found this definition (and other interesting ones on the website below) that explains how I employ this term:
"Reversal Networks * are collecting life force from the collective fields of all earth inhabitants and producing more subtle black forces and miasma. The much sought after spiritual energy contained in these fields is called energetic by the cabals. In this context, loosh is referred to as the emotional energy radiated by animals and humans when feeling threatened, harmed or being killed, that results in the traumatizing pain and suffering that is experienced and recorded in the body, mind and soul. This trauma and pain gets recorded in the earth body itself. For centuries the NAA have developed and exploited multidimensional occult practices through reversal creation code. This has been given to secret societies and institutions for the purpose of Mind Control and Social Engineering, in order to harvest Negative Emotional Energy or loosh from the masses..."
https://ascensionglossary.com/index.php/Loosh
* https://ascensionglossary.com/index.php/Reversal_Networks
In this definition, it means the low vibrational energy that we emit (of which adrenaline is the physical expression), not our high vibrational emissions. I sense that the latter are rather likely to create indigestion for the low vibrational forces that control us.
As to the military industrial pharmaceutical +++ complex stealing the patents of technologies that could set us free, I think it's quite clear why. After all, they are fully under the control, or emanations, of the controlling network/force/AI.
Is there a way out? Raising our consciousness and vibration are key ingredients (pun intended). But there is more to it, according to my current line of inquiry. I haven't properly digested the new information I have found yet, so I haven't come to a conclusion that I could present here.
So - loosh could have been accumulating via billions of people who read and believe the terrorising 'prophesies' in Revelation (just one historically significant example).... which is, as I previously stated, harvesting the energy of people's imaginations!
I would call it people's fears, triggered by prophecies and other thought forms that we have been fed. I employ the term imagination in a more creative, or active way, but I understand what you mean. The fear porn we have been subjected to the last three years, with that "imaginary" spike-ball called cov.19 that has been burnt into our "imagination", is a good example. As to Revelation: predictive programming, fear porn or prophecy? And, what is a prophecy anyway? Is it the reading of the script?
Nope. I am not at all convinced of the existence of 'occult hostile forces' or 'entity attachments'. I listened to the video and found the whole topic ludicrous.
Belief is everything.
If you believe a thing, it is true but only FOR YOU.
Not for me.
For example, lots of people believe in the existence of a Devil and his mates, Demons. I never have. Such twisted stories have been fed into our imaginations for thousands of years to generate fear (fear is just negative imaginings btw) and, above all, obedience.
How convenient for the Roman Empire that they hijacked a nascent religion and promoted it to their conquered slaves! The wealthy Roman Senators ceased to need an expensive military at that point, because fear of retribution from 'God' would do the job of control for them! They could employ a few Priests, dressed ominously in black to monitor the mind control and to inflict punishment to 'unbelievers'. While they sat around laughing in the bath houses of Rome.
They could sell 'indulgences' to the terrorised 'sinners' and make a nice fat income which would keep the ruling predators in fine silks and fancy homes.
2,000 years later the Vatican has a bank account in Basel, Switzerland which counts its wealth in the multi-trillion!
Nice little con job, that one!
Funny, I just listened to it this afternoon! Yes, Bernhard has collected a lot of information on loosh, miasms, Wetiko etc. The 4th dimension is a busy place!!
No it isn't..... the 4th dimension is the realm of imagination and can be a very peaceful place. Belief is everything. If you believe in negative external forces, then that is true FOR YOU. Not for me.
What's 'funny'? You know how your own name is important?
You don't let someone call you Lindsay, usually, do you?
Yet about the most important 'bloke' to come on this earth
is NOT NAMED 'Jesus'!! Invented. Means NOTHING.
Yehoshua is the Hebrew, 'ie sous', which will mean 'I AM',
the Eternal present. Like that ever spinning globe, orbiting at
667,000! mph. They measured this, RIIght??!! Sure.
And people wonder at lies. Even love got twisted into
last, or 'I love pizza'. Finding truth is hard. But worth it.
Remember, there's no up or down on a spinning globe where
you're somewhere on it.
It's all meant to demean you, victimize you, then use you
or kill you(vaccines anyone?).
Part of human needs are ownership: then we take care of it.
It's go to be through these topics that we'll upend this mechanistic agenda.
A rose by any other name will still smell as sweet.
Most people know who I mean when I write 'Jesus'.
As it goes I have been known as:
Frances, Frank, Fran, Frankie, Franifernackapan, Frantic, Froggy, Boodicca, Boodie, Mum, Nan and accused of giving everyone a right old Frannying loaded with Frannyisms.
Oddly, I have answered to all the above, often in good humour, so I imagine that, regardless of what Jesus is also known as, he was a good enough bloke not to worry what people called him.
Acts 4 says there's no other name by which we must be saved.
Since I do know it, I will now use it hating the fabricated no name 'Jesus', invented in 1460 a.d.
Try a different name on your title!! One little letter wrong.
But yes, I've run the gamut of names, being called 'X' by
a math teacher. I liked it. X
Do you seriously believe that whoever wrote Acts 4 actually had the authority and knowledge to make such a statement?
I don't.
I have no doubt that all of the characters in the New Testament were known by other names. They spoke Aramaic, didn't they? So Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Luke, Peter, John, Mary, Martha, Barrabas, Judas, Andrew, Thomas et al were ALL known by different names from those we see in English translations of the writings.
You are being pedantic about the use of names.
Secondly, you are relying on the integrity of others, those who translated the Apostles written words from Aramaic, to Greek, to Latin and then into English! So we can assume that the original intent of any phrase or word may have become distorted or misinterpreted over time. The whole story may have been tweaked to suit the prevailing belief systems of the time in which they were translated. I have seen an Italian translator, who worked for the Vatican, giving lectures explaining how to interpret the original Aramaic scriptures and the meanings were quite different throughout!
Acts 4 includes this at verse 12: "Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.”
Bit of a sweeping generalisation don't you think?
A bunch of semi literates living and teaching in a very small country at the arse end of the Mediterranean can hardly be presumed to know everything that was going on 'under heaven'! That was just their subjective point of view. It does not mean that Jesus was the ONLY deliverer of 'salvation'.
You strike me as far too fundamentally rigid and not at all realistic over your love of the man from whom we derive the foundation of Christianity.
There have been many beings who embodied a holy life and it should be acknowledged that they have set great examples. Not all of them were Christian.
Terrible response. Reactionary. A tad sensitive are we , Leader.?
Revelatory to see your true core - when faced with Truth.
You go 'ad hominem'
Oh, that's right - you are post modernist. There is no Truth for such as yourself.
Only YOUR viewpoint. Entirely subjective. No Truth, no reason, no logic, no critical thinking, just your own bespoke script. Mere opinion.
Of such is the world now comprised. Is it any wonder the world is in such a mess?
No, thanks.
Did I give you permission to refer to me by my surname?
The bible dogmatists comment often here Frances, and your replys are my favorite!
Yuval Noah Harari is 'just one Jew' in the tiny country of Israel.
Schwabb was invited to G20, just one man from a tiny country.
I'm delighted there were positive examples years ago.
You don't know anything about me. Don't judge.
I did not say ANYTHING about other people, except
Yuval and Schwabb.
It's great when I leave all that to God, just study
scripture. I'm grateful I wasn't indoctrinated into
Christianity.
How, btw, is ANY of that to do with me or my Salvation?
Sorry? Is this comment supposed to make some sort of sense?
Let's assume you're wanting my explanation. That means you'll lay down reacting, and see.
Yehoshua was prophesied and came and you know some of what happened.
Turned out, His name rises above all names, which come and go.
Yuval is one man, pretty small stuff, small country.
Negative. Wants to exterminate. But note it's never many.
So, no need to try to demean 'ie sous', the 'I AM'.
Not for you, but for billions over time? It has been.
Look at the world today, tell me how it's going right.
Depending on the power, you don't need many people.
If this makes no sense, just pass on it.
What do you base your beliefs on? Yehoshua said in
Matthew that 'unless you BE 'strepho', or completely turned around AND become AS a little child, you shall IN NO WISE enter the kingdom of heaven.
I wouldn't follow anyone unless they held the standards
I believe in. I could, but won't compare Muhammad,
one man, in a cave with ways I'd never hold.
But 'ie sous', the 'I AM' fits all my requirements.
Which one's fail for you?
For example, 'Sola scriptura' says NOTHING about
pro-'life' or 'pro-choice'. This to me is freedom.
I love freedom. You? Thanks for your time.
Sola scriptura signifies viewing the Bible as infallible. I definitely do not think that is a wise state of mind.
No, it does not. Sola=only, scriptura is scriptures, so nothing
added or subtracted.
How do you get 'infallible' from this?
For example, since 'Yehoshua'(Hebrew) said 'I am LORD also of the Sabbath', then it's Sabbath. All days are 'sabbaths',
1st, 2nd etc'. Thanks for your time.
I'd like to know what people MEAN when they claim
'the bible is infallible'.
Language alone corrupts, you know that.
It's not so hard as you might at first glance think to
know what is 'scriptura'.
So glad I wasn't indoctrinated!! 'Sola scriptura'. Do you see now?
"Belief is everything. If you believe a thing, it is true but only FOR YOU. Not for me." (If this is a true statement, then we cannot know anything.)
" You strike me as far too fundamentally rigid ..." (This may be said of all of us, especially when a clash of presuppositional basis of worldview is controlling the conversation.)
Belief is everything. If you believe a thing it is true but only for you.
Knowing is when your beliefs have been confirmed by personal experience.
Fundamental rigidity is crippling the acquisition of new knowledge and therefore very unwise.
Far too boring. You donknow what Christianity even is.
You'd carry the conflicts right into eternity. I'm glad God,
Yehoshua sums it up.
Why follow my views? Sometimes ok, often not.
No, it's true or not.
Simple.
I'm being led to become 'unmixed'.
What authority do you stand on? Your own? We are 'Sola scriptura', no doctrines of men. If you are the beginning and end, then for you there's no God, no hope. Studied for 40 years, gets more true, not less. Thanks.
I well understand 'Sola Scriptura, no doctrines of men.' And I understand that the atheist denies God and God's Righteous Law Order so that he may invent his own god or gods. Or even elevate himself to god-like status. On all of this, I will only say that Ecclesiastes is one of my favorite books of the Bible.
Time to shake the dust off of my feet, and move on.
What are you on about? Why would I need an authority to 'stand on'? I have no need of authority and do not grant authority over me to anyone or anything.
Sola scriptura is full of the doctrines of men. Who else wrote the scriptures?
thank you so much for this Frances, so beautifully reconciling the truth of the 'elites' message with their unenlightened and egotist reasons for saying it- they know not what they say!
I really struggle when people go on sarcastically repeating 'you will own nothing and be happy'- like it's a terrible thing and shows how evil the elites are, when owning nothing will indeed make us happy - as will realising that we in fact already own nothing!, it's just an illusion. What we are here for is not to gain more and more things but to love each other and every one else we share the planet with.
I struggle when people say they will use my compassion for animals and concern for the destruction of the planet to control me. I'm vegan because I know it is the right, beautiful, life giving path for me. Veering from my path because it is what the elites are hypocritically saying, would be insane. They know not what they say. But hopefully they will discover. That is my prayer.
🙏🏽
Jo
🐒
We will get there....
https://youtu.be/QSbQQtmyo2Q
this is beautiful x
🤣😂
Love is not a religion, nor has it been seen in genocides or democides or nationalism. Yes, sins have been committed in the 'NAME' of love, but was it genuine love? It could not have been.
"without love there is nothing to hold them together" - proving that love and magnetism may well be the same phenomena?
My son is the science buff in this house and I once asked him what he thinks gravity is.... he said, "Oh no! I am not going to do my head in trying to unravel THAT one!" lol
That is a lovely way to describe the action of gravity. Thanks! xx