Is the government informing the public of risks associated with 5G roll out?
This update is from our barrister, Philip Rule, written for his chambers’ website:
On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of State’s alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology.
No5’s Philip Rule acts for the claimants, led by Michael Mansfield KC, and instructed by Lorna Hackett of Hackett & Dabbs LLP. The case is brought by Action Against 5G and with the support of the public through Crowd Justice.
At the hearing the government argued that there is no duty to inform the public of any risks at all, because it essentially denies that there are any risks from the increased exposures or new form of radiation frequency to be used in 5G rollout. This is in keeping with its publications that have sought to reassure the public that there – categorically and conclusively – is no chance of harm arising from exposure to 5G and radiofrequency radiation (“RFR”).
The claimants’ case was outlined to the Court identifying that such a position taken by the government is not based upon the scientific report that the government itself has advanced as being the most up-to-date piece of international research. That is the “ICNIRP” (International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection) March 2020 guidelines. These however are far from finding that there are no risks at all.
Indeed, far from providing any proof of an absence of risk, the ICNIRP guidelines in fact evidence the existence of risks, and notes that several are yet to be fully understood or proven by repetition of study or by anthropological study directly on people who are ‘guinea pigs’ for ubiquitous RFR or 5G in the real-world.
ICNIRP summarises that it concludes, (based on its very limited approach discussed above) that there are already three substantiated effects caused by exposure to radiofrequency EMFs: (i) nerve stimulation, (ii) changes in the permeability of cell membranes, and (iii) effects due to temperature elevation. For many other recorded matters, it essentially notes the jury is still out, but did not find that as yet the harm to human health has already been proven. In particular there are not yet any significant number of studies into 5G technology (which uses high frequency waves, and targeted beams and pulsation in a way earlier generations did not).
For those with disability treated by medical implant the consideration of safety given by ICNIRP, in its revised 2020 guidelines expressly do not cater for their safety. As well as those genetically or environmentally susceptible to suffer cancer or EHS in the future from the exposure to RFR, there are also existing vulnerable groups who ought to be considered and who deserve to be given information to assist them (but have not been), including:
i. Those with disabilities that require medical implants with electrical currents or conductivity, including pace-makers in the heart for example. (This important issue has simply not been addressed at all by ICNIRP);
ii. Those with disability/injury that required the implant of metal to their body;
iii. Children–for instance, children’s brains absorb greater quantity of RFR, and bone marrow exposure is greater; as well as their lifespan exposure being of longer duration;
iv. Those who presently suffer disability arising from existing cancer;
v. Those presently suffering pre-cancerous conditions;
vi. Those exposed habitually to radiation in the workplace, of particular levels or longevity;
vii. Those with immunosuppressant conditions;
viii. Those suffering from ME;
ix. Those suffering from EHS.
The Court was shown, for example, that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified both ELF magnetic fields and RF EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Exposure to non-ionising radiation including radiofrequency is notably a recorded disease or illness recognised by the WHO, since 2005, in the International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10 (even if the precise cause is not yet understood or known). A responsible body of scientific study has raised concerns about risks that remain under study. Many studies ICNIRP identifies have identified certain effects that might prove harmful and their substantiation by further study is awaited – but a position where the jury is out is not the same as a concluded final position established by study that finds a radiation is safe, or safe for all people. Limitations on current knowledge are relevant when assurances are sought to be given by the government. The public has the right to be informed and not misled about how much is known or can be stated with certainty, and what risks remain to be investigated or conclusively determined one way or the other.
The Court of Appeal previously granted permission for the case to proceed on the grounds that challenge:
1. The failure to provide adequate or effective information to the public about the risks and how, if it be possible, it might be possible for individuals to avoid or minimise the risks;
2. (a) The failure to provide adequate and sufficient reasons for not establishing a process to investigate and establish the adverse health effects and risks of adverse health effects from 5G technology and/or for discounting the risks presented by the evidence available; and/or (b) failure to meet the requirements of transparency and openness required of a public body.
These grounds advance a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 by omissions and failings in violation of the positive obligations to protect human life, health and dignity, required to be met by Articles 2, 3 and/or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Judgment is awaited from the Administrative Court in due course.
If you feel you may have been affected by the implementation of 5G masts and devices in your environment (or just wish to read more about the studies and scientific research in this field) you may wish to visit https://actionagainst5g.org/ for more information”.
Action Against 5G notes as follows:
In 2020, ICNIRP also noted that biological effects are not easily discernible from adverse health effects, and that their guidelines:
“are not intended to protect against biological effects as such (when compensatory mechanisms are overwhelmed or exhausted), unless there is also an associated adverse health effect. However, it is not always easy to draw a clear distinction between biological and adverse health effects, and indeed this can vary depending on individual susceptibility to specific situations.
An example is sensory effects from nonionizing radiation exposures under certain circumstances, such as a tingling sensation resulting from peripheral nerve stimulation by electric or magnetic fields; magnetophosphenes (light flickering sensations in the periphery of the visual field) resulting from stimulation of the retina by electric fields induced by exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields; and microwave hearing resulting from thermoelastic waves due to expansion of soft tissues in the head which travel via bone conduction to the inner ear. Such perceptions may sometimes lead to discomfort and annoyance.
ICNIRP does not consider discomfort and annoyance to be adverse health effects by themselves, but, in some cases, annoyance may lead to adverse health effects by compromising well-being. The exposure circumstances under which discomfort and annoyance occur vary between individuals.”
Thus there are many identified potential outcomes.
Philip notes above “Many studies ICNIRP identifies have identified certain effects” and we add also that many responsible bodies of scientific study (for example the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health, Austrian Medical Chambers, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, European Academy for Environmental Medicine, International Society of Doctors for the Environment, Environmental Health Trust, BioInitiative Working Group, French National Assembly) have identified verified risks and that courts have ruled in favour of the science presented by some of these bodies contrary to ICNIRP’s assessment of the same science regarding these risks.
[PLEASE NOTE that the AA5G team does not have the resources to advise on or support mast objections and other local actions. We refer you to the excellent material on www.rfinfo.co.uk.]
Lone Skum's Star Link beams 12Ghz of electro-magnetic radiation at the entire planet. Look at how many satellites we have crowding our skies.... Elon is not the only madman on the block, is he?
Thanks for raising awareness about Musk's creepy 5G satellites. I get so flabbergasted when I hear "truth community" people cheering for Musk when he is clearly a deranged transhumanist plutocrat being propped up by the military industrial complex.
I also recently learned this about his other degenerative lithium related activities.
Over 50 percent of the world’s known lithium deposits are in the “Lithium Triangle”—the lithium concentrated brine sources in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. Bolivia’s high mountain deserts—the Salar de Uyuni—have by far the largest known reserves of lithium.
Evo Morales -- Bolivia's first indigenous president, had a commitment to the environment and to Pachamama (Mother Earth) and he was against inviting in transnational corporations (like Telsa and it's lithium mining partners) to pillage the land for lithium. When he refused to allow multi-national corporations to pillage the Earth for the large lithium deposits in his country it was not long before a US-backed military coup took place.
President Evo Morales Ayma, was removed illegally from his office in November 2019. The Bolivian military, at the behest of Bolivian oligarchs with ties to Lithium Mining Corporations and the United States government, threatened Morales; Morales went into exile in Mexico and then in Argentina.
The CEO of the U.S.-based Telsa car manufacturer has admitted to involvement in what President Morales has referred to as a “Lithium Coup.”
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” was Elon Musk’s response to an accusation on twitter that the U.S. government organized a coup against President Evo Morales, so that Musk could obtain Bolivia’s lithium.
The coup was about Bolivian lithium; and not only did it involve violent coercion to remove Bolivia's first indigenous president from office, it also resulted in two massacres local people defending their land against the lithium mines (and now is resulting in the destruction of the land and ecosystems there, as I exposed in my previous post where you shared your powerful poem).
This is what "sustainable development", Greenwashing, "Green Colonialism" and trading blood for lithium looks like.
For many years I have told people who champion electric cars and solar panels that considering they also rely on finite resources, we should be careful that we do not end up going from trading blood for oil, to trading blood for lithium.
It appears that, sadly, that is exactly what we are doing now in South America, Australia and soon in northern Ontario/Quebec (and in the Cobalt Mines in the Congo, that are also required to make the batteries).
The corporate oligarchs that are ravenous to make billions from pillaging the Earth for lithium and cobalt now have their crosshairs set on Ontario and Quebec. God help anyone that dares to stand in their way to defend the Boreal Forest (which they intend to scalp, blow to pieces with explosives, grind into rubble and poison with a stew of toxic chemicals so we can have ipads and EVs).
I have been reaching out to the Indigenous leaders in northern Ontario but so far the only two that got back to me told me that the mining companies had sent in teams of people to their town hall meetings and convinced most of the people in their community how beneficial the mines were going to be for them financially, sadly, this seems to have convinced many of them to lay down, take the money and not fight this. I am not gonna give up though ❤
Thanks for helping get this info out. I have been attempting to gather additional intel and make connections with people up north regarding the intended Cobalt and Lithium mines in Ontario/Quebec and it is not looking good so far (I updated the comment above).
Here is additional intel on the situation.
Our corrupt corporation captured government is helping to initiate large projects to pillage the lands of indigenous peoples (Cree of Eeyou Istchee, the Shakopaatikoong peoples of the Slate Falls first nation and the Waabitigweyaang peoples of Sandy Lake, among others ) and the body of Mother Earth in new Cobalt, Tantalum and Lithium mines in northern Ontario and Quebec.
Mines are proposed to be set up near James Bay and Red Lake with refineries in Thunder bay on Lake Superior. Given the nature of open pit mining, lithium leeching ponds and lithium refining, the inevitable result will be large scale poisoning of the water table and the ocean in James bay, contamination of the great lakes (through lake Superior, moving downstream into all the other great lakes), deforestation and genocide of local wildlife.
Rock Tech’s Georgia Lake Project at Nipigon is expected to produce an average of 100,000 Tons per a year of ore over its life.
Frontier Lithium is creating another lithium pillaging mining project with its PAK Project, 175 kilometers north of Red Lake. Much of Frontier’s 27,000 hectares is intended to be clear cut and devastated ecologically.
An Austrailian corporation called "Green Technology Metals" has already begun pillaging the boreal forest near and the body of Mother Earth with two projects (the "Seymour" and "Root" Projects) in Nipigon, Red Lake, Ontario. The company intends to destroy 40,800 hectares of ground with multiple lithium prospects spread out across the entire region.
Vancouver’s "Lithium One Metals" corporation has also acquired property 15 kilometres south of Green Technology’s Root Project where they intend to continue to pillage and destroy the boreal forest. Called the Pinto Property, the new addition brings the company's total land base of 25,950 hectares in Northern Ontario and the James Bay side of Quebec.
In Quebec, Critical Elements Corporation plans to dry and empty lakes to build a lithium and tantalum open mine that will produce approximately 4,500 tons of the mineral a day for 17 years.
There is another mine called North American Lithium Project, Quebec, Canada which is located in the La Corne municipality, 60km away from Val d’Or city in. The proposed pit is expected to have a length of 1,350m, average width of 750m and final pit depth of 270m. The North American Lithium project will have a processing facility that intends to pillage 1.5 million tonnes of ore per annum.
Another mine is proposed by Australia-based Allkem-Galaxy Resources Ltd. The mine site is set to be located about ten kms south of the Eastmain River and 100 kms east of the Cree community of Eastmain in northern Quebec. Despite concerns being expressed by indigenous community leaders the project was approved by our corrupt government on Jan. 16. has an estimated mine life of 15 to 20 years and is expected to produce on average 5,480 tonnes of ore per day.
The James Bay lithium mine is part of the federal government’s $3.8 billion critical minerals strategy to domestically extract minerals, like lithium, that are used in batteries for electric vehicles, laptops, solar panels, wind turbines and other so called "green" or "renewable" technology.
Strip mining and deforestation is not something that can be undone. It means the decimation of ancient diverse ecosystems, and so there is nothing "renewable" or "green" about it.
Extracting the soil in this region which has “one of the purest spodumen (lithium ore) deposits in the world, with more than 530 km2 of land,” according to Critical Elements Corporation, will also require destruction of wetlands and a significant number of trees.
This mining project plans to carve out massive areas of land so facilitate 136 heavy truck passes per day, in the middle of the boreal forest.
The boreal forest will be clear cut, the moose, caribou, the lynx, the mountain lion, wolves, fox, bobcats, eagles, hawks and countless other winged and four legged beings will be forcibly displaced from their homes (inevitably resulting in many of them attempting to return to their homes only to starve while pacing near the fences or to be poisoned by the toxins these mines produce). The fish in the lakes, the whales and countless other beings in James bay, they will all be decimated by these projects.
They appear to be moving in fast and as quiet as possible to avoid local and environmentalist resistance.
These projects will mean we trade blood for lithium so we can have fun smart devices and electric cars to play with. We will be trading the ancient beauty and majesty of the Boreal forest and all it's inhabitants for smart phones and tesla cars.
Please, if anyone reading this knows of any organizations that are working to resist this corporate/government pillaging of the Earth and prevent these mines from moving forward with their plans, let me know..
How do we find out who owns these awful industries? Without engaging my search engine my spidey sense screams the British Royal family which has been spearheading all Green Totalitarianism worldwide for at least a century.
Now I will dig..... I will also contact Iain Davis, Whitney Webb, Johnnie Vedmore and Max Igan to ask them to investigate further. May I please quote your comments here?
I have not started following the money upstream yet but I imagine at some point the flow would be traced to those massive flooded valley life suffocating 'financial reservoirs' that are Blackrock and The Vanguard Group. I will look into this further after I do some more networking to attempt to connect with indigenous peoples on the ground up north that care enough to take a stand. I figure with the way our Canadian government is spewing all these lies about "inclusiveness" and "reconciliation" having indigenous peoples say no to these projects in the spotlight would likely serve to throw one of the more powerful 'political monkey wrenches' into their Earth eating machinery of death. So I am gonna keep trying to reach out despite the disheartening results thus far.
Yes please, do call in the cavalry and share this data with anyone you feel could help bring transparency to (and hopefully prevent) this planned destruction of much of "The Lungs of the Earth" and the sacred waters in Ontario and Quebec from moving forward. Thank you.
He is on his way! I commented on that video as follows:
"I could not follow you until I saw this. I was so incensed by your narrow narrative and refusal to search outside the box. You have much more to learn yet. Look into Electro-magnetic radiation as the cause of the symptoms we attribute to 'viruses'.
Even when you follow the DOD discussions you will find that essentially the military industrial complex has entirely taken over our civil societies and turned it into a battlefield with military grade assaults on every level.
Down to every single human level, our homes, our bodies and our minds.
Gosh Frances … you sure are one smart dude! Amazes me where you get all your brain power from and not least your determination and courage …. keep writing coz I wanna keep reading … regardless of the scariness of it all 😨
I always laugh when people call me a dude! Even a smart dude! I gather that the word has now become asexual? You know when you are getting old - the lingo leaves you confused!
Thank you very much for the lovely compliments on this my 71st birthday! I am delighted to report that the old bonce is still firing on all channels, pretty much as it always has done. When I was very young I was told I had a very high IQ so I set about proving that the IQ test merely assessed our ability to learn and retain patterns. I gathered 15 young friends and we all took IQ tests every Sunday afternoon for 3 weeks. We all improved our scores significantly, showing that the tests were flawed. My Psychology tutor was a bit miffed with me when I submitted that paper with the epithet that a wild man of Borneo was probably much brighter than any Western educated person, yet he would not know how to even write his name and the date before he started attempting the test!
I’m only 3 years behind …. probably getting my dudes and dudesses all muddled up! Oh, to be in Borneo alongside that wild man … no doubt a much more sane and intelligent environment than right here, right now in Blighty! Enjoy your birthday 🎊
As I stated to your Knight: "I am here to share, or try., and have an open conversation. Back in the day I connected a cell phone on a "2G" network with a Thinkpad without my employers authorization or permission. The engineers knew ~ we hit 9,600 baud. Good times........." Knowledge is not grandstanding.
Having been admonished for grandstanding, you have the arrogance to repeat yourself? Why? What do you think that will achieve? Don't you realise that you appear vain and self obsessed?
Do try to keep on topic and bear in mind that you are among people who value their health far more than you value your ability to experiment with forces you clearly do not comprehend.
It is people like you, blindly messing with the delicate natural radiation of all living things, that inadvertently destroy peace and happiness, health and wellbeing - and THEN expect the rest of us to pat you on the head and say "thanks Jim, you are our hero!" when it is obvious that your chosen career is responsible for much pain and even death.
Millimeter wave technology (5G) does NOT work from space and the unobstructed transmission distance is roughly 1,500 feet. That is why so many small cell transmitters are required. Starlink is NOT 5G. This will help you understand the differences: https://bitactro.com/starlink-vs-5g/
That article is very poorly expressed because the writer is not using English very well. Also, the claims made about StarLink and 5G being different are out of date now. 5G simply means fifth generation it does not specify which frequencies or pulses are being employed. I am not convinced that we are being told everything that these StarLink satellites are capable of, because that would reveal trade secrets to potential competitor companies.
You are attacking the messenger and missing the message. While "5G" represents the fifth generation of wireless transmission you are woefully uninformed about 5G frequencies. The FACT is millimeter technology - 5G - is a high frequency wavelength and does not transmit over long distances as well as low frequencies. THAT is the point. I thought you vibrated at a higher frequency and I am not questioning that. This might help unless you again attack the messenger: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/what-frequency-is-5g-all-the-different-5g-ranges-explained/
This article is extremely frightening and confirms my worst conclusions. Thank you.
It is clear that the cacophony of electro-magnetic radiation is going to get much worse as these idiots continue to fill up the airwaves without a single thought or word about health impacts.
I was RIGHT to criticise the previous article. It was incoherent in comparison with this one. Saying so was not an ad hominem attack. It was FACT - in capitals since you seem to think that writing FACT in capitals makes your opinions FACTS.
The spectrum of wavelengths being used is horrific. Wait until you look into 60Ghz.... that one doesn't require licensing AND it causes oxygen molecules to spin so that they cannot be useful when we breathe.
The comments in the article in reference to stadiums, gigs and large venues nearly made me sick. Don't these tech freaks realise that such intense electro-magnetic pulsing and chaos of EMFs may well be why so many athletes and super stars are collapsing while being filmed by a bevy of SMART phones?
Where is their IQ? Somewhere near their shoe size?
Well? WTF are you trying to say? Huh? I notice you removed your big-headed smart mouthing shite from my post. So how about you explain what you mean by questioning my frequencies?
You attack the message and messenger. The FACT is that millimeter waves do not travel more than 1500 feet. I was simply pointing that FACT out yet your position is obviously untenable since you have to resort to personal attacks and name calling. As we say in the south "Bless your heart!"
FACT is FACTOID head, you have no idea how to read my post. You also have no idea what FACTS I have witnessed in my long life. Today is my 71st birthday, wankstain, and your FACTS are faked. So you can shove them where the sun don't shine cos I was working on satellites before you were even thought of.....
I ignored the message and pointed out that the link you provided at first was very poorly written. The 2nd item you shared was playing RIGHT into my hands and now you know it.
Do you remember the huge fuss about the cruise liners finding that they had numerous cases of 'covid' on board? 65 people are reported to have died as a result but it may well have been much more!
Why do you suppose that happened? Let me enlighten you. Each and every one of those ships was including in their advertising campaigns that they were updated with 5G. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. Now, Fleur, how did those ships get their signal? It certainly was not via a cable, was it......
Think again, love. Do not tell your grannie how to suck eggs, you are liable to make a big fool of yourself and provide your grannie with concerns about your lack of education!
Yep in NO WAY is E. Musk a friend of mankind , just another relative front-man kid billionaire for the SAME FAMILIES you have so excellently pointed out and revealed It takes 1,800 gallons of Diesel fuel to run the giant earth gobbling machine to get enough material for one Tesla car battery , anyone think thats green? And he is the neuro link guy for sure as you mention , anyone think he cares if they give you and your kinds that hook up at the base of your skull ?
Judicial Review Heard
Is the government informing the public of risks associated with 5G roll out?
This update is from our barrister, Philip Rule, written for his chambers’ website:
On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of State’s alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology.
No5’s Philip Rule acts for the claimants, led by Michael Mansfield KC, and instructed by Lorna Hackett of Hackett & Dabbs LLP. The case is brought by Action Against 5G and with the support of the public through Crowd Justice.
At the hearing the government argued that there is no duty to inform the public of any risks at all, because it essentially denies that there are any risks from the increased exposures or new form of radiation frequency to be used in 5G rollout. This is in keeping with its publications that have sought to reassure the public that there – categorically and conclusively – is no chance of harm arising from exposure to 5G and radiofrequency radiation (“RFR”).
The claimants’ case was outlined to the Court identifying that such a position taken by the government is not based upon the scientific report that the government itself has advanced as being the most up-to-date piece of international research. That is the “ICNIRP” (International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection) March 2020 guidelines. These however are far from finding that there are no risks at all.
Indeed, far from providing any proof of an absence of risk, the ICNIRP guidelines in fact evidence the existence of risks, and notes that several are yet to be fully understood or proven by repetition of study or by anthropological study directly on people who are ‘guinea pigs’ for ubiquitous RFR or 5G in the real-world.
ICNIRP summarises that it concludes, (based on its very limited approach discussed above) that there are already three substantiated effects caused by exposure to radiofrequency EMFs: (i) nerve stimulation, (ii) changes in the permeability of cell membranes, and (iii) effects due to temperature elevation. For many other recorded matters, it essentially notes the jury is still out, but did not find that as yet the harm to human health has already been proven. In particular there are not yet any significant number of studies into 5G technology (which uses high frequency waves, and targeted beams and pulsation in a way earlier generations did not).
For those with disability treated by medical implant the consideration of safety given by ICNIRP, in its revised 2020 guidelines expressly do not cater for their safety. As well as those genetically or environmentally susceptible to suffer cancer or EHS in the future from the exposure to RFR, there are also existing vulnerable groups who ought to be considered and who deserve to be given information to assist them (but have not been), including:
i. Those with disabilities that require medical implants with electrical currents or conductivity, including pace-makers in the heart for example. (This important issue has simply not been addressed at all by ICNIRP);
ii. Those with disability/injury that required the implant of metal to their body;
iii. Children–for instance, children’s brains absorb greater quantity of RFR, and bone marrow exposure is greater; as well as their lifespan exposure being of longer duration;
iv. Those who presently suffer disability arising from existing cancer;
v. Those presently suffering pre-cancerous conditions;
vi. Those exposed habitually to radiation in the workplace, of particular levels or longevity;
vii. Those with immunosuppressant conditions;
viii. Those suffering from ME;
ix. Those suffering from EHS.
The Court was shown, for example, that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified both ELF magnetic fields and RF EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Exposure to non-ionising radiation including radiofrequency is notably a recorded disease or illness recognised by the WHO, since 2005, in the International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10 (even if the precise cause is not yet understood or known). A responsible body of scientific study has raised concerns about risks that remain under study. Many studies ICNIRP identifies have identified certain effects that might prove harmful and their substantiation by further study is awaited – but a position where the jury is out is not the same as a concluded final position established by study that finds a radiation is safe, or safe for all people. Limitations on current knowledge are relevant when assurances are sought to be given by the government. The public has the right to be informed and not misled about how much is known or can be stated with certainty, and what risks remain to be investigated or conclusively determined one way or the other.
The Court of Appeal previously granted permission for the case to proceed on the grounds that challenge:
1. The failure to provide adequate or effective information to the public about the risks and how, if it be possible, it might be possible for individuals to avoid or minimise the risks;
2. (a) The failure to provide adequate and sufficient reasons for not establishing a process to investigate and establish the adverse health effects and risks of adverse health effects from 5G technology and/or for discounting the risks presented by the evidence available; and/or (b) failure to meet the requirements of transparency and openness required of a public body.
These grounds advance a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 by omissions and failings in violation of the positive obligations to protect human life, health and dignity, required to be met by Articles 2, 3 and/or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Judgment is awaited from the Administrative Court in due course.
If you would like to support the work being done please visit https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/legalactionagainst5g/
[Philip kindly goes on to note …]
If you feel you may have been affected by the implementation of 5G masts and devices in your environment (or just wish to read more about the studies and scientific research in this field) you may wish to visit https://actionagainst5g.org/ for more information”.
Action Against 5G notes as follows:
In 2020, ICNIRP also noted that biological effects are not easily discernible from adverse health effects, and that their guidelines:
“are not intended to protect against biological effects as such (when compensatory mechanisms are overwhelmed or exhausted), unless there is also an associated adverse health effect. However, it is not always easy to draw a clear distinction between biological and adverse health effects, and indeed this can vary depending on individual susceptibility to specific situations.
An example is sensory effects from nonionizing radiation exposures under certain circumstances, such as a tingling sensation resulting from peripheral nerve stimulation by electric or magnetic fields; magnetophosphenes (light flickering sensations in the periphery of the visual field) resulting from stimulation of the retina by electric fields induced by exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields; and microwave hearing resulting from thermoelastic waves due to expansion of soft tissues in the head which travel via bone conduction to the inner ear. Such perceptions may sometimes lead to discomfort and annoyance.
ICNIRP does not consider discomfort and annoyance to be adverse health effects by themselves, but, in some cases, annoyance may lead to adverse health effects by compromising well-being. The exposure circumstances under which discomfort and annoyance occur vary between individuals.”
Thus there are many identified potential outcomes.
Philip notes above “Many studies ICNIRP identifies have identified certain effects” and we add also that many responsible bodies of scientific study (for example the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health, Austrian Medical Chambers, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, European Academy for Environmental Medicine, International Society of Doctors for the Environment, Environmental Health Trust, BioInitiative Working Group, French National Assembly) have identified verified risks and that courts have ruled in favour of the science presented by some of these bodies contrary to ICNIRP’s assessment of the same science regarding these risks.
[PLEASE NOTE that the AA5G team does not have the resources to advise on or support mast objections and other local actions. We refer you to the excellent material on www.rfinfo.co.uk.]
See also: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/symptoms-of-electro-magnetic-sensitivity
and: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/full-steam-ahead-for-5g-and-lets-not-even-think-about-the-damage-to-health/
Lone Skum's Star Link beams 12Ghz of electro-magnetic radiation at the entire planet. Look at how many satellites we have crowding our skies.... Elon is not the only madman on the block, is he?
https://satellitemap.space/
Thanks for raising awareness about Musk's creepy 5G satellites. I get so flabbergasted when I hear "truth community" people cheering for Musk when he is clearly a deranged transhumanist plutocrat being propped up by the military industrial complex.
I also recently learned this about his other degenerative lithium related activities.
Over 50 percent of the world’s known lithium deposits are in the “Lithium Triangle”—the lithium concentrated brine sources in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. Bolivia’s high mountain deserts—the Salar de Uyuni—have by far the largest known reserves of lithium.
Evo Morales -- Bolivia's first indigenous president, had a commitment to the environment and to Pachamama (Mother Earth) and he was against inviting in transnational corporations (like Telsa and it's lithium mining partners) to pillage the land for lithium. When he refused to allow multi-national corporations to pillage the Earth for the large lithium deposits in his country it was not long before a US-backed military coup took place.
President Evo Morales Ayma, was removed illegally from his office in November 2019. The Bolivian military, at the behest of Bolivian oligarchs with ties to Lithium Mining Corporations and the United States government, threatened Morales; Morales went into exile in Mexico and then in Argentina.
The CEO of the U.S.-based Telsa car manufacturer has admitted to involvement in what President Morales has referred to as a “Lithium Coup.”
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” was Elon Musk’s response to an accusation on twitter that the U.S. government organized a coup against President Evo Morales, so that Musk could obtain Bolivia’s lithium.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2020/03/10/elon-musk-is-acting-like-a-neo-conquistador-for-south-americas-lithium/?fbclid=IwAR0h6Hzp8m5d4ZvHZ6C8TMJ1n9fkL74vBMJEnGhOAIHYj_xE-4oJMgWduX4
The coup was about Bolivian lithium; and not only did it involve violent coercion to remove Bolivia's first indigenous president from office, it also resulted in two massacres local people defending their land against the lithium mines (and now is resulting in the destruction of the land and ecosystems there, as I exposed in my previous post where you shared your powerful poem).
This is what "sustainable development", Greenwashing, "Green Colonialism" and trading blood for lithium looks like.
For many years I have told people who champion electric cars and solar panels that considering they also rely on finite resources, we should be careful that we do not end up going from trading blood for oil, to trading blood for lithium.
It appears that, sadly, that is exactly what we are doing now in South America, Australia and soon in northern Ontario/Quebec (and in the Cobalt Mines in the Congo, that are also required to make the batteries).
The corporate oligarchs that are ravenous to make billions from pillaging the Earth for lithium and cobalt now have their crosshairs set on Ontario and Quebec. God help anyone that dares to stand in their way to defend the Boreal Forest (which they intend to scalp, blow to pieces with explosives, grind into rubble and poison with a stew of toxic chemicals so we can have ipads and EVs).
I have been reaching out to the Indigenous leaders in northern Ontario but so far the only two that got back to me told me that the mining companies had sent in teams of people to their town hall meetings and convinced most of the people in their community how beneficial the mines were going to be for them financially, sadly, this seems to have convinced many of them to lay down, take the money and not fight this. I am not gonna give up though ❤
Very interesting info
Important additional info, Gavin. Thank you for adding it here! xx Pinned.
Thanks for helping get this info out. I have been attempting to gather additional intel and make connections with people up north regarding the intended Cobalt and Lithium mines in Ontario/Quebec and it is not looking good so far (I updated the comment above).
Here is additional intel on the situation.
Our corrupt corporation captured government is helping to initiate large projects to pillage the lands of indigenous peoples (Cree of Eeyou Istchee, the Shakopaatikoong peoples of the Slate Falls first nation and the Waabitigweyaang peoples of Sandy Lake, among others ) and the body of Mother Earth in new Cobalt, Tantalum and Lithium mines in northern Ontario and Quebec.
Mines are proposed to be set up near James Bay and Red Lake with refineries in Thunder bay on Lake Superior. Given the nature of open pit mining, lithium leeching ponds and lithium refining, the inevitable result will be large scale poisoning of the water table and the ocean in James bay, contamination of the great lakes (through lake Superior, moving downstream into all the other great lakes), deforestation and genocide of local wildlife.
Rock Tech’s Georgia Lake Project at Nipigon is expected to produce an average of 100,000 Tons per a year of ore over its life.
Frontier Lithium is creating another lithium pillaging mining project with its PAK Project, 175 kilometers north of Red Lake. Much of Frontier’s 27,000 hectares is intended to be clear cut and devastated ecologically.
An Austrailian corporation called "Green Technology Metals" has already begun pillaging the boreal forest near and the body of Mother Earth with two projects (the "Seymour" and "Root" Projects) in Nipigon, Red Lake, Ontario. The company intends to destroy 40,800 hectares of ground with multiple lithium prospects spread out across the entire region.
Vancouver’s "Lithium One Metals" corporation has also acquired property 15 kilometres south of Green Technology’s Root Project where they intend to continue to pillage and destroy the boreal forest. Called the Pinto Property, the new addition brings the company's total land base of 25,950 hectares in Northern Ontario and the James Bay side of Quebec.
In Quebec, Critical Elements Corporation plans to dry and empty lakes to build a lithium and tantalum open mine that will produce approximately 4,500 tons of the mineral a day for 17 years.
There is another mine called North American Lithium Project, Quebec, Canada which is located in the La Corne municipality, 60km away from Val d’Or city in. The proposed pit is expected to have a length of 1,350m, average width of 750m and final pit depth of 270m. The North American Lithium project will have a processing facility that intends to pillage 1.5 million tonnes of ore per annum.
Another mine is proposed by Australia-based Allkem-Galaxy Resources Ltd. The mine site is set to be located about ten kms south of the Eastmain River and 100 kms east of the Cree community of Eastmain in northern Quebec. Despite concerns being expressed by indigenous community leaders the project was approved by our corrupt government on Jan. 16. has an estimated mine life of 15 to 20 years and is expected to produce on average 5,480 tonnes of ore per day.
The James Bay lithium mine is part of the federal government’s $3.8 billion critical minerals strategy to domestically extract minerals, like lithium, that are used in batteries for electric vehicles, laptops, solar panels, wind turbines and other so called "green" or "renewable" technology.
Strip mining and deforestation is not something that can be undone. It means the decimation of ancient diverse ecosystems, and so there is nothing "renewable" or "green" about it.
Extracting the soil in this region which has “one of the purest spodumen (lithium ore) deposits in the world, with more than 530 km2 of land,” according to Critical Elements Corporation, will also require destruction of wetlands and a significant number of trees.
This mining project plans to carve out massive areas of land so facilitate 136 heavy truck passes per day, in the middle of the boreal forest.
The boreal forest will be clear cut, the moose, caribou, the lynx, the mountain lion, wolves, fox, bobcats, eagles, hawks and countless other winged and four legged beings will be forcibly displaced from their homes (inevitably resulting in many of them attempting to return to their homes only to starve while pacing near the fences or to be poisoned by the toxins these mines produce). The fish in the lakes, the whales and countless other beings in James bay, they will all be decimated by these projects.
They appear to be moving in fast and as quiet as possible to avoid local and environmentalist resistance.
These projects will mean we trade blood for lithium so we can have fun smart devices and electric cars to play with. We will be trading the ancient beauty and majesty of the Boreal forest and all it's inhabitants for smart phones and tesla cars.
Please, if anyone reading this knows of any organizations that are working to resist this corporate/government pillaging of the Earth and prevent these mines from moving forward with their plans, let me know..
Gavin,
How do we find out who owns these awful industries? Without engaging my search engine my spidey sense screams the British Royal family which has been spearheading all Green Totalitarianism worldwide for at least a century.
Now I will dig..... I will also contact Iain Davis, Whitney Webb, Johnnie Vedmore and Max Igan to ask them to investigate further. May I please quote your comments here?
Looks like Ontario is going to be the next Bolivia
https://archive.org/details/blood4lithiumborealforestpillaging
Our Royals are behind this.... the fightback must go straight to their door.
I have not started following the money upstream yet but I imagine at some point the flow would be traced to those massive flooded valley life suffocating 'financial reservoirs' that are Blackrock and The Vanguard Group. I will look into this further after I do some more networking to attempt to connect with indigenous peoples on the ground up north that care enough to take a stand. I figure with the way our Canadian government is spewing all these lies about "inclusiveness" and "reconciliation" having indigenous peoples say no to these projects in the spotlight would likely serve to throw one of the more powerful 'political monkey wrenches' into their Earth eating machinery of death. So I am gonna keep trying to reach out despite the disheartening results thus far.
Yes please, do call in the cavalry and share this data with anyone you feel could help bring transparency to (and hopefully prevent) this planned destruction of much of "The Lungs of the Earth" and the sacred waters in Ontario and Quebec from moving forward. Thank you.
Please help support the call for the Ecocide Law!
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/campaign-for-ecocide-law
Yeah, innit?
Thought you might like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3vY2LyQn1A&t=140s
He is on his way! I commented on that video as follows:
"I could not follow you until I saw this. I was so incensed by your narrow narrative and refusal to search outside the box. You have much more to learn yet. Look into Electro-magnetic radiation as the cause of the symptoms we attribute to 'viruses'.
THEN I will subscribe."
Spot on Frances!
💯💯💯
Besides the environmental issue the term dual-use is key to many issues:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-does-starlinks-participation-ukrainian-defense-reveal-about-us-space-policy
A foreign war has dual use as domestic war
TV has dual use
The bug called the internet has dual use.
Even when you follow the DOD discussions you will find that essentially the military industrial complex has entirely taken over our civil societies and turned it into a battlefield with military grade assaults on every level.
Down to every single human level, our homes, our bodies and our minds.
Useful article! Many thanks.
"a battlefield with military grade assaults on every level." - YEP! Totally!
Are they having a punt on the G-Gs ????????
Thought I'd send you another of mine it's probably worse than the Gs " ain't no one can solve my problems, it all comes down to me"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG4WL5ZXqAY
Punt on the G-Gs made me LOL!
Could it be that Musk's Twitter machinations were intended to obscure his StarLink project? Twitter will not kill us, but StarLink might.
Gosh Frances … you sure are one smart dude! Amazes me where you get all your brain power from and not least your determination and courage …. keep writing coz I wanna keep reading … regardless of the scariness of it all 😨
I always laugh when people call me a dude! Even a smart dude! I gather that the word has now become asexual? You know when you are getting old - the lingo leaves you confused!
Thank you very much for the lovely compliments on this my 71st birthday! I am delighted to report that the old bonce is still firing on all channels, pretty much as it always has done. When I was very young I was told I had a very high IQ so I set about proving that the IQ test merely assessed our ability to learn and retain patterns. I gathered 15 young friends and we all took IQ tests every Sunday afternoon for 3 weeks. We all improved our scores significantly, showing that the tests were flawed. My Psychology tutor was a bit miffed with me when I submitted that paper with the epithet that a wild man of Borneo was probably much brighter than any Western educated person, yet he would not know how to even write his name and the date before he started attempting the test!
Happy birthday Frances! 🎂🤗
Stay blessed dear Frances, you are a treasure! ❤️
MANY HAPPY RETURNS 🎉🥳
I’m only 3 years behind …. probably getting my dudes and dudesses all muddled up! Oh, to be in Borneo alongside that wild man … no doubt a much more sane and intelligent environment than right here, right now in Blighty! Enjoy your birthday 🎊
As I stated to your Knight: "I am here to share, or try., and have an open conversation. Back in the day I connected a cell phone on a "2G" network with a Thinkpad without my employers authorization or permission. The engineers knew ~ we hit 9,600 baud. Good times........." Knowledge is not grandstanding.
Having been admonished for grandstanding, you have the arrogance to repeat yourself? Why? What do you think that will achieve? Don't you realise that you appear vain and self obsessed?
Do try to keep on topic and bear in mind that you are among people who value their health far more than you value your ability to experiment with forces you clearly do not comprehend.
It is people like you, blindly messing with the delicate natural radiation of all living things, that inadvertently destroy peace and happiness, health and wellbeing - and THEN expect the rest of us to pat you on the head and say "thanks Jim, you are our hero!" when it is obvious that your chosen career is responsible for much pain and even death.
Millimeter wave technology (5G) does NOT work from space and the unobstructed transmission distance is roughly 1,500 feet. That is why so many small cell transmitters are required. Starlink is NOT 5G. This will help you understand the differences: https://bitactro.com/starlink-vs-5g/
That article is very poorly expressed because the writer is not using English very well. Also, the claims made about StarLink and 5G being different are out of date now. 5G simply means fifth generation it does not specify which frequencies or pulses are being employed. I am not convinced that we are being told everything that these StarLink satellites are capable of, because that would reveal trade secrets to potential competitor companies.
You are attacking the messenger and missing the message. While "5G" represents the fifth generation of wireless transmission you are woefully uninformed about 5G frequencies. The FACT is millimeter technology - 5G - is a high frequency wavelength and does not transmit over long distances as well as low frequencies. THAT is the point. I thought you vibrated at a higher frequency and I am not questioning that. This might help unless you again attack the messenger: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/what-frequency-is-5g-all-the-different-5g-ranges-explained/
This article is extremely frightening and confirms my worst conclusions. Thank you.
It is clear that the cacophony of electro-magnetic radiation is going to get much worse as these idiots continue to fill up the airwaves without a single thought or word about health impacts.
I was RIGHT to criticise the previous article. It was incoherent in comparison with this one. Saying so was not an ad hominem attack. It was FACT - in capitals since you seem to think that writing FACT in capitals makes your opinions FACTS.
The spectrum of wavelengths being used is horrific. Wait until you look into 60Ghz.... that one doesn't require licensing AND it causes oxygen molecules to spin so that they cannot be useful when we breathe.
The comments in the article in reference to stadiums, gigs and large venues nearly made me sick. Don't these tech freaks realise that such intense electro-magnetic pulsing and chaos of EMFs may well be why so many athletes and super stars are collapsing while being filmed by a bevy of SMART phones?
Where is their IQ? Somewhere near their shoe size?
EDIT: I DO question you vibrating at a higher frequency.
Jim, are you hear to share, or are you here to fight and grandstand?
How absurdly proper, this reply, showing your "lack of self awareness".
Can't you see that your response is not applicable to anything but to showing your own arrogance (and useless sword rattling)?
Let us do Better.
That is grandstanding.... you lack self awareness if you don't recognise it as such.
WTF are you trying to say?
Edited 15 hours later....
Well? WTF are you trying to say? Huh? I notice you removed your big-headed smart mouthing shite from my post. So how about you explain what you mean by questioning my frequencies?
Let's hear it pal.
You attack the message and messenger. The FACT is that millimeter waves do not travel more than 1500 feet. I was simply pointing that FACT out yet your position is obviously untenable since you have to resort to personal attacks and name calling. As we say in the south "Bless your heart!"
FACT is FACTOID head, you have no idea how to read my post. You also have no idea what FACTS I have witnessed in my long life. Today is my 71st birthday, wankstain, and your FACTS are faked. So you can shove them where the sun don't shine cos I was working on satellites before you were even thought of.....
I ignored the message and pointed out that the link you provided at first was very poorly written. The 2nd item you shared was playing RIGHT into my hands and now you know it.
IQ of a shoe size? Ooh yeah.
I was working in the City of London in the late 1980s. We were using a private satellite INTERNET fed to every port, airport and city in the world.
That system started with only one satellite and now has a whole network.
Look up INMARSAT and don't scoff at your grannie. She knows, ya know??
Do you remember the huge fuss about the cruise liners finding that they had numerous cases of 'covid' on board? 65 people are reported to have died as a result but it may well have been much more!
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/tourism-cruises/article241640166.html
Why do you suppose that happened? Let me enlighten you. Each and every one of those ships was including in their advertising campaigns that they were updated with 5G. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. Now, Fleur, how did those ships get their signal? It certainly was not via a cable, was it......
Think again, love. Do not tell your grannie how to suck eggs, you are liable to make a big fool of yourself and provide your grannie with concerns about your lack of education!
Speechless, love you...
@francesleader how I hope and pray you are wrong; but deep inside me, I recognise the breadcrumbs on the pathway to truth.
Great synopsis, Frances!
Yep in NO WAY is E. Musk a friend of mankind , just another relative front-man kid billionaire for the SAME FAMILIES you have so excellently pointed out and revealed It takes 1,800 gallons of Diesel fuel to run the giant earth gobbling machine to get enough material for one Tesla car battery , anyone think thats green? And he is the neuro link guy for sure as you mention , anyone think he cares if they give you and your kinds that hook up at the base of your skull ?