Exactly and I agree, Tulsi and Bernie are controlled opposition and it's really easy to research where they are coming from, also anyone who has a platform in the MSM spouting things we agree with, I would suggest they are part of the black Knobs-ility Respect & x 2 All
Is there a word for when you slowly red pill yourself, at a speed that matches your audience? Seems that is the best she can do, mentally, is to more slowly add new 'facts' as her mind can wrap them. That being said, one wouldn't look to Iverson for any kind of real thought provoking information. Perhaps she is trying to intervene in what would otherwise be full on outrage/riots. You cannot omit genocide.
A word for keeping up with your audience.... hmm....
What about tuning in? Synchronising? Aligning? Consciousness?
When I am suddenly inspired to dig up info on any given topic I never think it is an original idea. I always blame the universe for passing the question around in the real connected hive mind. I feel that I am like a very tiny cog in a huge complex machine that is not for me to understand but to play my part within. That is what faith is.... trusting that life itself knows where it is going and why. Maybe those who value their career or pocket are unable to connect to the zeitgeist of the whole, but rather choose to focus on only the materialism of it?
i watched it. was less than impressed. it was good that she brought up how insane the lockdowns were and how even more insane it was that people complied with them. and that she brought up the cdc changing the definition of vaccine - but that she didn't even mention death or injury was just pathetic. you would mop the floor with her, fran!
She gives me the impression that her personal fame is her #1 priority. Journalism is a career choice for her, rather than a chosen public service or vocation. She avoids the risk of deep diving and losing her platforms.
Yes, exactly. Anyone worried or concerned about fame, fortune, etc at this point is already missing the point. There’s something sleazy about it. It mirrors the corruption.
Exactly and I agree, Tulsi and Bernie are controlled opposition and it's really easy to research where they are coming from, also anyone who has a platform in the MSM spouting things we agree with, I would suggest they are part of the black Knobs-ility Respect & x 2 All
ps - Gonzalo Lira invited Kim onto his Roundtable #12
(I am getting the feeling that Mr Lira uses a fake name to read Substack) Just a hunch!
https://youtu.be/14NY87-lzSc
Harley Schlanger daily update for 8/8/22, 10.5 minutes; Schiller Institute and LaRouche are solutions based: https://youtu.be/qPRnnVAlE04
Nice one! Thanks for adding it here xx
Is there a word for when you slowly red pill yourself, at a speed that matches your audience? Seems that is the best she can do, mentally, is to more slowly add new 'facts' as her mind can wrap them. That being said, one wouldn't look to Iverson for any kind of real thought provoking information. Perhaps she is trying to intervene in what would otherwise be full on outrage/riots. You cannot omit genocide.
A word for keeping up with your audience.... hmm....
What about tuning in? Synchronising? Aligning? Consciousness?
When I am suddenly inspired to dig up info on any given topic I never think it is an original idea. I always blame the universe for passing the question around in the real connected hive mind. I feel that I am like a very tiny cog in a huge complex machine that is not for me to understand but to play my part within. That is what faith is.... trusting that life itself knows where it is going and why. Maybe those who value their career or pocket are unable to connect to the zeitgeist of the whole, but rather choose to focus on only the materialism of it?
i watched it. was less than impressed. it was good that she brought up how insane the lockdowns were and how even more insane it was that people complied with them. and that she brought up the cdc changing the definition of vaccine - but that she didn't even mention death or injury was just pathetic. you would mop the floor with her, fran!
She gives me the impression that her personal fame is her #1 priority. Journalism is a career choice for her, rather than a chosen public service or vocation. She avoids the risk of deep diving and losing her platforms.
Yes, exactly. Anyone worried or concerned about fame, fortune, etc at this point is already missing the point. There’s something sleazy about it. It mirrors the corruption.