52 Comments
author

Meanwhile the WEF proposes Space Bubbles. Please note: If the WEF talks about a thing, it is already a thing!

https://youtu.be/FPvKJw3PCKc

Expand full comment
author

Joined Erin Brockovich's Substack to be confronted with THREE disappointments!

1 She is a climate change alarmist

2 She is talking straight from the prescribed narrative about the UK heatwave..

(She says that UK topped 40c for the first time this week and blames it on industrialisation.....

Erm no.

UK topped 48c in 1858 pre-industrialisation.)

Very disappointed.

Then, to add insult to injury, she does not permit comment unless you are a paid subscriber.

I am OUT-A-THERE.

Expand full comment
author

Neil Oliver – talks about the Dirty Green Puppet Show in UK

‘…that’s what’s coming, it’s all about control’

https://youtu.be/Y_Jk4dt-VjE

Expand full comment

Perhaps the extensive research and data collation presented by the Corbett Report could enlighten the conversation here: https://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/

Also, on the topic of geo-engineering, cloud seeding, chem trails, and weather manipulation performed by governments, there is an excellent case study from the BBC concerning the Lynmouth flood disaster: https://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/news_features/2002/lynmouth_flood.shtml

Finally, you might find the work presented on the WeatherWar101 YouTube channel interesting, as this silicon valley network engineer theorizes that the doppler radar signals could be the mechanism being used to manipulate weather systems which are enhanced by the steam plumes issuing from power plants: https://www.youtube.com/c/WeatherWar101

Just food for thought ...and rock on \m/

Expand full comment

You believe the BBC??

Geo-engineering, cloud seeding, chem trails, and weather manipulation performed by governments sounds more to to me like new normal Wigington toilet waffle.

There is no evidence that supports that. It is all conjecture. We had a similar asinine posit blaming the same of flooding in South Africa of geo-engineering with HAARP thrown in for good measure. The fool asked for a n enquiry by the Public Protector to investigate the unsupported claim. Sometimes it is necessary to point out the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I have no doubt that the desire is their to geo-engineer. It is a stated aim of the clowns at the WEF to save the planet for their personal use only.

However when you can demonstrate that you can plug a volcano , hold back a Tsunami, change the earths rotation and move the moon, I will give it some attention.

Here is the article on KZN in South Africa. https://www.biznews.com/global-citizen/2022/04/20/kzn-floods-over-ages-du-bois

Expand full comment
author

You must forget the nonsense put out by Wiggington BUT do not throw the baby out with the bathwater. There is a history of evidence of geo-engineering, cloud seeding, chemtrails and above all, weather manipulation. See Jim Lee's work (Wiggington hates him!)

https://weathermodificationhistory.com/

Expand full comment

I have followed the debate of Jim Lee with Mick West of Metabunk. He Lee, was using circular reasoning. Jim Lee and Dane Wigington are playing with peoples emotion and neither are scientifically trained. They punt alarmism and people are gullible and believe everything they read or see on screens. Of course Wigington hates him, he is competition. Look at Jim on about Ionosphere heaters . It all based on HAARP and that still persists although the experiment has been completed and closed down in 2013.

I would like to correct a statement you make if I may. "There is a history of evidence of geo-engineering, chemtrails and a belief in weather manipulation".

The evidence is that politicians have made reference to the possibility of weather manipulation and convinced bureaucrats to propose that it must be done and paid for R&D using taxpayer funding.

There is no evidence of any successful weather manipulation only evidence of failed experiments.

Cloud seeding is not geo-engineering, it is claimed to be such. Correct me if I am wrong by all means, but cloud seeding is simply a very small window of opportunity that allows for a particular cloud formation that must pre-exist to be able to induce precipitation. It is not guaranteed either. Experiments have shown that the opportunity is very specific and conditional.

The fact that it has been show that it is possible to induce precipitation by seeding does not mean its weather manipulation, The cloud formation has to be perfect and must be present. if it is not exactly what is needed than you cannot induce any precipitation. You also cannot control by how much or how little either.

Now if you could generate a cloud like a moisture laden clouds is a different story. You would need to be able to produce water laden clouds like Cumulonimbus, Stratocumulus, Stratus, Cumulus or Nimbostratus and then seed them. If you could do that and repeat the experiment, explain how you did it and someone could follow your theory and do the same experiment and get the same result you would be able to make the claim that you had geo-engineered rainfall.

If you believe that mankind has the power to alter the weather and climate, then you will believe anything.

The history of Geo-engineering originated based on the idea of AGW when scientists wanted to make a continuous stream of income for their investors. Climate change was a perfect opportunity and a narrative has been established by a consensus of scientific opinion.

The theory of AGW, i.e., human-caused global warming, some scientists, engineers, and policy-makers were talking about about ideas to alter the world’s climate deliberately. This is called “geoengineering.” “Geoengineering schemes are being proposed with the best of intentions.

They’re trying to avoid a climate crisis that many people think will arise if we don’t do something about it.” – Claire Parkinson, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.

It is still a theory with many megalomaniacs still convinced it can be done and have enough money to play GOD.

There is a massive amount of money still being thrown into it. This is being perpetuated by the IPCC of the UN which is not a scientific organization but a political one. The Kyoto protocol and the Paris Agreement are two drivers of the nonsense and are funded by the WEF who see massive money on the investment in the Green new Deal. Its about the bucks and no different form the Covid contrick and its crises that became an "emergency".

Now we are having climate emergencies. What a racket. So we have a situation where it is now being driven by Corporate Environmentalists.

There is a very good piece on the issue by a physics and atmospheric scientist Dr Ed Berry on the issue. of the delusion- Here https://edberry.com/blog/climate/climate-politics/chemtrail-delusions-vs-scientific-method/ . Note you will need to scroll down a little on the page to see the post

Expand full comment
author

So you are saying that all 10 methods which "own the weather" are a delusion?

https://climateviewer.com/2017/11/07/ten-technologies-to-own-the-weather-today/

Expand full comment

Well what see are all unsubstantiated claims and are conjecture. There is no real empirical proof sorry. I don't buy it.

Ionosphere heating. Really where and by who and why? That was claimed that HAARP were doing that.

Sounding Rockets cause inoculant clouds . That is rubbish They are used for a very different purpose. In the case of weather rockets, the nosecone of the rocket carries an instrumented payload capable of telemetering high-altitude weather data, including wind velocity and direction, to ground stations. Also used as thy offer a considerable advantage over weather balloons, in that they can operate more quickly and at higher altitudes.

I quote according to Professor Cora Randall, a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder. NLCs are Earth’s highest clouds. Seeded by meteoroids, they float at the edge of space more than 80 km above the ground. NLCs form when summertime wisps of water vapor rise up to the mesosphere, allowing water to crystallize around specks of meteor smoke.

Cloud seeding I have discussed already.

There is no such thing as contrail induced cirrus. They may appear to be cirrus but they are not. https://contrailscience.com/hybrid-contrails-a-new-classification/

https://contrailscience.com/cirrus-uncinus-and-contrails/

Water vapor pollution really. Water vapor from cooling towers is no different from steam. Distillation process is very different and done under specific controlled conditions like making hydrocarbons and use specific catalysts. Water vapor can carry some molecules with it but gravity will force them to ground don't you think?

We know that our weather takes place in the troposphere. It does not take place in the other layers. Sure MAYBE they could have an effect, who knows. It is still guess work and claims and scaremongering.

Sure rockets launched into space may cause phenomena, but to claim that that affects the weather is pure conjecture based only on observation. You may see something but to make a claim guesses without any knowledge is lunacy. To claim rockets are doing Stratospheric Aerosol Injection is very questionable. As far as I know it is a proposed solution to cool the earth. Why needs to be ask as there is zero evidence that supports warming. Of course they are blaming Carbon dioxide, but that is another IPCC political maneuver. The cost for a payload of dust to be launched is astronomical I would think. Who is doing it NASA or Musk and for who?

Logic ask you to explain for what reasons would people who are on earth and have loved ones who live there be sensing all this up into the atmosphere to poison us. Would their loved ones not also be subjected to the same poisoning or do they live in special chambers and walk around in space suits?

Sure chemical spraying takes place , but that relates to crop spraying and pest control, spraying flame retardants etc.

This may help you. https://contrailscience.com/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/ and https://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/

I really don't have time to debunk all the claims made. If the writer makes the claim provide real evidence All I see is a claim with no support. If you want to believe everything without questioning it be my guest.

So ,yes I am saying it's a load of crock and a delusion. Who can make such a claim of owning the weather? I am a sceptic and rightfully so. It easy prove me wrong with evidence and I am quite open to other views. But I will question , that is me. A video is not evidence and is easily manipulated as is photoshop.

Metabunk is a really good place to find sane argument. Here https://www.metabunk.org/forums/contrails-and-chemtrails.9/

Expand full comment
author
Jul 24, 2022·edited Jul 24, 2022Author

References with direct links at the foot of the article I linked above:

[1] "On the Possibilities of Climate Control" in 1962: Harry Wexler on Geoengineering and Ozone Destruction, by James Rodger Flemming. Accompanying PowerPoint Presentation

[2] Pollution of the Upper Atmosphere by Rockets, RAND Corporation. June 11, 1964

[3] Space mirrors to focus sunlight and melt polar icecaps

[4] Background on the HAARP Project - By Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH, November 5, 1996

[5] NASA Sounding Rockets homepage

[6] NASA Sounding Rockets: Tracers - Clouds and Trails

[7] NASA Sounding Rockets: Sounding Rockets Overview (missions)

[8] HAARP and the Sky Heaters - ClimateViewer News

[9] MAP of Ionospheric Heaters - ClimateViewer 3D

[10] Ionospheric Heaters: How HAARP really works - ClimateViewer News

[11] Geoengineering Noctilucent Clouds: HAARP and Project Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds - ClimateViewer News

[12] Climate control via existing military equipment like HAARP to abate/recycle CO2 - Climate CoLab

[13] Purposeful Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: RF Ionospheric Heater Arrogance (e.g. HAARP) - Dr. Rick Shankman, MIT ClimateX

[14] HAARP on a Boat? Ionospheric Heaters go Mobile! - ClimateViewer News

THE ARGUS EXPERIMENT* BY N. C. CHRISTOFILOS.

Plasma Seeding and Magnetospheric Modification Begins! 1963

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, 1963

Artificial Strontium and Barium Clouds in the Upper Atmosphere, 1964

Observations of the Developement of Striations in Large Barium Ion Clouds, 1972

Rocket energy beams create artificial aurora, 1972

ARPA Project SECEDE II barium cloud releases, 1972

NASA Skylab launch knocks out radio communication over Atlantic Ocean, 1973

High-explosive shaped Barium charges pound ionosphere, 1974

NASA Project Cameo Barium Cloud Over Alaska, 1978

CRRES and the Arecibo Ionospheric Heater, 1990

Charged Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE), 2010

How Beijing used rockets to keep opening ceremony dry, 2008

HAARP WEATHER CONNECTION - Bernard Eastlund on Ionospheric Heaters controlling weather

COSMIC IGNITION WEATHER TOOL KIT - Bernard Eastlund on CIPPA Weather Effects

COSMIC IGNITED PLASMA PATTERNS IN ATMOSPHERE (CIPPA) - Bernard Eastlund on "Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors"

I recommend that you address your remarks above to Jim Lee direct so that he can provide you with his plethora of sources which you are choosing not to access. You can chat with him on his Discord channel.

Oh and forget Metabunk, that site is known to be alphabetti agency controlled. I am surprised you mentioned it.

Expand full comment
author
Jul 23, 2022·edited Jul 23, 2022Author

Wow. You chose my favourite docu from James Corbett followed by an incident in a place I visited as a child and then you topped it off with one of my favourite You Tube channels (now mysteriously quiet)!

We must be tuned into the same wavelength!

Expand full comment
Jul 22, 2022·edited Jul 23, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

Thank you for the collection of data!

The "Greens" have always been mostly a bunch of paid agents and a few naive morons... (That's true for ALL "volunteer" organizations.) Their role was to do their part of the predictive programming that is about to be used to empoverish, enslave, and decimate humanity.

Expand full comment

Right up my street. I am still trying to figure out, when I can't get a job because of my presence on Substack, how the hell I'm going to do... WHAT... about geoengineering...

Truly a thing. I'm thinking about a song about it... but low-tech dogs on ... where? In the park? Bark, bark, all over the park, will that do anything? I think maybe, but... I'm feeling stuck in a small town full of gas-lit fear bunnies... and no job makes for such a dull dog... I've been noticing the trees for almost 20 years now. Nobody else thinks it's ODD that trees used to snow here in the PNW might be toppled over by ... snow. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh.

Expand full comment
author

Katie is "rather warm" with Ionanthe on the gantry of the M25....

https://youtu.be/B6t4xRks8I0

Expand full comment
Jul 22, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

I monitor the trails everywhere I go. Was a travel nurse for 11 years. Pisses me off!!!! Thanks for writing this. Wish we could change things

Expand full comment

I think we COULD... I feel stymied by having no resources.

Expand full comment

Rudolph Bahro was a DDR ideologist. His autobiography was called From Red to Green. https://www.fifthestate.org/archive/316-spring-1984/rudolph-bahro-on-industrial-civilization/

Bahro, who developed his critique within a Marxist framework, accused the Communist Party leadership of betraying socialist ideals. Characterizing the states of Eastern Europe as systems of organized irresponsibility, he analyzed their political economy and aspects of their industrial production. He recommended far-reaching reforms of the administrative apparatus—indeed, an overhaul of the entire political structure. In Bahro’s view, the Eastern Bloc was not merely an example of deformed socialism, but rather a social reality based on entirely different principles. He accused the Soviet leadership of having, through its invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, robbed itself and the peoples of Eastern Europe of the experience of socialism with a human face. He demanded true economic democracy, without wage privileges for tiny elites, and also the elimination of the existing division of labor. Genuine institutional self-rule, Bahro declared, must gradually develop from below, with freedom of personal development a necessary condition. He believed that a coalition drawing from all political tendencies could lead the way out of self-imposed imprisonment. All this was conceived as a new vision of communism. Altogether some 300,000 copies of The Alternative were sold, and the book was translated into numerous other languages.

Expand full comment
author

Similar to Gadaffi's Green Book concept which worked so beautifully in Libya.

Expand full comment

Contrails they say!

Unfortunately we're not enough.

Just try to ask people if they see something weird in the sky. 1 out of 100k will see it. Now try to take the others out of the box. Wasted time. Too many discussions and friends lost on this subject. Anyway I will keep doing it wether they like it or not. Rather lose a friend than not trying to open a few eyes. The seed will be there.

Expand full comment
Jul 22, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

Same!

Expand full comment

Keep sayin, GROUND ALL THE PLANES AS FAST AS POSSIBLE....ALL OF THEM IS THE ONLY WAY.

Expand full comment
author

They will never do that! It would give the game away too quickly!

Jim Lee thinks that all these plane farts are caused by changes in jet fuel rather than actual spraying. He makes a good case for his conclusions:

https://weathermodificationhistory.com/

Expand full comment

USAF Whistle Blower SGT Kristen Meghan Edwards Public Speech CHEMTRAILS GEOENGINEERING DISCLOSURE

...here https://youtu.be/fZD1DbqoXcA

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I saw that many years ago. Maybe that was why they started adding the strontium, barium and aluminium to the jet fuel rather than risk it being so obvious to good people like Meghan Edwards.

Expand full comment

It seems you do not believe your own article which is confusing but ok.

Also the Army Navy? whistleblower on the enormous amounts of Alum Barium and STrontium being used by the military, saw that video a few weeks ago, now removed. See below for a few links. Please consider the enormous change in the amounts of those elements IN the plants and trees. We are being poisoned from above, this is quite clear now. Ground soil is becoming unsupportive to life, proveable.

https://rumble.com/v18aocz-the-dimming-documentary-exposing-the-global-climate-engineering-cover-up.html

https://youtu.be/w4Phln_z7-E german fella first hand account

Expand full comment
author

Whatever do you mean by this:

"It seems you do not believe your own article which is confusing but ok."

Expand full comment

You included the Jim Lee info in your comments, that this is NOT really happening, saying he makes a good case AGAINST IT. Thanks

Expand full comment
author

Erm..... I don't think you understand Jim's theory very well. He lists a number of contributing factors to weather warfare and he offers the explanation for chemtrails as being the result of metal nano-particulates being added to the fuel rather than actual spraying. This would explain why airport staff insist that they are not filling aircraft with anything other than fuel.

Perhaps you should watch and listen to or read this:

https://climateviewer.com/2017/11/07/ten-technologies-to-own-the-weather-today/

Expand full comment
Jul 22, 2022·edited Jul 22, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

I read your above comment to imply it wasnt happening....seems putting all that metal oxide in jet fuel would be really bad for jet engines, but I am just guessing based on 'sugar in the gas tank' pranks et al...

Expand full comment

It's the jet fuel. Who owns the refineries?

Expand full comment
author

Jet fuel plus 9 other known geo-engineering technologies:

https://climateviewer.com/2017/11/07/ten-technologies-to-own-the-weather-today/

Expand full comment

Good stuff. Thanks.

Expand full comment
deletedJul 23, 2022Liked by Frances Leader
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jul 23, 2022Liked by Frances Leader

see your point, R.T.

Expand full comment