Wow, this is a very good and informative article by Mr. Escobar. As depressing as it seems, it actually gives me hope because it shows how this proxy war with Ukraine is unsustainable and doomed for failure. Just hope they can accept losing...
"Operation Barbarossa was the invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany and many of its Axis allies, starting on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during the Second World War. It was the largest land offensive in human history, with over 10 million combatants taking part.[27] The operation, code-named after Frederick Barbarossa ("red beard"), a 12th-century Holy Roman emperor and German king, put into action Nazi Germany's ideological goal of conquering the western Soviet Union to repopulate it with Germans. The German Generalplan Ost aimed to use some of the conquered people as forced labour for the Axis war effort while acquiring the oil reserves of the Caucasus as well as the agricultural resources of various Soviet territories. Their ultimate goal was to create more Lebensraum (living space) for Germany, and the eventual extermination of the indigenous Slavic peoples by mass deportation to Siberia, Germanisation, enslavement, and genocide."
Would love to have it confirmed that this is the mother of all psyops. It wouldn't be surprising that they'd play such a game, but I haven't looked into this at all. Will check out the link below.
Maybe they can just send AI weapons and robots to the moon to have a never-ending war that serves no purpose except for making money for the weapons manufacturers instead.
All psychological: total control. Endless desperation. Fear of everything. Destruction of all cultures.
I'm going to give you one fallacious argument, and I hope you can see the fallacy, even though it is true: they say there have been quite a few nuclear submarines in the oceans and the seas, all over the ellipsoid that is our planet. These submarines move and operate everything inside with electricity generatedd by a nuclear fision reactor, boilers that produce vapor and huge generators. But there has been exactly zero nuclear catastrophes in the oceans caused by these hypothetical nuclear reactor submarine war vessels.
It would be a fallacy to affirm that nuclear weapons do not exist because submarines have not yet go boom-boom. The question is: if they can make a seemingly "safe" nuclear submarine, why do we have those crappy nuclear centrals everywhere, that so many people are afraid of?
If there is really a way to have very cheap electricity (like 1000 times less expensive) everywhere, why do we have to go through horrible wars over petroleum or the PR wars of the fracking stuff?
Maybe, maybe, there are no submarines, no nuclear centrals, no nuke weaponry. Maybe, I don't affirm this, maybe all this crap is just like the virus mythology and we don't know yet.
Maybe all the elctricity we have comes from gasoline generators. And the hydroelectric generators.
So, as we open up our minds, maybe we can see things that were always there but invisible to us, due to fear.
nuclear bombs don't work. He heiwaco, Ander Bjorkmann. 20 years ago I saw the report of someone who brought all the surviving g.i. who were still alive. In talking to them he saw that there were two locations in each of the two cities where they were connecting palettes of TNT together all day. The soldiers were told that on the other side of town they'd drop the "bomb" and explode it at 600 feet above ground level.
The soldiers interviews exposed that there was only tnt everywhere.
And then the lame film using the sun as the visual for an atom bomb.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed by conventional airplanes dropping tnt bombs.
The people who own the world's governments use lies as weapons.
It works on us because so many of us want to trust them.
Wasn't a world war with everyone going to fight in it enough for endless desperation? There was plenty of fear and destruction of everything.
Look, I am willing to entertain absolutely anything as being true, but the first thing I do is look for motive to determine how likely it's true. The bigger the motive, the more likely a conspiracy is true. I mean when there are trillions of dollars and unlimited power at stake, you think there is anything that people wouldn't do to gain it?
And this one does appear true to me, but the lack of obvious motive confuses me. False flags start (every) war, they don't end them.
As far as the cheap electricity goes, why on earth would those in power want us to have that?
I cannot remember where I read this, but there is a fatal flaw in the design of every nuclear power plant in the way it handles and creates nuclear waste. It is unnecessary. There needs not be any waste and it can even be used as fuel.
you should find Galen Winsor on youtube. He's dead now, lived 82 years. He would put a piece of plutoniium in his mouth and you'd see that it blackened his tongue. He said there's no such thing as nuclear waste, just fuel that can be put through the reactor again. He made me understand that what's going on is our enemies are running reactors, telling us that there's waste, making us pay to bury it where they can use it again. So it's about them hoarding it and getting it all out of the earth's crust and in their stock piles.
Even have the way to give it a negative value after one voyage through a reactor by calling it waste that needs to be stored.
Typical NWO operation, they get us to pay for everything and they keep everything.
1st They would do anything, even faking the doomsday machine.
2nd cheap electricity means cheaper production, which raises margin profits. That we benefit is an inevitable consequence.
3rd Kirk Sorensen is a guy who promotes the idea of molten-salt reactors using thorium, an abundant fissible material. The most attractive point of his public speaking is that the using fuel in liquid phase (molten salts) is far more safe than solid fuel (plutonium rods.) The torium reactor works only if more fuel is added to it, which would mean that the operators work to keep it producing energy, whereas the operators of the solid fuel reactors work to make sure it doesn't explode, because it has built in all the fuel and cannot be removed. So it is safer by design.
I don't know if this Sorensen was telling the truth, because that sounds too good to be true.
Cheap electricity means more freedom. They will never allow it. I believe there is a ton of technology that is suppressed because of this. That they don't teach about Tesla in school is proof. I never even heard of him until the band named Tesla became popular.
If you listen to the video you hear that Michael Palmer thinks the motive for all the false flags is one single objective: One World Government, the dissolution of countries. Totalitarianism.
Well that was certainly the long game, but the timing seems unnecessary to gain it 80 years later. Seems a bit extreme and very risky to put something in motion like that without jumping on it immediately.
I'm sure Eric Francis Coppolino will prove Michael Palmer wrong.
He says he starts his journalistic research without an agenda or preconceived conclusions. And he is convinced that nukes are real. He must have a good reason why he knows that.
I'll go ask him one of these days: Eric, how do you know nukes are real?
There is a limit to how much content out there that I have time to consume. Certain things, like flat earth, I immediately dismiss due to common sense, and this would fall in that category. How could they fake hundreds of thousands of Japanese deaths from radiation poisoning? Maybe I’ll watch the video, but most likely not...
Wow, this is a very good and informative article by Mr. Escobar. As depressing as it seems, it actually gives me hope because it shows how this proxy war with Ukraine is unsustainable and doomed for failure. Just hope they can accept losing...
One question: What is Operation Barbarossa?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa
"Operation Barbarossa was the invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany and many of its Axis allies, starting on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during the Second World War. It was the largest land offensive in human history, with over 10 million combatants taking part.[27] The operation, code-named after Frederick Barbarossa ("red beard"), a 12th-century Holy Roman emperor and German king, put into action Nazi Germany's ideological goal of conquering the western Soviet Union to repopulate it with Germans. The German Generalplan Ost aimed to use some of the conquered people as forced labour for the Axis war effort while acquiring the oil reserves of the Caucasus as well as the agricultural resources of various Soviet territories. Their ultimate goal was to create more Lebensraum (living space) for Germany, and the eventual extermination of the indigenous Slavic peoples by mass deportation to Siberia, Germanisation, enslavement, and genocide."
I'd like to share this cartoon I posted today about possible nuclear annihilation: https://open.substack.com/pub/annecantstandit/p/armageddon-anyone?r=7f8gy&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Would love to have it confirmed that this is the mother of all psyops. It wouldn't be surprising that they'd play such a game, but I haven't looked into this at all. Will check out the link below.
This has nothing to do with this article, but I just had to share.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/farce-mask-its-safe-for-only-20-minutes-20030427-gdgnyo.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Australia used to fine people and retailers for using misinformation that states that face masks can stop viruses.
Maybe they can just send AI weapons and robots to the moon to have a never-ending war that serves no purpose except for making money for the weapons manufacturers instead.
What a waste of time, lives and resources.
Did you happen to watch the interview Jerm Warfare did to a Doctor named Michael Palmer, where he explains that these things ain't real?
He is quite convincing, but I'm on the gullible side.
Are nukes just like viruses?
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/Michael-Palmer:6
I can't figure out the motive. They are usually easy to imagine.
Motives?
All psychological: total control. Endless desperation. Fear of everything. Destruction of all cultures.
I'm going to give you one fallacious argument, and I hope you can see the fallacy, even though it is true: they say there have been quite a few nuclear submarines in the oceans and the seas, all over the ellipsoid that is our planet. These submarines move and operate everything inside with electricity generatedd by a nuclear fision reactor, boilers that produce vapor and huge generators. But there has been exactly zero nuclear catastrophes in the oceans caused by these hypothetical nuclear reactor submarine war vessels.
It would be a fallacy to affirm that nuclear weapons do not exist because submarines have not yet go boom-boom. The question is: if they can make a seemingly "safe" nuclear submarine, why do we have those crappy nuclear centrals everywhere, that so many people are afraid of?
If there is really a way to have very cheap electricity (like 1000 times less expensive) everywhere, why do we have to go through horrible wars over petroleum or the PR wars of the fracking stuff?
Maybe, maybe, there are no submarines, no nuclear centrals, no nuke weaponry. Maybe, I don't affirm this, maybe all this crap is just like the virus mythology and we don't know yet.
Maybe all the elctricity we have comes from gasoline generators. And the hydroelectric generators.
So, as we open up our minds, maybe we can see things that were always there but invisible to us, due to fear.
nuclear bombs don't work. He heiwaco, Ander Bjorkmann. 20 years ago I saw the report of someone who brought all the surviving g.i. who were still alive. In talking to them he saw that there were two locations in each of the two cities where they were connecting palettes of TNT together all day. The soldiers were told that on the other side of town they'd drop the "bomb" and explode it at 600 feet above ground level.
The soldiers interviews exposed that there was only tnt everywhere.
And then the lame film using the sun as the visual for an atom bomb.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed by conventional airplanes dropping tnt bombs.
The people who own the world's governments use lies as weapons.
It works on us because so many of us want to trust them.
This is a mistake, they can't be trusted.
Wasn't a world war with everyone going to fight in it enough for endless desperation? There was plenty of fear and destruction of everything.
Look, I am willing to entertain absolutely anything as being true, but the first thing I do is look for motive to determine how likely it's true. The bigger the motive, the more likely a conspiracy is true. I mean when there are trillions of dollars and unlimited power at stake, you think there is anything that people wouldn't do to gain it?
And this one does appear true to me, but the lack of obvious motive confuses me. False flags start (every) war, they don't end them.
As far as the cheap electricity goes, why on earth would those in power want us to have that?
I cannot remember where I read this, but there is a fatal flaw in the design of every nuclear power plant in the way it handles and creates nuclear waste. It is unnecessary. There needs not be any waste and it can even be used as fuel.
you should find Galen Winsor on youtube. He's dead now, lived 82 years. He would put a piece of plutoniium in his mouth and you'd see that it blackened his tongue. He said there's no such thing as nuclear waste, just fuel that can be put through the reactor again. He made me understand that what's going on is our enemies are running reactors, telling us that there's waste, making us pay to bury it where they can use it again. So it's about them hoarding it and getting it all out of the earth's crust and in their stock piles.
Even have the way to give it a negative value after one voyage through a reactor by calling it waste that needs to be stored.
Typical NWO operation, they get us to pay for everything and they keep everything.
That right there is what tells me I'm right.
1st They would do anything, even faking the doomsday machine.
2nd cheap electricity means cheaper production, which raises margin profits. That we benefit is an inevitable consequence.
3rd Kirk Sorensen is a guy who promotes the idea of molten-salt reactors using thorium, an abundant fissible material. The most attractive point of his public speaking is that the using fuel in liquid phase (molten salts) is far more safe than solid fuel (plutonium rods.) The torium reactor works only if more fuel is added to it, which would mean that the operators work to keep it producing energy, whereas the operators of the solid fuel reactors work to make sure it doesn't explode, because it has built in all the fuel and cannot be removed. So it is safer by design.
I don't know if this Sorensen was telling the truth, because that sounds too good to be true.
Cheap electricity means more freedom. They will never allow it. I believe there is a ton of technology that is suppressed because of this. That they don't teach about Tesla in school is proof. I never even heard of him until the band named Tesla became popular.
If you listen to the video you hear that Michael Palmer thinks the motive for all the false flags is one single objective: One World Government, the dissolution of countries. Totalitarianism.
Well that was certainly the long game, but the timing seems unnecessary to gain it 80 years later. Seems a bit extreme and very risky to put something in motion like that without jumping on it immediately.
What do you mean "80 years later"? They created it immediately after WW2 - that is what the United Nations really is.
From what I’ve read...yes.
They’re a super sized psyop.
A lie. As is so many things we believe to be true.
I'm sure Eric Francis Coppolino will prove Michael Palmer wrong.
He says he starts his journalistic research without an agenda or preconceived conclusions. And he is convinced that nukes are real. He must have a good reason why he knows that.
I'll go ask him one of these days: Eric, how do you know nukes are real?
Geez, ask Japan if they’re real or not... 😒
But THAT is precisely what is under discussion here! You ought to watch the video we are talking about...
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/Michael-Palmer:6
There is a limit to how much content out there that I have time to consume. Certain things, like flat earth, I immediately dismiss due to common sense, and this would fall in that category. How could they fake hundreds of thousands of Japanese deaths from radiation poisoning? Maybe I’ll watch the video, but most likely not...
Generally, if I do not have time to watch a video or read an article, I refrain from commenting.
🤣😂
Ooh thanks! Watching/listening now!
Same, interesting!