British Crown and the City of London

Is it the Roman Empire rebranded, relocated and really rather regal?

This is a story of how wealth and power was systematically stripped from kings, sovereign nations and from ‘We the People’.

There are two Britains. One consists of the British people, who, for the most part, keep their heads down and occupy themselves with surviving in a system which strangles, robs and deceives them.
The other, occult and barely recognised, is the Invisible British Empire (which is not at all British), run out of the exclusive City of London, which is NOT IN THE UK OR THE EU OR THE UN OR NATO. It is an entirely independent city state that is an essential part of the international mafia style, above-all-law, globalist wet dream.

All decisions made by puppet politicians in ALL English speaking countries of the world are made by this secret criminal syndicate which comprises think tanks, masonic high ranking officials, bankers, insurers and fossil fuel corporation owners.

Unfortunately, this country fell to the domination of the globalists when the Romans created the square mile enclosure that became the City of London.

The long and painful history of how Britain has been misused to create and maintain a globalist Empire which has morphed, re-branded and gone undercover to continue it's dubious quest is well documented. It is also well hidden from the British people themselves, because if they fully understood what has been done in their name for many centuries, there would be a revolution of such proportion that the guillotines and hanging gallows of other revolutions would pale into insignificance beside their righteous rage.

Keeping the world unaware, or worse, in total disbelief that this criminal enterprise even exists, has been the most essential part of the agenda.
So cheer up.... it is not Britain that deserves contempt.
It is an international criminal predator class which dominates the City of London and THAT, my friends, is a very different animal indeed.

Part two:

Londinium had established itself as an attractive place to amass wealth as far back as Roman times.

A thousand years later, kings like William the Conqueror understood the importance of doing international business. From the moment he granted the City of London its Royal Charter in 1067, the symbiotic relationship between the British Crown and the City was cemented. The special provisions of the Magna Carta of 1215 confirm.

The art of war and statehood was left to the head of state, while the art of making money was in the hands of international merchants. Eventually, the wealth of the merchants became so great that they would, from time to time, lend out their huge stockpiles of gold to European nobility and kings. Soon enough, the aristocracy could not pay their dues. When this happened, there was always something that the money-lenders could take in return; frequently this was a noble title or an estate, but later it was something even more special - a central bank.

In the early years of the House of Hohenzollern, they were providing the Holy Roman Emperor, Sigismund, with enormous loans for his military campaigns in Transylvania. When he could not repay the money, the Hohenzollerns secured the Margraviate of Brandenburg as payment, a title which gradually turned them into Kaisers of the Reich. (Source » https://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/british-law/inner-city-temple-bar/)

The same type of playbook was adopted between the City of London and the hedonistic British royals. Wars and expensive taste in loose floozies by the two King Charles and their heir, James, cost a lot of money. The kings would borrow endlessly from the City’s goldsmiths, and in return would provide them with a promise to pay the loan back using a wooden tally-stick as the contract. Additionally, there was a considerable debt owed to the House of Orange-Nassau.

When the kingdom could not fulfil its promises, it was payback time. In the 1680s, however, the lenders did not want a minor noble title. They wanted a regime change to install the king’s daughter, Mary II and her Dutch husband, William of Orange as king. More importantly, the clever lenders wanted guaranteed complete control of the kingdom’s issuance of banknotes.

Supported by a group of influential British political and religious leaders, William invaded England in what became known as the Glorious Revolution. In 1688, he landed at the south-western English port of Brixham; the unpopular Catholic King James was deposed shortly afterward.

The City of London was now an autonomous wealth-haven sitting right in the middle of urban London. However, the Bank of England was not the only trophy sitting within the City walls. To see the real power within the City of London, we must note the Hanseatic League’s immense power and wealth derived from controlling the Baltic and North Sea trade:

Cannon Street railway bridge had a plaque unveiled in 2005, commemorating “600 years during which time some 400 Hanseatic merchants inhabited peacefully in the City of London… a German self-governing enclave on this site”.

This was the London base of the Hanseatic League - a powerful trading network for hundreds of years, stretching all the way from the East of England to the heart of Russia. It was one of the most successful trade alliances in history - at its height the League could count on the allegiance of nearly 200 towns across northern Europe. 

The Bank of England, Baltic Exchange, London Stock Exchange, London Commodities Exchange, London Metal Exchange, London Bullion Exchange, Lloyds of London and even the media monopolies on Fleet Street, were all located within the City’s walls. Almost all world trade was now monitored, financed and exchanged within the City.

Once William of Orange took the Crown and the great German-merchant migration was underway, almost every aspect of British commerce and royalty was in German hands.

The British people were given a Parliament which could govern and issue new laws, but this power meant nothing if the issuance of the nation’s money supply was not in their direct jurisdiction.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild was a Hofjuden (court Jew) to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel in the Free City of Frankfurt, Holy Roman Empire, who established his banking business in the 1760s

Mayer developed and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in the five main European financial centres to conduct business. The Rothschild coat of arms contains many interesting symbols, not least a clenched fist with five arrows symbolising the five dynasties established by the five sons of Mayer Rothschild, in a reference to Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior, so are the children of one's youth."

Nathan Mayer Rothschild was dispatched to Britain in 1798 at the age of only 21 years. He later moved to London and began dealing on the London Stock Exchange from 1804. He made a fortune in trading bills of exchange through a banking enterprise begun in 1805, dealing with financial instruments such as foreign bills and government securities. In 1822, all five brothers were granted the title of Baron, or raised to the Freiherrnstand, by the Emperor. From 1822, both Nathan Mayer himself, and any legitimate male descendant, could call himself: Freiherr von Rothschild, or in the language of diplomacy whether in France or not, Baron de Rothschild. In practice, having accepted the aristocratic title for the benefit of his family, he chose not to use it himself and so did not request official recognition of the title. In 1838, two years after his death, Queen Victoria did authorise the use of this Austrian title in the United Kingdom.

The family motto below the shield: Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Unity, Integrity, Industry)

I have frequently been asked “Who owns the Bank of England?” as most people have heard the rumour that it is a Rothschild Bank. Click the link to find the official explainer!

I have written about the power of the City of London several times over the recent decade, each time slightly revising my views. In my opinion, there is no greater expression of its extreme supremacy in the world than how its Temple Bar operates. Via the Rule of Law it does, indeed, resemble the Roman Empire.

Or maybe it IS the Roman Empire rebranded, relocated and regal?

—0—

Related post:

ONWARDS!
xx