The couple who are "hosting" me from having to sleep in my car, watch MSM. They saw a news report (US) about a student who has a Green Card-- legal resident in the US-- who was arrested and suffers Extraordinary Rendition to El Salvador, to a prison there, to be tortured. The prison is paid $1m/month by the US to take these menaces to society... WITHOUT A HEARING, WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS AT ALL. This particular student was ACCUSED (no trial, no proof) of having wrong "ideas" having to do with the genocide in Gaza.
My hosts, who know nothing aside from what they saw on TV news (oh, it's always TRUE) became enraged when I objected to this. They began to engage in personal disparagement-- of ME-- and could not tolerate the idea that I would disagree with them!! Then when I pointed out that it was illegal, and un-Constitutional to do this, the lady of the house actually SAID OUT LOUD that she didn't CARE about the Constitution, or the Law. She mocked me and asked if I wore a tinfoil hat. (Clearly, she's been gossiping with...?) I said I DID. (I do! At night, but it's metal of some kind, soft, not tin foil.) She then told me that I could not disagree with her or hubby, but that I couldn't NOT talk to her, but she didn't want to talk to me... She was almost hysterical, and really kind of scary. She told me I could stop talking about it or move out. She also told me I can't avoid talking to her. But not about what she doesn't like. But I don't know what all she means by that, so I will assume, NOTHING TRUE...
THIS is what my brother exhibited, and a couple of other people... Hysteria over an IDEA that happens to be a good thing, or at least, a relevant, important thing! Or just total silence and I never hear from them again, these people... VERY frightened, and raging, and hysterical! I think we've all seen this, I know I have... It destroyed my family. And my brother who tore my life apart was like that BEFORE Covid, BEFORE an jab troubles that we knew of... It's like he was the first one to INFECT the Whirled!
So, I've decided that my hope to calmly enlighten them, so they don't self-harm any further with jabs and so forth, is dead. I'm done. No more gentle hints about jabs, no more attempts to educate. Let them soak in their own karma, let them find out or not, on their own. I'm retired.
This comment is directed to Frances, or any one that is interested in protecting them self from Government over-reach.
There is a method of Legally taking oneself out of the System, whilst still being able to work within the System. It is Lawful and Legal, I have done it and so have many many thousands in all Commonwealth Countries.
In a nutshell.
You are born with a BC (Birth Cert), it is a Bond that is traded, it is Copywrited to the Crown and bond you to the System as an Implied Company. You buy your Name at Companies House where ALL Companies are Registered, but now your Name is a Company Name Expressed as a Limited Company, no longer Implied. As Companies has a SIC Code (Standard Industrial Classification Code), this is the Code a Company Trades under. A Company not ready for Trading is classed as Dormant Code 99999 and cannot be traded with, as it is an act of Fraud under the 2006 Fraud Act.
You are now protected and no one, no Company, be that UK Gov, any Police Agency, DVLA, Ofcom, Local Councils, etc can trade with you. Point of Fact. Every Body or Agency is Registered at Companies House, even the Church of England.
You Trade Mark your Name for extra Legal Leverage if someone does decide to chance it and change your name at the Royal Courts of Justice, this gives you Title Deed of your Name.
There is way more detail to this, suffice it to say I did it 2 years ago, Trump did it a while back, all the Police Superintendents do it, the Aristocracy do it, but you will not hear the BBC telling you of it.
Basically it is Legal and Lawful protection, if a large enough amount of the population did it the Government would lose its power.
If you are interested Frances, or anyone else, I will point you in the correct direction. Be warned, it is not for the faint hearted, there is a level of research that will change your perspective on how shit functions, but the work must be done, or just watch the waves role past as a Citizen on the Citizen-Ship.
I met someone who explained all that to me back in 2013. I had just retired on a state pension which was just enough to get by on. I asked if I were to follow her suggestion would I lose my pension? She did not know. I decided that I did not fancy being a precedent case.
I use my new Name to claim UC as I am Registered off work sick through mobility, this is no different to a State Pension, as I will be there in a few years, if the whole welfare system is still functioning. Here's the thing. Once the Name is changed at RCJ you own the Name Lawfully and Legally, not on a Boxed Legal Document issued by the State, it is at your discretion that the State now use it, even though they can trade on it. Same with Bank Accounts, or any other Legal Entity. I am even looking at charging and invoicing these entities for the use of my Name, here there would be a trade-off so that I may use the service, but they will earn a certain Interest payment.
The details are different for the individual, so in effect you have to customise/taylor your own way of navigation.
If you want to look again I have the address for the Telegram groups and the groups that will give you what you need to research your own path. I found that there is a great support mechanism and always someone to advise. Suffice it to say, I have been on these groups since the getgo of my doing the process and have found so many variations of peoples circumstances that tayloring what one does is essential.
“A proscribed organisation is an entity that has been identified as being involved in terrorism and is therefore illegal to join or show support for. The Home Secretary can choose to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000 if they believe it is concerned in terrorism and it is proportionate to do so.
Membership of a proscribed organisation, inviting support for it, or arranging a meeting for it are all criminal offences. The penalties for these offences can be severe, with a maximum of 14 years in prison and/or a fine for offences related to membership. Additionally, it is an offence to wear clothing or display articles in public that arouse suspicion of membership or support of a proscribed organisation, with a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and/or a fine.
The decision to proscribe an organisation is made by the government, and the process includes considering the nature and scale of the organisation's activities, as well as the need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism.~ so says AI
Personally, I think the British government should declare itself proscribed and take Israel with it to jail.
Hamas was elected by popular vote to govern Gaza. Wikipedia:
Legislative elections were held in the Palestinian territories on 25 January 2006 in order to elect the second Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC), the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). The result was a victory for Hamas, contesting under the list name of Change and Reform, which received 44.45% of the vote and won 74 of the 132 seats, whilst the ruling Fatah received 41.43% of the vote and won 45 seats.
An occupied people have the right under international law to resist occupation. Hamas as the elected government of Gaza have the right to organise and direct such a resistance. These are facts, not my opinions.
" is an offence to invite support for a proscribed organisation or to recklessly express support for such an organisation. This offence also has extra-territorial jurisdiction for British nationals and UK residents."
I live in China. I do not accept that the UK has any legal jurisdiction over what I say here. We have free speech here, Starmer, you imbecile, and I can wear my Palestinian flag T shirt here without fear of arrest. What are you going to do, Starmer, you Zionist toady, send a gang of thugs here to beat me up and drag me back to your decaying corpse of a country to be tried for speaking the truth?
Back in 1998, when the Guardian Weekly was still a newspaper, it ran a headline to the tune of "Capitalism Sucks", under the byline of Larry Elliott. Good for him I thought, especially when he published "The Age of Insecurity", detailing the 20,000 pieces of legislation curbing our freedom of speech and other civil liberties.
It was obvious that something was happening, and not just in the UK, but centrally choreographed. CCTVs everywhere, riot police all over the world suddenly appearing in samurai outfits as though from the same global theatrical costumer. It was obvious that our masters were watching a very different movie from ours. The media were dumbed down; intelligence was sidelined from tv programming, and The Guardian quickly changed its tune.
So here we are. What Frances so thoroughly demonstrates in the UK is the norm for every single country in the world. There is no escape. And it can only get worse, if we follow the graph from then to now.
What is the status of Richard Medhurst as journalist? I haven't seen a new story from him for many months. Did they just shut him up? What is he doing?
Protection of minors from harms via internet should be made a central issue with EDUCATION AT HOME !!! not enforced with sweeping and highly fluffy "laws" by the gorvernment that can and will be interpreted as the back-stage-handlers wish at any time ...
The current discussions about "hate-speech, anti-Semitism, -Zionism, terrorism is clearly only one of the many tools the Zionists are appliying to silence the Goy on a global scale.
People just should STOP using global-reaching tentacles of Mossad & Unit8200 ...
But still far too many will think Unit8200 is a new size of Mac-burger ...
Deliberately induced ignorance on an industrial scale is not a bliss, but the primary rock of ALL current problems ...
By any other name , the UK Online Safety Act is still censorship. But . . . we know that all speech is not appropriate anywhere and at any time. There are things we do not say to our parents, children, or close friends. There are things we do not say to strangers. This is not censorship, it is prudence.
Most of us do not have a dispute with the limitations of sending sexual messages online. It's the other subjects, such as is the COVID vaccine truly safe and effective that cross over into censorship. It's censorship when the govt. does not want you sharing an opinion or data about a particular subject - an opinion they do not want you to hold.
So we've moved from five years of information control about COVID to trying to come to grips with what actually happened. It is almost inevitable that our conclusions will differ from what our govt. wants us to believe. The govt.'s solution is censorship. Well, f that.
Terrorism = criticizing jews. Who do you think is behind this legislation? Just like in the USA where the house of non-representatives passed the antisemitism legislation last May in direct violation of the Constitution. That is a flagrant violation of their oath of office but we all know were captured and who controls us. It now sits with the senate. The fake staged protests and pograms will continue until the senate passes it so then we can go to prison for criticizing a foreign government. Wake up people.
Yes I have. I feel like it’s testing the waters first to see our reaction. People’s rights are being violated and it seems the majority is ok with this.
On the surface it seems reasonable and not as bad as some had expected. Sadly it will be abused, and could be amended over time to be increasingly draconian.
As always criticism is Jew and Israel seem not to rely on any legislation and is punished universally.
One point of note:
3 weeks before Zuckerberg announced encryption and self-destruct messaging, I published an article revealing that Fakebook Messenger was being used for communication between shills, pedophiles and government agents.
Coincidence ? Unlikely in my opinion.
I wonder what Fakebook will do in light of the encryption restrictions ?
Maybe you already know and have written about:
https://montanarcc.substack.com/p/the-pilgrims-society-subverting-american
Plenty of links to explore listed in this post:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/is-lord-mark-malloch-brown-british
More juicy stuff here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/cunts-corruption-usury-narcotics
Many thanks for these links !!!👍👍👍🔥🔥🔥
You're a real treasure trough !!!
It certainly is no coincidence that history-lessons in public indoctrination centers never go or even hint at these rabbit-holes ...
The couple who are "hosting" me from having to sleep in my car, watch MSM. They saw a news report (US) about a student who has a Green Card-- legal resident in the US-- who was arrested and suffers Extraordinary Rendition to El Salvador, to a prison there, to be tortured. The prison is paid $1m/month by the US to take these menaces to society... WITHOUT A HEARING, WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS AT ALL. This particular student was ACCUSED (no trial, no proof) of having wrong "ideas" having to do with the genocide in Gaza.
My hosts, who know nothing aside from what they saw on TV news (oh, it's always TRUE) became enraged when I objected to this. They began to engage in personal disparagement-- of ME-- and could not tolerate the idea that I would disagree with them!! Then when I pointed out that it was illegal, and un-Constitutional to do this, the lady of the house actually SAID OUT LOUD that she didn't CARE about the Constitution, or the Law. She mocked me and asked if I wore a tinfoil hat. (Clearly, she's been gossiping with...?) I said I DID. (I do! At night, but it's metal of some kind, soft, not tin foil.) She then told me that I could not disagree with her or hubby, but that I couldn't NOT talk to her, but she didn't want to talk to me... She was almost hysterical, and really kind of scary. She told me I could stop talking about it or move out. She also told me I can't avoid talking to her. But not about what she doesn't like. But I don't know what all she means by that, so I will assume, NOTHING TRUE...
THIS is what my brother exhibited, and a couple of other people... Hysteria over an IDEA that happens to be a good thing, or at least, a relevant, important thing! Or just total silence and I never hear from them again, these people... VERY frightened, and raging, and hysterical! I think we've all seen this, I know I have... It destroyed my family. And my brother who tore my life apart was like that BEFORE Covid, BEFORE an jab troubles that we knew of... It's like he was the first one to INFECT the Whirled!
So, I've decided that my hope to calmly enlighten them, so they don't self-harm any further with jabs and so forth, is dead. I'm done. No more gentle hints about jabs, no more attempts to educate. Let them soak in their own karma, let them find out or not, on their own. I'm retired.
Christians… so hypocritical!
And they OWL dat way. smfh Yesh, I tink dis is it, no mo after deez ones.
This comment is directed to Frances, or any one that is interested in protecting them self from Government over-reach.
There is a method of Legally taking oneself out of the System, whilst still being able to work within the System. It is Lawful and Legal, I have done it and so have many many thousands in all Commonwealth Countries.
In a nutshell.
You are born with a BC (Birth Cert), it is a Bond that is traded, it is Copywrited to the Crown and bond you to the System as an Implied Company. You buy your Name at Companies House where ALL Companies are Registered, but now your Name is a Company Name Expressed as a Limited Company, no longer Implied. As Companies has a SIC Code (Standard Industrial Classification Code), this is the Code a Company Trades under. A Company not ready for Trading is classed as Dormant Code 99999 and cannot be traded with, as it is an act of Fraud under the 2006 Fraud Act.
You are now protected and no one, no Company, be that UK Gov, any Police Agency, DVLA, Ofcom, Local Councils, etc can trade with you. Point of Fact. Every Body or Agency is Registered at Companies House, even the Church of England.
You Trade Mark your Name for extra Legal Leverage if someone does decide to chance it and change your name at the Royal Courts of Justice, this gives you Title Deed of your Name.
There is way more detail to this, suffice it to say I did it 2 years ago, Trump did it a while back, all the Police Superintendents do it, the Aristocracy do it, but you will not hear the BBC telling you of it.
Basically it is Legal and Lawful protection, if a large enough amount of the population did it the Government would lose its power.
If you are interested Frances, or anyone else, I will point you in the correct direction. Be warned, it is not for the faint hearted, there is a level of research that will change your perspective on how shit functions, but the work must be done, or just watch the waves role past as a Citizen on the Citizen-Ship.
I met someone who explained all that to me back in 2013. I had just retired on a state pension which was just enough to get by on. I asked if I were to follow her suggestion would I lose my pension? She did not know. I decided that I did not fancy being a precedent case.
I use my new Name to claim UC as I am Registered off work sick through mobility, this is no different to a State Pension, as I will be there in a few years, if the whole welfare system is still functioning. Here's the thing. Once the Name is changed at RCJ you own the Name Lawfully and Legally, not on a Boxed Legal Document issued by the State, it is at your discretion that the State now use it, even though they can trade on it. Same with Bank Accounts, or any other Legal Entity. I am even looking at charging and invoicing these entities for the use of my Name, here there would be a trade-off so that I may use the service, but they will earn a certain Interest payment.
The details are different for the individual, so in effect you have to customise/taylor your own way of navigation.
If you want to look again I have the address for the Telegram groups and the groups that will give you what you need to research your own path. I found that there is a great support mechanism and always someone to advise. Suffice it to say, I have been on these groups since the getgo of my doing the process and have found so many variations of peoples circumstances that tayloring what one does is essential.
This makes me feel paranoid, which is part of the purpose of this legislation.
what is a Proscribed Organisation anyway?
“A proscribed organisation is an entity that has been identified as being involved in terrorism and is therefore illegal to join or show support for. The Home Secretary can choose to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000 if they believe it is concerned in terrorism and it is proportionate to do so.
Membership of a proscribed organisation, inviting support for it, or arranging a meeting for it are all criminal offences. The penalties for these offences can be severe, with a maximum of 14 years in prison and/or a fine for offences related to membership. Additionally, it is an offence to wear clothing or display articles in public that arouse suspicion of membership or support of a proscribed organisation, with a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and/or a fine.
The decision to proscribe an organisation is made by the government, and the process includes considering the nature and scale of the organisation's activities, as well as the need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism.~ so says AI
Personally, I think the British government should declare itself proscribed and take Israel with it to jail.
as i was reading this i was thinking the same as your last paragraph
What is banned and proscribed ...always becomes more attractive.
It reminds you of that bizarre Jewish business model of exploiting the Jewish death wish.
The question is: who is this law really designed to protect. And I think we all know the answer!
I get the impression that all law is designed to protect the international crime syndicate from exposure, loss or prosecution.
Hamas was elected by popular vote to govern Gaza. Wikipedia:
Legislative elections were held in the Palestinian territories on 25 January 2006 in order to elect the second Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC), the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). The result was a victory for Hamas, contesting under the list name of Change and Reform, which received 44.45% of the vote and won 74 of the 132 seats, whilst the ruling Fatah received 41.43% of the vote and won 45 seats.
An occupied people have the right under international law to resist occupation. Hamas as the elected government of Gaza have the right to organise and direct such a resistance. These are facts, not my opinions.
" is an offence to invite support for a proscribed organisation or to recklessly express support for such an organisation. This offence also has extra-territorial jurisdiction for British nationals and UK residents."
I live in China. I do not accept that the UK has any legal jurisdiction over what I say here. We have free speech here, Starmer, you imbecile, and I can wear my Palestinian flag T shirt here without fear of arrest. What are you going to do, Starmer, you Zionist toady, send a gang of thugs here to beat me up and drag me back to your decaying corpse of a country to be tried for speaking the truth?
Well said! xx
🎯😶
"Coming soon to a country near you!"🙄
#follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Back in 1998, when the Guardian Weekly was still a newspaper, it ran a headline to the tune of "Capitalism Sucks", under the byline of Larry Elliott. Good for him I thought, especially when he published "The Age of Insecurity", detailing the 20,000 pieces of legislation curbing our freedom of speech and other civil liberties.
It was obvious that something was happening, and not just in the UK, but centrally choreographed. CCTVs everywhere, riot police all over the world suddenly appearing in samurai outfits as though from the same global theatrical costumer. It was obvious that our masters were watching a very different movie from ours. The media were dumbed down; intelligence was sidelined from tv programming, and The Guardian quickly changed its tune.
So here we are. What Frances so thoroughly demonstrates in the UK is the norm for every single country in the world. There is no escape. And it can only get worse, if we follow the graph from then to now.
What is the status of Richard Medhurst as journalist? I haven't seen a new story from him for many months. Did they just shut him up? What is he doing?
I tried to find something from him but came up blank. Maybe they have some sort of gag order on him.
Thanks for your concise info 👍👍👍 🔥🔥🔥 !!!
Protection of minors from harms via internet should be made a central issue with EDUCATION AT HOME !!! not enforced with sweeping and highly fluffy "laws" by the gorvernment that can and will be interpreted as the back-stage-handlers wish at any time ...
The current discussions about "hate-speech, anti-Semitism, -Zionism, terrorism is clearly only one of the many tools the Zionists are appliying to silence the Goy on a global scale.
People just should STOP using global-reaching tentacles of Mossad & Unit8200 ...
But still far too many will think Unit8200 is a new size of Mac-burger ...
Deliberately induced ignorance on an industrial scale is not a bliss, but the primary rock of ALL current problems ...
By any other name , the UK Online Safety Act is still censorship. But . . . we know that all speech is not appropriate anywhere and at any time. There are things we do not say to our parents, children, or close friends. There are things we do not say to strangers. This is not censorship, it is prudence.
Most of us do not have a dispute with the limitations of sending sexual messages online. It's the other subjects, such as is the COVID vaccine truly safe and effective that cross over into censorship. It's censorship when the govt. does not want you sharing an opinion or data about a particular subject - an opinion they do not want you to hold.
So we've moved from five years of information control about COVID to trying to come to grips with what actually happened. It is almost inevitable that our conclusions will differ from what our govt. wants us to believe. The govt.'s solution is censorship. Well, f that.
Terrorism = criticizing jews. Who do you think is behind this legislation? Just like in the USA where the house of non-representatives passed the antisemitism legislation last May in direct violation of the Constitution. That is a flagrant violation of their oath of office but we all know were captured and who controls us. It now sits with the senate. The fake staged protests and pograms will continue until the senate passes it so then we can go to prison for criticizing a foreign government. Wake up people.
And you've heard about Extraordinary Rendition... to El Salvador? To be tortured? geezuz.
Yes I have. I feel like it’s testing the waters first to see our reaction. People’s rights are being violated and it seems the majority is ok with this.
FUCK the majority then. I can’t stand it.
The same people are behind all legislation - the totalitarian international crime syndicate of aristocratic trillionaires, who else?
And Bibi's insane cohort.
On the surface it seems reasonable and not as bad as some had expected. Sadly it will be abused, and could be amended over time to be increasingly draconian.
As always criticism is Jew and Israel seem not to rely on any legislation and is punished universally.
One point of note:
3 weeks before Zuckerberg announced encryption and self-destruct messaging, I published an article revealing that Fakebook Messenger was being used for communication between shills, pedophiles and government agents.
Coincidence ? Unlikely in my opinion.
I wonder what Fakebook will do in light of the encryption restrictions ?
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/06/700896972/facebook-promises-more-private-and-self-destructing-messages