Certainly these are the property moguls of London. They are not necessarily members of the Club of Rome and Bilderberg. Exposing the top bosses is something I covered in Black Nobility 101 if you care to look.
Yes, I've read through this material which inspired me to search further and expand what you've revealed. It's incredible to know so much yet be powerless in comparison. Not that I'm concerned, I'm playing my role as an informed and non-compliant being with focused soul's energy toward harmonies. Your insights help chart the path, dispel the darkness.
All roads really do lead back to Rome! The Roman empire never fell, it just reinvented itself and its called the Vatican today! Your work is amazing Frances and people need to know the truth! 🤗
My concern is that if western well offs are ousted they will simply be replaced by well offs from further afield who will most likely be worse. It's already happening all over the rural parts. Some of these big name families are the main thing holding the national identity together I fear ..
Yes, family-owned farms are clearly in the cross-hairs now. The oligarchs and plutocrats want even more land for themselves and their mega corps - a plan that's as old as the hills.
yes .. it’s why I have an ambivalent relationship with feudalism .. some of these big estates are holding megacorps at bay.
I guess all this stuff happened in china back in the day, the big old family farms and communities were presumably purged to get so many into cities and create those huge agricultural fields. .
Yes, but - on second thoughts - it's not a plan that's as old as the hills. In pre-Roman Britain, every Briton was born with property birthrights: "There are three property birthrights of every Briton: five (British) acres of land for a home, the right of armorial bearings and the right of suffrage in the enacting of the laws, the male at twenty-one, the female on her marriage."
The laws of the time were surprisingly "distinguished for their clearness, brevity, justice, and humanity."
in Raleighs time there were about 6 million folks in England.. pre roman times I dont think we know. Lots were killed by vikingss and such , but I dont think our population was especially high . Plenty of room here back then. Easy to be just when you can all move away from each other :)
This is what needs done in all nations where corruption from the top down by bloodline tyranny is so obvious. Every single government has a monarchy of hidden "royals".
Name 'em and shame 'em I say. Let awakening of the masses beget more civil disobedience, and return us to fellowship, cooperation, and the best principles of humanity instead of the most low.
Provided their land is not mortgaged/encumbered, another collapse in the financial markets (which could easily happen as soon as next month!) should not have any serious long-term affect.
Look up the Girmaldi family.........and their ancestor Girmali Man.......I bring it up to show how it ain't just old money, it's old blood ties to the land. Long before it was called London the land was called something else. Wonder how the "Londoners" trace back to? Good post:)
London was founded by Brutus of Troy, who led to Britain a large migration of refugees after losing The Trojan War to the Greeks. He arrived in Britain in 485 BC and founded his capital, New Troy, now known as London.
The propaganda that claims London to have been founded by the Romans is lies and nonsense. London was already an ancient city and the centre of a sophisticated society when the Romans arrived.
Rob Shaw is writing another book about London's history and he recently published a video covering the forbidden archaeology of London's pre-Roman origins:
He identifies all the bloodlines, their genealogy, and their criminal industries.
Zeus's posts typically are deleted within an hour, but if you can find some archived, he is an encyclopedia naming the names of the criminals that really run this planet.
Yes, you can find Zeus’ website linked on my Black Nobility 101 collection of posts. I don’t necessarily believe that all the men are evil and their women are witches! But the photos are useful. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
I do. Search youtube on that family. Its interesting. They have aways been there. "Grimaldi man" is the oldest skeleton found in Europe I believe. Fascinating. :)
The way I see it … their beliefs matter not. Just because you’re rich doesn’t make you a Mensa member. The existence of God is self evident…so with that backdrop methinks my assertion holds water ✌️
.....HOW precisely, is it 'self-evident'? NATURAL forces certainly DO exist, in VARYING expressions (and NO, they're NOT random) - but it's ALWAYS been intellectually DISHONEST to make BLANKET references TO them as INCONTROVERTIBLY being, 'Go[o]d' (a title / term, wholly SUBJECTIVE) - while UNPLEASANT experiences and CONTRITE relationships provided the BASIS for Abrahamic 'religious' (read: RITUALISTIC, frequently REMOVED of any 'SPIRITUAL' underpinnings) traditions / EXERCISES, Roger.....
I’m sorry my friend but you’re really stupid … that and you’re not thinking hard enough. I’m not going to engage per se because to do so is a waste of time. But I’ll give you an opportunity to redeem yourself… explain to me how the Big Bang theory is flawed. If you can do this and still not believe in a supreme being… then you be you Bo but leave the rest of us alone.
.....'supreme being' - SPARE me the NOXIOUS Deist DEFERENCE, pal; 'Big Bang Theory' has been demonstrated as FLAWED, on MULTIPLE occasions / points now - whatever THAT has to even DO with it.....WHOLE truth to which I'VE arrived, is not NEARLY so ERSATZ (and far, FAR more existentially LIBERATING.....)
You really should hear the final half hour of my interview with James Delingpole. You will find my opinion on what you consider to be "self evident" there.
You can find the link to the interview highlighted in green in the first paragraph of this post.
From shopping at the Weston family’s Canadian food outlets, I’ve found them to have shoddy business practices: listing heavily discounted items in their flyers but having very few available. Another trick is to place a huge sign with a very low price over something that’s 2-3 times higher in price. If you catch them, they say the price was for something beside it that happened to be barely noticeable.
I think with these names and others too - older even ( except for the Grosvenors ) are perhaps the core of the oligarchy. Maybe you should call them the Grey Nobility - The Spencers and the Sinclairs as well...not just the City of London. And then the banking Jews - the International Jew - by Henry Ford - the Jews that never went to Auschwitz - married into those families....like the Kushner and Trump families joined up more recently - and we perhaps have the top of the pyramid ? Do you think that too Frances. ? I mean the European families all married their daughters to other European families - since the dark ages. And Shakespeare wouldn't have written about Shylock, who was no aristocrat but was obviously representative of the money lending Jews that financed the European aristocracy. I can't even imagine Shylock marrying into the rich British families and royalty though. But maybe some of them were more like Kushner and the daughters were okay. I'm not sure about this though, because I have some ties to British aristocracy and I can't even imagine any of them marrying Shylock.... Seriously. So did the banking jews marry into the British and black nobility Aristocracy at all ? Rothschilds - a jewish banking family has boasted they usually marry into their own family which is a tradition of the jews since biblical times.
Ann, I was only covering the old money of London, not the British Isles nor Europe! I did not intend to write a tome to augment my Black Nobility 101 series, the vastness of which would take me more years to compile than I am willing to give to studying the repulsive organised criminal syndicate.
I am a bit cheesed off with saying over and over that the Rothschilds are the STAFF not the OWNERS. I am also fed up to the hair ends of pointing out that Jews are just as much victims of the globalist aristocracy as any one of us.... in fact they have been abused incessantly since Rome destroyed Jerusalem!
Their vanity, believing that they are the Chosen, gets in the way of them discovering how much they have been manipulated and are now so brainwashed into delusions of grandeur that they are murdering Palestinians and threatening the world with their Samson Option. They are shockingly stupid, tbh.
So, NO. They have not married into the Black Nobility. They have always been the STAFF since the days when they occupied a mosquito infested islet which became the first Jewish Ghetto on the periphery of Venice.
okay - I see...yeah I thought of that. And about the jews. Its makes sense. When I was thinking of the Shylock character I realized how little it makes sense that Jews married into the Black Nobility - which the British Nobility is a part right ?
There are perfectly legitimate ways of avoiding UK Inheritance Tax which are open to all who potentially fall into the net. It just requires basic research and planning ahead. Legitimate avoidance or falling into the net is a choice.
Great information - you can guarantee that a lot of people were walked all over or were deceived, duped or even put away into mental institutions in order to acquire such massive property portfolios particularly in regards to the very old money families
It was in fact mostly a mixture of luck and shrewd marriages, but mostly shrewd marriages. The Enclosure Acts were also a factor in some cases; but the families who benefitted from enclosure were already big landowners. For them, the enclosures were icing on the cake.
yes in the olden times - around King Henry the 8th - they took the common land away from the farmers and peasants ( the population ) and raised sheep for wool becasue the nobility made more money selling the wool on the international market once the loom was invented.
That is so true Ann with the worst period of all for land enclosures, being in the 18th and 19th centuries which caused horrific hardship to the ‘commoners’ or ‘peasants’ as ‘ordinary’ people were then called (and probably still called by these names and worse by landowners with large Estates). What was worse however, was that, upon marriage, a wealthy woman’s assets then became under the control of her husband which, I believe, led to many wives being put into mental asylums for all kinds of spurious reasons, in order for the husband to have full ownership and control of everything his wife had ever possessed, leaving her to rot in Bedlam while he freely gallivanted around with other women using his wife’s wealth. I believe this was the case with one specific old money family mentioned in the article but won’t say it in case of being sued! At least until I obtain more confirmed evidence to that effect. I am sure there are lots of skeletons in the closets with these old families who present a genteel facade but who are all ruthless when it comes to maintaining their steel grip on their property ‘empires’.
yes, and as Frances told me just now - the Jews did not marry into the families...I read that somewhere else. But thinking of my own relatives and friends of my maternal grandmothers family - they would never stoop to marry a jew. Frances is right. I just realized that. The oligarchs in Great Britain are the biggest snobs of all - at least - I never met any from Venice. These families are so hidden from us commoners.
Many thanks, Frances. Thorough research, easily digested. Much appreciated- as always. xo
Why are they letting Britain devolve into a caliphate? Fk 'em. Hang them with silk nooses.
These wealthy families would be low on the food chain. At the top would be those orchestrating the mass immigration filling the streets.
Certainly these are the property moguls of London. They are not necessarily members of the Club of Rome and Bilderberg. Exposing the top bosses is something I covered in Black Nobility 101 if you care to look.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
Thanks so much for caring to reply.
Yes, I've read through this material which inspired me to search further and expand what you've revealed. It's incredible to know so much yet be powerless in comparison. Not that I'm concerned, I'm playing my role as an informed and non-compliant being with focused soul's energy toward harmonies. Your insights help chart the path, dispel the darkness.
Keep safe.
This [LINK] is now on the MINDS platform.
°Cherishº is the new love, be well.
*May God nod towards thine & mine as well!*
All roads really do lead back to Rome! The Roman empire never fell, it just reinvented itself and its called the Vatican today! Your work is amazing Frances and people need to know the truth! 🤗
My concern is that if western well offs are ousted they will simply be replaced by well offs from further afield who will most likely be worse. It's already happening all over the rural parts. Some of these big name families are the main thing holding the national identity together I fear ..
Yes, family-owned farms are clearly in the cross-hairs now. The oligarchs and plutocrats want even more land for themselves and their mega corps - a plan that's as old as the hills.
yes .. it’s why I have an ambivalent relationship with feudalism .. some of these big estates are holding megacorps at bay.
I guess all this stuff happened in china back in the day, the big old family farms and communities were presumably purged to get so many into cities and create those huge agricultural fields. .
Yes, but - on second thoughts - it's not a plan that's as old as the hills. In pre-Roman Britain, every Briton was born with property birthrights: "There are three property birthrights of every Briton: five (British) acres of land for a home, the right of armorial bearings and the right of suffrage in the enacting of the laws, the male at twenty-one, the female on her marriage."
The laws of the time were surprisingly "distinguished for their clearness, brevity, justice, and humanity."
"History of Britain," by Rev R W Morgan (1848)
https://thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf
in Raleighs time there were about 6 million folks in England.. pre roman times I dont think we know. Lots were killed by vikingss and such , but I dont think our population was especially high . Plenty of room here back then. Easy to be just when you can all move away from each other :)
True, Great Britain is about 52 million acres; so less than 1 acre per Brit these days!
Wondering about roots in the pseudo legal seizure and privatization of the commons??
Naming names YES!
This is what needs done in all nations where corruption from the top down by bloodline tyranny is so obvious. Every single government has a monarchy of hidden "royals".
Name 'em and shame 'em I say. Let awakening of the masses beget more civil disobedience, and return us to fellowship, cooperation, and the best principles of humanity instead of the most low.
So you're not in favour of respecting any property rights, or only other people's property rights?
Since I made zero reference to "property Rights" your question makes zero sense so willI assume its for someone else this thread.
Nice post, Frances. Thank you. I can't help wondering, when it all goes tits up where will these families end up.
Provided their land is not mortgaged/encumbered, another collapse in the financial markets (which could easily happen as soon as next month!) should not have any serious long-term affect.
Too right, Tirion. Plus they have it all secured in rings of Trusts.
"All hail Dick Whittington, thrice Lord Mayor of London" rings in my mind...
;-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Whittington - a fascinating character indeed!
Look up the Girmaldi family.........and their ancestor Girmali Man.......I bring it up to show how it ain't just old money, it's old blood ties to the land. Long before it was called London the land was called something else. Wonder how the "Londoners" trace back to? Good post:)
London was founded by Brutus of Troy, who led to Britain a large migration of refugees after losing The Trojan War to the Greeks. He arrived in Britain in 485 BC and founded his capital, New Troy, now known as London.
The propaganda that claims London to have been founded by the Romans is lies and nonsense. London was already an ancient city and the centre of a sophisticated society when the Romans arrived.
Rob Shaw is writing another book about London's history and he recently published a video covering the forbidden archaeology of London's pre-Roman origins:
"Traces of Troinovantum"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoEeBcsNLRA&t=10s
"The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.," by Marchell Abrahams
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
fascinating! Thank you for the insight and links!
Please note that this post is titled OLD MONEY FAMILIES OF LONDON and only covers the top ten in terms of their wealth.
You mean the Monaco family of Grimaldi. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Grimaldi
.....AS in, Princesses Caroline & Stephanie.....
erm.... please note that my post is about LONDON not MONACO. Thank you.
Frances, great chunk of info! Thank you!
Are you familiar with the work of 'Izrael Zeus'?
He identifies all the bloodlines, their genealogy, and their criminal industries.
Zeus's posts typically are deleted within an hour, but if you can find some archived, he is an encyclopedia naming the names of the criminals that really run this planet.
Yes, you can find Zeus’ website linked on my Black Nobility 101 collection of posts. I don’t necessarily believe that all the men are evil and their women are witches! But the photos are useful. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
I do. Search youtube on that family. Its interesting. They have aways been there. "Grimaldi man" is the oldest skeleton found in Europe I believe. Fascinating. :)
Funny how in the end all of this wealth means absolutely nothing. The man they encounter cares not for their wealth or position. Think about it :-)
Aristocrats are, by and large, atheists and nihilists. They do not believe in God even if they put on a show of attending Church.
The way I see it … their beliefs matter not. Just because you’re rich doesn’t make you a Mensa member. The existence of God is self evident…so with that backdrop methinks my assertion holds water ✌️
.....HOW precisely, is it 'self-evident'? NATURAL forces certainly DO exist, in VARYING expressions (and NO, they're NOT random) - but it's ALWAYS been intellectually DISHONEST to make BLANKET references TO them as INCONTROVERTIBLY being, 'Go[o]d' (a title / term, wholly SUBJECTIVE) - while UNPLEASANT experiences and CONTRITE relationships provided the BASIS for Abrahamic 'religious' (read: RITUALISTIC, frequently REMOVED of any 'SPIRITUAL' underpinnings) traditions / EXERCISES, Roger.....
I’m sorry my friend but you’re really stupid … that and you’re not thinking hard enough. I’m not going to engage per se because to do so is a waste of time. But I’ll give you an opportunity to redeem yourself… explain to me how the Big Bang theory is flawed. If you can do this and still not believe in a supreme being… then you be you Bo but leave the rest of us alone.
.....'supreme being' - SPARE me the NOXIOUS Deist DEFERENCE, pal; 'Big Bang Theory' has been demonstrated as FLAWED, on MULTIPLE occasions / points now - whatever THAT has to even DO with it.....WHOLE truth to which I'VE arrived, is not NEARLY so ERSATZ (and far, FAR more existentially LIBERATING.....)
My you’re a curious little tadpole aren’t you 😉
You really should hear the final half hour of my interview with James Delingpole. You will find my opinion on what you consider to be "self evident" there.
You can find the link to the interview highlighted in green in the first paragraph of this post.
From shopping at the Weston family’s Canadian food outlets, I’ve found them to have shoddy business practices: listing heavily discounted items in their flyers but having very few available. Another trick is to place a huge sign with a very low price over something that’s 2-3 times higher in price. If you catch them, they say the price was for something beside it that happened to be barely noticeable.
"Behind every great fortune are great crimes."
De Balzac had it about right, didn't he?!
Sleight of hand.... so obviously an organised crime favourite.
I think with these names and others too - older even ( except for the Grosvenors ) are perhaps the core of the oligarchy. Maybe you should call them the Grey Nobility - The Spencers and the Sinclairs as well...not just the City of London. And then the banking Jews - the International Jew - by Henry Ford - the Jews that never went to Auschwitz - married into those families....like the Kushner and Trump families joined up more recently - and we perhaps have the top of the pyramid ? Do you think that too Frances. ? I mean the European families all married their daughters to other European families - since the dark ages. And Shakespeare wouldn't have written about Shylock, who was no aristocrat but was obviously representative of the money lending Jews that financed the European aristocracy. I can't even imagine Shylock marrying into the rich British families and royalty though. But maybe some of them were more like Kushner and the daughters were okay. I'm not sure about this though, because I have some ties to British aristocracy and I can't even imagine any of them marrying Shylock.... Seriously. So did the banking jews marry into the British and black nobility Aristocracy at all ? Rothschilds - a jewish banking family has boasted they usually marry into their own family which is a tradition of the jews since biblical times.
Ann, I was only covering the old money of London, not the British Isles nor Europe! I did not intend to write a tome to augment my Black Nobility 101 series, the vastness of which would take me more years to compile than I am willing to give to studying the repulsive organised criminal syndicate.
I am a bit cheesed off with saying over and over that the Rothschilds are the STAFF not the OWNERS. I am also fed up to the hair ends of pointing out that Jews are just as much victims of the globalist aristocracy as any one of us.... in fact they have been abused incessantly since Rome destroyed Jerusalem!
Their vanity, believing that they are the Chosen, gets in the way of them discovering how much they have been manipulated and are now so brainwashed into delusions of grandeur that they are murdering Palestinians and threatening the world with their Samson Option. They are shockingly stupid, tbh.
So, NO. They have not married into the Black Nobility. They have always been the STAFF since the days when they occupied a mosquito infested islet which became the first Jewish Ghetto on the periphery of Venice.
🙌🏻
okay - I see...yeah I thought of that. And about the jews. Its makes sense. When I was thinking of the Shylock character I realized how little it makes sense that Jews married into the Black Nobility - which the British Nobility is a part right ?
And not an inheritance tax penny paid between them! Allegedly.
There are perfectly legitimate ways of avoiding UK Inheritance Tax which are open to all who potentially fall into the net. It just requires basic research and planning ahead. Legitimate avoidance or falling into the net is a choice.
Great information - you can guarantee that a lot of people were walked all over or were deceived, duped or even put away into mental institutions in order to acquire such massive property portfolios particularly in regards to the very old money families
It was in fact mostly a mixture of luck and shrewd marriages, but mostly shrewd marriages. The Enclosure Acts were also a factor in some cases; but the families who benefitted from enclosure were already big landowners. For them, the enclosures were icing on the cake.
Icing on the cake - and leaving nothing but the crumbs for the rest..
yes in the olden times - around King Henry the 8th - they took the common land away from the farmers and peasants ( the population ) and raised sheep for wool becasue the nobility made more money selling the wool on the international market once the loom was invented.
That is so true Ann with the worst period of all for land enclosures, being in the 18th and 19th centuries which caused horrific hardship to the ‘commoners’ or ‘peasants’ as ‘ordinary’ people were then called (and probably still called by these names and worse by landowners with large Estates). What was worse however, was that, upon marriage, a wealthy woman’s assets then became under the control of her husband which, I believe, led to many wives being put into mental asylums for all kinds of spurious reasons, in order for the husband to have full ownership and control of everything his wife had ever possessed, leaving her to rot in Bedlam while he freely gallivanted around with other women using his wife’s wealth. I believe this was the case with one specific old money family mentioned in the article but won’t say it in case of being sued! At least until I obtain more confirmed evidence to that effect. I am sure there are lots of skeletons in the closets with these old families who present a genteel facade but who are all ruthless when it comes to maintaining their steel grip on their property ‘empires’.
yes, and as Frances told me just now - the Jews did not marry into the families...I read that somewhere else. But thinking of my own relatives and friends of my maternal grandmothers family - they would never stoop to marry a jew. Frances is right. I just realized that. The oligarchs in Great Britain are the biggest snobs of all - at least - I never met any from Venice. These families are so hidden from us commoners.